new dodge dart commercial . i love it :)

[MaximRecoil]

Given that you responded it's clear you dismissed nothing.

That's only true if you are allowed redefine the word "dismiss" to mean something other than it currently means. You don't get to redefine the word "dismiss" however.

Dismiss - to reject serious consideration of

I did not seriously consider the content of your non sequitur, because a non sequitur is a logical fallacy. Logical fallacies don't require a counter-argument nor anything else that would suggest they are worthy of serious consideration; merely pointing out the fallacy and dismissing it is sufficient.

[bull]

Given that you responded it's clear you dismissed nothing.

That's only true if you are allowed redefine the word "dismiss" to mean something other than it currently means. You don't get to redefine the word "dismiss" however.

Dismiss - to reject serious consideration of

I did not seriously consider the content of your non sequitur, because a non sequitur is a logical fallacy. Logical fallacies don't require a counter-argument nor anything else that would suggest they are worthy of serious consideration; merely pointing out the fallacy and dismissing it is sufficient.

Allowed redefine? Is something missing there? You work very hard at sounding intelligent, but in that regard I advise you to look up the word fail next.

[JB400]

Given that you responded it's clear you dismissed nothing.

That's only true if you are allowed redefine the word "dismiss" to mean something other than it currently means. You don't get to redefine the word "dismiss" however.

Dismiss - to reject serious consideration of

I did not seriously consider the content of your non sequitur, because a non sequitur is a logical fallacy. Logical fallacies don't require a counter-argument nor anything else that would suggest they are worthy of serious consideration; merely pointing out the fallacy and dismissing it is sufficient.

Allowed redefine? Is something missing there? You work very hard at sounding intelligent, but in that regard I advise you to look up the word fail next.

He doesn't get the full definition of "insult" either.  His dictionary is clearly missing a few pages

I suppose I'll get the absurd response.