somebody is going to be very mad when they get these home...

[RD]

not promoting, just showing the obvious.  someone out there thinks these are for a 70 cuda, but actually they came off of a cordoba/magnum/charger.  I could be mistaken, but the passenger side remote mirror option was not available until 1975/76 year. 

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/71-72-73-74-75-76-MOPAR-REMOTE-MIRRORS-CUDA-CHARGER_W0QQitemZ4602953662QQcategoryZ34204QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

[ramit]

I would swear my 74 Cuda had a remote mirror, but I could be wrong.

[TruckDriver]

Those also were on '76 to '80 Aspens and Volares.

[Shakey]

3861327 R RACING DOOR MIRROR 1975-79 R,W,X,S


3861371 L CHROME RACING MIRROR,PU 1975 X,S,R,W

I'd be doing my homework if I were buying parts off of e-bay.

[6pkrunner]

I'd be doing my homework if I were buying parts off of e-bay.

-that is the golden rule for everything on eGouge. Never trust the seller's desription. Either through jonest lack of knowledge or intentional fraud it is up to the buyer to know what he/she is looking at. Sometimes through the seller's lack of knowledge you can get a deal, other times the deck is stacked against the buyer. P.T. Barnum was a wise guy.

[twilt]

absolute stupidity on someones part. the bases should be a dead giveaway. i usually find and sell a pair of them on ebay 4-5 times a year. i put a $55 BIN price on them for a pair. whether intentional or not, these are  fairly commonly misidentified items on ebay . funny thing is that when i have emailed sellers and told them the correct application, they have ignored the info.......... lots of sellers misidentify 3rd gen mirrors too, listing them as 71-74 when 71-2 and 73-4 are distinctly different and also significantly differ in value.   

[WM23N1]

Looks like the seller covered his a$$ when he said he wasnt sure what they were for.

['CUDA360]

I have a nice set of chrome ones. I'm gonna use them on the next street car 'cause they're pretty cool.

But I should just sell them on E-splay and pretend I don't know they came off my '75 doba  

['CUDA360]

  Nice sig pic WN

[WM23N1]

My redneck garage packed with charger junk? TY

[TK73]

Do you mean "passenger" remote as a '75 option?  I have the driver remote in my '73...

Aren't the base angles on those wrong to mount on earlier ( <74 ) doors?

[5.9_Liter_Grand_Cherokee]

3861327 R RACING DOOR MIRROR 1975-79 R,W,X,S


3861371 L CHROME RACING MIRROR,PU 1975 X,S,R,W

Had the same mirrors from the factory on my 77 Charger/doba

[Nacho-RT74]

Do you mean "passenger" remote as a '75 option? I have the driver remote in my '73...

Aren't the base angles on those wrong to mount on earlier ( <74 ) doors?

1-Yes

2-I don't think so. If we think that standart mirrors were the same angle to 75 and later Coronets/Monacos and they use the same ones than 74 and earliers becasue IN FACT 75 and laters Coronets/Monacos use the same doors than 74 Coronets and maybe earliers....

...and if we think that those standart mirrors were the same shape to Coronets and Chargers with just screw holes differences along the years as stated by Twilt ( and also pedestal itself shape but not angle )...

...and Coronet/Monacos ( included earliers 70s ) deluxe ones used the round chrome remote mirrors, same as some 75 and laters Cordobas/Chargers with remote mirror option but no the racing ones...

...we could conclude that if slope on door is the same on all these cars becsue the several mirrors they shared, then the Racing Cordobas/Magnums mirrors can be bolted on 3rd gen Chargers and E bodies without problem on angle, just redrilling holes to studs, and drilling the holes to wires on door, Jam and underdash to fit the joystick

Can I be right ?

when I say Monacos, I make reference to the B bodies Monacos

['CUDA360]

It looks to me that the base on the late model B-mirror is kicked out a bit more then the E.  So the top of the mirror looks a little over angled. Not alot though. Maybe a shim or two on the bottom of the base would straighten it out

[Nacho-RT74]

It looks to me that the base on the late model B-mirror is kicked out a bit more then the E. So the top of the mirror looks a little over angled. Not alot though. Maybe a shim or two on the bottom of the base would straighten it out

It looks my explanation wasn't clear enough.

If we think E bodies mirrors are the same that 71-74  B bodies mirrors.

...and all Cars explained above shared allong the years the same mirrors...

... the we have as conclussion...

[694spdRT]

Both mirrors are missing off of my '72 Challenger so I picked up a set of dual remote painted racing mirrors off of a Aspen R/T. I put them up against the door and they look like they will work fine. I did not bolt them in but, any slight adjustment that might be needed should not pose a problem. They may be a little different than stock but, I like the dual remote option and it is just going to be a driver anyway. 

[RD]

i emailed the leading bidder and told him the truth.  he is a egag newbie so I showed him how to retract his bid if need be (after he asked what his options were).  well, his leading bid is still up there as this is typed.  he said he was putting it on a cuda and thought they would be correct.  i told him he was mistaken and explained why.  5 bux says he does not listen, especially when I told him he could find those mirrors in any junkyard for 40 bux.  oh well. 

[twilt]

i emailed the leading bidder and told him the truth.  he is a egag newbie so I showed him how to retract his bid if need be (after he asked what his options were).  well, his leading bid is still up there as this is typed.  he said he was putting it on a cuda and thought they would be correct.  i told him he was mistaken and explained why.  5 bux says he does not listen, especially when I told him he could find those mirrors in any junkyard for 40 bux.  oh well. 

some people just cant be helped. I once had someone win a auction of mine for a set of 4 USED 72-74 sidemarkers. Their winning bid wasll in excess of $75. Of course, those same sidemarkers are still available from the dealer brand new for less $50.  I couldnt find it in myself to accept
full payment. I told him to pay half of his winning bid plus shipping and i would be fine with the transaction.