News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

correct size fuel line for H coded 383 engine

Started by resq302, January 31, 2006, 12:25:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

resq302

I am in the process of replacing all of the fuel and brake lines with stainless steel ones from The Right Stuff. They have 3 different sized fuel lines for my 69 Charger. Which size fuel line would be correct for a 383 High Perf H coded engine? 5/16" or 3/8"?

Thanks for the help.

Brian
Brian
1969 Dodge Charger (factory 4 speed, H code 383 engine,  AACA Senior winner, 2008 Concours d'Elegance participant, 2009 Concours d'Elegance award winner)
1970 Challenger Convert. factory #'s matching red inter. w/ white body.  318 car built 9/28/69 (AACA Senior winner)
1969 Plymough GTX convertible - original sheet metal, #'s matching drivetrain, T3 Honey Bronze, 1 of 701 produced, 1 of 362 with 440 4 bbl - auto

beenaround

5/16 but most people ungrade to the 3/8's as it won't hurt anything and if you ever drop a 440 in you will be all set.the 3/8 line was only used with 440's and hemi's.

Just 6T9 CHGR

:iagree:
I wouldnt use the SS stuff though..... Hard to seal the brake lines.
Stick with the regular stuff.  My 36+ year old stuff looked pretty good when I changed it....
Chris' '69 Charger R/T


694spdRT

Quote from: Just 6T9_CHGR.... on January 31, 2006, 07:44:48 PM
:iagree:
I wouldnt use the SS stuff though..... Hard to seal the brake lines.
Stick with the regular stuff.  My 36+ year old stuff looked pretty good when I changed it....

I have to agree on the stainless comment. I used the stainless lines and it was a real pain getting them to quit leaking. It looks good now but, for how I use the car the original steel would have done fine...oh well.
1968 Charger 383 auto
1969 Charger R/T 440 4 speed
1970 Charger 500 440 auto
1972 Challenger 318
1976 W200 Club Cab 4x4 400 auto 
1978 Ramcharger 360 auto
2001 Durango SLT 4.7L (daily driver)
2005 Ram 2500 4x4 Big Horn Cummins Diesel 6 speed
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 5.7 Hemi

8WHEELER

Great,  ''note to self, send back the big $$ Stainless brakes lines'' ''and take them off the car they are on''

Never heard the problems with the brake lines before  :rotz:  have them on my blue car that is not on the road yet.
And bought the full set for my wife's gold Charger, are they that bad??

Dan
74 Dart Sport 360, just for added fun.

694spdRT

Dan,

When I first installed the Stainless lines I checked everything to make sure it was tight and began bleeding the lines. I had leaks everywhere but, the front lines were the worst. Nearly every fitting was dripping and I had to tighten some to the point I was afraid of stripping the treads or fitting right off.

It never really occurred to me the stainless was causing the problem until I heard a few comment on the same problem.  They did seal up eventually after several rounds of tightening.
1968 Charger 383 auto
1969 Charger R/T 440 4 speed
1970 Charger 500 440 auto
1972 Challenger 318
1976 W200 Club Cab 4x4 400 auto 
1978 Ramcharger 360 auto
2001 Durango SLT 4.7L (daily driver)
2005 Ram 2500 4x4 Big Horn Cummins Diesel 6 speed
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 5.7 Hemi

chargerbr549

On the fuel line size issue i'm not 100 percent sure, but in 69 on the Charger the only engine that got a 3/8" body fuel line was the Hemi, the 440 got the 5/16" line with a 1/4" return line and it also had that funky vapor seperator similiar to the Hemi's and I think the 383 had the 5/16 line only with no return line and no vapor seperator and here's the weird thing the fuel tank sending unit was 3/8" on the Hemi and 440 only and 5/16" on the rest of the engines. My 69 R/T 440 came that way and they just used a rubber fuel line to connect the two different sized lines at the fuel tank,  I think in 70 that all changed where 440's and Hemi's both got the 3/8" body fuel line. I think they finally realized that the 5/16" line was way to small for a strong street motor.

8WHEELER

Quote from: 694spdRT on February 01, 2006, 01:00:26 AM
Dan,

When I first installed the Stainless lines I checked everything to make sure it was tight and began bleeding the lines. I had leaks everywhere but, the front lines were the worst. Nearly every fitting was dripping and I had to tighten some to the point I was afraid of stripping the treads or fitting right off.

It never really occurred to me the stainless was causing the problem until I heard a few comment on the same problem.  They did seal up eventually after several rounds of tightening.


OK Thanks, I will leave them on until I have two much trouble, they do look sweet.

Dan
74 Dart Sport 360, just for added fun.

Chryco Psycho

SS fuel ines are OK as there is hose at both ends , the brakelines can be tough to seal , the tube is Just too hard to bend & seal to the flare fittings

resq302

I installed the stainless brake lines and fuel lines on my 70 El Camino SS 396 and we had no problems with them.  Granted,  I tried the trick of tightening a bit then backing off and retightening again and so far so good.
Brian
1969 Dodge Charger (factory 4 speed, H code 383 engine,  AACA Senior winner, 2008 Concours d'Elegance participant, 2009 Concours d'Elegance award winner)
1970 Challenger Convert. factory #'s matching red inter. w/ white body.  318 car built 9/28/69 (AACA Senior winner)
1969 Plymough GTX convertible - original sheet metal, #'s matching drivetrain, T3 Honey Bronze, 1 of 701 produced, 1 of 362 with 440 4 bbl - auto

Steve P.

We used SS lines in the power house for remote oiling and gauges to the console rooms. The one trick I know of is to seat the fittings wet. Then back them off and seat them again. We had very few leaks using this method. As far as bending goes,,,, the more you do---- the better you get at it.. I will tell you that some of the guys on the other shift made up some NEW four letter words trying to make pretty bends...   :devil:  They thought they were going to make bends with their bare hands and fingers!! Hahahaha....   NOPE.....  The right tool for the job, period..... ;)
Steve P.
Holiday, Florida