What kind of RR is this?

[68X426]

What??? The ad says it's a 68 and restored. No buckets in 68, right? No grabber in 68, right?

Has a 69 grill and other 69 items on it. And then the VIN says its a 70.

So this one earns five shruggies.  

I e-mailed the seller. Could be a very funny explanation.  

EDIT (hours later) yeah I forgot the link, see several replies past this.

[Bakaruda]

What car no link or picture.

[moparstuart]

 

[vancamp]

  no pic no link

[Brock Samson]

What car no link or picture.

no pic no link

What car no link or picture.

       

[maxwellwedge]

Beep Beep!

[kamkuda]

I am not sure... It is hard to tell.

[68X426]

What??? The ad says it's a 68 and restored. No buckets in 68, right? No grabber in 68, right?

Has a 69 grill and other 69 items on it. And then the VIN says its a 70.

So this one earns five shruggies.   

I e-mailed the seller. Could be a very funny explanation. 

Well, stupid is as stupid does. I forgot the link. 

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=360242435645&viewitem=&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWAX%3AIT

[teddy1500]

Tail lights are wrong year, They are right for a 69, they do not interchange with 68. Seats are wrong,not even mopar seats. Fenders and grille are wrong, Can't get HI paint in 68, the vin looks like 1970. It has electronic ignition, not points That car has a few red flags, nice parts collection

[RD]

feedback rating says it all to me.

[oldcarnut]

Maybe 2 rear qtrs were put on without side marker cut outs and it was easier to put in round holes instead of rectangular  .

[moparstuart]

looks like a mixture of 68 and 69 parts mostly 69 , but has a 70 vin    RUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!  RUN AWAY

[68X426]

RUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!  RUN AWAY

Run away is no joke. I got an e-mail reply. The seller said that he knows it is the wrong VIN.

No, say it isn't so!!!! How can it be?? Then he directed me to call him for more details. I'm not bothering.

He appears to be a dealer and trades a lot on e-bay. I saw nothing in the ad that identified him as such, except the feedback list of dozens of car transactions.

Buyer beware. It remains a laughable three year freak hybrid with a cloud hanging over it (and I am being kind saying that).

[1969chargerrtse]

Not sure I would of shown the floor pan shot.

[tan top]

looks like a mixture of 68 and 69 parts mostly 69 , but has a 70 vin    RUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!  RUN AWAY

yeah  run forest run    well iffy 
looks  good in the first picture  though    10 footer

[rt green]

huh.....  good way to store all your parts. just put them all together and drive them around. 

[maxwellwedge]

huh.....  good way to store all your parts. just put them all together and drive them around. 

[68X426]

rt green ... that's funny.

I see that the ad now has added info: a new VIN, but only after you scroll down to the bottom. And a note that the rear quarters were changed to a 69.

So his claim is that it has a 69 rear (but featuring 68 side lights) and a 68 front (except for the 69 side light and 69 grill). Fact: he doesn't know what it is.

I couldn't resist: I e-mailed to ask for more info and pics.

[tan top]

huh.....  good way to store all your parts. just put them all together and drive them around. 

good one    

[vancamp]

1. color not available in 68 or 69
2. 69 stripes
3. gtx speedometer 150 instead of 120 road runner
4. wrong door panels look like sport satellite
5. trunk welded improperly and spatter painted instead of body color
6. vin issues
7. 69 grille painted like 68
8. 69 fenders
9. wrong horn pad
10. sheet metal or road sign floor pans
11. krylon black underhood
12. hood pins in wrong location
13. decal on doors but no "road runner" emblem
14. geez to much to go on writing run real fast away from this one.

[Nacho-RT74]

 

[oldcarnut]

Reminds me of Johnny Cash   One piece at a time
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBLrnaY8_bE

[FJ5WING]

to quote the kid from the Ally bank commercial...."It's a hunk of junk!"

[khodne]

Feedback:

1.  CAUTION BUYER BEWARE seams to have a hard time telling the truth ( LIES & LIES )
  reply.  Sold him PERFECT nut&bolt restored car, Shipping issue, leaves this? Amazing!

2.  Total nightmare! Car wont even pass the state inspection! Unprofessional seller.
  reply.  Check our feedback! Car was excellent, buyer wanted money, can't please everyone

3.  Car was a hacked up pile of crap
  reply.  Check it out.Great solid car.Described as project.Check our feedback!Bad buyer!

You guys are being to hard on this honest seller.

My favorite is the rare bucket seat option.

[TylerCharger69]

I'm surprised no one noticed that it does NOT have an air grabber hood like it says it does

[71gtx]

 

the doors are 1968 the dash is 1969 not 68
is 1969 car with 1968 parts on it 

[68X426]

The sale ended and it sold for $14,700. One messed up car. 

I think there will be a very disappointed buyer.

[Black Charger]

I would like to be a fly on the wall when the new owner attempts to register that thing. From the looks of things, it appears whoever "restored" that car bought a '69 RR without a tag or title, but went ahead with the resto anyway. It seems they weren't shy about mixing in '68 parts either. Then, when it came time to decide how to register the car so it could be licensed/titled, they simply got a tag from a crushed or rotted '70 RR and stuck it on there. The owner may have a hell of a lot of explaining to do if the state they live in requires an inspection before it can be licensed.