News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

What's your favorite ride height and wheel/tire combo look?

Started by bull, July 01, 2009, 10:16:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Do you like the stock look, the raked '70s style look or the modern low ride/big wheel look?

I prefer stock
17 (17.2%)
I prefer the '70s style jacked up RWL look
52 (52.5%)
I prefer the modern low ride/big wheel combo
30 (30.3%)

Total Members Voted: 99

bull

Just wondering what most guys like for the ride height and wheel/tire combos? Stock, raked or modern?

69bronzeT5

Stock and the modern mildly lowered/bigger wheels. Don't like the '70's completley jacked in the rear look at all :Twocents:
Feature Editor for Mopar Connection Magazine
http://moparconnectionmagazine.com/



1969 Charger: T5 Copper 383 Automatic
1970 Challenger R/T: FC7 Plum Crazy 440 Automatic
1970 GTO: Black 400 Ram Air III 4-Speed
1971 Charger Super Bee: GY3 Citron Yella 440 4-Speed
1972 Charger: FE5 Red 360 Automatic
1973 Charger Rallye: FY1 Top Banana 440 Automatic
1973 Plymouth Road Runner: FE5 Red 440 Automatic
1973 Plymouth Duster: FC7 Plum Crazy 318 Automatic

moparstuart

I like mine up some in the back , and dropped alittle in the front
GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE

69*F5*SE

Stock is good for me.  But, with some meat in the back.  :yesnod:

kab69440

Highbanked(?) Hauler has "The" ideal look nailed perfectly. I aspire to get it done half as well.
Imagination was given to man to compensate him for what he is not;  a sense of humor to console him for what he is.      Francis Bacon

WANT TO BUY:
Looking for a CD by  'The Sub-Mersians'  entitled "Raw Love Songs From My Garage To Your Bedroom"

Also, any of the various surf-revival compilation albums this band has contributed to.
Thank you,    Kenny

Jesus drove a Honda. He wasn't proud of it, though...
John 12: 49     "...for I did not speak of my own Accord."

Mr.Woolery

-1971 Charger R/T clone restomod project

For details on my cars, check out my web blog


NYCMille


69bronzeT5

Quote from: NYCMille on July 01, 2009, 01:00:35 PM
Like this...

Finally!!! I was wondering when we were gonna get to see a picture of Mr Angry and Angrier togther ;)
Feature Editor for Mopar Connection Magazine
http://moparconnectionmagazine.com/



1969 Charger: T5 Copper 383 Automatic
1970 Challenger R/T: FC7 Plum Crazy 440 Automatic
1970 GTO: Black 400 Ram Air III 4-Speed
1971 Charger Super Bee: GY3 Citron Yella 440 4-Speed
1972 Charger: FE5 Red 360 Automatic
1973 Charger Rallye: FY1 Top Banana 440 Automatic
1973 Plymouth Road Runner: FE5 Red 440 Automatic
1973 Plymouth Duster: FC7 Plum Crazy 318 Automatic

Foreman72

i think all three of those shots you posted look great bull

personally, i like a 1" drop in the front and 1" hike in the rear, only to fit the 15x10 wheels with huge rubber... :yesnod:

but there are many cars, esp muscles where everything about the car is spot on except the stance...spend time getting a mean stance...like this (even tho i think this is stock...but you get the point :icon_smile_big: )

Eric "Foreman"

Previous: 1972 Dodge Charger
Current: 2002 Volvo S60

"The steps of a man are ordered by the LORD, and He delights in his way. Though he fall, he shall not be utterly cast down; For the LORD upholds him with His hand.
=Psalm 37:23-24=
"But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven..."
=Matthew 6:19-21=
:pat

73chgrSE

I hate the "Dub" look with the really big rims on any car.  :eek2: I like the 70's hot rod look or the lowered pro touring look. Stock chargers, espicially 3rd gens, were to low in the back and tires were to skinny, didn't look right without fattys and a rake. But they really come alive with a more agressive stance. :coolgleamA:

elanmars

What make of rims does mr. angry's 68 have? anyone know? and size.

I need to move the back tires I have to the front and get fatter ones in the back.

How do you guys go about it as far as rims go? like how big do you all have the fronts and how much bigger are ya'lls rear rims? OK the last two words sound awful out of context, yikes.
1969 Dodge Charger, pseudo General Lee., 1973 ratty Dodge Charger.

check out my photography: http://www.tomasraul.com
instagram: tomasraul
facebook: www.facebook.com/tomasraulphotography


NYCMille

It's all personal opinion. That 3rd Gen... I wouldn't change a thing as it looks perfect with that stance and I think bigger wheels and tire would only detract from it. A 2nd Gen though, in my opinion, really benefits from a larger wheel and tire combo as the car is simply "big". Although with the right stance... ala Highbank haulers car, 15's work perfectly.

Brock Samson

 thought i'd post what i don't like,.. which is too little tire in the back jacked up too high on air shocks,...
yes you'r doing it wrong...
nice car though,.. I gotta talk to that girl..  :slap:

Rustymuscle

D) None of the above.

Stock wheels and tires - for the most part - were typically meant to be tossed as they looked (especially on B-Bodies) like ice skates on a rhinoceros, especially those skinny red lines. "High-jackers" are nearly single-handedly responsible for giving Mopars the goofy hillbilly reputation that its still trying to shake today (i.e. "That thing got a Hemi?"). And while the pro-touring look is all the rage with Popular Hot Rodding, and quite a few Mopars have been able to pull off the look, the end result ultimately doesn't rest well with the street and strip spirit of Mopar.

I would like to offer the following fifth option:

E) Meats and skinnies




1969 Dodge Charger R/T, 535ci Wedge, 727 w/ GV, Dana 60
1970 Dodge Super Bee
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4x4
2005 Dodge Ram 1500 SLT HEMI

mauve66

i chose #2 even though "jacked up" isn't exactly like im looking for, nose down, rear slightly raised, hair pulled back,................ oh wait a minute
Robert-Las Vegas, NV

NEEDS:
body work
paint - mauve and black
powder coat wheels - mauve and black
total wiring
PW
PDLKS
Tint
trim
engine - 520/540, eddy heads, 6pak
alignment

Ghoste

A little bit of a rake works for me.  Too much is bad and we did get a little carried away in the 70's (makes it kind of hard to pick on the ricers for the goofy things they do when you think about it), but a little rake is aggressive looking to me.

Sublime/Sixpack

My preference is with the car setting level (stock height) with 15 or 16 inch rims and good sized meats on all four.  :2thumbs:   But some cars look good with big and littles if set up right.  :yesnod:  I've always hated the stink bug look, never did see any sense in the over sized shackles in the rear and the High-Jacker look. :eek2:
1970 Sublime R/T, 440 Six Pack, Four speed, Super Track Pak

tan top

all look awasome  :drool5:  , but i'm liking the old grand national set up  :coolgleamA: :coolgleamA: :coolgleamA: :drool5:
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

HollyWoodCharger

I prefer the Modern Low Ride height and larger than stock Rim size, typically Rim sizes in the 16-18 diameter with modern performance rubber...... and a few performance suspension mods makes it easy to take advantage of the performance modern day radials offer.

The jacked up look and tires sticking out is too 1970's, it just doesn't look right to me...

NYCMille

Quotenose down, rear slightly raised, hair pulled back,................ oh wait a minute
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

lookin@my68

Here's how mine sits - a stock type look but just a little lower and with wider rubber out back...  :cheers:

4forty

Quotenose down, rear slightly raised, hair pulled back,................ oh wait a minute
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
[/quote]

:lol:

I like ass up slightly too

440charger68

Quote from: 4forty on July 02, 2009, 09:13:17 AM
Quotenose down, rear slightly raised, hair pulled back,................ oh wait a minute
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

:lol:

I like ass up slightly too
[/quote]
:rofl: me too
life's a garden, dig it.

440charger68

forgot a pic  :yesnod: my bad. i want to lower the rear a little cause i dont really like the gap, front is fine :icon_smile_wink:
life's a garden, dig it.

1970Moparmann

Quote from: lookin@my68 on July 02, 2009, 09:06:28 AM
Here's how mine sits - a stock type look but just a little lower and with wider rubber out back...  :cheers:

Looks like the leafs are shot.
My name is Mike and I'm a Moparholic!

Skyview69


lookin@my68



Looks like the leafs are shot.
[/quote]

;D No leafs are fine - I've got two inch lowering blocks under there ;)

Rolling_Thunder

My car will ultimately look like Mike's 68...     I am planning on running 17 or 18" TTM wheels and some Nitto Rubber... .   
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

Brock Samson


G-man

Front 1" lower than rear, 15" wide hoosiers in the rear on 15x12 ET classic 5 spoke wheels.

Hopefully Mine gets like that soon.

bull


2Gunz

Mine



R2


0X01B8

... sorta poll option #2

69*F5*SE

Damn, that is such a nice Charger.  I love the black wheels on it.   :2thumbs:

Foreman72

Quote from: G-man on July 03, 2009, 01:41:09 AM
Front 1" lower than rear, 15" wide hoosiers in the rear on 15x12 ET classic 5 spoke wheels.

Hopefully Mine gets like that soon.

thats the way...


hey 4fourty is yours stock? down on 1" in the front?
Eric "Foreman"

Previous: 1972 Dodge Charger
Current: 2002 Volvo S60

"The steps of a man are ordered by the LORD, and He delights in his way. Though he fall, he shall not be utterly cast down; For the LORD upholds him with His hand.
=Psalm 37:23-24=
"But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven..."
=Matthew 6:19-21=
:pat


1BAD68

I wanted mine to sit like this...
although its not very practical

1BAD68


68charger383

Brock's or 1Bad68, they look abouit right to me

A little low in the front and a little popped in the rear.

If I can count the bolts on your rear, your way to high  :lol:
1968 Charger 383(Sold)
2003 Dodge Viper SRT-10

viper r/t


Foreman72

Eric "Foreman"

Previous: 1972 Dodge Charger
Current: 2002 Volvo S60

"The steps of a man are ordered by the LORD, and He delights in his way. Though he fall, he shall not be utterly cast down; For the LORD upholds him with His hand.
=Psalm 37:23-24=
"But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven..."
=Matthew 6:19-21=
:pat

R6red4spd69RT

I like the wheel wells to look "filled".

As far as my ride goes, I went with a stock look to go with the original options resto.

SeattleCharger



Why would you want anything else?  Just give me a Charger and I'll be happy.

bull


BROCK

I like the rear stance of lookin@my68s' car but would want the front down at least another inch.
I like 4fortys' overall setup - just at least another inch down all the way around :Twocents:

=============================================
Let your music be in transit to the world

SeattleCharger

I like these cars.   

   


Why would you want anything else?  Just give me a Charger and I'll be happy.

Supercharged Riot

raised rear.  my rear height could be higher but my tubbed rear keeps my car's ass from being too high

tan top

 Damn  (SC riot)   :coolgleamA:  thats look like one mean mutha from the rear  :drool5: :2thumbs:
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

BrianShaughnessy

I put Calvert +1 split mono's on the other week but I forgot to get pix...  Ok.. it's been raining so much I couldn't take it out of the garage either.     I like it.
Tank is almost empty...  I figure with a full tank and a bunch of junk to go to Carlisle this weekend it'll be fine!

Oh yeah... less squeaks and groans than the old R/T springs and about 50 lbs saved.
Black Betty:  1969 Charger R/T - X9 440 six pack, TKO600 5 speed, 3.73 Dana 60.
Sinnamon:  1969 Charger R/T - T5 440, 727, 3.23 8 3/4 high school sweetheart.

Long Island RT

I gotta say - I haven't seen a bad pic yet.  I takes a lot to make these cars look bad.

I personally like a about a 2" rake - this way the car is always going downhill.   :nana:
1969 Dodge Charger RT Restomod<br />Triple Black, 512 stroker, Tremec TKO600 5-speed<br />2005 Dodge Magnum RT - Brilliant Black - Lowered

jb666

I haven't seen a bad shot here, either, keep'em coming!!

I loved the tubbed look too, but this shot is awesome!!


SeattleCharger

tubbed?  this was at the mopar show in bellevue, WA a couple years ago.

 


Why would you want anything else?  Just give me a Charger and I'll be happy.

Brock Samson

hey did anyone save the shot of that swedish red '69 R/T with the blower?.. i allways thought that was the ultimate stance, but lost the pic years ago..  :shruggy:

jb666

I know there are people who dislikes GL's, but I love the stance of the car in this "before" shot... The wheel/tire combo is nice with the 295's in the back and 245's up front.







OFF CHARGER TOPIC:
Now this , IMO, is an awesome stance too...



As well as this...



And Jon's Challenger  :drool5:



So I guess overall I like the raked in the rear, lower in the front look...

knitz01


WM23N1G1


SeattleCharger

That one reminds me a little of this one:   the angle and color and slant of blacktop,   from spy hard movie



Why would you want anything else?  Just give me a Charger and I'll be happy.

blk68wailer

Love the way a darker colored 2nd or 3rd gen charger looks with stock type black steel wheels with no hubcaps or center caps. A little lower and/or some rake also looks not bad. Wider tires in the back look good as well as long as they are tucked in the wheel well. :coolgleamA:

SeattleCharger


    slots on a souped-up zoomin' boomer    :D


Why would you want anything else?  Just give me a Charger and I'll be happy.