News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

10 wimpiest muscle cars ever

Started by lukedukem, September 15, 2012, 06:11:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

lukedukem

Saw this article on yahoo. it says top ten but i only counted nine???
anyway, i was born in 79 so this was pretty informative for me, thought i'd share.
and i didn't know that the road runner name was used/abused later on.
later
luke
1969 Charger XP29F9B226768
1981 CJ7 I6 258ci
2016 F150, 5.0, FX4, CC

b5blue


lukedukem

1969 Charger XP29F9B226768
1981 CJ7 I6 258ci
2016 F150, 5.0, FX4, CC

Indygenerallee

Yahoo is retarded, those are not muscle cars!!! those are nameplates of previous muscle cars on smog machines!!!
Sold my Charger unfortunately....never got it finished.

b5blue

9 not 10 your right, the 70's got pretty dismal after 72. Smog engines and big bumpers were a double whammy.  :rotz:

stripedelete

I agree, yahoo is retarded.  It seems like they are always "reaching" for some kind of content or they don't know how to title a story. Either way they always miss by a mile.

Btw, why throw the Mirada in the mix?  Sure it was a two door "me too", but, I don't remember them trying to pass it off as a muscle car.  :shruggy:

b5blue

Actually yahoo just grabs others stuff mostly. That topic is from Motor Week. (Look at the bottom.)

stripedelete

Quote from: b5blue on September 15, 2012, 07:46:32 PM
Actually yahoo just grabs others stuff mostly. That topic is from Motor Week. (Look at the bottom.)

I agree, Motor Week is retarded.  It seems like they are always "reaching" for some kind of content or they don't know how to title a story. Either way they always miss by a mile.

:icon_smile_big: :icon_smile_big: :icon_smile_big:

471_Magnum

Article would have been better titled, "Performance Posers of the 70's and 80's".

That being said, being born in 1970, some of those were the dream cars of my youth.
"I can fix it... my old man is a television repairman... he's got the ultimate set of tools... I can fix it."

1974dodgecharger

Quote from: Indygenerallee on September 15, 2012, 06:44:44 PM
Yahoo is retarded, those are not muscle cars!!! those are nameplates of previous muscle cars on smog machines!!!

lmao

70redbee


rt green

x-11? wow. those guys that had 'em thought they were really something. they talked big until you called them out and they figured out you were serious.
third string oil changer

Old Moparz

Read that this morning & I agree, yahoo isn't up to speed on performance cars.   ::)

Not in defense of yahoo, but in the first paragraph of the article it states that they were all from the era of low performance cars......

There's a dead zone in the history of performance cars between the hairy-chested muscle cars of the 1960s and the rebirth of power in the mid-1980s: the 1972–82 "malaise era," when machines were so strangled by new emissions rules that their performance levels were an embarrassment to even today's compact cars. Automakers slathered flashy paint and taped racy stripes and stickers to the hoods of the cars, but these 10 just couldn't get'er done at the dragstrip.

Counting to 10 is more than being about proofreading though.   :lol:
               Bob               



              Going Nowhere In A Hurry

bull

Wimpy muscle cars is a contradiction in terms. If it's a muscle car, by definition it's not wimpy.

Old Moparz

Quote from: bull on September 17, 2012, 08:18:03 PM
Wimpy muscle cars is a contradiction in terms. If it's a muscle car, by definition it's not wimpy.


Is that like a wimpy weightlifter?   :shruggy:
               Bob               



              Going Nowhere In A Hurry


Ghoste

Yahoo should not let their "writers" do articles on cars.  Ever.

JB400

Quote from: Ghoste on September 18, 2012, 05:49:55 AM
Yahoo should not let their "writers" do articles on cars.  Ever.
Correction, they should have real car guys like us write the articles.  Or set it up like Playboy, and then who cares about the articles?

1974dodgecharger

Quote from: Old Moparz on September 17, 2012, 11:40:28 PM
Quote from: bull on September 17, 2012, 08:18:03 PM
Wimpy muscle cars is a contradiction in terms. If it's a muscle car, by definition it's not wimpy.


Is that like a wimpy weightlifter?   :shruggy:

that little guy is dead let him RIP.  :angel:

hatersaurusrex

Quote from: stroker400 wedge on September 18, 2012, 06:35:02 AM
Quote from: Ghoste on September 18, 2012, 05:49:55 AM
Yahoo should not let their "writers" do articles on cars.  Ever.
Correction, they should have real car guys like us write the articles.  Or set it up like Playboy, and then who cares about the articles?

Totally agree.  More car porn... but I'd still read the articles, unlike Playboy.
[ŌŌ]ƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖ[ŌŌ] = 68
[ŌŌ][ƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖ][ƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖƖ][ŌŌ] = 69
(ŌŌ)[ƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗƗ](ŌŌ) = 70

GOTWING

they could not find a better picture of a volare roadrunner ! a junkyard picture?? the list and idea is dumb! they were not intended to be muscle cars, they were just fun youth cars to have the flash in the era they were built in.

JB400

Quote from: GOTWING on September 18, 2012, 10:48:50 AM
they could not find a better picture of a volare roadrunner ! a junkyard picture?? the list and idea is dumb! they were not intended to be muscle cars, they were just fun youth cars to have the flash in the era they were built in.
I think the car companies were just trying to do whatever it could think of to spruce up their products.  I'll give them a break.They went from Hemi Superbirds and Road Runners in all these fun and crazy colors with little government restrictions and insurance premiums, and cheap gas;  to getting bombarded with regulations and higher gas,  I'll give them an "E" for effort. 
Yahoo needs to talk to people like us before they print such articles.  Or at least add something pretty to look at.

lloyd3

Most Yahoo articles are by the brain-dead for the brain-dead. Only read them if you have nothing better to do.