Mopars In Barns

[moparsinbarns]

Check out my Mopars In Barns site!!!!! Make sure u SIGN THE GUESTBOOK please.

www.dodgesinbarns.piczo.com

[Drache]

For good news this '69 Daytona is currently being or already has been restored. There was a story about it on another site.

[moparsinbarns]

Thanks for reminding me. I knew that it was restored and the owner sent me the after pic but I just havent put it in my restored section yet.

[Drache]

No prob! 

[TheAutoArchaeologist]

Problem taken care of.

Ryan

[Drache]

Hey Cody.  I noticed you stole some of my pictures and are trying to pass them off as your own.  If you do not remove the pictures, I will have no choice but to get my lawyer involved since they are copywrited.

Ryan

I'm pretty sure he's not passing them off as his own since he doesn't state that he took those pictures. Maybe try being a little nicer about it? 

[Shakey]

Hey Cody.  I noticed you stole some of my pictures and are trying to pass them off as your own.  If you do not remove the pictures, I will have no choice but to get my lawyer involved since they are copywrited.

Ryan

Which photos on his site are copywrited?

Are these photos of your cars?

Does it cost $$ to get a photo copywrited?

What is the purpose of copywriting a photo?

Do you have a web site where you are showing these copywrited photos?

Just curious.

[Chris G.]

I'm pretty sure he's not passing them off as his own since he doesn't state that he took those pictures. Maybe try being a little nicer about it? 

FWIW, he was trying to pass off another Charger for his until Chris called him on it. It also looks like he edited his cars in barns page and credited some people. We are talking about a 13yr old kid here, so I guess some slack is in order.

ps- I see you have our fender tag decoder on your site. While we appreciate the use of it, how about just putting up our home page banner and linking that? It's in my sig in case you want to use it. 

[Arthu®]

Just curious.

Cut the kid some slack, I don't see him saying anything about those being his finds.

Arthur

[TheAutoArchaeologist]

I have emails between him and another member saying that he had found these cars in BC and was trying to get them onto the other members cars in barns site.  Luckily the owner knew they were my pictures and contacted me. 

These are all pictures I personally posted.  I do have the pictures online at yahoo, for all to see, but they are restricted from being saved/linked to because of the copywrite.  It does not cost anything to copywrite photos, just a lot of paperwork.  Which is in the disclamer on the page where the pictures are posted.

How should I have known he was 13?  Does it make it anymore wrong?

Ryan

[TheAutoArchaeologist]

BTW, I posted a link to my cars in barns site before.  Notice the disclaimer that says "READ FIRST" and that some of the pictures seem oddly familiar.

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,10558.0.html

Ryan

[moparsinbarns]

Hi Ryan,

I am sorry that I used those pictures without your permission but I'm only 13. All I want to do is make a cool site. Yesterday when I went onto your site, I didn't see the copyright page. I did delete the pictures from your site. The rest of the pictures on there are cars that were SENT to me and cars that I found on ebay. Anyways, I would like to say again that I am sorry and no hard feelings?

[TheAutoArchaeologist]

Thank you for understanding.  That little page at the bottom is easily missed normally.  Just try not to do it again.

Ryan

[Shakey]

A 13 year old from Canada falls under the "Young Offenders Act".  Which means whether you swipe some pics or murder another human, you'll only get a slap on the wrist.

[moparsinbarns]

Hey Shakey,

It dosent really matter. Me and him straightened everything out. I didnt see his tiny copyright thing at the bottom of the page so I got rid of his pics that I put on my site and we're cool now.

[inhrmswy]

Devil, before you start crying foul about copywrite infringement take another look at your own signature pic and avatar.  I some how think that those images are also copywrited and not by you.  So before you start slinging stones you had better be sure you have all you s#$t in one sock.  No malice intended just an observation.

[nh_mopar_fan]

Put my vote in for really not giving a crap.

[TheAutoArchaeologist]

I am using the Evil Monkey as an avatar, not saying that I created or made up the character.  It is two completely different circumstances.  What he was doing, which he has now corrected, was called libel, or an untruthful statement about a person, published in writing or through media, that injures the person's reputation or standing in the community. Because libel is a tort (a civil wrong), the injured person can bring a lawsuit against the person who made the false statement.  I am just trying to protect what is rightfully mine, as would anyone else.

And trying to connect two completely unrelated events just shows your level of ingenuity.

Ryan

[red72chrgr]

pathetic

[nh_mopar_fan]

Hey Perry Mason,

I suggest you go look up the definition of "libel".

[moparsinbarns]

Ya, I got corrected by Ryan and fixed my mistake.

[moparsinbarns]

Okay u guys, lets stop fighting here. Theres nothing to fight about, I made a mistake and I was corrected by Ryan and I thank him for that.

[TheAutoArchaeologist]

Perhaps you should go look up the definition of Libel.  Seriously.  The definition I posted was word for word the same that was in my Civil Law book.

It's pathetic that you guys are arguing with someone that's right.  He fixed his mistake, and I'm not going to continue with anything.  But the fact that you guys are arguing with me about it is sad. 

Perhaps when someone steals your car and calls it their own, that you might take this more seriously.

Ryan

[mustanghater]

he's worse then me

[nh_mopar_fan]

Hey Perry Mason,

Malicious. Look up the word. You have to prove malice in order to make a case for libel.

Hit the books, junior.

You're dismissed.