Spell Check

[Drop Top]

Troy, what a great addition. It makes me look more edgamacated, um-smarter. 
Thanks, I wish more people would use it. Might help with understanding some of the posts. 

[KMPX2]

Now if we had one that would decode some of the slang gays use. Like who would have thought that a wing is a fender?

[Drache]

Now if we had one that would decode some of the slang gays use. Like who would have thought that a wing is a fender?

Maybe the british? 

Still need that Sarcasm detector though! 

[Troy]

You're welcome Drop Top - although I didn't program it. Still need to fix some words I guess.

Now if we had one that would decode some of the slang gays use. Like who would have thought that a wing is a fender?

"Gays" use? I usually understand them fine - it's those dang foreigners that I can't figure out...

Troy

[psykicpup]

Now if we had one that would decode some of the slang gays use. Like who would have thought that a wing is a fender?

No a fender is a wing......or maybe a bumper....or atype of guitar!

[2fast4u]

  I thought a hood was a bonnet as far as the british were concerned!?   

[Drop Top]

In Australia. Don't ask for a napkin. They will give you a diaper.

[Charger_Fan]

In Australia. Don't ask for a napkin. They will give you a diaper.

Hopefully a clean one?


You're right DropTop, so far I've been able to understand everything you've said on the 1st pass.



Nuttin' but love, man.

[psykicpup]

  I thought a hood was a bonnet as far as the british were concerned!?     

Fulll Marks!

[ck1]

Troy, what a great addition. It makes me look more edgamacated, um-smarter.  
Thanks, I wish more people would use it. Might help with understanding some of the posts.  

ya but if you spell as bad as I do, some times spell check can't even figure out what I'm trying to spell and I need English grammer check too

[71charger_fan]

" I need English grammer check too"

That should be grammar.  Sorry but someone would eventually point that out.  I just noticed it first. 

How about software that inserts either the word had or or the word have in front of the word seen in most threads?  Or simply change all "seen" to "saw" as that would create fewer errors than it would correct.