68,69, or 70 hottest?

[VegasCharger]

I already have an electric razor in my bathroom drawer,  so I'm glad to own a '68 and '69 Charger.

[dual fours]

I always thought concerning the second generation Chargers, that third times a charm.
I do not have air conditioning, so my 70 is hotter then all those with AC.

[6pkrtse]

Growing up I have always loved the 68-70 Chargers. 69 always seemed to be my favorite. My first car was a 70 Charger at 15. I have had many 68-70's over the years, something like 15 or so & now I like the 70's more than the 69's due to options, paint colors, lower production numbers so there are less around etc. I still want one of each 68,68 & 70 in my garage all at once someday.

[Evoking]

Couple of things.

1) ALL of those values are way off for concours Chargers in the open market. They bring more.   

2) When I was shopping for a 68 they were ways more $. I thought it had something to do with being the only year to have the round tail lights.  In any case I found the part big muscle car, part Ferrari execution out back especially fetching.

3) when most people compare the somewhat anonymous look of the 69-70 rear to the chromed rings AND learn there is only one year to get them = halo year to general public.

What I've observed anyway.

[70B5Cuda]

I own a 68 and a 69 and I used to not like the 70 Grill/bumper , but the more time I spend looking at the 2nd generation chargers, the more I realize that I love every aspect of 2nd generation Chargers. I like some features (taillights, grilles) more then others, but no one year has everything I like best.....so my next best option is to own one of every year! They won't all be show cars; in fact, I gravitate more and more toward weathered/patina'd Mopars.... but I will own one of each so I can enjoy them without comparing and contrasting.

From watching/dabbling in the market, the 1969s are more rare and somewhat more valuable then the 1968, all things being equal. The 1970's are obviously behind the 1968/1969 in value but that being said, I don't see that many 1970's for sale. I've seen several really solid 1970 (non-R/T) rollers (no drivetrain) with seats, presentable grill, and all exterior sheetmetal sell for $8-10K.

[Mopar Nut]

Couple of things.
2) When I was shopping for a 68 they were ways more $. I thought it had something to do with being the only year to have the round tail lights.  In any case I found the part big muscle car, part Ferrari execution out back especially fetching.

People can ask what they, It's what they sell for is what counts.

I own a 68 and a 69 and I used to not like the 70 Grill/bumper , but the more time I spend looking at the 2nd generation chargers, the more I realize that I love every aspect of 2nd generation Chargers. I like some features (taillights, grilles) more then others, but no one year has everything I like best.....so my next best option is to own one of every year! They won't all be show cars; in fact, I gravitate more and more toward weathered/patina'd Mopars.... but I will own one of each so I can enjoy them without comparing and contrasting.

From watching/dabbling in the market, the 1969s are more rare and somewhat more valuable then the 1968, all things being equal. The 1970's are obviously behind the 1968/1969 in value but that being said, I don't see that many 1970's for sale. I've seen several really solid 1970 (non-R/T) rollers (no drivetrain) with seats, presentable grill, and all exterior sheetmetal sell for $8-10K.

When I sold my 68, one guy who wanted it, said he wanted to change it into a 69. I refused the sale!