1970 go wing question

[DoubleDlover]

ok.Not sure if you could get a go wind on a charger. But I know you can on the other b bodies so here goes. Which parts are the same and which parts are different from the 70 mopar coronet, roadrunner go wing and the 70 ford mustang go wing?? I know the plates under the deck lid are mopar. But what about the wing itself? The pedestals? Are the part numbers on them? thanks r

[6bblgt]

1970 Ford Mustang & Chrysler Corp's 1970 A/B/E-body spoiler is the same dimensionally (36" between feet) and was made by the same manufacturer.

the "WING" is the same,
the only difference in the pedestals is the cast in part number and pentastar VS. FoMoCo oval,
the '70 Charger under decklid brackets are '70 Charger ONLY,
studs & fasteners are Chrysler specific

[charger Downunder]

Check this site out

https://www.fpap.com/products.asp?cat=9

[DoubleDlover]

Hi. Wow. So just the numbers are different. Thanks cool. But I looked on that site and it said I beleave the 70 dodge vs. Plymouth, vs charger are all different? Whats different? thanks r

[6bblgt]

FPAP's spoiler package is different for each car line because it includes the under decklid brackets

[BLK 68 R/T]

Also the early production deck lids do not have the provisions punched in on the underside bracing for mounting a spoiler.

[VegasCharger]

Go wings look hideous on 2nd gen Chargers.

Thank god this concept wasn't available in 1968 although you'll see some with them bolted on.

[DoubleDlover]

6BBLGT   OOhhh ok thank you. NOW I understand why each one is different. ok cool. Ive learned a lot in 2 days with everyones help.  So does anyone know where I can just buy the pedistalls? So I can switch out the ford ones for mopar? thanks ron

[6bblgt]

Are you sure it's a '70 Mustang spoiler that you have?  '69 Mustang is different, '69 Cougar is different again, '69 Cyclone is different again ..... etc.

[DoubleDlover]

well. I beleave its marked 71 mustang. I can measure the total length and or the space between the pedistalls. r

[Kern Dog]

Don't do it. These wings look like a crappy "tack-on" accessory like you'd find at Pep Boys or a flea market.

[6bblgt]

between pedestals:
'70 Mustang 36" (& '70-'71 Mopars  )
'69 Cougar 33"
'71-'73 Mustang 31"

[DoubleDlover]

dam it.... between pedistalls is 33... And total length is 58...  This thing is worthless for my 70..... dammm

[6bblgt]

got pics and/or part numbers off the pedestals (are they adjustable?) - what condition is it in? '69 wings are usually split  

it's probably worth more than the reproduction on you WANT - once you ID it

[DoubleDlover]

I don't have pics at the moment. I didn't see any splitting. The pedistalls are adjustable. I can get the numbers of them. I do have a set of plates for under the trunk it came with. They might be cuda style. Im wondering if this wing would be the same for E body... HHmmm.. I'll have to see if I can find out the pedistall distance.

[tan top]

Go wings look hideous on 2nd gen Chargers.

Thank god this concept wasn't available in 1968 although you'll see some with them bolted on.

not keen on them either  ,  kind of look better on a 70 ! think its  psychological thing !  because I know they could have been an option / ordered on a 70 ....

 would be a nice factory option to have on a 70 , but  I would  take it off  though , along with the door scoops   no offence 70 guys  , we all know the 70 charger had the best options     etc  

[6bblgt]

I don't have pics at the moment. I didn't see any splitting. The pedistalls are adjustable. I can get the numbers of them. I do have a set of plates for under the trunk it came with. They might be cuda style. Im wondering if this wing would be the same for E body... HHmmm.. I'll have to see if I can find out the pedistall distance.

the MOPAR wings are all 36" & there are only 2 different wings 1970 (& early 1971) style & 1971 style

[Kern Dog]

I never liked the look of the 1970 R/T door scoops either. The door scallops are a great design feature. The scoops hide them. This is like make-up on a naturally beautiful woman.

[polywideblock]

plenty of 70 owners would disagree with you on both counts , I  prefer the 70's for the very reason you don't 

[DAY CLONA]

plenty of 70 owners would disagree with you on both counts , I  prefer the 70's for the very reason you don't 

I'd agree with you also, the 70 R/T is the pinnacle of 2nd gen Chargers, has everything the 68-9's don't have and need, 6pks, pistol grips, best looking interior/seats, body style, best looking grille, decals/stripes/scoops/spoilers/etc,etc

[alfaitalia]

A fair view point but "best looking" is strictly in the eye of the beholder. Personally I think the chrome grill/nose on the 70 is hideous and the reason I'm not even looking at 70s in my current search for a project. To my eye 69 was the pinnacle but I would have a 68. That said there are some amazing 70s on this site so each to his own.

[Bronzedodge]

not keen on them either  ,  kind of look better on a 70 ! think its  psychological thing !  because I know they could have been ordered on a 70 ....

I'm glad to hear that I'm not the only one that has that thing.  Like a High Impact color on a '68 anything, look strange to me.  I'm too much of a purist I guess. 

[odcics2]

plenty of 70 owners would disagree with you on both counts , I  prefer the 70's for the very reason you don't 

I'd agree with you also, the 70 R/T is the pinnacle of 2nd gen Chargers, has everything the 68-9's don't have and need, 6pks, pistol grips, best looking interior/seats, body style, best looking grille, decals/stripes/scoops/spoilers/etc,etc

15x7 wheels !! 

[DoubleDlover]

so does anyone here know if the wind I have with a distance of 33 in on the pedistalls is for a cuda or only mustang couger? thanks r

[6bblgt]

'Cudas are all 36" (MOPARS are all 36")