Challenger Days Numbered

[DC_1]

This was disappointing to read.......    

http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1071512_the-dodge-challengers-days-may-be-numbered-report

[Drache]

Now if they make a new 'cuda version of a new pony car and do as well as they did like the new Challenger then just maybe things will be ok.

[Ghoste]

It has always been a halo car, with the looming CAFE standards and Fiats desire to sell rebadged econo-cars it shouldn't surprise anyone.

[68X426]

The article makes it sound like a rumor. Is Fiat trying to fool someone?

I was told by a dealer this past summer that 2013 was definitely the last Challenger, that Chrysler had already officially notified all the dealers. (I still haven't bought one, not sure if a "last year production" matters to me as a plus or minus).

[41husk]

I would think the first year would be the most desirable as there was a limited # and only SRT8.  I have a 09, I will keep nice.  Who knows maybe it will be worth something some day

[TheAutoArchaeologist]

The Challenger is going to be around as long as the LX platform is, which should be until 2014 when a new platform is unveiled.  That is what Ralph Gilles (sp?) said last year. 

Who ever says anything else is BS.

Ryan

[Drache]

The article makes it sound like a rumor. Is Fiat trying to fool someone?

I was told by a dealer this past summer that 2013 was definitely the last Challenger, that Chrysler had already officially notified all the dealers. (I still haven't bought one, not sure if a "last year production" matters to me as a plus or minus).

Every article I see still calls it a rumor and that no one has come forward yet to say if it's hard facts or not.

[DC_1]

Here is another story

http://blogs.motortrend.com/detroits-hottest-rumor-chrysler-to-replace-dodge-challenger-with-a-barracuda-20329.html

[RallyeMike]

Motor Trend is reporting that the Challenger may be on its way out, to be replaced by a new car called the Barracuda. The new Barracuda (again re-using a legendary Chrysler nameplate, previously from Plymouth) is said to be significantly smaller and lighter than the current Challenger, and won't be built on the Charger's LY platform.

And far as "dissapointing"..... you are dissapointed that they are going to go back and do it right this time? The Challenger looks kinda ok considering it was shoe-horned onto an existing platform, but just like the article says, it's huge and heavy and does not hold up to the Mustang or Camaro in comparison.

I see this only as an an opportunity for improvement, and there is lots to be had for the 2014 'Cuda. Goodbye Challenger, hello 'Cuda 

[Steve P.]

The worry of it holding it's own with the ford or chevy to me is bold faced bull shit!! This it not the 60's and 70's. People are not bolting on a set of slicks and raising the timing and going after stockers anymore.  The game today is not focused on WHAT WINS ON SUNDAY, SELLS ON MONDAY.... I like the new Mustank and the new Comparo. That doesn't mean I am in the market for any of them... Mileage, comfort and HOW DO I LOOK IN THIS RIDE are what is selling today's cars...

I am happy to report to all of you that I see MANY Challengers on the road here. As many if not more than the Mustank and way more than the chubby.. It warms my heart.. I love the look of the Challenger and the Mustang too. They represent well, (in my opinion), their roots. Not so much on the Camgolfball.

The Challenger was allllways the LONGNECK of the pony cars. (Plus I hate the term, "PONY"). It came from the MUSTANG and stuck.  If you ask me, and it sucks that they didn't, I don't think they should be making a comparison of these three cars. To me MOPAR built a car that many of us said we would love to see again and they built it for us.. Not completely true on the Chargers, but many still love them. But this is a car that has a hot retro look that is fitting in every way. I think the Challenger AND the CUDA should be once again be waking up the blood of people young and old and screw what Motor Trend is being paid to say....

My .02  and I hope FIAT is reading.....

[Cooter]

SWEET, now i won't have to hear another stupid kid say "Hey! Whay did you put small wheels on your new Challenger?"

[RallyeMike]

................ Mileage, comfort and HOW DO I LOOK IN THIS RIDE are what is selling today's cars...

That's exactly what I would say if I owned a Challenger and regularly got a good view of rear end view of cheaper, faster, Camaros and Mustangs. 

I'm just happy that Mopar is making a RWD V8 2-door retro car. If they can improve on it with the 2014 Cuda and give the others a run for their money, so much the better.

[TheAutoArchaeologist]

Motor Trend is reporting that the Challenger may be on its way out, to be replaced by a new car called the Barracuda. The new Barracuda (again re-using a legendary Chrysler nameplate, previously from Plymouth) is said to be significantly smaller and lighter than the current Challenger, and won't be built on the Charger's LY platform.

And far as "dissapointing"..... you are dissapointed that they are going to go back and do it right this time? The Challenger looks kinda ok considering it was shoe-horned onto an existing platform, but just like the article says, it's huge and heavy and does not hold up to the Mustang or Camaro in comparison.

I see this only as an an opportunity for improvement, and there is lots to be had for the 2014 'Cuda. Goodbye Challenger, hello 'Cuda 

The Challenger is superior in just about everything compared to the Mustang and Camaro.  Heavier, by what standard.  A SRT-8 Challenger and SS Camaro are pretty damn close to the same weight Challenger's 3834 lbs to Camaro's 3780 lbs.  Also the Challenger's suspension is better then the Camaros and Mustangs.  Interior room is bigger then both the Camaro and Mustang.  Ride is far better.  Rear visability is better in the Challenger then the Camaro. The 5.7/6.1/6.4 Hemi is better in all regards, power, torque, power curve, etc... then the L99 or LS3.

People just tend to regurgitate the same information over and over they hear in the magazines.

The truth is the Challenger are not produced in the quantities the Camaro or Mustang are because it is built on the same line as 2 other cars, meaning that they produce far fewer of them a year, which leads to the price staying higher, which mean dealers always want a premium.  Which leads to less on the road.

Here I am beating a brand new 400 HP Transformers Edition Camaro in my "lowly" R/T.  And I had a crappy time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VwDUO3l6KU

Ryan

[Fred]

The worry of it holding it's own with the ford or chevy to me is bold faced bull shit!! This it not the 60's and 70's. People are not bolting on a set of slicks and raising the timing and going after stockers anymore.  The game today is not focused on WHAT WINS ON SUNDAY, SELLS ON MONDAY.... I like the new Mustank and the new Comparo. That doesn't mean I am in the market for any of them... Mileage, comfort and HOW DO I LOOK IN THIS RIDE are what is selling today's cars...

I am happy to report to all of you that I see MANY Challengers on the road here. As many if not more than the Mustank and way more than the chubby.. It warms my heart.. I love the look of the Challenger and the Mustang too. They represent well, (in my opinion), their roots. Not so much on the Camgolfball.

The Challenger was allllways the LONGNECK of the pony cars. (Plus I hate the term, "PONY"). It came from the MUSTANG and stuck.  If you ask me, and it sucks that they didn't, I don't think they should be making a comparison of these three cars. To me MOPAR built a car that many of us said we would love to see again and they built it for us.. Not completely true on the Chargers, but many still love them. But this is a car that has a hot retro look that is fitting in every way. I think the Challenger AND the CUDA should be once again be waking up the blood of people young and old and screw what Motor Trend is being paid to say....

My .02  and I hope FIAT is reading.....

that would be my  worth too.

[RallyeMike]

The Challenger is superior in just about everything compared to the Mustang and Camaro.  Heavier, by what standard.  A SRT-8 Challenger and SS Camaro are pretty damn close to the same weight Challenger's 3834 lbs to Camaro's 3780 lbs.  Also the Challenger's suspension is better then the Camaros and Mustangs.  Interior room is bigger then both the Camaro and Mustang.  Ride is far better.  Rear visability is better in the Challenger then the Camaro. The 5.7/6.1/6.4 Hemi is better in all regards, power, torque, power curve, etc... then the L99 or LS3.

People just tend to regurgitate the same information over and over they hear in the magazines.

     "Heavier by what standard?" Is this a trick question? How about the Standard of GRAVITY?!  You guys crack me up!  

Few of us own all three cars to perform out own objective tests. If we don't form opinion s based on the mutiple comparisons in the magazine, then what? Seat of the pants non-objectivity like yours?

Life-long die-hard Mopar fans just don't want to believe the Challenger is not the top dog. For 2011: The Challenger IS heavier (more than you say). The Challenger IS more expensive (a lot more expensive). The Challenger IS overall, slower. The Challenger stops later. The Challenger ties last 2nd on the skid pad. This is just one example, but read it and weep:

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/112_1006_2011_mustang_gt_2010_camaro_ss_2010_challenger_srt8_comparison/viewall.html


So what specifically about this comparison tells you "the Challenger is superior in just about everything"? Just the opposite in this one comparison. Are you saying this comparison (and others) are faulty in some way?


Again: Challenger = cool car. Just hoping for improvement vs the competition in 2014 with the Cuda.

[TheAutoArchaeologist]

The Challenger is superior in just about everything compared to the Mustang and Camaro.  Heavier, by what standard.  A SRT-8 Challenger and SS Camaro are pretty damn close to the same weight Challenger's 3834 lbs to Camaro's 3780 lbs.  Also the Challenger's suspension is better then the Camaros and Mustangs.  Interior room is bigger then both the Camaro and Mustang.  Ride is far better.  Rear visability is better in the Challenger then the Camaro. The 5.7/6.1/6.4 Hemi is better in all regards, power, torque, power curve, etc... then the L99 or LS3.

People just tend to regurgitate the same information over and over they hear in the magazines.

     "Heavier by what standard?" Is this a trick question? How about the Standard of GRAVITY?!  You guys crack me up!  

Few of us own all three cars to perform out own objective tests. If we don't form opinion s based on the mutiple comparisons in the magazine, then what? Seat of the pants non-objectivity like yours?

Life-long die-hard Mopar fans just don't want to believe the Challenger is not the top dog. For 2011: The Challenger IS heavier (more than you say). The Challenger IS more expensive (a lot more expensive). The Challenger IS overall, slower. The Challenger stops later. The Challenger ties last 2nd on the skid pad. This is just one example, but read it and weep:

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/112_1006_2011_mustang_gt_2010_camaro_ss_2010_challenger_srt8_comparison/viewall.html


So what specifically about this comparison tells you "the Challenger is superior in just about everything"? Just the opposite in this one comparison. Are you saying this comparison (and others) are faulty in some way?


Again: Challenger = cool car. Just hoping for improvement vs the competition in 2014 with the Cuda.

So you are taking a 3 year old Challenger VS a brand new Mustang 5.0 Vs a Brand New 2010 Camaro.  That seems fair..  As of right now the 392 Challenger is the fastest of the 3 if you don't consider their halo cars like the GT500 or ZL1.

As with anything, weight can change.  Add in the spare, sunroof and such and it can tip the scale at over 4000 lbs.  Just like the Camaro.

Did you actually read the article?  It won 2/4 events, the Camaro didn't win any.  The only reason they choose the Mustang was because it was cheaper and much lighter.

The lengthy and impassioned argument over which car would finish second is what really ran up the post-dinner bar tab. The proletarian staffers found the Challenger SRT8's sticker too shocking and argued fervently for the Transformers-yellow Camaro SS, while the Jack Daniels Single Barrel swilling patricians dismissed the gauche, faddish Camaro with its overwrought controls in favor of the refined, mellow, mellifluous Dodge. (Plus it finished higher in more of our individual contests.) So when the buzzer sounded (last call), the scoreboard indicated that more staffers would prefer to own the Challenger, even if it meant downgrading to blended whiskeys and Swisher Sweets to save the extra $10 large. And so, until Chevy or Dodge tweaks a substantial engine, chassis, or body part, the Ford Mustang GT is the reigning V-8 Ponycar champion of the universe. See you next season.

And that's the 3 year old 6.1 Liter, not the new 6.4 liter car.

Atleast this article was still better then the one that pitted the 5.0 and SS vs. a R/T Challenger.

[Hessian]

Having owned both a 2010 2SS Camaro and a 2008 SRT8 Challenger... I can say they are similiar in weight etc but completely different in terms of driving expierence.  

I pre-ordered my 2SS and put 40k miles on it in less than a year... I bought my SRT8 used with about 20k on it already and have put another 40k on top of that...

I loved them both, but prefer the challenger.  Yes, it feels like a tank, and not quite as nimble in turns as the Camaro-- but when you stomp on it, it just feels like you're holding on to the steering wheel while it screams down the road.  I guess I'm saying the camaro was almost too refined, felt less like an older "muscle car".  

With regard to the $$$... my used SRT8 was almost as much as my brand new totally optioned 2SS/RS Camaro... I do think the price point is a bit high for new Challys (MSRP of a 392 Challenger is 43k!)  

And as far as "how do I look" comment... I got WAAAAY more comments/looks with the Challenger.  Maybe it's because they just arent as many challengers on the road compared to camaros...but it was a big difference. The comment I got most with the Challenger was that it was the only one of the three legacy cars (Mustang, Camaro and Challenger) that looked retro.  I guess that reasoning is one of the main things I loved about it.  Also the interior.. the SRT8 compared with the 2SS is NO comparison.  The green electrionics in the Camaro remind me of 80s technology while the challenger (at two years older than the camaro) had 4GB of storage for mp3s, played dvds, and you could even copy cds onto the hard drive of the car from the player.  Neat.  

My only complaint on the Challenger?  The auto stick.  Manual trannys werent an option for the first year of production.  Of course the camaro had the annoying "skip shift" that used to shut the gate off to 2nd gear sometimes.  This feature got around the 'gas guzzler' tax but was annoying as hell!!  Finally got the pig tail that eliminated this problem which made it more fun to drive.    

I'm all about the 'cuda making a comeback, but hopefully not at the expense of the Challenger.    

Just my  

[RallyeMike]

Did you actually read the article?  It won 2/4 events, the Camaro didn't win any.  The only reason they choose the Mustang was because it was cheaper and much lighter.

Yes I read it, but text is subject to the writers opinion and carries less weight. Even so, 2nd place of three for a car that stickers for $7k more is hardly a victory (to use your words) of a car " that is superior in just about everything". Stats in the tables tell the tale. Numbers don't lie, unless your angle is that someone made them up. The Challenger just simply is the least superior car overall, $ for $, lb for lb.

So you are taking a 3 year old Challenger VS a brand new Mustang 5.0 Vs a Brand New 2010 Camaro.  That seems fair..

How so? Stated: 2010 Challenger. 2010 Camaro. 2011 Mustang.

Regardless, if you don't like this comparision, pick another. They all say the same thing - Challenger is slightly less overall performance for more money.

Not trying to hurt your pride as a Challenger owner, but facts is facts regardless of your faith in Mopar.

[TheAutoArchaeologist]

Did you actually read the article?  It won 2/4 events, the Camaro didn't win any.  The only reason they choose the Mustang was because it was cheaper and much lighter.

Yes I read it, but text is subject to the writers opinion and carries less weight. Even so, 2nd place of three for a car that stickers for $7k more is hardly a victory (to use your words) of a car " that is superior in just about everything". Stats in the tables tell the tale. Numbers don't lie, unless your angle is that someone made them up. The Challenger just simply is the least superior car overall, $ for $, lb for lb.

So you are taking a 3 year old Challenger VS a brand new Mustang 5.0 Vs a Brand New 2010 Camaro.  That seems fair..

How so? Stated: 2010 Challenger. 2010 Camaro. 2011 Mustang.

Regardless, if you don't like this comparision, pick another. They all say the same thing - Challenger is slightly less overall performance for more money.

Not trying to hurt your pride as a Challenger owner, but facts is facts regardless of your faith in Mopar.

The Challenger was released in 2008.  The Camaros and New Mustang were released in 2010 and "2011" respectively.  So by the time this comparison occurred in July of 2010 the Challenger was already 2 years old and the Camaro was brand new and as was the Mustang. 

Just like when they compared a 2009 Mustang GT vs a 2009 Challenger R/T.  You can't compare them.  The older Mustang hadn't been updated.  Still had the 4.6 and old suspension.  I understand that they are comparing the best at the time to each other.  But It is all relative.  Just like taking a 2012 Challenger 392 SRT and comparing it to a 2012 Camaro SS, the Camaro is the same as it was in 2010.

Believe what you would like to believe.  It isn't my place to try to change your mind.

[RIDELIKEHELL]

Damn I should of bought that 2008 Challenger SRT8 500 (500 released in Canada). I still someday want to get a 2010 SRT8

[Bobby41909]

I've got an '09 Challenger SRT in B5 (aka Surf Blue) with a blacked out hood and T/A stripes.  A few bolt on mod's (Corsa, custom tuned predator, lowered) and I love it!  The few mods really wake it up and the lowering kit help a bunch to tighten it up and present a tougher look.  Always get's tons of looks and comfortable fits my 3 year old's baby seat in the back.

Sure it's not the fastest thing on the planet but I only bought it because I liked the retro look (and I wanted to smoke the tires whenever I felt necessary).  IMO, nothing cooler looking on the road now. 

However, I welcome any improvements.  I won't sell my Challenger since it's perfect for a driver (creature comforts, leg room, a real trunk, sweet retro looks, and more seat performance then most of us need for a street car).  Plus it seems like everyones got a Mustang or Camaro...It's not like the Mustang and Camaro are leaps and bounds better. 

But I would add a smaller more performance minded Barracuda to the stable, especially if they add a factory supercharger!

[RallyeMike]

The Challenger was released in 2008.  The Camaros and New Mustang were released in 2010 and "2011" respectively.  So by the time this comparison occurred in July of 2010 the Challenger was already 2 years old and the Camaro was brand new and as was the Mustang.  

 

Ok, I understand. You are essentially saying "that Dodge didnt update the Challenger to keep up with the competition for 2-3 years, so that means it's not fair to compare the current 2010 Dodge/2010 Camaro/2011 Mustang models".

I agree with you: The current Challenger doesnt stack up as clearly shown in measured tests results for acceleration, braking, and cornering because it's design hasnt been updated by Chrysler to keep up with the competition.     Hopefully they will catch up with the 2014 Cuda!

As long as your Challenger and it's tops in your mind, that's all that matters. Enjoy your car.

It's not like the Mustang and Camaro are leaps and bounds better.  
 

True - they are not far apart. But when you throw in the substantial increase in sticker price of the Challenger, it makes the Challenger unfavorable unless you just have to have it for the styling and creature comforts. Maybe with a new platfrom, and some innovation, Chrysler can come up with a more competive, comparatively-priced ' Cuda in 2014. It sure wouldnt hurt sales.

[Troy]

I think a 25-30% price differential has a bigger impact than just about anything else. With an extra $10k you could do wonders with a Mustang. If you just want a comfortable daily driver that can spin the tires every once in a while then the Challenger would probably be nicer. However, if you want to be competitive you start with the lightest car that's easiest to modify (and preferably with the lowest cost of entry). In my opinion Mopar is way behind everyone else when it comes to ease of upgrades and after market support. That also means you're stuck paying dealer prices for most of the performance which means your wallet gets lighter 2-3 times faster.

I'd be happy if it goes to a newer platform. It looks too chunky for my taste at the moment.

Troy

[TheAutoArchaeologist]

I think a 25-30% price differential has a bigger impact than just about anything else. With an extra $10k you could do wonders with a Mustang. If you just want a comfortable daily driver that can spin the tires every once in a while then the Challenger would probably be nicer. However, if you want to be competitive you start with the lightest car that's easiest to modify (and preferably with the lowest cost of entry). In my opinion Mopar is way behind everyone else when it comes to ease of upgrades and after market support. That also means you're stuck paying dealer prices for most of the performance which means your wallet gets lighter 2-3 times faster.

I'd be happy if it goes to a newer platform. It looks too chunky for my taste at the moment.

Troy

It is even worse then that.  Dodge has locked down their software on 2011+ vehicles.  They say it is proprietary software and they don't want the aftermarket messing with it.  Causing a big stir on the LX and LC forums.

[Troy]

I think a 25-30% price differential has a bigger impact than just about anything else. With an extra $10k you could do wonders with a Mustang. If you just want a comfortable daily driver that can spin the tires every once in a while then the Challenger would probably be nicer. However, if you want to be competitive you start with the lightest car that's easiest to modify (and preferably with the lowest cost of entry). In my opinion Mopar is way behind everyone else when it comes to ease of upgrades and after market support. That also means you're stuck paying dealer prices for most of the performance which means your wallet gets lighter 2-3 times faster.

I'd be happy if it goes to a newer platform. It looks too chunky for my taste at the moment.

Troy

It is even worse then that.  Dodge has locked down their software on 2011+ vehicles.  They say it is proprietary software and they don't want the aftermarket messing with it.  Causing a big stir on the LX and LC forums.

It's been locked down more than the others for a loooong time. Probably the least after market friendly manufacturer.

Troy