News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Can anyone tell me more about the 1950's US Flying Saucer program

Started by XH29N0G, January 15, 2013, 07:29:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Drache

Quote from: stripedelete on January 17, 2013, 06:53:55 PM
Yep.  We beat the Russians to the moon because we got more Nazi's than they did.

The US went to the moon on Nazi Rockets and Canadian Engineering  :nana:
Dart
Racing
Ass
Chasing
Hellion
Extraordinaire

stripedelete

Quote from: Drache on January 17, 2013, 07:30:45 PM
Quote from: stripedelete on January 17, 2013, 06:53:55 PM
Yep.  We beat the Russians to the moon because we got more Nazi's than they did.

The US went to the moon on Nazi Rockets and Canadian Engineering  :nana:

...... and only a couple decades after making the world safe for Canadian Engineers.   :icon_smile_big:

b5blue

Quote from: mauve66 on January 17, 2013, 06:39:29 PM
i always think of MIGs when i see a shape like that, way ahead of the game for 58, those germans were pretty close to having their own jets/bombers when WW2 came to an end
i know they actually had them but with limited use and the bomber they were building would of reached the US
Just to set the record straight the Britt's were the pioneering force on jet turbine engines first and after the war freely shared with USSR. The MIG was built around a carbon copy of what they were shown!
  Also, as early as WW1 the Germans had plans to bomb the east coast of the USA with Zeppelins and U Boats!   

XH29N0G

So I hear talk of Canadians, Brits, and Germans.  What about Romans.  I thought it was their horses that determined the width of our rockets.

See sites like http://www.rocketryforum.com/archive/index.php/t-22631.html .... :2thumbs:
Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

Drache

Quote from: XH29N0G on January 17, 2013, 08:24:53 PM
So I hear talk of Canadians, Brits, and Germans.  What about Romans.  I thought it was their horses that determined the width of our rockets.

See sites like http://www.rocketryforum.com/archive/index.php/t-22631.html .... :2thumbs:

TECHNICALLY yes ONLY because it was easier to ship a rocket by rail than by road.
Dart
Racing
Ass
Chasing
Hellion
Extraordinaire

mauve66

Quote from: b5blue on January 17, 2013, 08:14:04 PM
Quote from: mauve66 on January 17, 2013, 06:39:29 PM
i always think of MIGs when i see a shape like that, way ahead of the game for 58, those germans were pretty close to having their own jets/bombers when WW2 came to an end
i know they actually had them but with limited use and the bomber they were building would of reached the US
Just to set the record straight the Britt's were the pioneering force on jet turbine engines first and after the war freely shared with USSR. The MIG was built around a carbon copy of what they were shown!
  Also, as early as WW1 the Germans had plans to bomb the east coast of the USA with Zeppelins and U Boats!   

they may have been a pioneering force but its the germans who had the plane up and those same scientists did come over here to develop the nasa rockets
Robert-Las Vegas, NV

NEEDS:
body work
paint - mauve and black
powder coat wheels - mauve and black
total wiring
PW
PDLKS
Tint
trim
engine - 520/540, eddy heads, 6pak
alignment

XH29N0G

Knew someone who recently passed away who worked with Von Braun in 1947.....

Then we got our time as world leaders in science and technology.

:yesnod:
Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....