ban

[68X426]

I think some one is just fishing for an argument 

He's likely from Kentucky. Make of that what you want. 

[Fred]

I think some one is just fishing for an argument  

He's likely from Kentucky. Make of that what you want.  

There once was a man from Kentucky,
who everyone thought was quite yucky,
he played with his d**k and proceeded to lick
on the ticks that he plucked from a ducky.

[UH60L]

Since I have absolutely no idea what the original topic is about,  I'll go with the chocolate.  Anyone else put Nesquik and Hersheys together in their chocolate milk?

Sounds like an auction at Barrett-Jackson......too rich for my blood!  

[Charger454]

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95899.0.html


he removed what was originally posted

No I didn't. 1HotDaytona moved it. He mistook it as a trolling effort. Hindsight is 20/20 when the TROLL corrects you isn't it? That's ok though my friend. No harm...unlike the intent of your post.

[Charger454]

I think some one is just fishing for an argument  

He's likely from Kentucky. Make of that what you want.  

There once was a man from Kentucky,
who everyone thought was quite yucky,
he played with his d**k and proceeded to lick
on the ticks that he plucked from a ducky.

And I'm the one up for baning?

[AKcharger]

I love when threads go wildly off-base...now to do my part!

[bull]

The main difference between a Chevy Impala and a 68 Charger is that the Impala looks like a big pile of steaming dog puke.

[Benji]

I put one teaspoon of Hershey's Chocolate syrup, one teaspoon of sugar, one teaspoon of heavy whipping cream and one squirt of whipped cream in my morning coffee then I have a homemade chocolate chip oatmeal cookie or two (or three!)

Benji

[Charger454]

The main difference between a Chevy Impala and a 68 Charger is that the Impala looks like a big pile of steaming dog puke.

Interesting statement. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_Charger_(B-body)
"The 1968 model year Charger sales increased to 96,100..."

http://www.chevylegends.com/forum/showthread.php?180-Impala-History
"Redesigned again in 1965, the Impala set an all-time industry annual sales record of more than 1 million units in the U.S., which has never been bettered."

[TheGhost]

Quote the statistics all you want, there isn't a Chevy made after 1960 that I would want to own.

If you are really into statistics, however, I could go find some racing statistics.  I understand Chevy was always a bit lacking in that department, at least until they could get the rules changed to their favor...

[Charger454]

you said the 67-68 GTO's possibly inspiring the 68-70 recessed rear window. but the 67 and 68 gto's are two tottally different body styles.
the impalla is a slow fat piece of shit and the 68 charger is a muscle car.
and who cares about camaros. their everywhere. what is a camaro, the name. we know what a cuda is. a bad f'n fish. i seen them
that's my  on the legitimate discussion
luke

"...you said the 67-68 GTO's possibly inspiring the 68-70 recessed rear window."
Yeah, and it looks like I'm not the only one...
On the roof, a "flying buttress" was added to give the rear window area a look similar to that of the 1966-67 Pontiac GTO.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_Charger_(B-body)

"...but the 67 and 68 gto's are two tottally different body styles."
Yup, my bad. Had a brain fart.

"the impalla is a slow fat piece of shit..."
Well that was certainly offensive. Just wait until you read my response to YOUR muscle car. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg0ViQdjd6I

"...the 68 charger is a muscle car."
See attached pic. I suppose everything with factory white walls and hubcaps represent muscle. Even if it does come out with a rehashed version of the 1965 Biscayne's tailights...otherwise known as, the cheap Impala. Yeah, I know...kinda shitty statement. But so was yours. lol  If you can't take it, don't dish it out.

"...and who cares about camaros. their everywhere."
I wonder why?

"...what is a camaro, the name"
French slang for "friend".

"...we know what a cuda is. a bad f'n fish"
Not so fast Flash. As a diver, I can attest to you that a Barracuda is not a ferocious beast. Yet a simply curious creature.

Now look, I own a Charger. So quit getting all worked up. I'm not hating. Your just getting all butt-hurt over my simple statement about similarities and it hurts your soul. Your momma should have raised you to have thicker skin.

[BananaDan]

There once was a man from Kentucky,
who everyone thought was quite yucky,
he played with his d**k and proceeded to lick
on the ticks that he plucked from a ducky.

Did someone say duck?

[cdr]

There once was a man from Kentucky,
who everyone thought was quite yucky,
he played with his d**k and proceeded to lick
on the ticks that he plucked from a ducky.

Did someone say duck?

[Indygenerallee]

You startin' trouble again Charlie!!! 

[cdr]

You startin' trouble again Charlie!!! 

apparently

[lukedukem]

you said the 67-68 GTO's possibly inspiring the 68-70 recessed rear window. but the 67 and 68 gto's are two tottally different body styles.
the impalla is a slow fat piece of shit and the 68 charger is a muscle car.
and who cares about camaros. their everywhere. what is a camaro, the name. we know what a cuda is. a bad f'n fish. i seen them
that's my  on the legitimate discussion
luke

"...you said the 67-68 GTO's possibly inspiring the 68-70 recessed rear window."
Yeah, and it looks like I'm not the only one...
On the roof, a "flying buttress" was added to give the rear window area a look similar to that of the 1966-67 Pontiac GTO.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_Charger_(B-body)

"...but the 67 and 68 gto's are two tottally different body styles."
Yup, my bad. Had a brain fart.

"the impalla is a slow fat piece of shit..."
Well that was certainly offensive. Just wait until you read my response to YOUR muscle car. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg0ViQdjd6I

"...the 68 charger is a muscle car."
See attached pic. I suppose everything with factory white walls and hubcaps represent muscle. Even if it does come out with a rehashed version of the 1965 Biscayne's tailights...otherwise known as, the cheap Impala. Yeah, I know...kinda shitty statement. But so was yours. lol  If you can't take it, don't dish it out.

"...and who cares about camaros. their everywhere."
I wonder why?

"...what is a camaro, the name"
French slang for "friend".

"...we know what a cuda is. a bad f'n fish"
Not so fast Flash. As a diver, I can attest to you that a Barracuda is not a ferocious beast. Yet a simply curious creature.

Now look, I own a Charger. So quit getting all worked up. I'm not hating. Your just getting all butt-hurt over my simple statement about similarities and it hurts your soul. Your momma should have raised you to have thicker skin.

i'm not worked up, just giving my two cents, thats all. everyone has an opinion. and places like this is where to talk about them. right?

[jb666]

Hey.. I'm curious... If we STARTED a thread about dog shit would it end up being a serious discussion about Chargers?? 

[Charger454]

Luke, That's questionable. Why? Cause I've been treated like a troll ever since.

[69finder]

Obvious troll is obvious.

[Fred]

Hey.. I'm curious... If we STARTED a thread about dog shit would it end up being a serious discussion about Chargers?? 

Only one way to find out.  You go first. 

[Charger454]

Obvious troll is obvious.

No but coming into the lions den to discuss the similarities leaves me with no other way out! Don't you think this would have went a little better if I said it on a GM site? Broaden you mind...not everything is an attack

[AKcharger]

Hey.. I'm curious... If we STARTED a thread about dog shit would it end up being a serious discussion about Chargers?? 

lol

[bull]

The main difference between a Chevy Impala and a 68 Charger is that the Impala looks like a big pile of steaming dog puke.

Interesting statement. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_Charger_(B-body)
"The 1968 model year Charger sales increased to 96,100..."

http://www.chevylegends.com/forum/showthread.php?180-Impala-History
"Redesigned again in 1965, the Impala set an all-time industry annual sales record of more than 1 million units in the U.S., which has never been bettered."

Yea, I hear Corollas, Beetles and Escorts have sold well too. Which of those looks better than a 68 Charger?

[lukedukem]

Luke, That's questionable. Why? Cause I've been treated like a troll ever since.

kinda what i was getting at. hard to type how i talk. sarcastically.whatever, no hate here

luke

[Fred]

The main difference between a Chevy Impala and a 68 Charger is that the Impala looks like a big pile of steaming dog puke.

Interesting statement. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_Charger_(B-body)
"The 1968 model year Charger sales increased to 96,100..."

http://www.chevylegends.com/forum/showthread.php?180-Impala-History
"Redesigned again in 1965, the Impala set an all-time industry annual sales record of more than 1 million units in the U.S., which has never been bettered."

Yea, I hear Corollas, Beetles and Escorts have sold well too. Which of those looks better than a 68 Charger?

Okay, let me just say this..............Beauty is  in the eyes of the beholder.