News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Mopar Performance Hydraulic lifters

Started by 68r/t, November 26, 2009, 08:31:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

68r/t

Some time ago I bought a set of Mopar Performance hydraulic lifters, they are new in a sealed box, now I just checked the part number on the boxes and it is listed as a solid lifter p/n P2843177.
The lifter is definitely an hydraulic one,  now I don't know really what I have.
Is there a way to tell the difference from a anti pump up and a std type lifter?
I have the std rocker setup and I don't want to go to adjustable.

71superbee

The Mopar Performance lists that part # as
"Mechanical Tappet sold individually P2843177 Tappet, mechanical 0.0005" undersize

Ghoste

Just to be clear, have you taken any of the lifters out of the sealed boxes to look at them?

68r/t

Yes I have taken them out of the sealed boxes, I have attached a couple of photo's of what I have got.
I don't want the solids so I,m half way there with knowing that they are hydraulic but I don't know if there std or anti pump up lifters.
Do Mopar Performance even sell a std lifter?

firefighter3931

That looks like a standard hyd lifter to me.  :scope:

The anti-pump lifters have a c-clip retainer at the plunger and yours do not. You're good to go with the stock valvetrain.  ;)


Ron
68 Charger R/T "Black Pig" Street/Strip bruiser, 70 Charger R/T 440-6bbl Cruiser. Firecore ignition  authorized dealer ; contact me with your needs

BrianShaughnessy

Quote from: firefighter3931 on November 27, 2009, 07:21:13 AM
That looks like a standard hyd lifter to me.  :scope:

The anti-pump lifters have a c-clip retainer at the plunger and yours do not. You're good to go with the stock valvetrain.  ;)


Ron

I got a set of MP solids with a .528 awhile back and a bunch were missing the C clips.    Standard hardware store item but I really didn't like the way they were made so I bought a box of Comps.   Much better stuff.  I've commited to Howards for the next project.

If you take a pushrod or just about anything and push down on the plunger and it goes down and springs back up it's hydraulic.   
Black Betty:  1969 Charger R/T - X9 440 six pack, TKO600 5 speed, 3.73 Dana 60.
Sinnamon:  1969 Charger R/T - T5 440, 727, 3.23 8 3/4 high school sweetheart.

68r/t

Thanks for the replies, now I may be getting a bit anal about all of this but I was looking at Summits  and they show a picture of a small block lifter which has the wide oil groove like I have and there is a p/n and picture of a big block lifter with a narrow groove about 3/16  wide.

They have a diffrent p/n for a big blocks  and small blocks and they have different oil grooves.
Now if I was to buy a set of comps/ cranes etc they have the same p/n for big blocks and small blocks.

Is it O.K to use the small block Mopar Performance lifter in the big block? I can't see why not.





BrianShaughnessy

The pics in a online catalog are not the best nor could they even be of the same part.

You already have a mislabelled set of lifters from MP,  I'm leary of them already and you should be too.   I'd stick with Comp or Howards.   Summit sells several varieties of each. 

Crappy lifters along with the lack of sulfer compounds in todays oil are the biggest reasons for new engine fails with flat tappet cams.   
Black Betty:  1969 Charger R/T - X9 440 six pack, TKO600 5 speed, 3.73 Dana 60.
Sinnamon:  1969 Charger R/T - T5 440, 727, 3.23 8 3/4 high school sweetheart.

Ghoste

I agree with Brian.  Use those for nifty paperweights or sell them on e-bay but I would get a set of known quality and application lifters.

68r/t

I just a pulled a lifter out of a 383 that  I know has a purple shaft and lifter kit in it and the lifter has the narrow 3/16 oil groove, so I  presume the lifters I have  are small block lifters.
They most probally will work but I am not going to take the chance and just bought a set of Crowers ,which  has the same part number for big block and small blocks. the cam is also a Crower.

Nacho-RT74

Venezuelan RT 74 400 4bbl, 727, 8.75 3.23 open. Now stroked with 440 crank and 3.55 SG. Here is the History and how is actually: http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,7603.0/all.html
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,25060.0.html

Ghoste

At high rpm stock lifters cannot control oil flow quickly enough to maintain proper valve lash.  The anti-pumps prevent this.

oldkimmer

............That is a sb hyd lifter................kim..............
Back in the good old days 1968 charger rt 440 magnum . 1968  charger 383 magnum. The Beast has been Unleashed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nacho-RT74

Quote from: Ghoste on November 27, 2009, 01:02:52 PM
At high rpm stock lifters cannot control oil flow quickly enough to maintain proper valve lash.  The anti-pumps prevent this.

and how ?
Venezuelan RT 74 400 4bbl, 727, 8.75 3.23 open. Now stroked with 440 crank and 3.55 SG. Here is the History and how is actually: http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,7603.0/all.html
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,25060.0.html

Ghoste

The basic idea with a hydraulic lifter is that it fills with oil when it's on the bottom of the cam and eliminates excess valve lash.  The amount of oil needed to accomplish this as the engine warms up changes and the idea is that the lifter can let oil bleed off internally to compensate.  When the engine is reaching high rpm it can "pump up" which really means it isn't bleeding off oil to allow the lifter to compress internally and compensate for the warmer and therefore expanded valvetrain components.  This ultimately means that the valves won't close completely and power is lost.
The idea with anti-pump up lifters is that metering inside the lifter allows it still bleed oil off under these conditions yet still operate correctly under normal operation.
This is an oversimplification and done in my laymans understanding but hopefully clears it up a little.  I'm sure one of the engineers or engine builders on the site can explain it more clearly and correctly.