News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

What's the farthest you've seen a Charger torn down for resto?

Started by bull, January 19, 2013, 03:28:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

bull

Quote from: stripedelete on January 20, 2013, 03:41:32 PM
Quote from: Mytur Binsdirti on January 19, 2013, 08:01:13 PM
Quote from: bull on January 19, 2013, 03:28:56 PM
Recently saw this car being torn down by the Smith Bros. and as far as I can recall it's about as gone as any I've seen. Yet they're going to bring it back. Have any of you seen one go farther than this one?


OK, what's so special about that car that warrants a restoration of such magnitude; Hemi car, 500, Daytona?

Wow, you read my mind on that one.  Either pretty special or they got it for free.

It's a valid point but one I no longer subscribe to depending on the initial cost of the car. Granted, I probably don't have the means to do something like this but I no longer believe ANY 2nd gen Chargers should be scrapped unless most of the subframe metal is shot. When I think about mine, it needed a driver's quarter panel, the Dutchman panel, the speaker tray, the rear valance and corners, the lower passenger's quarter and the driver's outer wheel house. I paid $5,000 for it. Assuming this one fetched $1,000 or less, how much of the rest of the sheetmetal can you get for the extra $4,000? Maybe not quite all you need but I bet it's close. Be that as it may, it's a Charger and I think it should be saved for that reason alone.

hemi68charger

Quote from: Mytur Binsdirti on January 20, 2013, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Indygenerallee on January 19, 2013, 10:27:52 PM
most had a variance of up to 1/4" when they were built.

Do you really think that they were that close?   :lol:

The gaps on my rear valance to end caps on my former '68 Hemi Charger R/T was 1/8" on one side and 1/16" on the other. I made sure the guy doing the panel replacement measured it out exactly..   :smilielol:  I didn't want anything symmetrical if MaMopar couldn't do it....
Troy
'69 Charger Daytona 440 auto 4.10 Dana ( now 426 HEMI )
'70 Superbird 426 Hemi auto: Lindsley Bonneville Salt Flat world record holder (220.2mph)
Houston Mopar Club Connection

Patronus

I found a penny wedged into the Dutchmen/quarter seam. Looked like it had been used a few times as a shim. Sure would've been crazy to watch em welded up.
'73 Cuda 340 5spd RMS
'69 Charger 383 "Luci"
'08 CRF 450r
'12.5 450SX FE

Mike DC

Honestly I don't care about saving every old Charger as much as I used to.

I wanna see these cars survive as much as anyone else.  But IMHO reproduction parts & unibodies are more crucial to that goal than saving every rusty hulk.  A bare shell, even a rust-free one, is still a long expensive distance from a complete car. 

bull

Regardless of what engine combo they came with there's so many directions you can go these days I think it's a shame to junk them anymore. How much did that restomod '62 Corvette go for on Barrett? $350k? Probably very little of it was made in 1962.

Mike DC

 
The parts on the car don't all have to be made in the 1960s but they do have to be there. 

Crushing a nicely restored Charger is a real shame by our logic (including mine).  So is it an equal crime to crush a rusty Charger hulk + $25k worth of repro Charger parts?  What about leaving the rusty hulk alone and just not buying $25k worth of new repro parts, is that almost as bad?

What if somebody started buying complete restored cars and parting them out for a profit?  People would think that was a crime too.  But why, exactly?  Nothing is going to waste and in fact it might cause more cars to be restored in total.



I'm just rhetorically provoking thoughts here.  In this hobby we treat an assembled restored car differently than we treat the pieces individually.  Even when the stuff removed from a car is purely bolt-ons and nothing is hacked or damaged in the process.


Indygenerallee

I decided to build one because it was easier for myself as I know how to do all the work plus spending the money over a period of time makes it easier to afford and when it's all said and done I know what is behind every panel and every bolt. If you can afford to go buy a nice $30,000 Charger go for it but personally I get a lot of satisfaction out of doing it myself, to each their own.  :2thumbs:
Sold my Charger unfortunately....never got it finished.

charger_fan_4ever

Mine got as much metal replaced as the car posted. Mind you we did one panel at a time and had it braced, so it wouldn't twist.

I'm with Indy.

Always wanted one didn't have 30-40k for a done car. Paid $5k for a project. Almost in primer and i've got about $23k tied up in it including mostly brand new interior. I know there is not 1 spec of rust to be found on the car all metal :)

Thing is mist "driver" projects for 10-15k really need as much metal work as the projects in boxes. Actually more work as you have to cut threw all the years of bondo and hack repairs.

As long as the frame rails and unibody are solid save it if you can. If the springs are threw the trunk and the rails all rotted let her die unless its a hem/500/ect.

You want bad look at the east coast riverbank daytona. There is nothing left,but a restoration is in the planning....





JB400

Just out of pure curiosity, what happened to just replacing one or two pieces at one particular time?  I can understand removing some parts to fix another area, but I'm halfway under the impression that some people don't know when to stop.  Granted, there are cars that have been extreme rust buckets with not much holding them together, but in other cases, cars that seem to need only a couple patch panels get torn down to nothing recognizable.  I'll use the XP Hemi as an example.  I do recognize that car was built so AMD could market their panels, but I didn't see no need of completely dismantling it down to nothing.  I guess I'm one of the lucky ones with a low rust car, but I think I'd rather replace one part at one particular time compared to getting sawzall happy and end up with a pile of scrap metal and a dream.  I'm under the impression that replacing one part at a time would help keep the car within factory building specs.  Some of you guys aren't using a jig or anything to ensure that will remain true.  Hope some of you took plenty of measurements and photographs.

I'm always open to different building techniques, that's why I ask. :popcrn:


Charger-Bodie

Quote from: bull on January 22, 2013, 03:55:45 PM
Quote from: Homerr on January 22, 2013, 12:11:15 PM
SGTPaul over at FBBO had his '68 down to not much at one point.

http://www.forbbodiesonly.com/moparforum/showthread.php?15210-SGTPaul%E2%80%99s-68-Charger-R-T-project&p=180826&viewfull=1#post180826

I think we have a winner. :o

Yep. That ones even worse than mine. There is no way Id ever take it that far apart at one time. You need to keep it as together as you can as to keep the placement in control.
68 Charger R/t white with black v/t and red tailstripe. 440 4 speed ,black interior
68 383 auto with a/c and power windows. Now 440 4 speed jj1 gold black interior .
My Charger is a hybrid car, it burns gas and rubber............

moparstuart

Quote from: bull on January 22, 2013, 03:55:45 PM
Quote from: Homerr on January 22, 2013, 12:11:15 PM
SGTPaul over at FBBO had his '68 down to not much at one point.

http://www.forbbodiesonly.com/moparforum/showthread.php?15210-SGTPaul%E2%80%99s-68-Charger-R-T-project&p=180826&viewfull=1#post180826

I think we have a winner. :o
yup matts car was bad , also you should see donnies thread  on a 69 GTX and 69 satellite hes doing
both those cars are as bad as matts car .
                                http://www.forbbodiesonly.com/moparforum/showthread.php?4258-Donny-s-1969-GTX&highlight=donnie
 
GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE

Indygenerallee

QuoteJust out of pure curiosity, what happened to just replacing one or two pieces at one particular time?  I can understand removing some parts to fix another area, but I'm halfway under the impression that some people don't know when to stop.  Granted, there are cars that have been extreme rust buckets with not much holding them together, but in other cases, cars that seem to need only a couple patch panels get torn down to nothing recognizable.  I'll use the XP Hemi as an example.  I do recognize that car was built so AMD could market their panels, but I didn't see no need of completely dismantling it down to nothing.  I guess I'm one of the lucky ones with a low rust car, but I think I'd rather replace one part at one particular time compared to getting sawzall happy and end up with a pile of scrap metal and a dream.  I'm under the impression that replacing one part at a time would help keep the car within factory building specs.  Some of you guys aren't using a jig or anything to ensure that will remain true.  Hope some of you took plenty of measurements and photographs.

I'm always open to different building techniques, that's why I ask

For starters you may think you have a rust free car until you start into it, then the ugly rust monster rears it's head, You have to understand rust starts from the backside and works through the panel, most framerails will look great until you get the trunk pan out and to do that if your doing a one piece trunk floor you have to remove the tail light panel,
It is far easier IMO to remove all the bad and look at what you have left media blast and then start re-assembly, I don't know why everyone thinks these cars had "exacting" tolerances when they were way, way off when built new! My 69 was complete and had just a small amount of rust around the rear wheel wells and a couple pin holes starting in the rear window corners but looking at the backside of the panel was a different story!
Sold my Charger unfortunately....never got it finished.

bull

Quote from: charger_fan_4ever on January 21, 2013, 11:26:48 PM
I know there is not 1 spec of rust to be found on the car all metal :)

Really? Are you a gambling man? :D

RallyeMike

QuoteQuote from: bull on Yesterday at 11:55:45 AM
Quote from: Homerr on Yesterday at 08:11:15 AM
SGTPaul over at FBBO had his '68 down to not much at one point.

http://www.forbbodiesonly.com/moparforum/showthread.php?15210-SGTPaul%E2%80%99s-68-Charger-R-T-project&p=180826&viewfull=1#post180826

I think we have a winner. Shocked

Yep. That ones even worse than mine. There is no way Id ever take it that far apart at one time. You need to keep it as together as you can as to keep the placement in control.

Holy smokes. I agree. The care it would take to keep everything aligned would be challenging to say the least.

The rust bucket jobs that people are taking on today are so far beyond what I ever imagined would be done. IT's actually pretty impressive, but it's hard to call it the same car that it was at one point.
1969 Charger 500 #232008
1972 Charger, Grand Sport #41
1973 Charger "T/A"

Drive as fast as you want to on a public road! Click here for info: http://www.sscc.us/


charger_fan_4ever

Quote from: bull on January 22, 2013, 07:04:09 PM
Quote from: charger_fan_4ever on January 21, 2013, 11:26:48 PM
I know there is not 1 spec of rust to be found on the car all metal :)

Really? Are you a gambling man? :D

Ok i lied as i wont be blasting INSIDE the front frame rails in the section under the hood then :P

BlueSS454

I would have torn mine down that far if the AMD panels were available when I had it apart.  FWIW, I had my 70 Chevelle convertible cut in half this time 2 years ago and apart even farther than that.  The only difference is, I replaced major pieces to build off of first instead of having it all out at he same time.



Tom Rightler

DC_1

Yep, a fair bit of dedication required to go to that level!

HeavyFuel

Quote from: Indygenerallee on January 22, 2013, 04:46:17 PM
QuoteJust out of pure curiosity, what happened to just replacing one or two pieces at one particular time?  I can understand removing some parts to fix another area, but I'm halfway under the impression that some people don't know when to stop.  Granted, there are cars that have been extreme rust buckets with not much holding them together, but in other cases, cars that seem to need only a couple patch panels get torn down to nothing recognizable.  I'll use the XP Hemi as an example.  I do recognize that car was built so AMD could market their panels, but I didn't see no need of completely dismantling it down to nothing.  I guess I'm one of the lucky ones with a low rust car, but I think I'd rather replace one part at one particular time compared to getting sawzall happy and end up with a pile of scrap metal and a dream.  I'm under the impression that replacing one part at a time would help keep the car within factory building specs.  Some of you guys aren't using a jig or anything to ensure that will remain true.  Hope some of you took plenty of measurements and photographs.

I'm always open to different building techniques, that's why I ask

For starters you may think you have a rust free car until you start into it, then the ugly rust monster rears it's head, You have to understand rust starts from the backside and works through the panel, most framerails will look great until you get the trunk pan out and to do that if your doing a one piece trunk floor you have to remove the tail light panel,
It is far easier IMO to remove all the bad and look at what you have left media blast and then start re-assembly, I don't know why everyone thinks these cars had "exacting" tolerances when they were way, way off when built new! My 69 was complete and had just a small amount of rust around the rear wheel wells and a couple pin holes starting in the rear window corners but looking at the backside of the panel was a different story!
Looking at some of these 'cars' make me appreciate the shape mine was in when the resto started.

Is mine 100% rust free now?   I doubt it......the bill for my body/paint was $7K.


But I think it's good enough.  Considering my cars future is in somewhat of a controlled environment (heated garage, no driving in the rain, etc.).............even with a little rust hiding somewhere it will outlast me on this planet.

Hell, I'm 51....if the thing holds together for 15 years I'm golden. :yesnod:  

Mike DC

 
IMHO perfectionism sometimes plays a role in causing big sheetmetal teardowns. 

Some guys will to tear half the sheetmetal off a car to fix rust holes that could have been patched without such extreme hacking.  Non-body guys sometimes look at it in black & white terms where a rust area is either "fixed RIGHT" (read: entire panel replaced) or is isn't. 


IMHO there isn't enough appreciation for the subtle damage & changes that are caused every time a weld-on panel gets replaced.  Things are never 100% the same no matter how professionally the job is done.   Sometimes the "imperfections" of cut & patched areas hurt the unibody less than replacing the whole panel.


Mytur Binsdirti

Theoretically, you can restore a care around a door hinge and not every rusty 318 piece of junk should be "restored" (ahem). The hobby does need parts cars.