News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Timing questions on my twin turbo 318

Started by elsensei, October 22, 2010, 12:54:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

elsensei

Hi everyone-

A couple years ago I posted that I intended to build up the stock 318 in my 68 Dodge charger to a intercooled fuel injected twin turbo.  Well, I finally got it all together, and it's running, and now I'm just working on tuning.

The specs: when I bought the car it had a rebuilt engine and it had about 4000 miles on it.  It now has about 9000 miles.  I left the bottom end stock, but replaced the cam, the timing set, etc. I am running Edelbrock RPM heads, solid lifters and roller rockers. I built and installed a megasquirt unit and I have full control over fuel and spark. I set the redline to 6000 RPMs. I am running a pair of Garrett GT turbochargers blowing into an eBay intercooler, and then into a 90 mm infinity q45 throttle body.  I also swapped out the stock transmission for a Keisler performance TKO600.  I am running 3.23 gears with a suregrip setup. Oh, right now I am running 9.5 pounds of boost, but I intend to turn it up to 12.5. My goal is 20 mpg on pump 91 and 600 RWHP.

The only specs for timing that I was able to find work in my 1968 charger shop manual.  According to that, timing is supposed to be set at 2.5° after top dead center.

Can any of you make a recommendation as to what the initial timing should be set at for this set up, what full advance should be, etc?

also, the mega squirt system offers a self tuning function that works really well.  All you have to do is set your target air fuel numbers and feed an o2  sensor signal back into the computer and it adjusts while you drive. any recommendations as to what cruising AFR should be? Right now i am at about 15.4 to 1 with no pinging, but under boost i'm running 12.6 at 3 lbs, 12.2 at 6 pounds and 11.8 at 9 lbs. Any advice there?

I know these are kind of off-the-wall questions,and not the usual setup, but I figured if anyone could offer some good advice, it would be someone here.

Thanks in advance (pardon the pun)

Sam

elsensei

forgot to mention....also running dual 3" exhausts.

here's an underhood pic.

Rolling_Thunder

cruising A/F ratio seems pretty decent...   no need to run any richer if you're not detonating...        A/F ratios overall seem pretty good ---   

The timing on most performance engines seem to be about 10* initial...      but - that is without boost...     ideally you can pull timing as boost is added - but overall your set up doesnt seem that bad off -  maybe play with the timing - bump it up some and see what happens -  its just some keys on your laptop...       :2thumbs:
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

elsensei

yes, I can pull timing under boost or anywhere else. The megasquirt system is pretty amazing, esp. for the price.

I was planning on pulling 1 degree per lb.

What do you recommend for maximum advance when NOT under boost?


Rolling_Thunder

I would start around maybe 30* total under no boost....     see if you get ANY detonation - if you do then sub some timing out - if not see how she runs -

this is why tuning is the most time consuming part - every build is different ----   so no matter what you will be messing with the MS and just playing - seeing how your combo reacts....

Which MS are you running ?   I would assume a MSII ?

if you feel up for it please post more pics and info on your build -  I've thought about a SB TT build myself....   
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

elsensei

Yes MSII.

OK so i set initial to 11 btdc and what a difference! Fires right up, idles well, between 650 and 715 rpms, not sure what dodge was thinking with 2.5 atdc. Then again, this isn't a stock motor haha.

i have full advance set to 30 at 6K, pulling one degree per lb of boost so at 6K 9.5 lbs timing is 20.5 degrees. It's really nice to be able to specify EXACTLY what timing you want per rpm/pressure intersection, down to the tenth of a degree. I don't detect any pinging but then again it's kind of hard to hear because I have the wastegate dump tubes pointed straight to the ground between the frame and the torsion bars on both sides and when they open under boost it sounds like the end of the world.

I set the timing to ramp up fairly quickly (i think, meaning it seems quick to me but I'd welcome opinions) and then just had the computer interpolate from mid to max RPM.  In fact, I'll take a screenshot and post it in a second...be right back.

elsensei

here's the timing map. i made a couple changes already, now full timing is 34 degrees at 6K.

Rolling_Thunder

looks pretty good to me - glad that the 11btdc makes a big difference
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

elsensei

to keep you in the loop-

now that the timing is set more aggressively, not only does it idle smooth as glass and run with much more power, but the boost comes on so quickly that you literally cannot feel it. It's just always there.

The other thing that is amazing to me...two days ago while i was still messing with all the settings, while driving it, if it got into boost at all it would fall flat on it's face and then it got harder and harder to start until finally it refused to catch at all. I racked my brain and investigated all sorts of things, checked TDC for the third time, changed timing settings again and was finally reduced to pulling the spark plugs. Of course they were uniformly black and soaked with gasoline. The engine was literally drowning in fuel. I changed the plugs, checked my settings one final time and it started with the first crank. I immediately set the computer to autotune and it started pulling fuel like you wouldn't believe. I would say it easily reduced injected fuel across the board by about 40%! It still hesitated near boost, so I manually lowered those numbers by 25% just so it would boost without stalling and I set the computer to make fast adjustments and went for a cruise. Every time I got into positive pressure it would get smoother and smoother and more powerful.

I'll post dyno numbers when I get them.


Rolling_Thunder

Damn!    40% reduction on the injectors is HUGE.       Figure that will save you some fuel on your MPG scale    :D     

When coming into boost it should be a fairly smooth transition - this is of course managed by fuel and timing - as you have well learned   

I have been dicking on a friends Lexus that we built a turbo system for...    running a conservative 9psi...       the MAF sensor mounting was causing some turbulance through the intake - making the fuel map compensate for erratic MAF sensor readings...      not cool....         

keep us updated on the progress -  most guys around here might not care due to their reliance on carbs but a few of us sure do...   I am working on some EFI projects myself - something about a Twin Turbo set up for a BB      :2thumbs:     
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

elsensei

yeah I'm kind of over the whole MAF thing. See if he'll consider going megasquirt w/MAP sensor.

Rolling_Thunder

Well he is trying to keep the car compliant with CA smog laws -  currently he is running a CARB legal turbo kit - but if you replace the ECU with the MSII you fail the visual test...        so...      He is actually running this set up with a factory ECU - no flashing or mods -  which is actually pretty cool that the Lexus ECU will adjust enough to control this...    he's aiming for 400hp with 9psi and methanol injection - he's planning on auto crossing it - against my Charger actually...     so I figure it will be a good run when I get my car up and running.
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

elsensei

sweet.

I'm most likely going to the dyno tomorrow. Dare I turn the boost up to 12.5?

Rolling_Thunder

I would - but again if there is ANY symptoms of detonation get out of it quick -  you'll need to adjust the timing once again as well as the fuel mapping...      but thats the place to do it     :2thumbs:
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

elsensei

Ok Back from the dyno. Ended up running 11 psi, made minimal changes to boosted timing, richened it up a little bit up top to try to stay safer, and it actually made MORE power that way. That was a nice surprise. I'm scanning the dyno sheet now, but it made 509 HP and 473 lb/ft at the wheels, SAE corrected, at 6000 RPMs on pump 91. Zero detonation. I just let the megasquirt tune itself for fuel. I could probably advance the timing some more but didn't have time, plus that much power on a stock bottom end...how much more can it take? :)

elsensei


Rolling_Thunder

Nice numbers!    glad the higher boost worked out for you ---     i'm sure there's some more power kicking around in there with fine tuning -  but those numbers are more than respectable --       the 318 is a kick ass engine - it is a very stout bottom end -    :2thumbs:
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

elsensei

regarding the 318 as a stout bottom end...

how stout is it, really? I have no idea about the composition of the crank or rods or pistons in this motor, because frankly, I figured if it blew up I'd just grab another one (they practically give them away at the junkyard), bolt all my aftermarket parts on it, install it, turn the boost down by 1 psi from whatever level exploded it and hit the road. So I figure it's comprised of whatever dodge was using back in the day, or rather, whatever engine rebuilders were using in a grandmotherly grocery-getter. (this car had 67K miles on it when I got it, and I found a receipt for a rebuilt engine from 63K miles). And it was owned by a little old lady, the original owner. I am not making this up.

Back on topic, I do know that the greatest stress on the motor is the connecting rods changing direction, and that is why I'd prefer to run more boost than wind the engine to higher RPMS. But having said that, does anyone know how fast you can safely spin one of these? Aside from the valvetrain, the rods and bearings must be the limiting factors unless I am missing something. How high can it go?


Rolling_Thunder

I know the 318s used a factory forged steel crank - so you're good there...           I have heard (somewhere) that the factory 318 rods are fairly strong - the weak links (if you can call them that) are the connecting rod bolts.

The block is like any other small block chrysler -  fairly stout but not impossible to damage...       


To honestly answer this question:  No idea...       i'm not sure how much HP you can pump out of your 318 without it grenading.   

I would bet it could spin to 6500rpm easily...     with the valvetrain and heads that will work that high....        I don't know about you but my stones aren't big enough to spin anything to 7000rpm (on purpose) --   I've spun a 426 hemi past that as well as a 440...      but wouldnt do it on purpose.   
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

elsensei

i might turn the redline down to 5000 but up the boost to 15 psi. that ought to be interesting.

Rolling_Thunder

well that would definitely increase the stress on the engine -  you'd be better off IMO to just try 12 -14psi with a 6000rpm redline   
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

elsensei

really? I was under the impression that higher RPM is more stressful than higher boost. to a point.

Rolling_Thunder

well the higher RPM does cause stress - the higher boost will cause even more - it causes more heat and greater cylinder pressure...    you'll possibly start running into cylinder head sealing problems --   

you could try both and see which works better for you    :2thumbs:
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

elsensei

true. just FYI at night my intake air temps are holding steady at 68-70 degrees. I have a pretty burly intercooler and my own special intake that i submitted for patent. Plus, I'm running cometic head gaskets and switched to ARP studs.

I'll mess around with it and see what happens...

:)

Rolling_Thunder

Ah - cometic with studs ---   turn up that boost until you get a little detonation at 6000rpm and then turn down 1 psi   haha
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

Wicked72

Hows about a vid of this badboy running!  :popcrn: :drool5: :cheers:

Btw what does a megasquirt system cost?
M-Massively O-Over P-Powered A-And R-Respected

Rolling_Thunder

a MSII computer and harness can be had for around $400...    but you'll have to source other parts like the injectors, intake, bungs, O2 sensor, throttle body...      but the joy of the MS is you can piece together affordable pieces like a Fox mustang Throttle body with say GM MAP, O2 and sensors...        :Twocents:
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

Wicked72

thats sounds like alot of fun. Hows the tuning part of the system? is it a pita or straight forward?
M-Massively O-Over P-Powered A-And R-Respected

Rolling_Thunder

Quote from: Wicked72 on November 24, 2010, 08:15:58 AM
thats sounds like alot of fun. Hows the tuning part of the system? is it a pita or straight forward?

pretty straight forward if you understand the principals of an engine.    :2thumbs:
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

elsensei

Quote from: Wicked72 on November 23, 2010, 06:25:27 PM
Hows about a vid of this badboy running!  :popcrn: :drool5: :cheers:

Btw what does a megasquirt system cost?

Just saw this request so here ya go!

This is my dyno run-
http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=1612406120955
or
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B4iEKFT3lSDFNGJlOTM0MWQtYmY1My00MTJjLWJiYjctOTVlMzEwYTg4Njdk&sort=name&layout=list&num=50

Idling afterwards, at home. Just thought it looked/sounded cool. plus I love the "sleeper" aspect of turbos...no rough idle, nice and quiet then HOLYCOW!

http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=1600899353293
or
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B4iEKFT3lSDFOTA4YTRhODMtNjgxNi00OTQwLWIwZGEtNTYyMzBhOTBlOWU3&sort=name&layout=list&num=50


Re: megasquirt. Had an interesting couple weeks...was tuning last weekend, with my girlfriend in the car and went to write a new map while coasting in the fast lane, something I've done 100 times before...But this time, I had upgraded to the newest version of the tunerstudio PC software and believe me, it has bugs. Ended up wiping the MS unit clean and killing the engine dead. Fast lane had no shoulder, luckily I had enough momentum to coast to where a shoulder appeared again. It was a little unnerving to have cars going by both directions at 85 MPH while we waited for the tow truck. As it tuned out, my MS genius friend ryan had the SAME THING happen to another friend of his and we deduced that it was a software issue. So I reinstalled tunerstudio ver. 997 (999 is the killer) and reloaded everything and car is running tits right now. Still stand my MS and the best solution out there at any price, but beware 999. If anyone needs 997 (it's not available on the diyautotune.com website) hit me up.

coxie1996

I am thinking about a twin Turbo kit myself too.. but just an average question.. how much did this cost to do minis the twin Turbo kit.. intercooler, turbos, bov, tubing etc. And about how long did it take you to build this project.. good job! Thanks!

elsensei

Quote from: coxie1996 on June 28, 2011, 08:18:08 AM
I am thinking about a twin Turbo kit myself too.. but just an average question.. how much did this cost to do minis the twin Turbo kit.. intercooler, turbos, bov, tubing etc. And about how long did it take you to build this project.. good job! Thanks!

took about 2 years. not sure of your other question...there was no "kit" this was all hand made. I didn't add it all up but I'll tell you that quality parts cost. The turbos alone were $1600 each...347 stainless exhaust housings, v-band in and out, ball bearing, zero lag.

Rolling_Thunder

yeah -  sounds like a pretty costly addition.  But...   it seems well worth it.    :2thumbs:
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

Chryco Psycho

I would try a bit more initial timing up near 14 as long as no detonation appears , it should respond faster that way , the other place I would change is not dial out so much timing with boost , try 1/2* / lb using 34* peak under no boost & pulling back to maybe 28* . I doubt you need to pull the timing back into the low 20 range at full boost

elsensei

CP-

took your advice but went just a bit more conservative, starting at 13 and pulling 3/4 degree per lb. I'd say results were positive. I'll post my latest timing map later today and if you'd be so kind as to make any other suggestions I'd be game to try. Thanks. :)

Chryco Psycho

well if you understand what a carb does there should be a lot of adjustment but if it learns on its own maybe it will solve most of them , we pull timing with boost but 4-6* from peak would be max I have retarded timing you could get as high as 38*with no boost so you could be as high as 32* under boost  , Do you have a detonation sensor ?