News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

2011 "Charger" - Here we go again??

Started by FastbackJon, May 21, 2009, 06:32:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

FastbackJon

Found this at Allpar today... almost looks like a new invention of a '68 (:2thumbs:) four-door(:eek2:), and IMO not anywhere as good looking as a '68. No tunnel rear window and probably no quarter panel fuel cap placement either.

I'd say maybe 3/10, whereas the 2006-2010 was a 1/10.

Link: http://www.allpar.com/cars/dodge/charger-2010.html

"This was the dedication of the altar, in the day when it was anointed, by the princes of Israel: twelve chargers of silver, twelve silver bowls, twelve spoons of gold..." -- Numbers 7:84 KJV




aone415



This Charger right here is a one of none, that means none before it, none to come.

1969chargerrtse

This car was sold many years ago to somebody in Wisconsin. I now am retired and living in Florida.

bull

It's a step in the right direction but when you have 3,000 miles to go, one step doesn't amount to much.

jb666

You guys are funny.. Because it's a 4 door it's not a "real Charger".. Sad thing is there are 100's of other cars y'all could be ragging on but one of your own  :lol:

At least they didn't let the name just die. Sure, they changed this worse than they did the new "GTO" , but what the Hell, it's still a cool ride.  :cheers:

chargerjy9

for what it's worth, it will have a rear quarter high mounted fuel cap and the rear end is wrong.it will have tail light  similar to 1970.the bodyside has way more plan view coke bottle shape
1973 Dodge Charger SE 400 4 bbl,727, survivor
1977 AMC Pacer original
2011 Dodge charger R/T Max

charger Downunder

When are they going to make it right hook for us guys.
[/quote]

jb666

Quote from: charger Downunder on May 21, 2009, 07:12:03 PM
When are they going to make it right hook for us guys.

There's one cool rendition of a 2-door Charger up there.. Looks pretty cool, but I don't see it happening. I remember when the new Charger came out I was thinking "Here we go again, it's the same as when they introduced the IMPALA SS... NOTHING like the old SS's". Then I drove one and bought one. What a car (SS).


Just 6T9 CHGR

That is a horrible grade school photoshop :rotz: :puke:
Chris' '69 Charger R/T


jb666

THIS (while not a Charger) is one of the hottest "new" cars I've seen in a LONG time  :coolgleamA:

http://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/ctd/1180095315.html





wordslikebullets

You guys are funny thats for sure... :smilielol:

I think for this day and age with all of the hippies and green freaks out there we should just be happy to have a charger at all.  I mean you guys remember the 80's charger...at least this one still has 425hp I dont know about you but that is alot of power and you can get it for about the same price as a tricked out hybred :eek2:

So all in all I think its cool enough for me.  It could be better but at least its not a K car right?  I like the lines on the side like the 70 and the rear tail lights of a strange 68 and kinda like the pipes too.  I just hope we get to see another charger...
I Love Chargers Yes I Do....I love Charger How Bout You

Silver R/T

that really looks like camaro back end imo
http://www.cardomain.com/id/mitmaks

1968 silver/black/red striped R/T
My Charger is hybrid, it runs on gas and on tears of ricers
2001 Ram 2500 CTD
1993 Mazda MX-3 GS SE
1995 Ford Cobra SVT#2722

mikepmcs

Life isn't Father Knows Best anymore, it's a kick in the face on a saturday night with a steel toed grip kodiak work boot and a trip to the hospital all bloodied and bashed.....for reconstructive surgery. But, what doesn't kill us, makes us stronger, right?

69*F5*SE

Yeah, they do shine a bit don't they. 

68charger383

Well they at least got one thing dead on in that article:\

The next generation Charger is expected to merge the styling of the current version with a more classic look from the famous 1968 Chargers, one of the most stylish vehicles ever built.

they had the same issue in 69 and 70...they just couldn't get the car to look better than it did in 68 and they finally gave up :lol:
1968 Charger 383(Sold)
2003 Dodge Viper SRT-10

Brock Samson

well i sure hope it don't look like that !  :eek2:

GeneralLeeTESH

ANY  4  door  "granny car"  dodge/chrysler is a Gdamned waste of precious time and money !
Might as well spend the money on "WHAM" concert tickets !
The TESH

jb666


Khyron

Im not even gonna click on the link and give it two middle fingers up.

MaMopar will be out of buisness before the abortion they call a Charger will see the light of day.


Before reading my posts please understand me by clicking
HERE, HERE, AND HERE.

Khyron

O.k. I clicked on the lonk and have to add.... that concept drawing looks like a bag of ass.


Before reading my posts please understand me by clicking
HERE, HERE, AND HERE.

Old Moparz

What the hell is this?  ::)
               Bob               



              Going Nowhere In A Hurry

Khyron



Before reading my posts please understand me by clicking
HERE, HERE, AND HERE.

69bronzeT5

Quote from: chargerjy9 on May 21, 2009, 07:11:32 PM
for what it's worth, it will have a rear quarter high mounted fuel cap and the rear end is wrong.it will have tail light  similar to 1970.the bodyside has way more plan view coke bottle shape

If that's true, then it'll be pretty damn cool. :yesnod:
Feature Editor for Mopar Connection Magazine
http://moparconnectionmagazine.com/



1969 Charger: T5 Copper 383 Automatic
1970 Challenger R/T: FC7 Plum Crazy 440 Automatic
1970 GTO: Black 400 Ram Air III 4-Speed
1971 Charger Super Bee: GY3 Citron Yella 440 4-Speed
1972 Charger: FE5 Red 360 Automatic
1973 Charger Rallye: FY1 Top Banana 440 Automatic
1973 Plymouth Road Runner: FE5 Red 440 Automatic
1973 Plymouth Duster: FC7 Plum Crazy 318 Automatic

Brock Samson

what!?..
have you learned nothing!?..   :slap:

Khyron

yep, they'll F it up...


yes folks, I'm starting early on this one :-P


Before reading my posts please understand me by clicking
HERE, HERE, AND HERE.