News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

original grandnational Cyclone ?????

Started by tan top, June 22, 2011, 12:03:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

tan top

Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

Budnicks

Cool old piece of FoMoCo & Nascar history.....
"fill your library before you fill your garage"   Budnicks

SFRT

Always Drive Responsibly



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

69 OUR/TEA

Every time I see someone write"grandnational",I think of Buick!!!!!

440


Aero426

Not a real Grand National car.   That is a local home build type late model sportsman.   To use the words built to Holman-Moody spec in the listing is not anywhere close to correct.  

RallyeMike

I wouldnt throw it out of bed for eating crackers. I love these old race car finds.

Sponsored partially by Earl's Machine Shop. I wonder if that's the old fart just down the road from me?
1969 Charger 500 #232008
1972 Charger, Grand Sport #41
1973 Charger "T/A"

Drive as fast as you want to on a public road! Click here for info: http://www.sscc.us/

Mike DC

QuoteNot a real Grand National car.   That is a local home build type late model sportsman.   To use the words built to Holman-Moody spec in the listing is not anywhere close to correct. 

What makes you say that? 

I'm not disputing you, just curious.  I'm not nearly enough of a Ford guy to call it.   The only wrong detail that immediately comes out and grabs me is the lack of any trunkfloor.  That, and the outer body doesn't look like a GN job.  But a lot of the cage/chassis looks like early NASCAR stuff.


Aero426

Quote from: Mike DC (formerly miked) on June 24, 2011, 12:50:15 AM

What makes you say that?  

I'm not disputing you, just curious.  I'm not nearly enough of a Ford guy to call it.   The only wrong detail that immediately comes out and grabs me is the lack of any trunkfloor.  That, and the outer body doesn't look like a GN job.  But a lot of the cage/chassis looks like early NASCAR stuff.

It's not junk, and it is old, and there is a lot to work with, thats true.   I assure you if it was anything close to a GN car with a shred of history, it would not be $7500 Buy it Now.    That car has been offered several times.

Typical Ford GN cars of the period used a unitized body from cowl back, with a 65 Galaxie type front frame section grafted in to the cage structure.  It appears to be riding on a fulll frame which would not be legal for a Cyclone/Torino in GN racing.    Non Holman-Moody dash,  non H-M hubs with stock looking dust covers.  Interior tin work (rear bulkhead) would need to be in the normal placement.  Front upper hoop and shock towers are not like other HM built cars.  Exposed rear compartment with no trunk floor is a sportsman looking thing.    Street trunk lock pillar would be removed.  

To summarize, it lacks the features of a top level professional stock car.


Mike DC

Amazing how much of the stock car is still there on that real H&M car in the link.  The lack of passenger side door bars is startling too.

Aero426

Things changed a lot between those 1965 cars and the 68-71 era.   The newer cars got a lot more structure throughout the whole car. 

Mike DC

Yeah, there was really a shift there in a short time.  In 1965 they were rollcaging a stock car body, in 1970 they were covering a rollcage with stock panels. 

That Cyclone in the Ebay ad looks like a later era building method than the GN Cyclones/Torinos.  Would that be because it was a lower rank series than GN, and therefore they were running the body a few years later than the GN series was running that bodystyle?