what do you guys Think of new ZL1 Camaro

[TXcharger70]

"Chevrolet is estimating that its supercharged and intercooled 6.2-liter LSA V8 engine will put out around 550 horsepower and 550 pound-feet of torque. Those ponies will be sent to the rear wheels via a six-speed manual transmission using a dual-disc clutch that's necessary to properly harness all those horses". I wonder what the sticker price will be.

http://www.autoblog.com/2011/02/09/2012-chevrolet-camaro-zl1-chicago-2011/?icid=maing%7Cmain5%7Cdl7%7Csec1_lnk1%7C42609

[1969chargerrtse]

Powerful car, but like with the Charger I wish they would do something, anything, different with the grille.

[Charger´69]

Way more better than new Charger that is so big disappointment that I can´t even think about it 

But new Challenger is so much better than that new Camaro  I wish I someday have opportunity to buy that new Challenger  My Charger´s ex owner bought new Challenger, that is the reason why He sold this Charger, lucky me  I would´t never trade my old Charger to new Challenger even it is very vey nice 

[tan top]

nice car 

[greenpigs]

It is a ride worth owning, just not with my money.

[Brass]

I don't know... I'm down with the muscle revival and the numbers are impressive.  They're not entirely devoid of cool.  But I think Chevy tried too hard.  They look to me like they were shat out of a Cylon base ship.

[maxwellwedge]

It still looks like a tank to me......I'll take a 69 ZL-1 though!

[Khyron]

needs T-tops and I would buy one.

[stripedelete]

"Cartoonish".

[A383Wing]

needs T-tops and I would buy one.

[TruckDriver]

That thing is baddd asss!!!!!

[TXcharger70]

I agree it does need t-tops

[Cooter]

Too much Cadillac in that front end...No matter how hard they try, the very definition of "Musclecar" is an AFFORDABLE car for the masses, that simply has a monster engine...try again boys, thanks for playing, but I have better things to spend my $70K on...

[A383Wing]

you got 70K laying around??

care to share?? 

[Charger´69]

you got 70K laying around??

care to share?? 

I´m in too!! 

[Darkman]

the very definition of "Musclecar" is an AFFORDABLE car for the masses, that simply has a monster engine...try again boys

[miller]

needs T-tops and I would buy one.

Ask and you shall receive...
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/11/04/sema-2010-drop-top-customs-brings-the-t-tops/

[68X426]

  Ugliest front end in history.

[TXcharger70]

I dig the T-Tops.... The Trans Am might be better
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/sema-2010-dtc-trans-am-t-top/#3540804

[Brock Samson]

 I'm just not feelin' it- I clicked on the link expecting something way beyond stock,.. So what?..  some boxes in the lower front facia?. 
For that amount of coin I'd build up my own Phase III Baldwin Style Vette..

[Iceyone]

Don't really like the grill and I still have a bad taste in my mouth from GM after the past several late model GMs I have owned have all suffered from premature mechanical failures.

But as far as new cars go, I am digging the new 2011, 470HP, SRT 392 Challenger.

[mikesbbody]

Who was it here at DC.com who said new GM Car's (including the Camaro) had that "Angry Kitchen appliance" look? 
I thought that was pretty funny and summed up the look well I think it's ok but would take the new Challenger anyday!

[Brock Samson]

according to a search June '07 was the first mention of "Angry Kitchen Appliance" http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,29887.0.html
But I'm sure I read it a few years prior in relation to some japanese car or other...

[71charger_fan]

It's still an ugly car. I have no desire to own one. Not that I wouldn't want to drive someone else's.