I was under the impression the '66-'68 console lids were all the same. So is PG Classic: http://gallery.bcentral.com/GID5143510P5365030-B-Body/Transmission/1966-68-B-Body-Console-Door.aspx
If they are the same, where is the difference in the length made up?
ask Kenny aka Kab.
he's got both in his car and yeah i once noticed they're different too...
66/67 had no ribs they were flat and had a brushed alluminum look-MATT
Many 66 and 67 mopars came with the ribbed top plates, but not in chargers.
This is a 67 GTX.
Dan
Quote from: bull on December 13, 2006, 12:30:50 AM
I was under the impression the '66-'68 console lids were all the same.
If they are the same, where is the difference in the length made up?
No difference in stow box door length, only center trim style and surrounding paint color. The "extra length" in the full length 66 console is a separate plate which bolts onto the top of a bolt-on rear section.
Would this ribbed lid be found in any '66 B-Bodies?
The console door wouldn't be different but the shifter plate might. The ribbed style was certainly used in 67 but I don't know enough about 66s to say for sure. As Kab mentioned, the longer console on a Charger is actually a second piece (a rear console). The front shifter plate could be different on the earlier models if you're looking for a used one since the holes for the console mounted vacuum gauge may have been drilled. This was not an option in 68 but the top has the locations marked on the back.
Troy
Quote from: bull on December 13, 2006, 09:06:58 AM
Would this ribbed lid be found in any '66 B-Bodies?
Originally? Not as far as I have seen. I did know of a silver 66 with the short console transplanted from a 68 complete with ribbed top plates, years ago. It's been a lot of years since I last saw it.
The Console shell in my car is out of a 68 Charger and the top plates I had put on it where out of a 66 Satellite. They worked GREAT! No worries! It will work!
Quote from: kab69440 on December 13, 2006, 11:49:08 PM
Quote from: bull on December 13, 2006, 09:06:58 AM
Would this ribbed lid be found in any '66 B-Bodies?
Originally? Not as far as I have seen. I did know of a silver 66 with the short console transplanted from a 68 complete with ribbed top plates, years ago. It's been a lot of years since I last saw it.
But Dan (8WHEELER) said above that the ribbed lid was used on
some B-body Mopars in '66-'67 and I think he's right. I remember seeing one on a Fury which I think was a '67.
67? Yes. 66? No, not that I have seen. The answer was directed specifically at 66 cars, which is what you asked... Sorry for the confusion. The only original style top plates I know of for 66 cars are the smooth brushed aluminum ones. Something else to consider, on most of the Chargers, the stow box door didn't even exist. The hole was covered with a plate for mounting an armrest, which flipped up for access to the stow box.
It's easily changed out to the 2nd gen style though. Four screws and away you go. (provided you have a 2nd gen door to put in its place of course)
Don't forget about removing the two angle brackets, and you will also need to drill the holes for the door hinge and come up with your own sheetmetal for the screws to go into. The stock screw strip from a 2nd gen will not fit the 66-67 consoles, as they are reinforced differently.
That's a pretty cool setup. I wouldn't mind having something like that in my '68. Those ribs are a PITA once the pot metal starts rusting. Something smooth would be much easier to restore I bet.
Love the 1st gen ints, the full leangth console with dual armrests and the one piece door panels and headliner ROCK! Too bad they cheaped out for the big redesign...
I remember reading that by goin with a conventional back seat they saved $28.oo per car...
would really love this interior in my car!
Kab's '678970 is gonna be so sweet! :yesnod:
(wish he'd get goin on the project... ;) )
Quote from: Brock Samson on December 14, 2006, 02:56:46 PM
Love the 1st gen ints, the full leangth console with dual armrests and the one piece door panels and headliner ROCK! Too bad they cheaped out for the big redesign...
I remember reading that by goin with a conventional back seat they saved $28.oo per car...
would really love this interior in my car!
Yea, but when demand goes up by 500% you gotta move your tail (no offense to the first gen guys).
well i guess goin with a total redesign was risk enuff and expensive too, remember what they said about they hadn't concidered a follow on Charger and assumed the 2nd gen would just be a fast backed Coronet...
the styling buck that was hidden floored everyone...
...still does... if the word "Classic" ever applied to a muscle car the Charger is it!
:yesnod:
this car is still for sale by the way..
I like the first gen seats and console as much as the next guy, but what about dating :ahum: :ahum:
not a hole lot of room back there, yes the seats fold down, but I would like a regular back seat for that :yesnod: :yesnod: :icon_smile_big:
Dan
Quote from: 8WHEELER on December 14, 2006, 05:40:39 PM
I like the first gen seats and console as much as the next guy, but what about dating :ahum: :ahum:
not a hole lot of room back there, yes the seats fold down, but I would like a regular back seat for that :yesnod: :yesnod: :icon_smile_big:
Dan
Good point.
Quote from: Brock Samson on December 14, 2006, 02:56:46 PM
I remember reading that by goin with a conventional back seat they saved $28.oo per car...
would really love this interior in my car!
Well, start collecting the pieces and putting them in. In fact, if you are serious about the conversion, I have a crapload of duplicate parts from buying parts in lot form.
And as for 8wheeler's concern about not being able to "get any" in a 1st Gen... with the seats folded down, can you honestly say there are more possibilities on a stock 2nd gen backseat than there are with all that room in the cargo area of a 66? I'm not seeing it,man... :icon_smile_big:
Quote from: kab69440 on December 14, 2006, 09:11:48 PM
Quote from: Brock Samson on December 14, 2006, 02:56:46 PM
I remember reading that by goin with a conventional back seat they saved $28.oo per car...
would really love this interior in my car!
Well, start collecting the pieces and putting them in. In fact, if you are serious about the conversion, I have a crapload of duplicate parts from buying parts in lot form.
And as for 8wheeler's concern about not being able to "get any" in a 1st Gen... with the seats folded down, can you honestly say there are more possibilities on a stock 2nd gen backseat than there are with all that room in the cargo area of a 66? I'm not seeing it,man... :icon_smile_big:
I know what you are saying, trust me I know how much room there is in the back of a 1st gen. But you are
in a fish bowl back there, anybody that comes anywhere close can see just about everything, that was my point.
2nd gen, back seats are lower, fold the front seat foward much better :yesnod: :yesnod:
Dan
I don't know. I've used the front and back seats of both generations and I much prefer the back of the 66-67 for those midnight encounters.