News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Concensus on 06 Charger RT

Started by DodgeDan, January 06, 2006, 10:10:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

4forty

still real ugly, 4 doors or not. although you could put a SRT Hemi in a pile of crap and I'd love to drive it!..............oh yeah, they did.

defiance

O NOES!  TEH THREDD!  EET IS BAAAACK!!!!

We need a zombie smiley :P

Orange_Crush

Either way you go, if you buy a new car looking to keep it 30 years, buy something you'll like and enjoy.

Personally, I like the Charger and I don't like the Challenger.

The Charger is powerful, comfortable, handles very well and is easy to live with.  It is well suited to its intended mission.

Can the same be said for the Challenger?  well...no.

Yes they are both bui;lt on the same platform, and that's the problem.  The Challenger is meant to be competing against a smaller, lighter, more nimble car.  In this capacity, the Challenger is an overweight hog.

If I want a '70/'71 Challenger, I'll just buy one.  The originals are much more attractive.

Myself, if I'm in the market for a 2-door ponycar in the future, I'll probably go for the Camaro.
I ain't got time for pain, the only pain I got time for is the pain i put on fools how don't know what time it is.

Dale The Bold

Quote from: 69Charger500 on January 07, 2006, 09:22:59 PM
Not everybody likes everything.  Would I have liked a real retro Charger??  You bet I would.  Do I like the new Charger??  Very much...  It is a fantastic car, and I look forward to getting one, hopefully soon...  Make mine an SRT in Sublime...
You're not the one who screwed up.  The Dodge Enforcer is a great car, no doubt, but it should have been called the Enforcer.  It's a perfect name for the car.  But to call it a "Charger," is ridiculous, and is a result of the "dummies are always in charge" rule.  They might as well have called it "The USS Enterprise" just to capitalize on a recognized name, and since similarity to the original is completely disregarded. 

I don't care if the car runs on air, travels through time, cures cancer, stops the aging process, and diamonds come out of the exhaust.  It's not a Charger.  Telling us how great the car is changes nothing about the fact that the erroneous naming of the car is offensive to the consumer.  Whoever made the call to name that wonderful, awesomely engineered car that inappropriate name made one of the largest corporate blunders so far of the 21st century.

Four doors mean nothing to me.  One of the most beautiful cars I ever saw was a four door.  The '99 Charger concept.
Matt. 14:8 (KJV) "And she, being before instructed of her mother, said, 'give me here John Baptist's head in a Charger.'"

plum500

QuoteI don't care if the car runs on air, travels through time, cures cancer, stops the aging process, and diamonds come out of the exhaust.  It's not a Charger.

:iagree: :smilielol:

Brock Samson

Quote from: defiance on May 25, 2006, 11:29:34 AM
O NOES!  TEH THREDD!  EET IS BAAAACK!!!!

We need a zombie smiley :P


  :horse:


Hense: the Beaten Horsey...

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?action=search2

also see:

"Deadhorse"
"Beaten Horse"
"Ugly"
"Abomination"
"Creeder"
 "'06 Sedan"
"Checker Cab"
       And My favorite...   :flame:
"Blunderbus".

19Charger68

Whew!  I read this whole thing.  When the new Charger's first came out I went to our local Dodge Dealer to see it.  The salesman, a friend of mine, took me over to where the car was and the first words out of my mouth were "that's not a Charger!".  Anyway, like most of you, I think it is a decent car but certainly agree that it was a total disgrace to name it a Charger.  What a disappointment!  The plans that they had for the Charger sometime around 2000 looked great.  If they would have left it like that, I would have bought, 4 doors or not!
Bruce

mikepmcs

this should settle it. courtesy of chargerboy69.  new chally video! no question in my mind i want to own this.

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=115459#43

v/r
Mike
Life isn't Father Knows Best anymore, it's a kick in the face on a saturday night with a steel toed grip kodiak work boot and a trip to the hospital all bloodied and bashed.....for reconstructive surgery. But, what doesn't kill us, makes us stronger, right?

Chris G.

So who is this Skibuff guy that felt like bringing up a thread from 5 months ago? It's his only post.  :scratchchin:

Always liked the '06 and see no reason why not to. I think the new Chally will very disappointing to many of you. Don't ask me how I know, but I sense that feeling.

I'll take one of these please.  :yesnod:


TheGhost

Quote from: Burnt70R/T on May 25, 2006, 06:26:29 PMll take one of these please.  :yesnod:

In black, please and thank you.


Or perhaps that Burnt Orange/Go ManGo color.  That's a sharp looking color....
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.  Especially if they have access to the internet.

Mike DC

  
This whole topic has been beaten to death many times already.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--  The '06 Charger is a mechanical success and a good value for the money, but it's a stylistic trainwreck for the name it wears.  Nothing else to say.

--  The proposed Challenger concept will be a mechanical success and a stylistic success.  But it looks like DCX may still shoot themselves in the foot by pushing the car too far towards the Lexus market with extra luxury & price & curb weight.  

 

Ghoste

Not to mention a very good chance of being too late for the retro party.

Orange_Crush

Quote from: Mike DC (formerly miked) on May 25, 2006, 09:11:02 PM
 
This whole topic has been beaten to death many times already.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--  The '06 Charger is a mechanical success and a good value for the money, but it's a stylistic trainwreck for the name it wears.  Nothing else to say.

Obviously enough people like it to make it a sales success considering its sold 30,000 more units in a year than projected.  

Quote--  The proposed Challenger concept will be a mechanical success and a stylistic success.  But it looks like DCX may still shoot themselves in the foot by pushing the car too far towards the Lexus market with extra luxury & price & curb weight.  

No factual basis here.  The car is going to be waaay too too heavy for its intended market.  The Mustang weighs in at almost 500 pounds less and the Camaro is projected to weigh much less as well.  In addition, both the Mustang and Camaro are MUCH smaller than the Challeneger.  As far as the "lexus market" is concerned.  Keep in mind that V-6 base Mustangs sell for 26 grand and up with the upcoming GT500 seeing a price well into the 45 grand range.  That's the going price for these cars nowadays.  If Dodge offers a V-6 model (and my money says they will), I exepct that it will sell for 27-8 grand for the base model with the supercar version getting up to 48 grand.
I ain't got time for pain, the only pain I got time for is the pain i put on fools how don't know what time it is.

472 R/T SE

As much as most of you hate the Charger, I feel the same about the Challenger.  It (the challenger) has no value to me, if I want to be the Hot Rod Dad that I am, I need the 4 doors of the Charger.
Besides, I already have a 2 door Chally & Charger.   

Orange_Crush

Quote from: Ghoste on May 25, 2006, 09:18:02 PM
Not to mention a very good chance of being too late for the retro party.

Good point.  Retro is a fad.  GM is doing the right thing by making the Camaro acknowledge the past, but look like a completely new car.  
I ain't got time for pain, the only pain I got time for is the pain i put on fools how don't know what time it is.

Big Lebowski

Quote from: Ghoste on May 25, 2006, 09:18:02 PM
Not to mention a very good chance of being too late for the retro party.

Ya and who else is to blame for that other than the ignorant "Anti-Retro" Mr Creed himself. (Trevor Creed, ex-Ford employee, now VP Daimler Chrysler for those of you in Rio Linda.) The retro Mustang sells 175,000 units this year, and the boring 4 door disgrace makes its low expectations of a measly 60,000. Big deal, Ford sells the cookies and we got the crumbs.

   
"Let me explain something to you, um i am not Mr. Lebowski, you're Mr. Lebowski. I'm the dude, so that's what you call me. That or his dudeness, or duder, or you know, el duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

Headrope

Yeah. Ford really knows what it's doing ...

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2006/tc20060525_098532.htm

"Sales of Ford-branded cars and trucks are off about 4% this year, and its market share has dropped by more than half a percentage point through April.

Market shares of Jaguar and Volvo are also down, while Lincoln and Mercury market shares are flat. Sales of onetime juggernaut Ford Explorer are off 30%. The Expedition SUV, despite a redesign, is off 25%. Even sales of the Mustang, Ford's hot passenger car last year, are off almost 9% this year. The Ford brand's share of U.S. light-vehicle sales fell to 14.8% in April, compared with 15.7% a year earlier and 25.7% a decade ago, according to Autodata.
Sixty-eights look great and the '69 is fine.
But before the General Lee there was me - Headrope.

Big Lebowski

Quote from: Headrope on May 25, 2006, 10:15:27 PM
Yeah. Ford really knows what it's doing ...

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2006/tc20060525_098532.htm

"Sales of Ford-branded cars and trucks are off about 4% this year, and its market share has dropped by more than half a percentage point through April.

Market shares of Jaguar and Volvo are also down, while Lincoln and Mercury market shares are flat. Sales of onetime juggernaut Ford Explorer are off 30%. The Expedition SUV, despite a redesign, is off 25%. Even sales of the Mustang, Ford's hot passenger car last year, are off almost 9% this year. The Ford brand's share of U.S. light-vehicle sales fell to 14.8% in April, compared with 15.7% a year earlier and 25.7% a decade ago, according to Autodata.


  The key words there...Mustang, Ford's hot passenger car. Ok yawn, now imagine the sound of crickets when looking for Dodge's answer to a car that always sells in larger numbers than the yawn again, unleashed Dodge Charger R/T Hemi Daytona Super Bee SRT-8.
     Even though Mustang sales are down 9% Dodge has NOTHING to offer to that 9% To get back to the point, that idiot Trevor Creed is proud of his 60,000 Charger sales, but the 175,000 still un-answered "retro" Mustang sales keep Ford on top of the 2 door car market. Of course there is no 2 door car market, more visionary words from the man with no vision.

   ***Don't make me post the Dodge Nitro pic again, you know another one of Trevor Creed's visionary designs.***

                         

     
"Let me explain something to you, um i am not Mr. Lebowski, you're Mr. Lebowski. I'm the dude, so that's what you call me. That or his dudeness, or duder, or you know, el duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing."

plum500

'06 Charger might as well be a Hyundai with a Hemi.

cobradriver

i for one like the new charger...as long as its the hemi version.   Yeah mustangs got it right as far as retro but there are billions everywhere.   I like the new charger for what it is...good looking car with decent performance.   I want my wife to get a black one....so we have 3 black dodges......my hemi ram, hemi 06 charger,  and maybe after afgan a hemi crate motor for the 69 charger?....hmmmmmm all 3 black with the red bumble bee stripe.....heheeehehehe

xs29j8Bullitt

Just got back from having my 2004 Ram serviced at the local Dodge dealership.  They had a neat display of three black cars... Hemi Magnum, Hemi Charger, and Hemi Charger SRT8. A yellow Ram SRT10 was also part of the display.  Although I am definitely waiting for the Challenger to come out, the black SRT8 looked great...  I saw another black Charger SRT8 on the road yesterday, and it looked even better in motion!

Like many others, I am not happy with DCX using the Charger name on this car... but it is a neat car none-the-less...  If I had a need for a 4 door car, I would probably get one..

JMHO...

XS
After 8 years of downsizing, whats left...
1968 Charger R/T, Automatic, 426 Hemi
1968 Polara 4Dr Sdn, Automatic, 440 Magnum
1968 Polara 4Dr HT, Automatic, 383
1969 Charger 500, 4 Speed, 440 Magnum
1969 Daytona, Automatic, 440 Magnum
1969 Road Runner, 4 Speed, 426 Hemi
1970 `Cuda, Automatic, 440-6BBL
1970 Challenger T/A, Automatic, 340 6 Pack
2004 Ram, Automatic, 5.7L Hemi
2009 Challenger SRT8, Automatic, 6.1L Hemi
<This Space Reserved for a 2016 Challenger SRT Hellcat, 8Sp Automatic,

472 R/T SE

xs29j8Bullitt, which dealership is that?  I thought you were in the Metroplex area? 
My mom's the comptroller @ the biggest Mopar dealership in that area, just curious.

xs29j8Bullitt

Quote from: 472 RT/SE on May 26, 2006, 01:12:38 PM
xs29j8Bullitt, which dealership is that?  I thought you were in the Metroplex area? 
My mom's the comptroller @ the biggest Mopar dealership in that area, just curious.

The dealership is Allen Samuels Alliance Dodge on I-35N just north of Golden Triangle Blvd... about 15 miles north of Fort Worth.

Metroplex area for sure, where did you think the pictures were taken?

XS
After 8 years of downsizing, whats left...
1968 Charger R/T, Automatic, 426 Hemi
1968 Polara 4Dr Sdn, Automatic, 440 Magnum
1968 Polara 4Dr HT, Automatic, 383
1969 Charger 500, 4 Speed, 440 Magnum
1969 Daytona, Automatic, 440 Magnum
1969 Road Runner, 4 Speed, 426 Hemi
1970 `Cuda, Automatic, 440-6BBL
1970 Challenger T/A, Automatic, 340 6 Pack
2004 Ram, Automatic, 5.7L Hemi
2009 Challenger SRT8, Automatic, 6.1L Hemi
<This Space Reserved for a 2016 Challenger SRT Hellcat, 8Sp Automatic,

bull

In the spirit of the the thread title, could we at least come to the consensus, (which means "general agreement or accord") that the '06 should not have been given the name "Charger"? Aside from it's looks, features and performance, which can be argued until the end of time, most if not all people who frequent this board had certain expectations as to what a modern Charger would look like. For better or worse in the eyes of each individual I think it's safe to say that the modern "Charger" did not meet those expectations. Am I right? In other words, if DCX had given the car a name other than "Charger" we would not be having these discussions, correct? :yesnod:

BigBlackDodge

Quote from: bull on May 26, 2006, 02:06:33 PM
In the spirit of the the thread title, could we at least come to the consensus, (which means "general agreement or accord") that the '06 should not have been given the name "Charger"? Aside from it's looks, features and performance, which can be argued until the end of time, most if not all people who frequent this board had certain expectations as to what a modern Charger would look like. For better or worse in the eyes of each individual I think it's safe to say that the modern "Charger" did not meet those expectations. Am I right? In other words, if DCX had given the car a name other than "Charger" we would not be having these discussions, correct? :yesnod:

:iagree:

BBD