News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Favorite Year 3rd Gen Charger?

Started by 1972Rallye, February 11, 2010, 09:42:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Since all 3rd Gens were lumped together in the recent poll, pick your favorite here!

1971 (Gen 3.0)
36 (43.4%)
1972 (Gen 3.1)
20 (24.1%)
1973 (Gen 3.2)
16 (19.3%)
1974 (Gen 3.2.1)
10 (12%)
I love 'em all the same
8 (9.6%)
I think they're icky
0 (0%)
I thought they were all the same
3 (3.6%)

Total Members Voted: 83

1972Rallye


41husk

As stated
1. 72 Rallye
2. 71 Bee
3. 71 R/T
4. 73 WannaBee  :nana:
1969 Dodge Charger 500 440/727
1970 Challenger convertible 340/727
1970 Plymouth Duster FM3
1974 Dodge Dart /6/904
1983 Plymouth Scamp GT 2.2 Auto
1950 Dodge Pilot house pick up

Foreman72

get my a 72 any day...any...followed by a 71...cuz of the hemi :D
Eric "Foreman"

Previous: 1972 Dodge Charger
Current: 2002 Volvo S60

"The steps of a man are ordered by the LORD, and He delights in his way. Though he fall, he shall not be utterly cast down; For the LORD upholds him with His hand.
=Psalm 37:23-24=
"But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven..."
=Matthew 6:19-21=
:pat

elanmars

I like 73/74s better, it's as if they perfected the body. they specially look better when they are modded to have the hidden headlights from a 71/72.
1969 Dodge Charger, pseudo General Lee., 1973 ratty Dodge Charger.

check out my photography: http://www.tomasraul.com
instagram: tomasraul
facebook: www.facebook.com/tomasraulphotography

41husk

So you like 73-74s that are moded to look like 71-72s :cheers: just kidding!  I love the hidden head lights as well.  Wish I had put them on the WannaBee.
1969 Dodge Charger 500 440/727
1970 Challenger convertible 340/727
1970 Plymouth Duster FM3
1974 Dodge Dart /6/904
1983 Plymouth Scamp GT 2.2 Auto
1950 Dodge Pilot house pick up

tan top

like them all the same  :yesnod:   :coolgleamA: if i had a 3rd generation  would build  a  grandnational replica ,   :coolgleamA:
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

moparstuart

Quote from: tan top on February 11, 2010, 03:36:56 PM
like them all the same  :yesnod:   :coolgleamA: if i had a 3rd generation  would build  a  grandnational replica ,   :coolgleamA:
I know there are several running around but i'm surprised theres not 100 STP clones around .
GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE

nakita7

Quote from: elanmars on February 11, 2010, 02:27:51 PM
I like 73/74s better, it's as if they perfected the body. they specially look better when they are modded to have the hidden headlights from a 71/72.

My favourite is 72, then 71, but I do have to agree with you. The 'triangular' rear pillar on the 71-72's does look stupid. I like the open (non-opera windows) 73-74 rear quarter windows the best. Not sure of the model? It flows really well with the Coke-bottle body lines. I also like the 72 SE, very cool, had one for 6 years. The 73-74 SE's with the opera windows, are kind of cool unto themselves. The 73-74 with that tiny little square quarter window (coupe is it?) are not cool at all. Thanks to all the guys who have ripped those babies out!

71383bee

No comparison...

71 had the last of most of the high impact colors, colored bumpers, spoilers, the 440 +6 (I know I know but making only 3 does not make this a real option for 72!  :icon_smile_big:), vertical door scallops, the 500 package, the Super Bee, The R/T, the HEMI, the special hoods you get with Super Bee or R/T, the smooth sidemarker lights, rear louvers...etc

Cons for the 71...well i don't have any because I am biased! :rofl:

72 is next.  I prefer the horizontal scallops of the Rallye to the 71 vertical's, the trunk stripe is kickass, the V21 in organisol is awesome, the front grilles are sweet, still could get the AG setup, and BOTH years could get the flat out best taillights put on a mopar EVER...IMHO!  :2thumbs:  i also like the SE rear 1/4 window treatment and the fancy chrome trimmed taillights, and the last year of also the best exhaust tips put on a mopar...EVER (I know the E body guys will disagree!)   

Cons for the 72...the cheap sidemarkers (sorry guys I know some love em, but using the same marker that you can get on an 80's omni is cheap) The standard taillights are vanilla, the fact that a rallye package could come with a 318 or 400 2 bbl ( I know you had to do anything to sell cars at that VERY turbulent time but a lo po motor just takes a lot of the fun out of the package), you could not get spoilers or louvers. other than that...

I like the 3.5 gens, but they don't have nearly the same cool ops as the 71/72's.  The BB's need a completely different K member, the 8 3/4 was dropped, no spoilers, the taillights are  :eek2:, the grills are vanila compared to the 71/72's, the aforementioned sidemarkers, the bulge hoods are cool, but no AG.  Personally I really dig the full vinyl SE's with the opera windows.  And I have to admit that i absolutely HATE the non SE vinyl tops...what were they thinking!  Why does the vinyl stop 3" short of the edge and then use 2x as much chrome trim?  It looks like a mistake...like the factory ran out of vinyl or something.   :shruggy:

However...I would not say no a nice 73/74 SE as a daily cruiser so please don't beat up too much on me guys!   :hah:     

Here's a photo collage...









71 - FC7 383 Super Bee

tan top

Quote from: 71383bee on February 11, 2010, 06:59:43 PM
No comparison...

71 had the last of most of the high impact colors, colored bumpers, spoilers, the 440 +6 (I know I know but making only 3 does not make this a real option for 72!  :icon_smile_big:), vertical door scallops, the 500 package, the Super Bee, The R/T, the HEMI, the special hoods you get with Super Bee or R/T, the smooth sidemarker lights, rear louvers...etc

Cons for the 71...well i don't have any because I am biased! :rofl:

72 is next.  I prefer the horizontal scallops of the Rallye to the 71 vertical's, the trunk stripe is kickass, the V21 in organisol is awesome, the front grilles are sweet, still could get the AG setup, and BOTH years could get the flat out best taillights put on a mopar EVER...IMHO!  :2thumbs:  i also like the SE rear 1/4 window treatment and the fancy chrome trimmed taillights, and the last year of also the best exhaust tips put on a mopar...EVER (I know the E body guys will disagree!)   

Cons for the 72...the cheap sidemarkers (sorry guys I know some love em, but using the same marker that you can get on an 80's omni is cheap) The standard taillights are vanilla, the fact that a rallye package could come with a 318 or 400 2 bbl ( I know you had to do anything to sell cars at that VERY turbulent time but a lo po motor just takes a lot of the fun out of the package), you could not get spoilers or louvers. other than that...

I like the 3.5 gens, but they don't have nearly the same cool ops as the 71/72's.  The BB's need a completely different K member, the 8 3/4 was dropped, no spoilers, the taillights are  :eek2:, the grills are vanila compared to the 71/72's, the aforementioned sidemarkers, the bulge hoods are cool, but no AG.  Personally I really dig the full vinyl SE's with the opera windows.  And I have to admit that i absolutely HATE the non SE vinyl tops...what were they thinking!  Why does the vinyl stop 3" short of the edge and then use 2x as much chrome trim?  It looks like a mistake...like the factory ran out of vinyl or something.   :shruggy:

However...I would not say no a nice 73/74 SE as a daily cruiser so please don't beat up too much on me guys!   :hah:     

Here's a photo collage...












thats some nice chargers there :drool5: :2thumbs: :popcrn:
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

Foreman72

man i totally agree with you on the taillights...they are the best... :2thumbs: :2thumbs:
Eric "Foreman"

Previous: 1972 Dodge Charger
Current: 2002 Volvo S60

"The steps of a man are ordered by the LORD, and He delights in his way. Though he fall, he shall not be utterly cast down; For the LORD upholds him with His hand.
=Psalm 37:23-24=
"But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven..."
=Matthew 6:19-21=
:pat

mikesbbody

I'm not surprised with the results I voted for the 71's and 72's and I like them in that order.
I agree with everything 71383bee said only, I dont like the 72 SE 1/4 window (I can say that since I have one  :lol:) never liked the sidemarker lights on 72-74's definitly the best option's and colors were in 71 not to mention true H.P motors.

Chargerguy74

It's a tough one for me to chose between 72 and 74. I prefer the 73/74 body. I love Sienna Metallic paint.  And then theres the V6R, V6Y, and V6K reflective side stripes. Now the 72 Rallye.... I voted for both.
WANTED: NOS or excellent condition 72-74 4 speed shifter boot for bench or centre armrest car, part number 3467755. It's a rubber boot that looks like it's sewn up leather.

WANTED: My original 440 blocks. Serial # 2A188182 and 3A100002

jaak


71383bee

Quote from: mikesbbody on February 11, 2010, 09:59:07 PM
I'm not surprised with the results I voted for the 71's and 72's and I like them in that order.
I agree with everything 71383bee said only, I dont like the 72 SE 1/4 window (I can say that since I have one  :lol:) never likes the sidemarker lights on 72-74's definitly the best option's and colors were in 71 not to mention true H.P motors.

Hah!  

Hey man it's America!  There's no right answer really.  Next post will be from someone saying the 84 charger is the best!

I would not say no to any of them from a 318 car to a BB car.  I have my favorites though.  I would love a 73 SE in B5 and a white top with a white or blue interior as a cruiser personally...keystone or Crager SS's a nice exhaust and any v8 for me...She would make a nice stable mate to the Bee!
71 - FC7 383 Super Bee

SG1022

Quote from: 71383bee on February 11, 2010, 10:20:58 PM
Quote from: mikesbbody on February 11, 2010, 09:59:07 PM
I'm not surprised with the results I voted for the 71's and 72's and I like them in that order.
I agree with everything 71383bee said only, I dont like the 72 SE 1/4 window (I can say that since I have one  :lol:) never likes the sidemarker lights on 72-74's definitly the best option's and colors were in 71 not to mention true H.P motors.

Hah!  

Hey man it's America!  There's no right answer really.  Next post will be from someone saying the 84 charger is the best!

I would not say no to any of them from a 318 car to a BB car.  I have my favorites though.  I would love a 73 SE in B5 and a white top with a white or blue interior as a cruiser personally...keystone or Crager SS's a nice exhaust and any v8 for me...She would make a nice stable mate to the Bee!

What about a 73 SE in TB3 Petty blue, with a white top and blue interior with a 318?  :nana:

71383bee

Quote from: SG1022 on February 11, 2010, 10:32:04 PM
Quote from: 71383bee on February 11, 2010, 10:20:58 PM
Quote from: mikesbbody on February 11, 2010, 09:59:07 PM
I'm not surprised with the results I voted for the 71's and 72's and I like them in that order.
I agree with everything 71383bee said only, I dont like the 72 SE 1/4 window (I can say that since I have one  :lol:) never likes the sidemarker lights on 72-74's definitly the best option's and colors were in 71 not to mention true H.P motors.

Hah! 

Hey man it's America!  There's no right answer really.  Next post will be from someone saying the 84 charger is the best!

I would not say no to any of them from a 318 car to a BB car.  I have my favorites though.  I would love a 73 SE in B5 and a white top with a white or blue interior as a cruiser personally...keystone or Crager SS's a nice exhaust and any v8 for me...She would make a nice stable mate to the Bee!

What about a 73 SE in TB3 Petty blue, with a white top and blue interior with a 318?  :nana:

Sorry man!  From your pictures you have a bit more work than I would like right now!  A nice car though when its done.
71 - FC7 383 Super Bee

mikesbbody

Bottom line...71-74 Charger's are COOL!!!  :2thumbs:

SG1022

Quote from: 71383bee on February 12, 2010, 01:15:27 AM
Quote from: SG1022 on February 11, 2010, 10:32:04 PM
Quote from: 71383bee on February 11, 2010, 10:20:58 PM
Quote from: mikesbbody on February 11, 2010, 09:59:07 PM
I'm not surprised with the results I voted for the 71's and 72's and I like them in that order.
I agree with everything 71383bee said only, I dont like the 72 SE 1/4 window (I can say that since I have one  :lol:) never likes the sidemarker lights on 72-74's definitly the best option's and colors were in 71 not to mention true H.P motors.

Hah! 

Hey man it's America!  There's no right answer really.  Next post will be from someone saying the 84 charger is the best!

I would not say no to any of them from a 318 car to a BB car.  I have my favorites though.  I would love a 73 SE in B5 and a white top with a white or blue interior as a cruiser personally...keystone or Crager SS's a nice exhaust and any v8 for me...She would make a nice stable mate to the Bee!

What about a 73 SE in TB3 Petty blue, with a white top and blue interior with a 318?  :nana:

Sorry man!  From your pictures you have a bit more work than I would like right now!  A nice car though when its done.

I wasn't selling mine, I just thought it was funny somebody wanted my specific car color combo  :cheers:  .  Can't wait to have mine to a daily driver point.

elacruze

'74, just because my best friend had one in high school and we used to troll girls in it. Silver/black SE, 318 and clean as could be. I've considered finding one for a DD. But I plan on DD'ing the '68...what to do, what to do.
1968 505" EFI 4-speed
1968 D200 Camper Special, 318/2bbl/4spd/4.10
---
Torque converters are for construction equipment.

chargerjy9

73. I've owned 2 of them. a red SE, white brougham interior, brand new, and a dark gold metallic SE that I've owned for 7 years. both equipt with 400 4 bbl, 727, 8/3/4 rear, A/C.
I really like the slotted opera windows, nothing like them at the time. set that car above others IMO. the red 73 was my 1st new car, a luxury hotrod, it was fast, comfortable, handled and rode well for it's time. the sheet metal is sleek and sexy. long hood, short deck, great lines and proportions.
1973 Dodge Charger SE 400 4 bbl,727, survivor
1977 AMC Pacer original
2011 Dodge charger R/T Max

451-74Charger

Quote from: elacruze on February 12, 2010, 04:10:30 AM
'74, just because my best friend had one in high school and we used to troll girls in it. Silver/black SE, 318 and clean as could be. I've considered finding one for a DD. But I plan on DD'ing the '68...what to do, what to do.

OK, im hoping that by DD you dont mean Demolition Derby !!!
(I know you meant daily driver. I had to read twice though)

gschmidt211

What can I say, I have a thing for 1972.

My first MOPAR collector car was a 1972 Chrysler New Yorker.  I sold that and eventually bought a nice 1972 Plymouth Satellite.  I sold that last year for my first Charger.  A 1972 Dodge Charger Rallye.  I am building it, so I don't have a driver right now.  So, 1972 it is.

My 1972 Rallye:

http://gallery.me.com/gschmidt211#100047
1972 Charger Rallye
2014 Ram Outdoorsman 3.6L 4x2
1978 D100 Utiline Standard Cab

BROCK

1  71 R/T
2  72 SE
3  73 - 74 non SE

Best of em all would be a 71 SE with 73 - 74 doors & quarters & R/T hood & doors scoops

=============================================
Let your music be in transit to the world

ACUDANUT

 73 and 74 Chargers are Grandma cars. Boring and ugly.  :Twocents: :popcrn:

chargerjy9

that's just not nice, I got somethings to say about e bodies, but this is not the place
1973 Dodge Charger SE 400 4 bbl,727, survivor
1977 AMC Pacer original
2011 Dodge charger R/T Max

1972Rallye


ACUDANUT

 Heehee, Just stirring the pot. I had a 73 Charger for 15 years, but I always wanted a 71-72.  The 72's (rallye) are my favorite. Let's face it...They had Louvered doors, Louvered Taillights, Power bulge hood, Hide-a-way headlights. ect.  73-74 got boring and imo they ruined the roof/body lines.  :Twocents:

mikesbbody

I'm surprised how popular the 72 Rallye is  :2thumbs: very cool but not quite a 71 RT or S.B IMO. It's funny, when I first got my 72 SE I LIKED the fact it wasnt a 71 I like how it didn't have a bulge hood, stripes etc but then I started liking the 71's more... ::) now I want my 72 to be more like a 71...as for 73-74's I think they had their good points too. I like how there's no "Arrow" emblem in the center of the bumper. I like the quarter windows on the non SE models it would have been cool if hideaway's were still optional in 73-74  :Twocents:

skip68

I go with a 68...   :2thumbs: :icon_smile_big: 

:scratchchin:   3rd gen........   I want a 73 baby.    :yesnod:
I like the tail lights on the 73's.   
skip68, A.K.A. Chuck \ 68 Charger 440 auto\ 67 Camaro RS (no 440)       FRANKS & BEANS !!!


mikesbbody

Quote from: skip68 on February 15, 2010, 11:49:24 PM
I go with a 68...   :2thumbs: :icon_smile_big: 

:scratchchin:   3rd gen........   I want a 73 baby.    :yesnod:
I like the tail lights on the 73's.   

The tailights on a 73-74 Charger are one of those "love em or hate em" type deals I'm kinda in the middle I neither love or hate them  :lol:

ACUDANUT


Dans 68

As I just saw an original bronze metallic, '71 R/T 4-speed yesterday, in a garage undergoing freshening up, with 56k original miles, I would have to go with that year. Used to be dragged at Fremont raceway years ago. It was beyond nice...!  :2thumbs:

Dan
1973 SE 400 727  1 of 19,645                                        1968 383 4bbl 4spds  2 of 259

mikesbbody

Quote from: ACUDANUT on February 16, 2010, 02:52:08 AM
How many 71 R/T's were made ?

3118 71 RT's and 5054 71 Super Bee's those are the numbers I have memorized

451-74Charger

Quote from: skip68 on February 15, 2010, 11:49:24 PM
I go with a 68...   :2thumbs: :icon_smile_big: 

:scratchchin:   3rd gen........   I want a 73 baby.    :yesnod:
I like the tail lights on the 73's.   

I have a 74, but I have a spare set of 73 tail lights ;)

chargerjy9



"they ruined the roof/body lines." 

Never was one much for the Gremlin- like quarter glass DLO on the 71-72s, too much sheet metal on the C pillar, IMO was out of proportion to the body. Also I would say that the body lines, especially the A line was way more defined and crisp on the 73-74. the qtr glass slotted inserts on the 73-73 SE even though they hid the glass did not look as heavy as the 71-72, because of the vinyl roof and the sweeping molding that defined the edge. the whole effect was kind of organic, which blended well with the sweeping lines and curvy shapes of the body, a beautiful execution of styling, certainly not ugly. yeah, it did'nt have hidden headlights which I would have liked,but the tail lights were cool and highly styled.
1973 Dodge Charger SE 400 4 bbl,727, survivor
1977 AMC Pacer original
2011 Dodge charger R/T Max

ACUDANUT

Quote from: chargerjy9 on February 16, 2010, 11:13:32 AM


"they ruined the roof/body lines." 

Never was one much for the Gremlin- like quarter glass DLO on the 71-72s, too much sheet metal on the C pillar, IMO was out of proportion to the body. Also I would say that the body lines, especially the A line was way more defined and crisp on the 73-74. the qtr glass slotted inserts on the 73-73 SE even though they hid the glass did not look as heavy as the 71-72, because of the vinyl roof and the sweeping molding that defined the edge. the whole effect was kind of organic, which blended well with the sweeping lines and curvy shapes of the body, a beautiful execution of styling, certainly not ugly. yeah, it did'nt have hidden headlights which I would have liked,but the tail lights were cool and highly styled.

Too each their own. The 73-74 were not only identical, but look at the poll. They are LAST. :Twocents:

chargerjy9


"Too each their own. The 73-74 were not only identical, but look at the poll. They are LAST"




man, who peed in your Wheaties?
1973 Dodge Charger SE 400 4 bbl,727, survivor
1977 AMC Pacer original
2011 Dodge charger R/T Max

mikesbbody

I think? they made more 73-74's than they did 71-72's if so then easier to find parts for them
I think also because of the change to the suspension, the 73-74's give a softer ride I drove a 73 on a few occasion's and to me it drove better than my 72. I quite like how in 74 there were no "louvers? vents?" and the end of the hoods. But I read something about there being no 4 speed 440 cars in...73? 74? both years?