News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Camaro Experts Build Coolest Car Ever: A 1969 Dodge Charger

Started by chargerman69, March 12, 2016, 10:19:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

JR

That interior is phenomenal. Very tastefully done.

Ive come around to liking the taillights as well.

I'd like to know how it handles on the new suspension/subframe. The GM stuff sounds a little cringeworthy, but I would assume it handles pretty well.

Didn't this build cost 600k or so?

I dig it.
70 Charger RT top bananna /68 Charger RT triple green


BrianShaughnessy

QuoteCamaro Experts Build Coolest Car Ever: A 1969 Dodge Charger

Well...  normally a 1969 Dodge Charger is the coolest car ever...    :2thumbs:

I'm just not so sure about this custom being the coolest ever   :Twocents:    There's some cool touches here and there but sometimes things are changed around just to say they're changed... not necessarily better.
Black Betty:  1969 Charger R/T - X9 440 six pack, TKO600 5 speed, 3.73 Dana 60.
Sinnamon:  1969 Charger R/T - T5 440, 727, 3.23 8 3/4 high school sweetheart.

Mike DC

   
GM guys.  They like to take the good bodylines & the motor, and change everything else that's signature Mopar because it's unfamiliar/uncomfortable to them. 

     

Charger_Fan

I honestly don't get the disdain some of you guys are showing toward this car. So some Cramaro guys did the work on this, so what? They probably are sick to death of working on the same 'ol thing. :lol:
This is a restomod, and as such, none of them ever end up looking like a stock Charger. Other than a few minor changes (a few interior pieces), I would be perfectly happy to own this car! IMO, most of the body mods are subtle, yet tasteful...the main body items that stray from stock Charger are the hood, rear spoiler & the Vette door handles. Yet, all of which are integrated tastefully to look very nice.

I guess we'd better get right over to Stevearino's Daytona build & start nitpicking the shit out of it, huh? :shruggy:

The Aquamax...yes, this bike spent 2 nights underwater one weekend. (Not my doing), but it gained the name, and has since become pseudo-famous. :)

myk

Quote from: Lennard on March 12, 2016, 12:09:55 PM
Quote from: myk on March 12, 2016, 12:02:58 PM
The car has painted mirrors, so what.  The rest of the car looks like a 2nd Gen Charger to me.   ::)
So what?  It's my opinion that it's ugly.

So what?  So what?  I guess you don't like 2nd Gen Chargers since that car's lines are 99% faithful to the original.  Do you prefer Volkswagen Beetles or Mazda Miatas, maybe?

Lennard


Kern Dog

Quote from: Mike DC (formerly miked) on March 13, 2016, 10:23:49 AM
   
GM guys.  They like to take the good bodylines & the motor, and change everything else that's signature Mopar because it's unfamiliar/uncomfortable to them. 

     

Great point made here.

DAY CLONA

Quote from: Mike DC (formerly miked) on March 13, 2016, 10:23:49 AM
   
GM guys.  They like to take the good bodylines & the motor, and change everything else that's signature Mopar because it's unfamiliar/uncomfortable to them. 

     




It looks more like they were striving to retain the Mopar attributes, a gen 3 HEMI mill, the body lines are accentuated or cleaned up at various points, not like they stuck a Camaro cowl induction hood on it, or a 1st gen Camaro spoiler on the front and rear, they actually seem to have considered the styling changes they were making, the interior is very well executed, personally a 70 Charger front end with the bumper molded and color keyed into the sheetmetal would have made for a more dramatic front end styling Que, rather than the gawky 69 grille, and factory painted 70 racing mirrors rather than the aftermarket ones used, but even if it had a GM LS series engine under the hood it still would be a well executed vehicle

And as far as suspension/braking upgrades, vintage Mopars need all the help they can get, even if it's brand X/aftermarket components

Mike   

Kern Dog

Guys who race Mopars on road courses like Mopar Mitch and Andy F feel different. They have clearly stated that there is no clear advantage to using an aftermarket front suspension & steering setup as compared to a well optimized stock torsion bar arrangement.

Mike DC

QuoteIt looks more like they were striving to retain the Mopar attributes, a gen 3 HEMI mill, the body lines are accentuated or cleaned up at various points, not like they stuck a Camaro cowl induction hood on it, or a 1st gen Camaro spoiler on the front and rear, they actually seem to have considered the styling changes they were making, the interior is very well executed, personally a 70 Charger front end with the bumper molded and color keyed into the sheetmetal would have made for a more dramatic front end styling Que, rather than the gawky 69 grille, and factory painted 70 racing mirrors rather than the aftermarket ones used, but even if it had a GM LS series engine under the hood it still would be a well executed vehicle

And as far as suspension/braking upgrades, vintage Mopars need all the help they can get, even if it's brand X/aftermarket components

Mike

     
That's what I said  - GM guys do like the Mopar Hemi engines & bodylines.  But the rest of the car can be GM/aftermarket as far as they're concerned.  

The result is nice but more generic than necessary.


The Camaro subframe is the LS motor of front suspensions.  Yeah, it works fine.  It's still disappointing to see it under a Charger.    


69wannabe

Looks cool to me but expensive!!!!! At least it's orange!!  :icon_smile_big:

bull

Painted mirrors and bumpers don't float my boat but as long as people don't change the basic design of the body I typically like mods like this. I do like the interior quite a bit on this one for some reason.

VegasCharger


Mike DC

  
QuoteWhat the hell were they thinking here........


Camaro subframe --> removable inner fenderwells.

RCCDrew

IMO there have been much better pro touring builds... :-\

VegasCharger

Quote from: Mike DC (formerly miked) on March 13, 2016, 11:59:14 PM
 
QuoteWhat the hell were they thinking here........


Camaro subframe --> removable inner fenderwells.

Okay that makes sense............... :cheers:

Not used to the GM thing.

Charger_Fan

Quote from: VegasCharger on March 13, 2016, 11:46:32 PM
What the hell were they thinking here........
Actually that was one of the ideas I really like. I mean, it would only mean a day's worth of stitch work with a welder to make it look more appealing to the purists...but what the hell, this car is never gonna appeal to the purists anyway, so screw it, go for some original thought! :2thumbs: And in the event there should ever be a mechanical failure extreme enough to warrant a cowl-forward surgery, never fear, zip-zip on a dozen-ish fasteners & you are done.

I genuinely like what they've done here.
I would choose to lose a couple inches of (wagon wheel) in favor of a bit more sidewall, and some adjustments on the interior, otherwise I am good to go!

The Aquamax...yes, this bike spent 2 nights underwater one weekend. (Not my doing), but it gained the name, and has since become pseudo-famous. :)

Mike DC

   
Meh.  If the subframe is rubber-mounted then the body flexes all over the place + gets extra weight.  If it's solid-mounted then it's still extra weight.


The bolt-on front clip isn't necessarily a bad idea but I wouldn't do it quite like that.   


Homerr

Cool, start lining up more Chargers to destroy.   :brickwall:

Abarth
Alfa Romeo
Aston Martin
Audi
Bentley
BMW
Bugatti
Cadillac
Chevrolet - check
Citroen
Dacia
Ferrari
Fiat
Ford
Honda
Hyundai
Infiniti
Jaguar
Kia
Lamborghini
Land Rover
Lexus
Lotus
Maserati
Mazda
Mclaren
Mercedes-Benz
Mini
Mitsubishi
Nissan
Noble
Pagani
Porsche
Radical
Renault
Rolls-Royce
Saab
Seat
Skoda
Smart
Subaru
Suzuki
Tesla
Toyota
Volkswagen
Volvo