Ebay charger anyone from daytona beach area

[chargerman69]

Does anyone live in this area, looks pretty good but still want your input

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Dodge-Charger-SE-2-Door-Big-Block/181541581028?_trksid=p2045573.c100033.m2042&_trkparms=aid%3D111001%26algo%3DREC.SEED%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20131017132637%26meid%3D02d37651dd5744308a4384a079fba455%26pid%3D100033%26prg%3D20131017132637%26rk%3D4%26rkt%3D4%26sd%3D161430947463

[73rallye440magnum]

That one has been relisted a few times. Probably because of the short description and absence of pictures. Looks like it has potential.

[chargerman69]

I wood drive it for a year or teo then restore it bsck to T7

[chargerman69]

.

[tan top]

I wood drive it for a year or teo then restore it bsck to T7

was it originally T7 ?    ,  looks like it might once of had a vinyl top ! unless i'm getting confused where i'm looking   ( see picture below .
its had a quicky paint job by the looks of it too    not really a biggie but if they have painted over the door lock/ latch / hardware  , plus a few other things I can see that is not right ,&   body / bondo shapes etc    ,   what else have they not done properly cut corners with ect , for the $$$ he is asking   ,  

having said all that , it was done some time ago &  if any rot was not done properly , would of thought it would of come through by now  

 all them things aside  , perhaps i'm being too critical    , it does  look good   , nice color  

[chargerman69]

This is not the charger that was T7, I put a new link to this yellow charger instead

[tan top]

This is not the charger that was T7, I put a new link to this yellow charger instead

oh right I see       ,   only was reading the ad  of the yellow one & it said original color combo  my mistake   

[tan top]

 

[tan top]

 

[tan top]

 

[tan top]

 

wants $32900 for it here

   http://www.autabuy.com/Vehicles/Details.cfm?VID=1739844&Year=1969&Make=Dodge&Model=Charger

[chargerman69]

thanks for posting the pictures tan top,
Am emailing the guy tonight and this the same color as your car

[tan top]

thanks for posting the pictures tan top,
Am emailing the guy tonight and this the same color as your car

yes same color !!

this charger looks good  , but imo needs some work ,  I don't like criticising / finding fault / picking holes in another guys car or even one for sale  ,  its got a few faults with the body that are apparent  just from the pictures   ,  PM  if you want  

[Homerr]

Looks like another case of the backward rear stripe.

[chargerman69]

Feel free to say whats wrong i want the input
I have not heard back from him yet not sure yet what were willing to pay yet

[tan top]

 before I start , I don't want to come across a A-hole  pulling a car apart  , ( but its for sale & asking good money imo ),  don't mean any offence to any one , just trying to help  , all what I have mentioned  , if I was after   that car , as a must have color options etc I wanted ,  would not put me off , if its only this stuff I have mentioned , when inspecting it in real life  , I  would  just factor in the time cost of materials  for a bare metal repaint   , if it can be bought for the right price ,  reason being  if these corners have been cut , what else has !! .
 think the seller is aware of the problems  , because of the pictures he has posted & sort of showing you , with out saying  

 not  including ( , evey panel is out of alignment (  mine was too & it had all original panels & never had a wreck ) think this is just Chrysler quality control , , but worth checking for accident damage all the same !
 body lines are a bit wiggly in places  , could just be incorrect blocking of high build primer , or a bondo bandit has been at work or both ,  also looks like  the primer was / may of been , incorrectaly ( car sales job) dry flatted from the passenger side shot  , looking down the side , soo could be something to do with it . trunk floor  how good has that been done , &  spare hold down bracket in wrong place ,   &  the trunk  lock painted ?  , all that points to how good the rest of the work is  
has various things missing &  incorrect stuff , most obvious is the seats . hoods off color too)
 
these are the main off putting things I see wrong below , from the pictures    , although the more you look the more you see ,

[tan top]

 shape / bad repair ,  bondo or bad blocking of high build primer  , or all  

1 , fender front edge
2,  fender front edge
3 & 4 , upper cowl join to Apost / pillar
 

[tan top]

 shape / bondo /  bad repair or ?

5 ,  roof  A post / wind shield  pillar  , seam cracked & pillar shape
6 & 7, missing weather strip ends  , plus painted  door hardware , no real biggie but what other corners have been cut !
8  , shape / bondo  =looks like rust coming through factory seam

[tan top]

 9 , looks like rust bubbling through  
10 ,  sealer / paint cracking
11 ,  no panel sealer , between frame & outer skin ,   hood skin will vibrate / resonate like the bottom of a snare drum going down the street
12  painted lock latch bolts , pin switch etc ,

[TUFCAT]

Trunk floor was replaced (no drain plug holes).
Front bumper chrome is very dull.
Poor quality quickie paint job all over - as pointed out and evidenced by the door jamb areas.
Undercoating covering up floor pan sections (probably replaced as well)
Front bumper is tweeked around corner (see tan top photo #4)
Has antenna hole in fender, with radio delete plate?

[tan top]

Trunk floor was replaced (no drain plug holes).
Front bumper chrome is very dull.
Poor quality quickie paint job all over - as pointed out and evidenced by the door jamb areas.
Undercoating covering up floor pan sections (probably replaced as well)

You got it  TC      

[tan top]

13 , same as 12    no biggie in its self  cutting corners  , what else has been cut !!
14 bondo or lead or both , lifting at factory joint
15 bondo shape , factory join
16 , bondo falling out , maybe  or bubbling because of rust  or  bad bondo or  , just could be my eyes seeing something that is not there ?  

[tan top]

  17 ,    either rust starting  or just dirt in end cap seams  
 18  , same as 5
 19 ,  rust or  may be dirt in  factory  joints / seams  

hard to say with out actually  looking at the car in person

[tan top]

 if you have decided on a y2 69  ,  this looks a much better car from the pictures  , says original motor too , although still has things wrong with it ,   but going by the pictures & not seeing it in real life  , your not ( famous last words   )  going to be into a bare metal repaint  to sort it out , but we all know what body & paint can be like ,    ,  

http://www.autabuy.com/Vehicles/Details.cfm?VID=1863749&Year=1969&Make=Dodge&Model=Charger%20SE

[Homerr]

if you have decided on a y2 69  ,  this looks a much better car from the pictures  , says original motor too , although still has things wrong with it ,   but going by the pictures & not seeing it in real life  , your not ( famous last words   )  going to be into a bare metal repaint  to sort it out , but we all know what body & paint can be like ,    ,  

http://www.autabuy.com/Vehicles/Details.cfm?VID=1863749&Year=1969&Make=Dodge&Model=Charger%20SE

1969 Dodge Charger SE R/T

This is a all matching # 1969 Charger SE with R/T upgrades,has original 383ci. V8

Just stop with false titling and the R/T Hemi Six-Pack keyword bs!