Who has a General Lee?

[elacruze]

Let's get pictures of all of them in one thread!

[Back N Black]

Let's get pictures of all of them in one thread!

I think there are other sites with lots of GL pics......

[Nacho-RT74]

I guess he is refering OWNED by members , what would it make a diff stuff that simply pics around at the web

[elacruze]

I just figured I could get it out of the way in one place. 

[Brock Samson]

the thread has allready been done...

have a question?... do a search. simple.
took me all of ten seconds.. 

http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,47103.0.html

[elacruze]

Sorry for wasting your time.

[MoparManJim]

Sorry for wasting your time.

Don't be sorry, why not recent photos of the cars? those ones in that thread is all old photos from over a year ago. 

[Brock Samson]

didn't waste my time... your the one who waited,.. 

[Brock Samson]

 

[69bronzeT5]

Sorry for wasting your time.

Don't worry about Dave...he's the "duplicate thread police"

[moparstuart]

all this and no one has posted a picture yet  ?

[JT01]

Im building one but its not done yet or I would post a pic for ya

[Brock Samson]

 

[ZSmithersCharges]

Wheres Joe Gowdy?  He's always posting up pics of his...  

[elacruze]

Sorry for wasting your time.

Don't worry about Dave...he's the "duplicate thread police"

Yeah, being the FNG around here I was kinda trying not to point out that if nothing was ever allowed to come up for discussion again, this would be a "Database" not a "Forum".

Oh well.

[CB]

oh well 

[magnum]

  Hows this . Mine in the making!

[mikepmcs]

...

[elacruze]

Hows this . Mine in the making!

[Landonsrt]

This site is slowly turning into the GL fan club.....

[elacruze]

This site is slowly turning into the GL fan club.....

Aw c'mon guys! This thread started as a bit of a joke, but also just a spot to get them all together.

Who said that earlier...

STOP WHINING. You can see the thread title, and you can pass it by just the same if you don't like it. Boo Hoo.

[RamchargerMopar]

This site is slowly turning into the GL fan club.....

Aw c'mon guys! This thread started as a bit of a joke, but also just a spot to get them all together.

Who said that earlier...

STOP WHINING. You can see the thread title, and you can pass it by just the same if you don't like it. Boo Hoo.

dont like it dont read it

[MoparManJim]

This site is slowly turning into the GL fan club.....

Now you hold it right there with that comment  because you are sure over looking one tiny tiny part of the detail. The General Lee is also a Charger and this is also a Charger site. 

[Brock Samson]

"Origin myths and sacred time
Eliade notes that, in traditional societies, myth represents the absolute truth about primordial time.[96] According to the myths, this was the time when the Sacred first appeared, establishing the world's structure—myths claim to describe the primordial events that made society and the natural world be that which they are. Eliade argues that all myths are, in that sense, origin myths: "myth, then, is always an account of a creation".[97]

Many traditional societies believe that the power of a thing lies in its origin.[98] If origin is equivalent to power, then "it is the first manifestation of a thing that is significant and valid"[99] (a thing's reality and value therefore lies only in its first appearance).

According to Eliade's theory, only the Sacred has value, only a thing's first appearance has value and, therefore, only the Sacred's first appearance has value. Myth describes the Sacred's first appearance; therefore, the mythical age is sacred time,[100] the only time of value: "primitive man was interested only in the beginnings [...] to him it mattered little what had happened to himself, or to others like him, in more or less distant times".[101] Eliade postulated this as the reason for the "nostalgia for origins" that appears in many religions, the desire to return to a primordial Paradise.[102]"

  from..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mircea_Eliade
also see:

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_and_profane
religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart and forbidden."[1] In Durkheim's theory, the sacred represented the interests of the group, especially unity, which were embodied in sacred group symbols, or totems. The profane, on the other hand, involved mundane individual concerns. Durkheim explicitly stated that the dichotomy sacred/profane was not equivalent to good/evil. The sacred could be good or evil, and the profane could be either as well.

[elacruze]

Sorry, Dood.

I don't get my life philosophy from Wikipedia.

"Origin myths and sacred time
Eliade notes that, in traditional societies, myth represents the absolute truth about primordial time.[96] According to the myths, this was the time when the Sacred first appeared, establishing the world's structure—myths claim to describe the primordial events that made society and the natural world be that which they are. Eliade argues that all myths are, in that sense, origin myths: "myth, then, is always an account of a creation".[97]

Many traditional societies believe that the power of a thing lies in its origin.[98] If origin is equivalent to power, then "it is the first manifestation of a thing that is significant and valid"[99] (a thing's reality and value therefore lies only in its first appearance).

According to Eliade's theory, only the Sacred has value, only a thing's first appearance has value and, therefore, only the Sacred's first appearance has value. Myth describes the Sacred's first appearance; therefore, the mythical age is sacred time,[100] the only time of value: "primitive man was interested only in the beginnings [...] to him it mattered little what had happened to himself, or to others like him, in more or less distant times".[101] Eliade postulated this as the reason for the "nostalgia for origins" that appears in many religions, the desire to return to a primordial Paradise.[102]"

  from..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mircea_Eliade
also see:

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_and_profane
religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart and forbidden."[1] In Durkheim's theory, the sacred represented the interests of the group, especially unity, which were embodied in sacred group symbols, or totems. The profane, on the other hand, involved mundane individual concerns. Durkheim explicitly stated that the dichotomy sacred/profane was not equivalent to good/evil. The sacred could be good or evil, and the profane could be either as well.