WIW? ... 1974 Charger 318, auto

[johnnyseville]

My friend it going down to look at one this weekend, supposedly the car is a survivor, 2nd owner, no rust, all original body panels, 76K, been sitting in a garage for a while.  Just a run of the mill Charger.  No idea what shape it is really in, no pics yet.  He has the idea of picking it up and flipping it.  He is excellent at body and paint work, so if it needed, that would be no problem, but don't think he want to get involved with major stuff since he does not have the time.   Throw some numbers out.   I know the description is kind of sketchy, but that's  all he knows so far. 

[TruckDriver]

$3,000 to $4,000 if it is a basic low or no option charger, and it is very solid, and is basically a turn key car.

[skip68]

$2,500 or so.  Hard to say without pictures and more details.   

[1974dodgecharger]

What skip said 

[TruckDriver]

Depends on too, where he is talking. In the rust free states, $2,500 might be the norm, but in the snow states, you will never get a running rust free Charger base model under $3,000., specially, with that low mileage on it. A car like that here in Wisconsin is a easy $4 to 5,000 car or more.  

[greenpigs]

I think $4500 even if it was rust free is about the limit as nearly everyone wants a 440.

[chargd72]

It seems that 3rd Gens are picking up more $ in the unrestored state.  Unfortunately, they only bring in a few extra Ks when they are finished.  I got my 72 a few years back completely disasembled, 318, auto non running car for close to what some are saying you can get for that turn key 74.  Most of the body was in great shape but I have yet to see any similar 72 in the same shape go for any cheaper. 

[super77se]

they are around here for 2 to 5 K but everyone has their own idea of what they are worth. without any pics i would say the lower end of the scale...

[johnnyseville]

Never compared prices on these, though I like the body lines, and maybe one day will pick one up, if it was really nice, so have no clue as to their value.  All I know is it below the 2nd generation Chargers, all being equal.  I will pass this info on to him.  Maybe he is under the misconception they are worth more than they really are, since he said he was hoping to flip it for 2-3 times his cost with minor reconditioning.  Personally with a 318, I don't think so.   Thanks to all for your opinions.  

[ACUDANUT]

I can't help but to add my 2 cents.  If it was a 71/72 it would be worth looking into

[brigond]

wow those are big price differences from what I've seen . check out nada guide  pricing for this car .

[brigond]

I also have a 2012 classic car price guide at home . Ill check that out and post it when I get a chance.

[greenpigs]

wow those are big price differences from what I've seen . check out nada guide  pricing for this car .

I think most of us are talking about REAL prices paid for the Charger in question.

[VegasCharger]

3rd gen Chargers are not really best for flipping IMO. They are for those who want one to keep. By the resto threads I've seen on here people have started with some of the most rusted out Chargers. Evidence was myself trying to sell a rust free '73 SE 360 8 3/4 runs and drives car. Needed paint and completed restoration. I had down to $2500.00 at one point and no luck. Decided to part it out. I'm at $900.00 with parts sold on it to this point and I still have the drive train, complete interior, all body panels, both bumpers/grilles/tail lights and most of the bright wear. I will 3X my money doing it this way because you can definately sell parts for these cars but not as a whole complete car. At least in my experience.

Good luck on your quest 

[Daytona R/T SE]

Here's how the value stacks up on the 71-74 Chargers:


1971...






1972...



















































































































1973/1974.

[greenpigs]

See what?

Just blank after the model year.

[Fitz73Chrgr]

See what?

Just blank after the model year.

He's indicating that 71/72 Chargers are desirable and 73/74 are not.  In his opinion anyway.   

[Daytona R/T SE]

See what?

Just blank after the model year.

He's indicating that 71/72 Chargers are desirable and 73/74 are not.  In his opinion anyway.  

Wrong.

I was indicating that all else being equal (condition,etc)1973 and 1974 Chargers sell for less money than 1971 and 1972 Chargers. Not my opinion, just an observation.

[brigond]

See what?

Just blank after the model year.

He's indicating that 71/72 Chargers are desirable and 73/74 are not.  In his opinion anyway.   

Wrong.

I was indicating that all else being equal (condition,etc)1973 and 1974 Chargers sell for less money than 1971 and 1972 Chargers. Not my opinion, just an observation.

Hmmm. This is something that  I'm having trouble with.  After recently purchasing a 71, just for that reason. (71,72, hold value better.)  I've learned that 71 and 72 hold value better because they marked the ending of the muscle car era. I understand this but I don't agree with the logic. It is what it is though. I think that in the future, especially as they become more scarce, the 73 and above will be looked at in a better light. To me these body styles are all similar and beautiful. If I had some extra cash laying around ( and the space ) I would buy as many 73 and 74's as I could. If they are as cheap as this thread has indicated.  I think they are a bargan. Recently, when I was looking for a 1971 3rd gen, I didn't find the prices to be this low as I came accross the later chargers. If I had found a mint  nicely optiond 73 or 74 for 9 or ten grand I probably would have grabbed it.

[johnnyseville]

It seems 1971 was the last year of the performance era that started in the mid 60's, though I think in reality 1969 may have been for most brands. 

[ACUDANUT]

71 R/T and 72 Rallyes are theee ones to own.