News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Differences between 71 / 72 and 73 / 74 Chargers?

Started by cudaken, January 10, 2014, 06:15:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bob

The 1973 Charger was the best model year for sales.

VegasCharger


VegasCharger

I believe the fuel tanks were: 71 one year only, 72-73 the same and 74 different from the rest.

71-72 interior part of the doors had different upper panels than the 73-74. They raked up higher at the end of the door. So you cannot use a 73 upper front door panel on a 72 and vise versa.

Although you can bolt one deck lid from the group to another, there were some slight differences in the key tumbler suface area. 71-72 had a tear drop indentation and the 73-74 were flat.

Also the quarter end caps differ from 71-72 than 73-74.   71-72 had a rounded upper corner and 73-74 came to more of a pointed shape.

Adding my  :Twocents:

67tbird

The front wheel openings are different also(71-2 to 73-4)

MrSnicks

Ok.. Specific question.   Will a 1973 front lower valance fit a 1971 Dodge Charger?

Thanks,

Patrick

MoparRocks

Well, this thread just confirmed my suspicion that my fenders aren't correct on my 71. The front side markers are from a 72.  :slap:

1971 Charger Richard Petty tribute
Mopar 340 three on the tree

polywideblock



  and 71 GA4  383 magnum  SE

Nacho-RT74

Quote from: MrSnicks on April 11, 2017, 02:49:34 PM
Ok.. Specific question.   Will a 1973 front lower valance fit a 1971 Dodge Charger?

Thanks,

Patrick


Wow! Resurrecting an old thread.

On a short answer, yes, but brackets to frame rails won't meet.

The rear area of the valance is shorter on 73/74, so you'll get a gap between valence and radiator core support. BUT from outside, nothing will be noticeable.

Do you know both valences are available from AMD?
Venezuelan RT 74 400 4bbl, 727, 8.75 3.23 open. Now stroked with 440 crank and 3.55 SG. Here is the History and how is actually: http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,7603.0/all.html
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,25060.0.html

Nacho-RT74

Quote from: MoparRocks on April 11, 2017, 10:53:44 PM
Well, this thread just confirmed my suspicion that my fenders aren't correct on my 71. The front side markers are from a 72.  :slap:



It can be 73/74 too ( which looks to me due the wheel opening height )... how is the fitment with radiator core support?
Venezuelan RT 74 400 4bbl, 727, 8.75 3.23 open. Now stroked with 440 crank and 3.55 SG. Here is the History and how is actually: http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,7603.0/all.html
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,25060.0.html

73chgrSE

Obviously they finally got it right in '73 that's why they didn't have to change much for '74.

ACUDANUT

Same could be said for the 71 and 72's.  Which... had the last of the cool stuff.  :2thumbs:

ACUDANUT


RallyeMike

Nice cars! Looks like a familiar color combo  :2thumbs:  I've since sold the yellow one though to make room for new projects.
1969 Charger 500 #232008
1972 Charger, Grand Sport #41
1973 Charger "T/A"

Drive as fast as you want to on a public road! Click here for info: http://www.sscc.us/

odcics2

Quote from: hemihead on January 16, 2014, 05:51:05 PM
The 71- 74 Chargers were the most aerodynamic Chargers built ( including the 500 and the Wing Cars ) . The 73 -74 being the best . They took all the tricks they learned in the wind tunnel on the 500 and wing cars and built the slickest B Body . And Petty had more success with the Small Block than the Big Block and his records backs that up .

Drag numbers...

69 500   .38
Daytona .29
1974      .45

(lower is better)

I've never owned anything but a MoPar. Can you say that?