News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Is it just me or does the design of certain streets actually promote road rage?

Started by bull, May 02, 2010, 04:54:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

bull

Sure, there's no excuse for road rage but have you ever wondered what genius designed certain streets, interesections, on ramp/off ramp clusters? I see so many of them that seem to actually promote aggressive driving and confrontations. So why does the finger of blame always get pointed at the drivers when the design of the streets is at least party to blame?

Examples within a few miles of my house:

1. The freeway on ramp to westbound I-84 is a funnel for both northbound and southbound traffic into one lane. The northbound on ramp has yield signs that are routinely ignored which has caused collisions and many close calls.

2. A road that goes southbound from here Ts off at a traffic light and there are two turn lanes but get this, to get to one of those two lanes to go eastbound you have to be in the left lane because the right lane is right turn only at the light. The second left turn lane doesn't appear until roughly 50 yards prior to the light which has created a mad-dash scenario around slower drivers. Then, once you've made the turn from the left turn lane it's another two lane mad dash to get into the right lane to do it all over again at the next light to go south.

3. Washington state especially is notorious for putting freeway on ramps and off ramps in the same lane so you must change lanes to the right to get on the freeway while someone coming off the freeway must change lanes to the left to exit.

4. There are several streets in my area that are two lanes at the stop light and go down to one lane on the other side. So when the light turns green you either have to gun it and race to get in front of or behind the guy next to you or take it easy and get cut off by as many as three people trying to get the holeshot.

Am I the only one annoyed by the way certain streets breed confrontations?

elacruze

1968 505" EFI 4-speed
1968 D200 Camper Special, 318/2bbl/4spd/4.10
---
Torque converters are for construction equipment.

ZSmithersCharges

We have a couple of such roads here in Ohio.  You must have had a bad driving day today, because thats normally when I notice how poor our roads are too :D  Tell us what happened! Don't be shy

Just 6T9 CHGR

Chris' '69 Charger R/T


Black Charger

One of my biggest pet peeves is concrete medians. Here in Springfield, there are certain businesses that simply cannot be accessed from both sides of the street, one of which is an emergency medical clinic. My question is: What does a big, ugly and obstructive piece of concrete do that yellow lines painted on the roadway wouldn't accomplish? There is a gas station down the street from my house that I rarely go to simply because it's such a pain in the ass to get in and out of, thanks to a big concrete median.

elacruze

Quote from: Black Charger on May 02, 2010, 09:12:42 AMMy question is: What does a big, ugly and obstructive piece of concrete do that yellow lines painted on the roadway wouldn't accomplish?

You've never driven in Miami, have you?
1968 505" EFI 4-speed
1968 D200 Camper Special, 318/2bbl/4spd/4.10
---
Torque converters are for construction equipment.

b5blue

Or Tampa's malfunction junction! If I ever won the lottery I would buy and over-insure a C body, build a 440 from hell, and have some fun!  :D

elacruze

Quote from: b5blue on May 02, 2010, 09:40:03 AM
Or Tampa's malfunction junction! If I ever won the lottery I would buy and over-insure a C body, build a 440 from hell, and have some fun!  :D
:D Maybe everybody could do that...quietly at home...then meet in a random city, and have a Blues Brothers Festival!! Then abandon the cars and do it again next year...


1968 505" EFI 4-speed
1968 D200 Camper Special, 318/2bbl/4spd/4.10
---
Torque converters are for construction equipment.

b5blue

I can just see it!  :cheers:  Later we could scrape BMW's and Honda's off our bumpers like bugs.

tricky lugnuts

It actually does - and it's not just roads. If you look at the layout of vast segments of our nation, crappy design and limited forethought leads to stress and inefficient outputs in countless situations.

One example that always bothered me: Why do we use fresh, treated potable water (a very valuable commodity in most of the world) to defecate in?

I realize no one wants dirty or unsightly water sitting in their toilet bowls, but shouldn't boundless human ingenuity be able to come up with some sterile solution that could be flushed and re-treated and replenished through toilet bowls of America, so that we weren't slowly cycling all of our future drinking water through our toilets first? California wants to tell you when and how you can wash your car, or how long you can shower or run the dishwater, all the while crapping and pissing in perfectly good water and flushing it off the local wastewater treatment plant. It seems like WASHING something is a much better use of water than just pissing in it, but the distinction apparently goes over the head of earth loving Californians hell bent on saving this planet and our natural resources...

Of course, a little forethought would have made the laying out the infrastructure for such a thing much simpler in the first place...

Instead, we all crap in our water before we drink in it, and drive ourselves mad (wasting gas, shortening our lives with higher stress levels) on roads that were never designed to support such heavy loads. I can't remember the last estimate of wasted gasoline and hours of time spent stuck in traffic, but it is a large amount.

Of course, the alternative is central economic planning...

bull

Quote from: ZSmithersCharges on May 02, 2010, 05:34:00 AM
Tell us what happened! Don't be shy

Nothing has happened as in road rage but I deal with one or more of these streets almost daily. It just gets frustrating to me knowing that a daily traffic standoff is almost always inevitible. Especially when most of the trouble could have been avoided with simple design changes.

b5blue

On the toilet thing look into "gray water" recycling. Forced to find a new job I targeted the V.A. 2 miles from my home, my temp gauge barely starts to move by the time I park it. Never have I understood people who commute vast distances and spend hours a day driving. (yet I've already met some who drive 90 some odd miles a day there....and the V.A. provides van pools they do not use!)

bull

Quote from: b5blue on May 02, 2010, 02:02:14 PM
On the toilet thing look into "gray water" recycling. Forced to find a new job I targeted the V.A. 2 miles from my home, my temp gauge barely starts to move by the time I park it. Never have I understood people who commute vast distances and spend hours a day driving. (yet I've already met some who drive 90 some odd miles a day there....and the V.A. provides van pools they do not use!)

I would do that too if my workplace wasn't on the edge of what the locals call "Felony Flats." As it is my commute is 10 miles one way which isn't too bad. But I work with guys who drive 50-70 miles one way and force themselves to work graveyard shift so they can stand the commute.

b5blue

I was lucky to get hired right when I did, they called a week later and offered a position for 7.00 an hour more but it was temp (1-2 year contract with a restriction after of a 1 year hold off to work again) I stuck with the permanent position (after a year "probation period") for less money but security of future. My last job required driving to wherever the job site was and most averaged 10-15 one way, a few hit 25 one way and I lost a small fortune in extra time and expenses for no more money. Traffic here can be insane on the bridges between Tampa and St. Pete and some of the main roads are just as you pointed out, add unfamiliar tourists and really old farts who love to impede the flow by rubber necking and creeping along in the fast lane or inter states and rage rules the road for AM and PM rush hours. Having the power to pass when needed and keep the NASCAR driving SUV's and Minivans from constantly cutting you off was sorely missed for years while my Charger waited for the 440 rebuild. I LOVE being 2 minutes from the front gate of my job.  :2thumbs:   

ChgrSteve67

What I don't understand is that here we are 30+ years after the gas crisses of the 70s and none of the signal lights are timed in order to allow smooth traffic flow, better fuel economy and less wear and tear on my car when traveling across town or anyware else. I think there are only 2 streets in down town Sacramento that have any level of synronization.

The road that goes from one major freeway to another (about 5 or 6 miles) has no less than 12 traffic signals.
You would be lucky to make it throught two intersections on a green light.

All of them are computerized lights with Wi-Fi anteanas yet none of them are syncronized.

It should only take 7 or 8 minutes to get from one freeway to the other but you consider yourself lucky of you can do it in under 15 minutes. God help you if your running late for work in the morning. The on ramps to the freeway will take you 30 minutes to get through if the meetering lights are on.

At night (after 8pm) if I have to go into work it takes 15 minutes to get there. Durring daylight (5:30AM) it takes me 45 minutes to an hour. If its 8AM to 8:30AM its a good 1 hr 15 min to 1 hr 30 min.  BTW I live 13 miles from work.

I have a friend who works in the Bay Area and he has 3 hr 30 min commute each way. (fricken insane)

I keep praying to win the lottery so I can retire.

elacruze

The problem with American roads is American drivers. We are a selfish discourteous lot. Germany has very few traffic devices compared to the U.S., and their traffic even where very heavy never stops moving. When somebody needs room, they give a little. If they don't need to, they don't jam in front of you. It's just our American Me-First attitude that causes the problems. The roads could have had better designs, but Europe by and large gets along without rage on roads that were designed for horses.
1968 505" EFI 4-speed
1968 D200 Camper Special, 318/2bbl/4spd/4.10
---
Torque converters are for construction equipment.

Ghoste

I know you said "by and large", but I still can't help thinking about traffic circles in France.  There is a very good reason why so many of their cars are dented all over the sides.
That said, I can also add that three lane highways in Europe are not treated as three passing lanes by people who think they are racing.  Lane discipline and passing etiquette are well followed there.

bull

Quote from: elacruze on May 03, 2010, 10:21:40 PM
The problem with American roads is American drivers. We are a selfish discourteous lot. Germany has very few traffic devices compared to the U.S., and their traffic even where very heavy never stops moving. When somebody needs room, they give a little. If they don't need to, they don't jam in front of you. It's just our American Me-First attitude that causes the problems. The roads could have had better designs, but Europe by and large gets along without rage on roads that were designed for horses.

I agree for the most part, although I can't really speak to traffic patterns in different countries (except Mexico, where it's chaotic at best). I can't count how many times I've tried to get on the freeway (after sitting at one of those idiotic metering lights ChgrSteve just mentioned) only to have my entry blocked by someone with tunnel-vision doing 50 mph who won't move over. They usually don't even bother to acknowledge your existence. And I hate the "I'm on my own schedule so screw you" attitude so many people have. The idea of a road, a freeway especially, is to get somewhere. IMO that means going with the flow of traffic, staying out of the way, etc. People do things behind the wheel they wouldn't do anywhere else. If these people acted like this in a restaurant or post office there would be fights there too.

ChgrSteve67

It cost a hell of a lot more to drive in other countries than in the US so you don't find near as many people on the roads except near/in the cities where there are rarely more than 2 or three lanes going in the same direction.

Also most people in other countries walk or take public transprotation to get to work each day. Not something most people that live in the US are willing to do. If I had to take the bus to work it would take me three hours to get to work. Hell every other block has a bus stop. If I took a taxi every day to work and back I could have a new Challenger SRT8 paid for in no time.

Remember the US is an enourmous coutry compared to others.

Most people in the US don't live near thier place of work so of course everyone is on the road durring rush hour traffic.

And they will give a drivers license to anyone in the US as long as you have insurance. If if you don't those people just drive anyways.

ZSmithersCharges

Quote from: bull on May 02, 2010, 01:38:41 PM
Nothing has happened as in road rage but I deal with one or more of these streets almost daily. It just gets frustrating to me knowing that a daily traffic standoff is almost always inevitible. Especially when most of the trouble could have been avoided with simple design changes.

Well it's a good thing nothing did! Just wondered what finally snapped that made you post. The roads being described here are everywhere.  I haven't seen a "new" road design for as long as I've been in Cincinnati yet they always have lanes closed for construction anyways.  Its somewhat baffling that we spend all this money fixing the roads but don't really change anything.

bull

Quote from: ZSmithersCharges on May 04, 2010, 03:38:26 AM
Well it's a good thing nothing did! Just wondered what finally snapped that made you post. The roads being described here are everywhere.  I haven't seen a "new" road design for as long as I've been in Cincinnati yet they always have lanes closed for construction anyways.  Its somewhat baffling that we spend all this money fixing the roads but don't really change anything.

No snapping. :lol: Just wanted to vent some I guess. Maybe I'm getting old and cranky but all these people who believe in evolution must not interact with the same people I do every day. For all our efforts to allegedly improve the way things are done the results seem to fly more in the face of common sense now more than ever.

elacruze

Quote from: Ghoste on May 03, 2010, 10:28:29 PM
I know you said "by and large", but I still can't help thinking about traffic circles in France.  There is a very good reason why so many of their cars are dented all over the sides.
That said, I can also add that three lane highways in Europe are not treated as three passing lanes by people who think they are racing.  Lane discipline and passing etiquette are well followed there.

I forgot about France. I generally don't think of France when I think of Europe. I generally don't think of France at all.
1968 505" EFI 4-speed
1968 D200 Camper Special, 318/2bbl/4spd/4.10
---
Torque converters are for construction equipment.

stripedelete

Quote from: elacruze on May 03, 2010, 10:21:40 PM
The problem with American roads is American drivers. We are a selfish discourteous lot. Germany has very few traffic devices compared to the U.S., and their traffic even where very heavy never stops moving. When somebody needs room, they give a little. If they don't need to, they don't jam in front of you. It's just our American Me-First attitude that causes the problems. The roads could have had better designs, but Europe by and large gets along without rage on roads that were designed for horses.

Yep. 

I don't believe the design causes road rage.   However, I do believe that there should be some engineers behind bars for manslaughter.  :Twocents:

ZSmithersCharges

Quote from: bull on May 04, 2010, 03:43:52 AM
Maybe I'm getting old and cranky but all these people who believe in evolution must not interact with the same people I do every day.
:lol:
This had me laughing pretty good. Thanks for that  :cheers: The sad thing is you couldn't be more correct.  I have not had a day that I can recall where I have run into more intelligent people than people who need to go hit the books and stop watching the boob tube.  That or go find themselves a hobby to interest and challenge themselves with.  That's why I come on forums in the first place!  It is my escape to intelligent people who want to talk with other like minded individuals.  Now, if we could only convince our elected officials to allow us to take over all of the state road and expressway planning we would really be in the green.

tricky lugnuts

Insert Quote
What I don't understand is that here we are 30+ years after the gas crisses of the 70s and none of the signal lights are timed in order to allow smooth traffic flow, better fuel economy and less wear and tear on my car when traveling across town or anyware else. I think there are only 2 streets in down town Sacramento that have any level of synronization.

This can make a significant difference in driving times, number of red lights, accidents, etc.

In one city where I lived, it used to take five or six red lights to go about two miles down a main stretch of road through town.

The city hired a traffic engineering consultant and synchronized all the lights and then it was rare if you hit one... The time to drive that stretch was more than halved, I believe, and it only cost a few thousand dollars - say $20K or $30K. They'll recoup that in gas savings and accident response savings in probably less than six months...

Unfortunately, the haven't moved on to any of the other roads...

LMAO about the evolution bit. You'd think, after a century of automobiles, that the idiots would have killed themselves off by now. Daily experiences do suggest otherwise.

If you don't think design, or lack thereof, causes road rage, and accidents at the least, apparently you've never caught the long red light after midnight, when you have to sit there for five minutes and not a single car passes in the other direction... It could be a flashing red, but the traffic light, or whoever put it there, thinks you're too dumb to tell when you can or cannot proceed, even on virtually deserted streets.

Or you've never got stuck in a four-lane corridor full of entries and exits with backed up traffic and lights every 800 feet and No Right Turns in one place and No Left Turns in another place, or concrete medians that force you to drive miles out of your way only to turn around, because you couldn't make a left turn where you needed to...

Or almost been annihilated trying to merge onto an expressway with 200 foot on ramps and a wall of steel rushing towards you at 80 mph with no spare lane for traffic to slowly merge in...

The list could go on and on.

Try driving through downtown Chicago sometime on 80-90. Let me know how that design works out for you.

The other issue here that no one has mentioned is sprawl, and what it does to force people into their cars, a sometimes aggravating thing, in the first place.


tricky lugnuts

What is sprawl? A fair question and likely a subject for another post since I hate to see this thread hijacked by me, but this link seems to address the concept of urban sprawl fairly well:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_sprawl

Essentially urban sprawl seems to be the consumption of land for low-density populations, especially those populations around a denser (albeit possibly abandoned to a large extent) city core...

Granted, not everyone wants to live in a dense urban environment or to take it to the extreme, an Arcology -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcology - myself included.

But on the other hand, not everyone wants to see their wild, rural or agricultural surroundings consumed by cookie cutter housing developments, traffic-choked commuter roads, big box stores, and fast food restaurants...

I think of it this way: The "village" or "town" of old was replaced by the city. As people fled dense cities (with the proliferation of the automobile), suburbs formed, necessitating commutes in vehicles...

While we all enjoy driving our Chargers, myself as much as possible, I think it would be debatable if we all enjoy driving an hour or more to and from work every day. I have to walk across one 25 mph road to get to work. It's great. In fact, living in small towns, I haven't regularly driven to work in nearly four years.

I'm simply postulating that yes, the design of roads does affect the extent to which we experience road rage; that faulty design of roads and traffic systems leads to more road rage and to more accidents. Further, I'm postulating that as cities and suburbs have sprawled, the ability of poorly designed roads and traffic systems to affect our lives, and induce road rage, has increased...  :cheers:

MoparManJim

Yea, the dang place over town "Clarion" is starting to turn into a city like with streets. They got dang cars park along the dang road where only one car can get through at a time on some streets!  :icon_smile_angry: and the one street like this is a 2 way street! But has cars parked on the  right side as you go down the hill  by the cars that are parked on the hill slope. Then down town Clarion isn't much better, They have 3 lanes at the intersection where you turn into to go to afew stores or to the hospital.

And what gets me is when you are in a dame hurry and are pulling out of a parking lot onto one of the main drag there is always a car coming, they are moving fast BUT when they see you setting there waiting for you to get pass them they slow way the hell down way down the road  :flame: and then when they get by you they speed back up! 

Now I just heard that out town, they are going to widen the dame main road on top of the hill at the red light where the gas station sets. They are going to add afew more lanes to the road there like as if we need anymore then the lanes we already have  ::). For once the town sheriff has nothing to do with the idea and isn't the one to come up with the hair brain idea of widen the road more  :lol: , he mostly is mostly the one that comes with them mostly. 

chargergirl

Quote from: b5blue on May 02, 2010, 09:40:03 AM
Or Tampa's malfunction junction! If I ever won the lottery I would buy and over-insure a C body, build a 440 from hell, and have some fun!  :D
Florida's answer to the Bermuda Triangle even the radio quits working at some spots in that mess. Fun going through that surrounded by big trucks!
Trust your Woobie!

ZSmithersCharges

Quote from: tricky lugnuts on May 05, 2010, 11:17:36 AM
What is sprawl? A fair question and likely a subject for another post since I hate to see this thread hijacked by me, but this link seems to address the concept of urban sprawl fairly well:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_sprawl

Essentially urban sprawl seems to be the consumption of land for low-density populations, especially those populations around a denser (albeit possibly abandoned to a large extent) city core...

Granted, not everyone wants to live in a dense urban environment or to take it to the extreme, an Arcology -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcology - myself included.

But on the other hand, not everyone wants to see their wild, rural or agricultural surroundings consumed by cookie cutter housing developments, traffic-choked commuter roads, big box stores, and fast food restaurants...

I think of it this way: The "village" or "town" of old was replaced by the city. As people fled dense cities (with the proliferation of the automobile), suburbs formed, necessitating commutes in vehicles...

While we all enjoy driving our Chargers, myself as much as possible, I think it would be debatable if we all enjoy driving an hour or more to and from work every day. I have to walk across one 25 mph road to get to work. It's great. In fact, living in small towns, I haven't regularly driven to work in nearly four years.

I'm simply postulating that yes, the design of roads does affect the extent to which we experience road rage; that faulty design of roads and traffic systems leads to more road rage and to more accidents. Further, I'm postulating that as cities and suburbs have sprawled, the ability of poorly designed roads and traffic systems to affect our lives, and induce road rage, has increased...  :cheers:


Wow that's quite a read you put on me there with that wikipedia article  :lol: But, I think I got the gist of it!  It's actually pretty much common sense if you think about it.  The further you live from the city the more you have to drive the further you are from stores etc. More people in similar situations on the road, more traffic, more traffic and more frustration!  Whereas if we all lived in the city we would be in walking distance to work, store, etc. Less cars on the road equals less frustration for when you do have to drive.  Sorry for the grammatical errors I am in a rush  :icon_smile_wink:

bull

Quote from: ZSmithersCharges on May 06, 2010, 07:08:52 PM
It's actually pretty much common sense if you think about it.  The further you live from the city the more you have to drive the further you are from stores etc. More people in similar situations on the road, more traffic, more traffic and more frustration!  Whereas if we all lived in the city we would be in walking distance to work, store, etc. Less cars on the road equals less frustration for when you do have to drive.  

But then you'd have to deal with the wall-to-wall annoyances that comes with wall-to-wall people. It's a catch 22.

ZSmithersCharges

Quote from: bull on May 06, 2010, 07:26:35 PM
Quote from: ZSmithersCharges on May 06, 2010, 07:08:52 PM
It's actually pretty much common sense if you think about it.  The further you live from the city the more you have to drive the further you are from stores etc. More people in similar situations on the road, more traffic, more traffic and more frustration!  Whereas if we all lived in the city we would be in walking distance to work, store, etc. Less cars on the road equals less frustration for when you do have to drive.  

But then you'd have to deal with the wall-to-wall annoyances that comes with wall-to-wall people. It's a catch 22.

Indeed, I was just saying it was a understandable concept.  Not that I would choose to live that way  :icon_smile_wink:  I can't stand hearing my neighbors gabbing over the weekend when they have their friends over for "tea time".  None the less if I had neighbors on all four sides of me in an apartment.  If it were up to me I would much rather sleep in the charger in some country field with peace and quiet.  Unfortunately I brought that up with the GF, no go.

tricky lugnuts

It is sort of a catch 22 - damned if you do, damned if you don't... Or just a matter of everything having both its benefits and drawbacks, like trying to design the perfect engine. You get something in one place, you lose something in another.

I hear you about not wanting to live in the city. That life is not for me.

I recently moved to Brown County in southern Indiana and absolutely love it. Only 15,000 people in the whole county. Only five or six gas stations in the county, all of them near the center of it. Most of the roads are gravel. Many people's nearest neighbors are a quarter mile away... Everything is hills and 90-plus percent of the county is forested.

You couldn't pay me enough to trade it for life in Indianapolis or some such place.

Of course, the nearest box store is 20 miles away. But hey - I don't want to go there anyway!  :cheers:

Arigmaster

Quote from: elacruze on May 03, 2010, 10:21:40 PM
The problem with American roads is American drivers. We are a selfish discourteous lot. Germany has very few traffic devices compared to the U.S., and their traffic even where very heavy never stops moving. When somebody needs room, they give a little. If they don't need to, they don't jam in front of you. It's just our American Me-First attitude that causes the problems. The roads could have had better designs, but Europe by and large gets along without rage on roads that were designed for horses.

I couldn't agree more with the "Me First" attitude of some drivers... I drive to and from work in heavy traffic every day and nothing causes break checks more than som idiot who is constantly bullying their way in front of the next lane of traffic or cutting someone off because their lane may be going a millisecond slower than the next one. It's also the ones who cut in front of someone because they are actually following traffic in front of them at a safe distance for the speed and not riding a bumper of the car in front of them. (This is a safety zone and not an invitation to your sorry ass to push your tuna boat in to only to slam on the break)

All that combined with people talking and texting on their cell phones or doing makeup... (Distractions in general) It all contributes to the traffic problems thus pissing everyone off and for some... Causing road rage somewhere down the line away from the people causing the trouble in the first place. (They may need to try decalf) Anyway... Traffic engineers can only do so much to help traffic flow but the rest is up to the drivers and if people were more curtious... It wouldn't be near as bad for everyone else.

Some of the worst offenders I have seen... (not trying to stereotype but) The soccer mom's driving minivans.  AArrrgh... They don't care who they kill along the way just as long as they get there first.


ZSmithersCharges

Not to stereotype but, I hate all women drivers in general.  I was actually just discussing this with my girlfriend.  Generally dudes don't drive like asses because they know if they piss of some other dude he will beat his ass when they both come to a stop.  Women don't have to worry about this predicament so they drive like they want to.  Which, Is generally not how I want them to drive  :RantExplode: My girlfriend actually agreed with me here.  She said she hates women drivers too, go figure  :lol:

I also hate the people who cut in my safety zone too.  So annoying when your following at a short distance just enough to react to the other driver in front of you applying the brakes without having to slam on them in return.  Then some ass hat has to jump right in front of you(generally right when the car in front of you originally gets on the brakes) and there you are, doing what you were prepared to prevent.  Slamming the brakes so hard your face is in the dash board.

bull

Quote from: ZSmithersCharges on May 09, 2010, 04:17:07 PM
I also hate the people who cut in my safety zone too.  So annoying when your following at a short distance just enough to react to the other driver in front of you applying the brakes without having to slam on them in return.  Then some ass hat has to jump right in front of you(generally right when the car in front of you originally gets on the brakes) and there you are, doing what you were prepared to prevent.  Slamming the brakes so hard your face is in the dash board.

That's when you go out and buy some big POS International pickup you don't care about and then don't slam on the brakes when someone cuts in on you. A textbook T-bone into the side of their pretty black Escalade would educate them in a hurry, and it would be their fault.

ZSmithersCharges

Quote from: bull on May 09, 2010, 10:06:24 PM
That's when you go out and buy some big POS International pickup you don't care about and then don't slam on the brakes when someone cuts in on you. A textbook T-bone into the side of their pretty black Escalade would educate them in a hurry, and it would be their fault.

I thought I was the only crazy person who had this thought!  I think of that scenario a hundred times a shitty day!  :smilielol:

chargergirl

Totally get why everyone hates women drivers...most are putting on their makeup, talking/texting on cell phone. Work with someone that has put SUV in ditch twice in six months...for tak/text while driving. Most can't drive a stick which leads me to believe it is also part of the problem. Most never learned to be in tune with car...I love a stick....then your REALLY driving. Case in point today a woman is tailgating a guy who had his turn signal on properly to turn right...she was 6 inches off his bumper...still breaking and dashed left...then without a signal or looking, forbid she grow a brain in the middle of traffic, she cuts in front of my 3/4 ton...white truck...never even looked. Guy on motorcycle looks at me like I was nuts for slamming to a stop...then almost gets run over by lady changing lane again without signaling or looking...2 minutes later there was an accident on the bridge into Pensacola...hope it wasn't the motorcycle guy...I almost know it was caused by her.
Trust your Woobie!

ZSmithersCharges

Quote from: chargergirl on May 10, 2010, 12:51:30 PM
Totally get why everyone hates women drivers...most are putting on their makeup, talking/texting on cell phone. Work with someone that has put SUV in ditch twice in six months...for tak/text while driving. Most can't drive a stick which leads me to believe it is also part of the problem. Most never learned to be in tune with car...I love a stick....then your REALLY driving. Case in point today a woman is tailgating a guy who had his turn signal on properly to turn right...she was 6 inches off his bumper...still breaking and dashed left...then without a signal or looking, forbid she grow a brain in the middle of traffic, she cuts in front of my 3/4 ton...white truck...never even looked. Guy on motorcycle looks at me like I was nuts for slamming to a stop...then almost gets run over by lady changing lane again without signaling or looking...2 minutes later there was an accident on the bridge into Pensacola...hope it wasn't the motorcycle guy...I almost know it was caused by her.

If I weren't practically married you would be my next in line  :lol: I wish all women had the thing you do... brains.  And you drive a stick?!  Someone ban me I'm in love!  :slap:

chargergirl

Quote from: ZSmithersCharges on May 10, 2010, 06:23:25 PM
Quote from: chargergirl on May 10, 2010, 12:51:30 PM
Totally get why everyone hates women drivers...most are putting on their makeup, talking/texting on cell phone. Work with someone that has put SUV in ditch twice in six months...for tak/text while driving. Most can't drive a stick which leads me to believe it is also part of the problem. Most never learned to be in tune with car...I love a stick....then your REALLY driving. Case in point today a woman is tailgating a guy who had his turn signal on properly to turn right...she was 6 inches off his bumper...still breaking and dashed left...then without a signal or looking, forbid she grow a brain in the middle of traffic, she cuts in front of my 3/4 ton...white truck...never even looked. Guy on motorcycle looks at me like I was nuts for slamming to a stop...then almost gets run over by lady changing lane again without signaling or looking...2 minutes later there was an accident on the bridge into Pensacola...hope it wasn't the motorcycle guy...I almost know it was caused by her.

If I weren't practically married you would be my next in line  :lol: I wish all women had the thing you do... brains.  And you drive a stick?!  Someone ban me I'm in love!  :slap:
Aww sweet thanks! Send you over the edge I can drive a stick in 4 inch heels and do most days...little pontiac chirps in all five gears!
Trust your Woobie!

ZSmithersCharges

Quote from: chargergirl on May 10, 2010, 07:27:15 PM
Aww sweet thanks! Send you over the edge I can drive a stick in 4 inch heels and do most days...little pontiac chirps in all five gears!

:pullinghair: Your an evil lady!  Don't put that imagery in my head  :lol: