News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

71 Charger Convertible?

Started by 71 b-body charger, May 09, 2012, 03:29:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

71 b-body charger

Alright i dont know if im posting this in the right area, but i screwed up on taking the bad roof off my 71 charger to the point where I was told its un-fixable and i got thinking is there a way to turn one of these older cars into a convertible?? I know they didnt come stock but ive already put money into the car and its not gonna be a parts matching car, so is it possible to buy a kit??
1972 Charger SE

TheGhost

I've seen a few 2nd Gen convertibles, but never a third Gen.  I doubt there is a kit, either.  If you want to do this, you'll need to fabricate alot of the parts needed.
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.  Especially if they have access to the internet.

kab69440

There's no such thing as unfixable. It may not be worth fixing, but it certainly can be fixed. Doing a convertible is going to mean fabbing a new package tray and dutchman. You will want a set of sub connectors and torque boxes if you're going to drive roofless. Honestly it's probably going to be easier to put a replacement skin back on. How close to Central Ohio are you? I've always wanted to see a 3gen droptop!
Imagination was given to man to compensate him for what he is not;  a sense of humor to console him for what he is.      Francis Bacon

WANT TO BUY:
Looking for a CD by  'The Sub-Mersians'  entitled "Raw Love Songs From My Garage To Your Bedroom"

Also, any of the various surf-revival compilation albums this band has contributed to.
Thank you,    Kenny

Jesus drove a Honda. He wasn't proud of it, though...
John 12: 49     "...for I did not speak of my own Accord."

moparstuart

cut it off and make it a roadster , fair weather only but they look great I have seen a couple pictured on the site here.
GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE

moparstuart

GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE

moparstuart

GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE

Indygenerallee

Im with Stuart I have seen a few on here.
Sold my Charger unfortunately....never got it finished.

mauve66

fair weather only hell, put indoor/outdoor carpet on the floor and boat seats in and really freak people out going down the road in the rain :2thumbs:
Robert-Las Vegas, NV

NEEDS:
body work
paint - mauve and black
powder coat wheels - mauve and black
total wiring
PW
PDLKS
Tint
trim
engine - 520/540, eddy heads, 6pak
alignment

41husk

 :scratchchin: That would have people scratchin there heads :2thumbs:
1969 Dodge Charger 500 440/727
1970 Challenger convertible 340/727
1970 Plymouth Duster FM3
1974 Dodge Dart /6/904
1983 Plymouth Scamp GT 2.2 Auto
1950 Dodge Pilot house pick up


Nacho-RT74

for a Charger conv version, I think looks way better a 3rd gen than a 2nd gen... and maybe even better a 4th gen.
Venezuelan RT 74 400 4bbl, 727, 8.75 3.23 open. Now stroked with 440 crank and 3.55 SG. Here is the History and how is actually: http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,7603.0/all.html
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,25060.0.html

AirborneSilva

Quote from: Nacho-RT74 on May 10, 2012, 10:17:01 AM
for a Charger conv version, I think looks way better a 3rd gen than a 2nd gen... and maybe even better a 4th gen.

I agree, third Gen looks way better  :yesnod:

A383Wing


71green go


ACUDANUT

I would rather see a 3rd gen with T-Tops.

mauve66

while not really a charger convertible i think it would of looked better putting the real taillight in it, hard to do but looking better

i saw it in person in colubia mo back in the late 90's

http://wwnboa.org/67ccc.htm
Robert-Las Vegas, NV

NEEDS:
body work
paint - mauve and black
powder coat wheels - mauve and black
total wiring
PW
PDLKS
Tint
trim
engine - 520/540, eddy heads, 6pak
alignment

Bob


A383Wing

Quote from: Bob on May 12, 2012, 07:25:13 PM
Quote from: A383Wing on May 10, 2012, 06:50:22 PM
:popcrn:

While I love the concept it looks like a 442.

you and I must be looking at different pictures  :shruggy:

jaak

Man a third gen does look good topless.


Jason

surmanajaja

damn 3rd gen looks better without a roof than with it! it reminds me a lof of e-body converts, especially challenger.


Fred

Quote from: surmanajaja on May 13, 2012, 02:49:24 AM
damn 3rd gen looks better without a roof than with it! it reminds me a lof of e-body converts, especially challenger.



Quote from: jaak on May 12, 2012, 08:02:53 PM
Man a third gen does look good topless.


Jason

I have to agree with you both there.  :2thumbs:


Tomorrow is promised to no one.......drive your Charger today.

nh_mopar_fan

Looks better than it does with the top, that's for sure.  :smilielol:

Bob

Quote from: A383Wing on May 12, 2012, 07:44:44 PM
Quote from: Bob on May 12, 2012, 07:25:13 PM
Quote from: A383Wing on May 10, 2012, 06:50:22 PM
:popcrn:

While I love the concept it looks like a 442.

you and I must be looking at different pictures  :shruggy:

Poor choice of words I guess. While the car looks awesome and at a poor eye sight glance ( I'm old) it had a similarity from the doors back.

bugsydog

as a 3rd gen owner,I like the look....... i know of a plain jane 73 charger that the roof is in really bad shape and really cheap...i might have to start another project and go topless :coolgleamA:

Wicked72

i never liked convertibles but its surprising to see that the 3rd gen looks awsome topless..weird :scratchchin:
M-Massively O-Over P-Powered A-And R-Respected