News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

unrestored 69 charger ----- 33 thousand miles

Started by tan top, May 13, 2015, 03:43:15 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

c00nhunterjoe

Just because its pretty, doesnt mean its been restored.

Just 6T9 CHGR

Quote from: tan top on May 13, 2015, 03:31:07 PM
Quote from: Challenger340 on May 13, 2015, 11:45:25 AM
Yessiree, looks like old "curly" with the uniquely formed "C" on Broadcast Sheets was doing all of them ?

Here is mine, same / same distinctive "C" as yours, and done the same day Nov 23rd 1968 by "curly" at work, same day as the one in the Charger Ad.

Quote from: 5hunert on May 13, 2015, 11:30:41 AM
I've seen the "curley" at the top of the grease penciled "C" on broadcast sheets from other 69 Chargers (here's once from Nov. 20, 1968).  Is there a significance to that or was there one guy doing a lot of cars who had unique handwriting?



  have the same , on mine  ! all be it CRX ,

  my SPD was /is  22nd November 1968 - B22  , 

got to be the same Guy !! on all the Hamtramck 69 charger broad cast sheets ,  that has had the trim code  crayoned across it , its  the same writing style  ( not all Hamtramck sheets ive seen had them though  , may be , the ones with out the trim code written across it, were for a different department  :shruggy: & or these sheets were found in a different place to the rear seat back ,   one more thing , ive see on one  69 charger broad  broadcast sheet , from the  Hamtramck assembly plant  ,  the trim code written it Crayon ,& it was  a different style   :o  only one I've ever seen that style of writing .
  (i'm far from a expert on this stuff , just my own observations  :yesnod: ...)

:popcrn:


My 4/30/69 SPD sheet has the curly C also ;)
Chris' '69 Charger R/T


tan top

Quote from: Just 6T9 CHGR on May 13, 2015, 05:26:48 PM
Quote from: tan top on May 13, 2015, 03:31:07 PM
Quote from: Challenger340 on May 13, 2015, 11:45:25 AM
Yessiree, looks like old "curly" with the uniquely formed "C" on Broadcast Sheets was doing all of them ?

Here is mine, same / same distinctive "C" as yours, and done the same day Nov 23rd 1968 by "curly" at work, same day as the one in the Charger Ad.

Quote from: 5hunert on May 13, 2015, 11:30:41 AM
I've seen the "curley" at the top of the grease penciled "C" on broadcast sheets from other 69 Chargers (here's once from Nov. 20, 1968).  Is there a significance to that or was there one guy doing a lot of cars who had unique handwriting?



 have the same , on mine  ! all be it CRX ,

 my SPD was /is  22nd November 1968 - B22  ,  

got to be the same Guy !! on all the Hamtramck 69 charger broad cast sheets ,  that has had the trim code  crayoned across it , its  the same writing style  ( not all Hamtramck sheets ive seen had them though  , may be , the ones with out the trim code written across it, were for a different department  :shruggy: & or these sheets were found in a different place to the rear seat back ,   one more thing , ive see on one  69 charger broad  broadcast sheet , from the  Hamtramck assembly plant  ,  the trim code written it Crayon ,& it was  a different style   :o  only one I've ever seen that style of writing .
 (i'm far from a expert on this stuff , just my own observations  :yesnod: ...)

:popcrn:


My 4/30/69 SPD sheet has the curly C also ;)


:coolgleamA:  , just for reference  ,  heres the broadcast sheet with ! different  trim code writing  imo  :shruggy:  thought sure it was a C500  , but  looks like I was remembering it wrong  :scratchchin:

second picture  , back to  normal Curly C guy
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

Challenger340

I should go pull my 2nd Broadcast Sheet above the Glove Box, and see if "Curly" wrote on it.
I "felt" it there by hand a couple of years ago....
but I never pulled it for fear of tearing it or screwing it up, because I figured one day I would carefully remove the glove box itself to access it, so as not to damage anything.

"Curly" was a busy guy ! Who'd have thunk 47 odd years later "Curly" would be notable ?
Only wimps wear Bowties !

Bob T

Quote from: cdr on May 13, 2015, 04:15:12 PM
curly did my 68 also.

Same here.
Kinda cool eh. Hadn't even considered it until Ghoste raised it.
Will put up a pic tomorrow

Edit. Added sheet
September 7th 1967 Shipping number 110853 XS29L8B124308
Old Dog, Old Tricks.

Ghoste

I can't take credit for it Bob, it's some interesting trivia I'm just learning about myself.

six-tee-nine

Greetings from Belgium, the beer country

NOS is nice, turbo's are neat, but when it comes to Mopars, there's no need to cheat...


66FBCharger

'69 Charger R/T 440 4 speed T5, '70 Road Runner 440+6 4 speed, '73 'Cuda 340 4 speed, '66 Charger 383 Auto
SOLD!:'69 Charger R/T S.E. 440 4 speed 3.54 Dana rolling body

wingcar

I believe everything in the ad to be true....oh, wait...I need to go offline for a while as I see a couple of black helicopters hovering over my house. 

(Very nice car, but there are many questions......)
1970 Daytona Charger SE "clone" (440/Auto)
1967 Charger (360,6-pak/Auto)
2008 Challenger SRT8 BLK (6.1/Auto) 6050 of 6400

Ghoste

Which is interesting because the ad states "no dreamers".

myk

The seller and the ad are targeting buyers that don't know any better.  Unfortunately, there are plenty of uninformed people that are just too willing to part with their hard earned money...

Troy

What am I missing? The seller lists the VIN and clearly states it's a 383 4bbl PLUS there's a pile of documentation - none of which says it's an R/T. In the ad text he refers to the car as an "SE". He does mention "RT/SE" clearly as a comparison. If someone were trying to be sneaky I'd say this is possibly the absolute worst example in history.

There's a badge in the grill and a stripe - something we've discussed a million times (it seems) as being ridiculously easy to reverse. What's the problem?

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.

Ghoste

I think its the"original" part that is being questioned.

68pplcharger

lol If you look at the end of the add he lists the three changes done to the car. Might be over priced, but a garage kept car in San Diego( or any dry area of Cali) would look about this good.  :Twocents:







Cncguy

The quarter panel to roof seam is very visible, in first pic.

Ghoste

It is, but I've seen some others with pretty bad roof seams from the factory.  :shruggy:

Challenger340

Quote from: 68pplcharger on May 14, 2015, 10:35:53 AM
lol If you look at the end of the add he lists the three changes done to the car. Might be over priced, but a garage kept car in San Diego( or any dry area of Cali) would look about this good.

Are the R/T style Chrome Exhaust Tips factory on the 330hp 383 Cars as well ?
Only wimps wear Bowties !

tan top

Quote from: Challenger340 on May 13, 2015, 06:20:39 PM
I should go pull my 2nd Broadcast Sheet above the Glove Box, and see if "Curly" wrote on it.
I "felt" it there by hand a couple of years ago....
but I never pulled it for fear of tearing it or screwing it up, because I figured one day I would carefully remove the glove box itself to access it, so as not to damage anything.

"Curly" was a busy guy ! Who'd have thunk 47 odd years later "Curly" would be notable ?


:coolgleamA:  your got one on top of the glove box liner also  :o   good stuff , ( only had one in mine rear seat back )   be careful pulling the glove box liner , should you decide to retrieve it ! , its a  pain  :icon_smile_blackeye:  , you have to squish the liner to fit it through the glove box slot in the dash frame ,   doing so the top edge of the glove box liner  scrapes the  top edge of the dash glove box opening ,   easily rip or damage broadcast sheet  , may be with a mirror or something see how its attached at the top etc & go from there  :scratchchin:

the liner  comes out at a angle  , right side  corner comes out first , & goes in last ,
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

5hunert

My car had two sheets. The front sheet (behind the kick panel)had no marking on it, while the back seat sheet (from a different car, probably the seat was switched at birth at Creative Industries) had Curley's mark on it.

68pplcharger

Quote from: Challenger340 on May 14, 2015, 02:23:26 PM
Quote from: 68pplcharger on May 14, 2015, 10:35:53 AM
lol If you look at the end of the add he lists the three changes done to the car. Might be over priced, but a garage kept car in San Diego( or any dry area of Cali) would look about this good.

Are the R/T style Chrome Exhaust Tips factory on the 330hp 383 Cars as well ?
It was an option as far as I know...

Ghoste

Bright exhaust tips were standard on the RT, except in California of course, and were N/A on the XP Chargers.

myk

What did California cars have instead of those bright tips?  Turn downs, I'm guessing?

Ghoste


68pplcharger

Good to know Ghoste, would a dealer install them if a customer wanted them anyway?

Ghoste

I'm sure a dealer would do just about whatever it took to sell a car.  :lol:
I think for California it might have been different for the dealers though because that was a noise pollution thing so they would have been creating an illegal car?