News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Will someone mark these pictures to show me how to measure pinion angles?

Started by XH29N0G, August 01, 2013, 07:59:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

XH29N0G

I have attached two pictures.  I can measure the angle on the drive shaft easily (it sits exactly flat - 0 degrees).  I think the transmission is pointing down by about 3 degrees and the differential is pointing down by about 3 degrees, but I do not know where to get an exact measurement because both do not have flat surfaces to measure from (the bottom of the differential has a slight curve to it.

It would help me to see marks on the pictures about exactly what people measure to do this correctly.

Thanks in advance.
Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

flyinlow

Mopar had special tools to measure this. I have never seen anything but pictures of them.

You know how to measure the driveshaft. I use the engine oil pan rail on BB's for the tail shaft. Should be parallel. I remove the driveshaft and measure across the companion flange screw holes ,from one u joint cap leg to the opposite side. Do both ways and see if they agree. The picture I drew on is not the way I do it. I was just marking the approximate surface I use. This requires rotating the angle meter ,don't get confused.  There might be better ways.   :Twocents:

flyinlow


MSRacing89

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/features/1203phr_1968_dodge_charger/index.html

'68 Charger 440, 11:1, ported Stealth Heads, Lunati voodoo 60304, 3.23 gear, Mulit-port EZ-EFI, Gear Vendors OD and Tallon Hydroboost.

MSRacing89

Rear.

Now I did some forensics on your photos and came up with the angles you see on the attachments.  I see a bit of an issue with your front working angle which appears to be around 5º.  This could produce some premature wear on the u-joints and a possible vibration at highway speeds.  Everything else looks to be in pretty good shape.  Obviously you can verify and let us know.
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/features/1203phr_1968_dodge_charger/index.html

'68 Charger 440, 11:1, ported Stealth Heads, Lunati voodoo 60304, 3.23 gear, Mulit-port EZ-EFI, Gear Vendors OD and Tallon Hydroboost.

XH29N0G

Quote from: flyinlow on August 01, 2013, 09:33:07 PM
What transmission?

Tremec TKO 600

Quote from: MSRacing89 on August 01, 2013, 11:49:00 PM
Rear.

Now I did some forensics on your photos and came up with the angles you see on the attachments.  I see a bit of an issue with your front working angle which appears to be around 5º.  This could produce some premature wear on the u-joints and a possible vibration at highway speeds.  Everything else looks to be in pretty good shape.  Obviously you can verify and let us know.

I did not see the attachments.  I am having slight vibration at 70 mph. The transmission and driveshaft are newly installed/adapted.  The rear axle was also off during restoration.  I read somewhere that there can be issues with the transmission angle related to spacers and this is what I would like to measure.  I had not thought of using the flats on the u-joints as a reference (Thanks flyinlow).  I will do my best tonight to measure these now directly on the car and post to see if they sound OK.

Thanks for all the help.
Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

ottawamerc

Also I noticed your drive shaft might be a tad too long? you should be able to bottom it out then pull it back about 1" - 1 1/2" into the rear yoke.

Scott :cheers:
This hobby is more than just our cars, it's the people you get to meet along the way!!!

XH29N0G

Quote from: ottawamerc on August 02, 2013, 06:47:43 AM
Also I noticed your drive shaft might be a tad too long? you should be able to bottom it out then pull it back about 1" - 1 1/2" into the rear yoke.

Scott :cheers:

Let's see if I understand correctly,  You mean the yoke into the transmission should be out of the transmission by about 1/2 to 1"  The yoke in the differential is bolted in place, right.  The yoke in the transmission sticks out 1/2 and 1", but without taking the driveshaft off, I cannot be sure that this represents the play you describe that is wanted.


As for the measurements, my most recent ones indicate that the transmission to driveshaft is with the angle opening upward about 4 (maybe 5) degrees off 180 degrees (like MSRacing89 noted), the driveshaft is pretty close to flat with respect to the ground, and the driveshaft to differential is with the angle opening upward about 3 degrees off 180 degrees.  So it is making a U shape.

Some questions:

Is a U-shape OK? 

If the angle is too large for the trans-driveshaft U joint, how would this be corrected - By raising the tailshaft of the transmission with a spacer?

I am chasing down a slight vibration, would it be best to get the new and balanced driveshaft rebalanced before seeing if the source is too large an angle with for the front U joint?

Thanks,

James
Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

ACUDANUT

Quote from: ottawamerc on August 02, 2013, 06:47:43 AM
Also I noticed your drive shaft might be a tad too long? you should be able to bottom it out then pull it back about 1" - 1 1/2" into the rear yoke.

Scott :cheers:

Agree. But I also can't see the front, where the shaft going into the transmission. The rear looks fine.

MSRacing89

The attachments are there on my posts.  They are PDF's. 

If you notice by the angles I took your front working angle is up around 5º.  This could be the source of your vibration.  You want to try and keep that working angle under 3º.  The trans may need to come up slightly to minimize this angle.
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/features/1203phr_1968_dodge_charger/index.html

'68 Charger 440, 11:1, ported Stealth Heads, Lunati voodoo 60304, 3.23 gear, Mulit-port EZ-EFI, Gear Vendors OD and Tallon Hydroboost.

XH29N0G

Quote from: MSRacing89 on August 02, 2013, 10:45:02 AM
The attachments are there on my posts.  They are PDF's. 

If you notice by the angles I took your front working angle is up around 5º.  This could be the source of your vibration.  You want to try and keep that working angle under 3º.  The trans may need to come up slightly to minimize this angle.

I see  :slap: 

Thank you.  The pdf images and explanations are a big help.  Bringing the trans up will be a matter of spacers with the rear cross member/trans support, Right?
Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

MSRacing89

Quote from: XH29N0G on August 02, 2013, 01:29:35 PM
Quote from: MSRacing89 on August 02, 2013, 10:45:02 AM
The attachments are there on my posts.  They are PDF's. 

If you notice by the angles I took your front working angle is up around 5º.  This could be the source of your vibration.  You want to try and keep that working angle under 3º.  The trans may need to come up slightly to minimize this angle.

I see  :slap: 

Thank you.  The pdf images and explanations are a big help.  Bringing the trans up will be a matter of spacers with the rear cross member/trans support, Right?

You may just be able to bring it up by spacing between the trans and trans mount.
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/features/1203phr_1968_dodge_charger/index.html

'68 Charger 440, 11:1, ported Stealth Heads, Lunati voodoo 60304, 3.23 gear, Mulit-port EZ-EFI, Gear Vendors OD and Tallon Hydroboost.

flyinlow

Quote from: XH29N0G on August 02, 2013, 01:29:35 PM
Quote from: MSRacing89 on August 02, 2013, 10:45:02 AM
.  Bringing the trans up will be a matter of spacers with the rear cross member/trans support, Right?



Yes if you have the room. Moving the tail shaft up will of course change the angles at the back, so recheck those.

If I understand It:

In a perfect word the driveline angles would be zero under load with the driveshaft only flexing for suspension movement for road conditions. I don't have that.
The next best choice is tailshaft and pinion parallel . I don't have this either.
What I ended up with is an OD trans as high as I can get it, almost touching the tunnel  and a small front angle ( 2* the wrong way for parallel tailshaft/pinion). The rear angle I shimmed to get 4-5* driveshaft /pinion angle static. The rear angle reduces under load as the pinion raises. Under high loads it might go past zero angle which in my case would help get the tailshaft/pinion closer to parallel , but will make the u-joints flex more under high torque loads.

Your front angle dose not compliment your rear angle. So the drive shaft would have to speedup and slowdown as it rotates. This can cause vibration. Raising the trans with spacers and reducing the front angle might help.

XH29N0G

Thanks.  This is very informative, and I find a lot of these things unintuitive so having them spelled out this way really helps. 

The next three questions relate spacers.  I took a look under the transmission at the transmission mount.  It is the red block in the two pictures I have attached. 

Is there any specific place I go to buy spacers? 

Do the spacers mount between the transmission and the mount (above the mount like in top image) or between the mount and the crossmember (below the mount - bottom image).  It looks to me like there is one above the mount and this is where I should put it, but I thought I would ask. 

Finally, is there a straightforward way to estimate how thick a spacer is needed to change the angle from 4-5 degrees to something more reasonable?
Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

flyinlow

Yea ,sometimes I think Voodoo would help ,working with driveline set up. I got mine where there is no vibration or wheel hop and the u joint life is good, so I must be in the ballpark.

Factory shims looked like 1/8 stock about 1" wide by 1.5" long with a 1/2" hole.

I would vote for above the mount.

I added 1/4" to mine(a518, 3.5" longer than 727TF) changed a couple degrees or so ,its been awhile.