News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

2nd gen lowered look....

Started by 1974dodgecharger, July 13, 2012, 12:40:23 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

1974dodgecharger

Im assuming to get this looked these are bagged?  Unless he never drives the car on the roads since it might hit the road and harm the under carriage area?

I liked the 'little bit of tire' under the body, but I know if I go over speed bumps im gonna scrape the buttom somehow unless I had the abliliy to raise it.

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?topic=86094.0

Mike DC

  
Never underestimate people's willingness to build good looking cars too impractical to drive in the real world.


If you bring a car down by more than a couple inches, the unibody's front subframe itself gets low enough to hit the pavement on bumps.  At that point it won't matter what you do with the exhaust & suspension, the car is just too low.  

IMHO any car going really low needs the whole undercarriage sunk a few inches upwards into the body like the early NASCAR Chargers.  At least if you want it to be a REAL street car and ride that low.      



:Twocents:    airbags = bling

myk

As long as it's functional and lends to the performance potential of the car I see nothing wrong with it.  Ricers do similar things, scraping tires on the actual fenders and whatnot AND THEY THINK ITS COOL.  Again as long as the performance potential of the car isn't sacrificed and hopefully improved the setup is at the discretion of the owner. 

And honestly, what I truly find ridiculous is that stock looking '68 on the other thread; does that thing still have teeny weeny bias-play tires?  Drum brakes?  The ammeter wired up and ready to go up in flames?  Probably...

Cooter

AMEN Mike once again. Things that look cool are almost always impractical in the real world. Very few actually have a cool look and function. Lowered cars IMO, as I've had/have a few, SUCK to drive in the real world. However, the cool factor and how long you put up with it, all depends on your patience.
" I have spent thousands of dollars and countless hours researching what works and what doesn't and I'm willing to share"

Ghoste

Imagine some of the exotic sports cars like the Porsche Carrera GT where they are scraping level ground just about and its the way they come from the factory.  Pay all that money for something and have to plot out the route each trip to avoid road conditions that are otherwise normal.

1974dodgecharger

I guess I just like the look where the rear tires lip is stuffed in the wheel well, but at the same time for everyday driver also where I dont have to worry too much about some dinky speed bumps at the mall or something to scrape my under carriage.

I found out it requires alot of suspension work to get this look. I will lower it low as possible with the smallest shackles one could find.

Mike DC

Just to clarify, 

The post I made above was directed more at the MAJOR lowering jobs.  Its usually not a big deal to bring a car down an inch or two below stock.


But these days, most of the cars in the Mopar hobby are already riding around with the front end slightly lowered compared to the true stock height.  So when someone talks about wanting to lower their Mopar down, they are usually picturing something pretty far below the factory intended setting on the front end. 

twodko

I hear the intent of your post and thank you for it. With that said the Chip Foose Bagged look has always seemed ghetto to me.  :eek2:
FLY NAVY/Marine Corps or take the bus!

c00nhunterjoe

Quote from: twodko on July 13, 2012, 01:18:41 PM
I hear the intent of your post and thank you for it. With that said the Chip Foose Bagged look has always seemed ghetto to me.  :eek2:

What, you don't think 2nd gen's look good with 24 inch rims???????:lol:

1974dodgecharger

Quote from: c00nhunterjoe on July 13, 2012, 04:58:21 PM
Quote from: twodko on July 13, 2012, 01:18:41 PM
I hear the intent of your post and thank you for it. With that said the Chip Foose Bagged look has always seemed ghetto to me.  :eek2:

What, you don't think 2nd gen's look good with 24 inch rims???????:lol:

I personally would take up to max 20s...

c00nhunterjoe

Quote from: 1974dodgecharger on July 13, 2012, 05:04:00 PM
Quote from: c00nhunterjoe on July 13, 2012, 04:58:21 PM
Quote from: twodko on July 13, 2012, 01:18:41 PM
I hear the intent of your post and thank you for it. With that said the Chip Foose Bagged look has always seemed ghetto to me.  :eek2:

What, you don't think 2nd gen's look good with 24 inch rims???????:lol:

I personally would take up to max 20s...

Depending on the style they don't look bad. Chip foose wheels are horrific in my opinion.  The torque thrusts look really good in big sizes and if they made a vector in a 16 or 17 I would probably buy it. The low profile tires would make a world of difference.

Cooter

Can't stand big wheels on older cars. Need to be on newer cars with those HUGE fender openings. Big wheels IMO on these cars looks "Ghetto" as well.


Personally, even if the wheel is model'd after an existing one, it still looks stupid. Like those 18-20" Plymouth Rallye wheels in chrome. Damn, that looks sh*tty. Low profile tires will cause all kinds of headaches when it comes to ride quality. Ever hit a pot hole with those things? Yep, bent wheel.
" I have spent thousands of dollars and countless hours researching what works and what doesn't and I'm willing to share"

c00nhunterjoe

My 07 RT has the road and track package, part of the upgrade is the 20 inch rims and I don't have any problems.

20's on the 2nd gen look ghetto, I agree, but I think some of the 17's I've seen look pretty good.

1974dodgecharger

Quote from: Cooter on July 13, 2012, 05:23:25 PM
Can't stand big wheels on older cars. Need to be on newer cars with those HUGE fender openings. Big wheels IMO on these cars looks "Ghetto" as well.


Personally, even if the wheel is model'd after an existing one, it still looks stupid. Like those 18-20" Plymouth Rallye wheels in chrome. Damn, that looks sh*tty. Low profile tires will cause all kinds of headaches when it comes to ride quality. Ever hit a pot hole with those things? Yep, bent wheel.

yeah the thin profile tires are horrible for daily driver.  Had rid in one before and man let me tell ya feels likes crap. I do believe in a happy medium though....though not too beefy sidewalls either like some guys like it sorry I dont go to the track daily.....

c00nhunterjoe

There are some happy mediums in this thread. I like the look on hitman's post.

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,40025.50.html

1974dodgecharger

Quote from: c00nhunterjoe on July 13, 2012, 08:30:33 PM
There are some happy mediums in this thread. I like the look on hitman's post.

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,40025.50.html

hitman does have that look that I like seems he didnt alter his suspension drastilly....gonna PM him

Cooter

16-17" would be bout the maximum for me. "Hitman's" post with the black Dodge looks tarded. Not enough backspacing on the wheels. Looks to "Hot wheels" to me.

I like the look of the "Fiske"(I think?) wheels Cody posted though.
" I have spent thousands of dollars and countless hours researching what works and what doesn't and I'm willing to share"

twodko

FLY NAVY/Marine Corps or take the bus!

chargerboy69

Quote from: 1974dodgecharger on July 14, 2012, 06:35:42 AM
Quote from: c00nhunterjoe on July 13, 2012, 08:30:33 PM
There are some happy mediums in this thread. I like the look on hitman's post.

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,40025.50.html

hitman does have that look that I like seems he didnt alter his suspension drastilly....gonna PM him


That is not Johns (Hitmans) car, that is Mikes (Mr. Angry) car.  Those pictures are just photo-shopped pictures of Mikes car with different wheels and stripe.

He never did that to his car, in fact he sold his car at least a couple years ago.
Indiana Army National Guard 1st Battalion, 293rd Infantry. Nightfighters. Fort Wayne Indiana.


A government big enough to give you everything you need, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have.
--Gerald Ford


                                       

surmanajaja

Quote from: chargerboy69 on July 14, 2012, 08:02:15 PM
Quote from: 1974dodgecharger on July 14, 2012, 06:35:42 AM
Quote from: c00nhunterjoe on July 13, 2012, 08:30:33 PM
There are some happy mediums in this thread. I like the look on hitman's post.

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,40025.50.html

hitman does have that look that I like seems he didnt alter his suspension drastilly....gonna PM him


That is not Johns (Hitmans) car, that is Mikes (Mr. Angry) car.  Those pictures are just photo-shopped pictures of Mikes car with different wheels and stripe.

He never did that to his car, in fact he sold his car at least a couple years ago.

yup, it went to this guy in Estonia:

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,76732.msg881084.html#msg881084

I think its now resold and in Finland.

c00nhunterjoe

woops, didnt know that.


went to the york pa, us 30 nostalgia show yesterday. LOTS of nice cars there. saw this pretty 68 charger that happened to have 16 inch wheels. i liked the look and fit of them.


1974dodgecharger

got any more pics of this? Looks badass.....

Quote from: c00nhunterjoe on July 15, 2012, 06:33:00 PM
woops, didnt know that.


went to the york pa, us 30 nostalgia show yesterday. LOTS of nice cars there. saw this pretty 68 charger that happened to have 16 inch wheels. i liked the look and fit of them.



c00nhunterjoe

Sadly no. I had my 9 year old daughter with me and let's just say she is less then enthusiastic about old cars at this point. I bought extra time by getting her icecream but I was scared to death she would spill it on a car so I kept my distance. :rotz:

1974dodgecharger

Quote from: c00nhunterjoe on July 15, 2012, 08:31:41 PM
Sadly no. I had my 9 year old daughter with me and let's just say she is less then enthusiastic about old cars at this point. I bought extra time by getting her icecream but I was scared to death she would spill it on a car so I kept my distance. :rotz:

I have to say those 16s fit it so well.....they look l ike 20s to me....I like that look also.  :2thumbs:

autodynamics

Function and fit! 16-17-18-19 wheels look real nice
If your into the tiny 15" look that's ok too
But performance is in the bigger sizes
There is a limit to how big and yes a lot do cross the line!

Just remember little wheels =little brakes

Bastrd

Quote from: 1974dodgecharger on July 13, 2012, 12:40:23 AM
Im assuming to get this looked these are bagged?  Unless he never drives the car on the roads since it might hit the road and harm the under carriage area?

I liked the 'little bit of tire' under the body, but I know if I go over speed bumps im gonna scrape the buttom somehow unless I had the abliliy to raise it.

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?topic=86094.0

That one is actually not bagged, leafes (spelling?) in the back!

HPP

If the car posted in the first post of this thread is in Sweden, consider their tax base allows them to have very nice roadways that are better maintainted than most anything you will find in the US. That allows them to get away with skinny sidewalls and stiff suspensions that would tear a car apart on almost any US road way.

Brass

Quote from: autodynamics on July 15, 2012, 11:14:23 PM
Function and fit! 16-17-18-19 wheels look real nice
If your into the tiny 15" look that's ok too
But performance is in the bigger sizes
There is a limit to how big and yes a lot do cross the line!

Just remember little wheels =little brakes

Agreed.  I like the look of staggered 17" and 18".

chargerboy69

Quote from: Brass on July 16, 2012, 02:57:30 PM
Agreed.  I like the look of staggered 17" and 18".


Yes, that is a great look. That's what I run.
Indiana Army National Guard 1st Battalion, 293rd Infantry. Nightfighters. Fort Wayne Indiana.


A government big enough to give you everything you need, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have.
--Gerald Ford


                                       

Wicked72

i had 16 - 17 on my first 72 looked awsome.
M-Massively O-Over P-Powered A-And R-Respected

autodynamics

Some people here on this forum at anti- plus size wheels
Glad to see a lot of you guys are out there!!!!

DPL

I've always been partial to 15" rims for muscle cars.  These are wrapped with 245-60 on the front and 295-50 in the rear.  Dropped as far as I could go while keeping it everyday-driveable.
1968 Charger RT
1969 Charger RT
1968 Super Bee
1970 Super Bee V Code

autodynamics

Quote from: DPL on July 16, 2012, 07:11:14 PM
I've always been partial to 15" rims for muscle cars.  These are wrapped with 245-60 on the front and 295-50 in the rear.  Dropped as far as I could go while keeping it everyday-driveable.


That looks good !
Fat and low !

Lennard

Fat and low with 15" wheels is my favorite! :2thumbs:

autodynamics

Oooooooyeahhhhhh!!!! She's got hips also!!!

1974dodgecharger

Quote from: Lennard on July 16, 2012, 10:06:13 PM
Fat and low with 15" wheels is my favorite! :2thumbs:


fck im confused I like yours also.....

doctor4766

I too like the fat n low look.



Gotta love a '69

bill440rt

Quote from: c00nhunterjoe on July 13, 2012, 05:08:02 PM

Depending on the style they don't look bad. Chip foose wheels are horrific in my opinion.  The torque thrusts look really good in big sizes and if they made a vector in a 16 or 17 I would probably buy it. The low profile tires would make a world of difference.


KWS' Extreme Lee with custom billet Vectors by Budnik. Sizes 18" & 19".
Would these be considered horrific or ghetto??  :scratchchin:
"Strive for perfection in everything. Take the best that exists and make it better. If it doesn't exist, create it. Accept nothing nearly right or good enough." Sir Henry Rolls Royce

RIDELIKEHELL

I like the look of an 18" but some of the 15" & 16" with the fat tire and lowered look great also. Too each their own  :2thumbs:
AMD POSTER BOY

1968 CHARGER R/T  http://www.youtube.com/user/ridelikehell73

chargerboy69

Quote from: RIDELIKEHELL on July 17, 2012, 07:18:39 AM
I like the look of an 18" but some of the 15" & 16" with the fat tire and lowered look great also. Too each their own  :2thumbs:


Yes, I agree.

For the last couple years I thought larger wheels were the way to go.  After seeing a few of these Chargers, the "look" is all in the stance.  If you drop it down low it will look good no matter what.
Indiana Army National Guard 1st Battalion, 293rd Infantry. Nightfighters. Fort Wayne Indiana.


A government big enough to give you everything you need, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have.
--Gerald Ford


                                       

AirborneSilva

Quote from: Cooter on July 14, 2012, 07:32:31 AM
16-17" would be bout the maximum for me. "Hitman's" post with the black Dodge looks tarded. Not enough backspacing on the wheels. Looks to "Hot wheels" to me.

See, you and I can agree on some things  :yesnod:

Dino

It's all about the ratio.  I see a lot of classics with bigger rims and they usually look stunning but sometimes people go overboard.  Looking at the black 68 in Sweden I think the wheels simply do not match the car, it looks wrong.  This is just my opinion, there's no real right or wrong until you start putting hi jacks and 24+" rims on them.   :eek2:

I'm also a big fan of the deep dish rims, I just don't like Chargers without but there's exceptions. 

If you're racing the car thought you shouldn't be looking at the fashion side of things, only at what gets you through the corners fastest.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

AirborneSilva

Quote from: Dino on July 17, 2012, 11:57:36 AM

I'm also a big fan of the deep dish rims, I just don't like Chargers without but there's exceptions. 

If you're racing the car thought you shouldn't be looking at the fashion side of things, only at what gets you through the corners fastest.

:2thumbs:

HPP

Quote from: chargerboy69 on July 17, 2012, 08:03:28 AM
For the last couple years I thought larger wheels were the way to go.  After seeing a few of these Chargers, the "look" is all in the stance.  If you drop it down low it will look good no matter what.

Ehhh, I'm not so sure. Stance is a HUGE part of it, but you can nail the stance and still have the wrong wheels on it. KWS's Ultiamte Lee has awful rims on it, IMO, but the stance is decent. I'm not saying all big rims are bad, some look good, but not all of them work well with classic lines.

chargerboy69

Quote from: HPP on July 17, 2012, 04:32:00 PM
Quote from: chargerboy69 on July 17, 2012, 08:03:28 AM
For the last couple years I thought larger wheels were the way to go.  After seeing a few of these Chargers, the "look" is all in the stance.  If you drop it down low it will look good no matter what.

Ehhh, I'm not so sure. Stance is a HUGE part of it, but you can nail the stance and still have the wrong wheels on it. KWS's Ultiamte Lee has awful rims on it, IMO, but the stance is decent. I'm not saying all big rims are bad, some look good, but not all of them work well with classic lines.

Thats true, I should have thought that through more before just typing it out.  Wheels do matter. . alot.  But like a couple of the Chargers pictured above with Vectors, they look so much better because of stance.  I feel if they where sitting higher, they would not look as good.  In my opinion the Vectors are a "alright" wheel.  But these guys above have their cars looking real good because of stance.

Some of the bigger wheels do suck, and no matter what, the stance will not help sh!tty wheels.

As a side note I like KWS's wheels.  Not everyones taste, but I think they look cool on his car.
Indiana Army National Guard 1st Battalion, 293rd Infantry. Nightfighters. Fort Wayne Indiana.


A government big enough to give you everything you need, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have.
--Gerald Ford