Is this legal? Or, who needs a title for their '69 Charger?

[bull]

I saw this ad while looking for a 383 block:

http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/pts/252873258.html

1969 Dodge Charger title only - $90

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: sale-252873258@craigslist.org
Date: 2006-12-23, 11:40AM PST


1969 Dodge Charger, title only. I junked this car roughly 20 years ago. I personally watched the car go through the shreader at General Metals in Tacoma, Washington. I was able to keep the title. (legal paper work) This was an
original big block four barrel car.

I blocked out the name in the picture only, the title is not altered in any way.

I have this title listed on ebay, item number 260068307405 I listed it here also because I am getting very tired of ebays greed and other BS rules.

Key words: hemi plymouth 383 440 426 392 bigblock superbird challenger daytona
dana 60 mopar chrysler EBAY SUCKS !

[Dodge440Coronut]

So illigal it isn't funny, but if I had a solid non R/T charger witn no title and a valid vin tag/title for a Charger, I would likely use it. I guess it's a question of ethics, but if you're not trying to represent the car as something it's not to another buyer, I'd be "ok" with it. I personally find parting out or crushing a good car just because it doesn't have the proper paperwork to satisfy the DMV more un-ethical.

I wouldn't go buying as title from some random guy on ebay/cragslist though............

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&viewitem=&item=260068307405

[69bronzeT5]

Quote "I personally watched this car go through the shreader". Quote