News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Wasn't this car on Ebay about 3 months ago and the owner was asking $35k?

Started by 1970Moparmann, May 27, 2012, 08:36:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Troy

So are those flames new or old?

That's a supremely crappy ad for that asking price.

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.

Tilar

They are also advertising it as an R/T and it's not. I sent them a message mentioning this.  :D
Dave  

God must love stupid people; He made so many.



nvrbdn

i agree troy. not much of a detailed description. and if the new paint job is all the flames and stuff, im not into that. the wheels are ok either way. then no pic,s of the interior? engine? belly side?:shruggy:
70 Dodge Charger 500
70 Duster (Moulin Rouge)
73 Challenger
50 Dodge Pilot House

tan top

heres the pictures before the ad goes  :yesnod:

clever stuff , lot of work to paint the flames & stuff   :coolgleamA:  ,   not something i would ever do to mine though   :Twocents:
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

Old Moparz

               Bob               



              Going Nowhere In A Hurry

69CoronetRT

Quote from: Tilar on May 27, 2012, 09:00:59 AM
They are also advertising it as an R/T and it's not.

But of course it is. Don't you know all you have to do is slap on badging/stripes and it becomes whatever it is you want it to be?

<scarcasm off>
Seeking information on '69 St. Louis plant VINs, SPDs and VONs. Buld sheets and tag pictures appreciated. Over 3,000 on file thanks to people like you.

vick79

looked better before those ugly flames. its been on cars-on-line for a while too
'70 Charger RT

Indygenerallee

Flames I could live with but when people start putting skulls in them and plaster them everywhere it just looks tacky! Looked better before someone molested it.
Sold my Charger unfortunately....never got it finished.

BrianShaughnessy



I guess this car made another lap around the internweb  ::)    I saw it maybe a year ago at Bear Mt.

   It's pretty nicely done to the tastes of the person that had it done...   It's got a lot of nice parts and stuff.   Paintwork is awesome even if you don't like skulls and stuff... which is fine.  I don't either.

     That being said,   it would appear to me to have been flipped and somebody is out to try to make some bigger bucks off it.
Black Betty:  1969 Charger R/T - X9 440 six pack, TKO600 5 speed, 3.73 Dana 60.
Sinnamon:  1969 Charger R/T - T5 440, 727, 3.23 8 3/4 high school sweetheart.

twodko

The entire ad is untruthful. The car looks too ghetto for me and with all the mods you know it's been driven hard. Way too much money for a bogus R/T, what else is the seller trying t o pass off as the "real deal".  :Twocents:
FLY NAVY/Marine Corps or take the bus!

tcs69rt

Which rims are going with it? 2 different sets in the pics? Lotta $$$ they are asking too....
"Life ain't easy when you rode the short bus."

A383Wing


aussiemuscle

Quote from: twodko on May 27, 2012, 01:03:41 PM
The car looks too ghetto for me
a car like that wouldn't last too long in the ghetto  :pity:

Quote from: Troy on May 27, 2012, 08:57:29 AM
That's a supremely crappy ad for that asking price.
:yesnod: it's amazing that some people put no effort into an advert that is trying to sell a $60,000 item.  :shruggy: (worse is the ones that don't even bother with a photo).

Kern Dog

Quote from: Troy on May 27, 2012, 08:57:29 AM


That's a supremely crappy ad for that asking price.




That is a supremely crappy thing perpretrated on the paint of the car. Tweekers should stay away from cars when they are on drugs.

1970Moparmann

I guess no one remembers this car before..... I made the statement that the owner should remove the flames and fancy stuff and the car would be worth more.  I got comments back on how each to there own and more.  The person who made the car what you see today is on this board somewhere - at least what I was told before.  :shruggy: :shruggy:
My name is Mike and I'm a Moparholic!

duanesterrr

I agree the value would be higher with the flames off.

As for the lincoln I would drive that as-is.  Looks cool imo.

Vainglory, Esq.

Neither one of those cars is at all attractive. Not that they're valueless, but take their value and subtract whatever it takes to get rid of the effing disgusting paint jobs and ridiculously retarded wheels, and that's about what they're worth. So if this car sold for $35k earlier, I'd say maybe $20-22k now.

myk

Alright, well all the seller has to do is knock it down about 10K, rub the autozone decals off, take the Firestone wheel/tire combo package off and you've got yourself a decent car...