The 69 500 that was for sale at the Nats

[arrow]

Danny do you have any info on C500 XX29L9B214398 ?  You may have seen its 4 spd. is advertised

[hemigeno]

I saw this thread:

XX29L9B214398 on Moparts

It was not worth getting into a debate with the guy who started that thread about the other "HemiDaytona" he supposedly knows about (which isn't on the Shipment list or Dealer Invoice List, predates any other Daytona ever recorded AND predates the introduction of the Daytona model itself).   

[moparstuart]

 you just can tell anything to some peoples children

[arrow]

I saw this thread:

XX29L9B214398 on Moparts

It was not worth getting into a debate with the guy who started that thread about the other "HemiDaytona" he supposedly knows about (which isn't on the Shipment list or Dealer Invoice List, predates any other Daytona ever recorded AND predates the introduction of the Daytona model itself).   

I thought the same thing about the debate - that trans vin is real close to my Nov. built C 500s vin.

[69_500]

Well I can say this about the VIN's he listed, I haven't heard anything about either one of them. The 214398 does fit into a sequence, so one is plausible. I didn't have anything wrote down on it either.

The one of a 256xxx is too late to be a Charger 500, and WAY too early to be a Daytona. Is he sure its a Daytona? Or is he sure its 256 and not 356xxx?

[nascarxx29]

2 210 daytonas  210708 210719 coincedence there both from Ohio

[nascarxx29]

The wingcars & 500 vin numbers dictated from the 1979 archive article as written it says All known true charger 500s identificatin numbers are XX29*9B10000-XX29*9B260000 Daytonas 280000-480000 superbirds140000-182000