BEWARE of this 69 daytona I saw

[nascarxx29]

I saw this car advertised somewhere .while back and saw the vin was very odd as being low in sequence for a daytona.And this is whats come up about this car..
And the numbers as evidence .So in my opinion and others this is not a daytona.You want to spend big bucks on


.XX29L9B155758 = title = altered
XP29G9B155758 = original car

Car is in CA, being advertised as Daytona.   Has fiberglass nose and wing.   Owner says it's "all correct and original, and all Daytona's were made that way".   Car has no fender tag, broadcast sheet, or dash plate.   Car is not even a Charger 500; it's just a total fraud.

[Blown70]

Thanks for the HEADS up.

Tom

[hemi68charger]

Thanks........
You have a link? I always like to see people who have gall..........

Troy

[Silver R/T]

thanks for info, someone should pay local authorities visit to stop this scammer

[Just 6T9 CHGR]

I'd like to see it myself.

i dont have that one in the registry yet either...

[nascarxx29]

I will go back to my papers.See If I can located the full ad.And pm it to the registry

[Just 6T9 CHGR]

I will go back to my papers.See If I can located the full ad.And pm it to the registry

OK Dave thanks!

[Beep Beep Dave]

I'd love to see the pics or the ad on that one!!!

Dave

[Blakcharger440]

Where did the VIN#s come from then if the car has no data plate,broadcast sheet or dash plate??? Just because the car is missing all of these does not mean it wasnt originally a wingcar.
Unless I am missing something obvious here....

But I would also proceed with caution when someone is advertising a potentially high dollar mopar that does not have documentation to back it up.

[Brock Samson]

Wait a min.
XX29 states the car isn't even a 500, i seriously doubt anyone would be much fooled with the rear windowbeing  stock, that is the case  right?. 

[Ghoste]

I believe it was RT Barnum (PT's brother) who said, "you can fool some of the suckers everytime just by telling them it's safe to part with their money".  Or something like that.

[PocketThunder]

Wait a min.
XX29 states the car isn't even a 500, i seriously doubt anyone would be much fooled with the rear windowbeing   stock, that is the case   right?.  

what?

[hemigeno]

Where did the VIN#s come from then if the car has no data plate,broadcast sheet or dash plate??? Just because the car is missing all of these does not mean it wasnt originally a wingcar.
Unless I am missing something obvious here....

But I would also proceed with caution when someone is advertising a potentially high dollar mopar that does not have documentation to back it up.

Well, the VIN is way too low to be a Daytona.  With only one exception, Daytona VIN's are 355101 and higher.  IF ANYTHING it would be a C500, and it was pointed out at the beginning of this thread that the car was previously recorded or known to have been a 383-2bbl (G9B) engined car, so could never have been either a Daytona or a 500.  The whole point is that the car is a fraud.  The fact that the owner is trying to persuade potential buyers that legit Daytonas came with fiberglass wings and noses would be enough of a reason for anyone to steer clear of spending big bucks on anything he's selling.

[Brock Samson]

Whatta' ya' mean "what?"? 

[Blakcharger440]

Where did the VIN#s come from then if the car has no data plate,broadcast sheet or dash plate??? Just because the car is missing all of these does not mean it wasnt originally a wingcar.
Unless I am missing something obvious here....

But I would also proceed with caution when someone is advertising a potentially high dollar mopar that does not have documentation to back it up.

Well, the VIN is way too low to be a Daytona.   With only one exception, Daytona VIN's are 355101 and higher.   IF ANYTHING it would be a C500, and it was pointed out at the beginning of this thread that the car was previously recorded or known to have been a 383-2bbl (G9B) engined car, so could never have been either a Daytona or a 500.   The whole point is that the car is a fraud.   The fact that the owner is trying to persuade potential buyers that legit Daytonas came with fiberglass wings and noses would be enough of a reason for anyone to steer clear of spending big bucks on anything he's selling.

Yep, re-read the above post regarding the fiberglass pieces. I agree. What a sham!

[Troy]

Whatta' ya' mean "what?"?

He means that XX29 signifies that it would be a 500 or Daytona. XP would make it a standard Charger.

Troy

[nascarxx29]

More related info on the bogus daytona

**Link Removed**

[Brock Samson]

what says xx?.. the title?.. onna piece of paper,.. and that alone?.. anyone with a tenth of a brain has gotta realize... Case Closed!
i say you retitle the topic FRAUD daytona, and perhaps we should have a halpag warning stickied up top while were at it... Troy?..     
BTW: I think it's awsome there are no ads on the site... thanks man!

[PocketThunder]

what says xx?.. the title?.. onna piece of paper,.. and that alone?.. anyone with a tenth of a brain has gotta realize... Case Closed!
i say you retitle the topic FRAUD daytona, and perhaps we should have a halpag warning stickied up top while were at it... Troy?..     
BTW: I think it's awsome there are no ads on the site... thanks man!

You said XX29 states the car isn't even a 500, and i concur, all 500s and Daytonas "should" start with XX29..... 

but i see what you're saying....

[Ghoste]

Keep in mind that some early 500's did not come through with all of the XX markings in place yet.

[Just 6T9 CHGR]

Whatta' ya' mean "what?"?

He means that XX29 signifies that it would be a 500 or Daytona. XP would make it a standard Charger.

Troy

I believe the XX29 Strat is referring to is the original poster's name.....just shortned

Am I correct???

[PocketThunder]

Whatta' ya' mean "what?"?

He means that XX29 signifies that it would be a 500 or Daytona. XP would make it a standard Charger.

Troy

I believe the XX29 Strat is referring to is the original poster's name.....just shortned

Am I correct???

Gosh what a dilema we have here.....

[Brock Samson]

You are correct Sir... I was indeed refering to the original poster. xx29.