News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

No 2010 Camaro???

Started by BLUE68RT4ME, March 26, 2009, 09:47:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Chargerrtforme

None of what you're talking about with oil and cars matters as the very near future is Hydrogen powered fuel cells for cars. It's already out there and on the way. They are building Hydrogen stations in my state as we speak.

Ghoste

I think starting a thread about it is the whole reason we have a forum whether we've discussed it before or not.  To me, this is just a car club meeting that is always open and a different form of communicating.  The car buddies I meet weekly in person talk about the same things all the time too and the new Camaro, politics, and the price structure of oil and its effects are all hot topics with them as well. So Brock keep telling us we've already discussed this, Mike stay on that soapbox, and Blue68 keep bringing up things to discuss; it's all good guys!  (everyone is wrong except for me anway  :nana:)
Oh, and I think the 2010 Camaro will be a go, the CAFE standards will kill the Camaro and the Challenger, fuel prices and CAFE will BOTH go up, Oswald didn't act alone, Obama now knows the secret of Area 51 but we aren't ready for the technology, Led Zeppelin knew damned well that playing Stairway backwards invokes Satan and how in the Hell do they get the gooey center into the Caramilk bars?

Chargerrtforme

Quote from: Ghoste on March 27, 2009, 11:10:10 AM
I think starting a thread about it is the whole reason we have a forum whether we've discussed it before or not.  To me, this is just a car club meeting that is always open and a different form of communicating.  The car buddies I meet weekly in person talk about the same things all the time too and the new Camaro, politics, and the price structure of oil and its effects are all hot topics with them as well. So Brokc keep telling us we've already discussed this, Mike stay on that soapbox, and Blue68 keep bringing up things to discuss; it's all good guys!  (everyone isl wrong except for me anway  :nana:)
Oh, and I think the 2010 Camaro will be a go, the CAFE standards will kill the Camaro and the Challenger, fuel prices and CAFE will BOTH go up, Oswald didn't act alone, Obama now knows the secret of Area 51 but we aren't ready for the technology and Led Zeppelin knew damned well that playing Stairway backwards invokes Satan and how in the Hell do they get the gooey center into the Caramilk bars?



All good stuff, but Oswald was alone. Sorry.

Brock Samson

Quote from: BLUE68RT4ME on March 26, 2009, 08:58:57 PM
Quote from: Brock Samson on March 26, 2009, 08:18:41 PM
A couple moments of simple google reasearch would lay these rumors to rest, just like a couple words in the search box will reveal a treasure trove of past threads about pretty much anything charger related,..   :scope: :shruggy:
I think folks especially new members just want to start a thread or discussion..  :callme:  or stir the pot..  :stirthepot:  :chatting:
I guess it's pretty much human nature.  :icon_smile_wink:

Wow Brock, you sure assume a lot.  I asked if anyone's read the article because I hadn't.  My friend that DID read the article summarized it as I mentioned, but I asked for feedback from ANYONE ELSE who read the article.  He said the article is on page 13 of the April addition of Car and Driver.  And for your information I did read other threads but none of them mentioned their concerns about bringing the car to market.

I guess because I'm a new member I'm just not as worthy of speaking as you and I see that when you do you have to make sure everyone knows it.  Sorry to have caused you so much trouble.  :bawling: If I were you I'd just ignore any other threads that us new-bies start because they will probably just waste your time.   :blahblah:


   pretty much

BLUE68RT4ME

At least now we have a clear understanding.
Mark Schultz
"BLUE68RT4ME"


Chargerrtforme

 ::) Brock brock brock. Thats not nice. :rotz:

Brock Samson

 here's a gift from me to you.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1MQW5e6KcE  :icon_smile_wink:


"Dragula"

Dead I am the one, Exterminating son
Slipping through the trees, strangling the breeze
Dead I am the sky, watching angels cry
While they slowly turn, conquering the worm

Dig through the ditches,
And burn through the witches
I slam in the back of my
Dragula

Dig through the ditches,
Burn through the witches
I slam in the back of my
Dragula

Dead I am the pool, spreading from the fool
Weak and want you need, nowhere as you bleed
Dead I am the rat, feast upon the cat
Tender is the fur, dying as you purr

Dig through the ditches,
And burn through the witches
I slam in the back of my
Dragula

Dig through the ditches,
And burn through the witches
I slam in the back of my
Dragula

Do it baby, Do it baby
Do it baby, Do it baby
Burn like an animal

Dead I am the life, dig into the skin
Knuckle crack the bone, 21 to win
Dead I am the dog, hound of hell you cry
Devil on your back, I can never die

Dig through the ditches,
And burn through the witches
I slam in the back of my
Dragula

Dig through the ditches,
And burn through the witches
I slam in the back of my
Dragula

Do it baby, Do it baby
Do it baby, Do it baby
Burn like an animal

Dig through the ditches,
And burn through the witches
I slam in the back of my
Dragula

Dig through the ditches,
And burn through the witches
I slam in the back of my
Dragula

Dig through the ditches,
And burn through the witches
I slam in the back of my
Dragula
 
 
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_IqWOPMHbs0E/SQCBFKY8vyI/AAAAAAAABMQ/Mz9BM2U5ubE/s1600/munsters_koach_dragula.jpg

wayfast1500

Guess I'll be keeping my 5.9 ram because I refuse to drive a hybrid.  Even when gas was $4.00+ around me I just kept it tuned up and used discression before I put my foot in it. Does this include diesels too?

BLUE68RT4ME

I'm sure it does but I can't see this ever coming to fruition on trucks.  How on earth will farming and construction survive without the torque?  So, you get better milage but take two trips?   ::)

Anyway, I think it's time to get the cylinder index up as high as you can now!   :icon_smile_big:  Well, any time is a good time but now even more.  I might start looking for a good used truck after I'm done with taxes.

How's the 5.9 treating you?
Mark Schultz
"BLUE68RT4ME"


Mike DC

QuoteI'm sure it does but I can't see this ever coming to fruition on trucks.  How on earth will farming and construction survive without the torque?  So, you get better milage but take two trips?   Roll Eyes

I don't know either.  The CAFE standards will absolutely destroy trucks for their real intended use as beasts of burden. 

I don't know how they will fix that.  I really hope that they will somehow come up with a better form of truck/car separation in the regulations.  This whole problem started because they let leather-upholstered, DVD-players-in-the-headrests Ford Explorers keep their "farm vehicle" kind of CAFE exemptions.



It occurs to me that maybe they could use Diesel & gasoline fuel as the difference.  Maybe they could set some rules about what kind of vehicle is allowed to get a diesel-powered motor, and then let the CAFE standards only apply to the gasoline ones.   Just write the rules in such a way that diesels are not practical for soccer-mom duty anymore, and it could work.

   

Troy

Quote from: Mike DC (formerly miked) on March 27, 2009, 05:22:25 PM
QuoteI'm sure it does but I can't see this ever coming to fruition on trucks.  How on earth will farming and construction survive without the torque?  So, you get better milage but take two trips?   Roll Eyes

It occurs to me that maybe they could use Diesel & gasoline fuel as the difference.  Maybe they could set some rules about what kind of vehicle is allowed to get a diesel-powered motor, and then let the CAFE standards only apply to the gasoline ones.   Just write the rules in such a way that diesels are not practical for soccer-mom duty anymore, and it could work.
I think it would have to be by gross weight or towing capacity because many small cars are moving to diesel engines. Not all large farm vehicles are diesel either. Most of my family lives on farms and yet I'm the only one with a diesel pickup.

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.

bull

Brock's job here is to monitor the site 24/7 and make sure none of the information repeats itself.

Brock Samson


Mike DC

       

Yeah, I've thought about the diesel in cars thing.  But it does seem like there is diesel showing up in small cars & huge trucks but nothing in the middle.  The differentiation could still be made. 

The rules would not be retroactive either.  I would think that between that and just reclassifying things, the split could feasibly be made through fuel type.  The point would not be to control things by jacking up the price of certain fuels, but rather to CAFE-police how the new vehicles are built.  Just like now. 


-----------------------------------


Towing capacity and/or vehicular tonnage could certainly work too.  Although we might discover that using raw GVW alone might create some bass-ackwards incentive to make the borderline vehicles HEAVIER  because of it if we're not careful!

 

Sublime/Sixpack

Quote from: BLUE68RT4ME on March 26, 2009, 08:58:57 PM
Quote from: Brock Samson on March 26, 2009, 08:18:41 PM
A couple moments of simple google reasearch would lay these rumors to rest, just like a couple words in the search box will reveal a treasure trove of past threads about pretty much anything charger related,..   :scope: :shruggy:
I think folks especially new members just want to start a thread or discussion..  :callme:  or stir the pot..  :stirthepot:  :chatting:
I guess it's pretty much human nature.  :icon_smile_wink:

Wow Brock, you sure assume a lot.  I asked if anyone's read the article because I hadn't.  My friend that DID read the article summarized it as I mentioned, but I asked for feedback from ANYONE ELSE who read the article.  He said the article is on page 13 of the April addition of Car and Driver.  And for your information I did read other threads but none of them mentioned their concerns about bringing the car to market.

I guess because I'm a new member I'm just not as worthy of speaking as you and I see that when you do you have to make sure everyone knows it.  Sorry to have caused you so much trouble.  :bawling: If I were you I'd just ignore any other threads that us new-bies start because they will probably just waste your time.   :blahblah:
Not trying to give you a rough time here Blue, but I just checked my April '09 issue of Car and Driver and all thats on page 13 is an advertisement for Victory Motorcycles.   :shruggy:
1970 Sublime R/T, 440 Six Pack, Four speed, Super Track Pak

BLUE68RT4ME

Then I will go through every new magazine issued for April until I find it.  Sorry.
Mark Schultz
"BLUE68RT4ME"


Red Ram

I get an automotive trade magazine at work...what they did say is that they're going to postpone the release of the Z-28 and convertible versions of the Camaro. The base, RS and SS are a go. The base V-6 has 300 hp the SS is 400 and 426hp! The base V-6 is supposed to be nice motor and you can get a manual transmission with it.

Article from Autoweek:

General Motors has delayed indefinitely the Chevrolet Camaro convertible and Z28 high-performance variant to save cash, sources say.

GM also has tabled plans to add a four-cylinder engine version of the Camaro. GM is starting to ship the Camaro to dealers this week.

Insiders say executives hope to restore the convertible to GM's product plan. GM originally had wanted to launch a convertible in 2010 and bring out the Z28 soon afterward.

"Neither one has been outright canceled," says Terry Rhadigan, a Chevrolet spokesman. Rhadigan said GM will seek to bring out the convertible in 2011.

The Z28 was to have challenged two rival performance muscle cars--the Shelby GT500 version of the Ford Mustang and Dodge's Challenger SRT8.

Plans for a four-cylinder engine for the Camaro lost appeal as gasoline prices dipped and the Camaro scored well on federal fuel-economy tests.

Last year, Vice Chairman Bob Lutz said GM was considering the same four-cylinder engine for the Camaro that GM uses in the Pontiac Solstice and Saturn Sky roadsters. The 2.0-liter turbocharged direct-injection engine is rated at 260 hp in those cars.

Gene Stefanyshyn, GM's vehicle line executive for performance cars, said cheaper gasoline played a role in shelving the smaller engine.

"We're looking at it. We don't have anything approved," Stefanyshyn said at a press event last week. "But with gas $1.78 a gallon, we have to weigh where we put our poker chips."

Another source familiar with GM product plans confirmed that the four-cylinder for the Camaro is dead for "the time being."

Not only have fuel prices leveled out, but GM surpassed its own estimated highway mileage rating of 27 mpg for the V6 Camaro. The EPA last week rated that vehicle at 29 mpg in highway driving.

The strong fuel-economy performance of the 3.6-liter, 304-hp V6 reduces the need to offer a four-cylinder engine, sources say.

GM also offers a 6.2-liter V8 in two versions, making 400 hp and 426 hp.

GM began building the Camaro, which starts at $22,995, including shipping, on March 16. GM estimates that it will take until May or June to fill the 14,000 sold orders in hand.
"In search of truth...some pointy boots and a few snack-crackers"

426HemiCharger

Quote from: keepat on March 26, 2009, 08:10:24 PM
One of the black Camaros is mine!  :yesnod:
Pat





I hope for Chevy's sake that the Camaro doesn't end up like the Superbird "On the showroom floor and three years later"
------------------------Cars I have now----------------------------
1969 Charger R/T
1998 Ford Econoline 150
2002 Hyundai Elantra GLS
-----------------------Cars I wish I had----------------------------
1969 Charger R/T 4-Speed or Hemi Clone
1970 Charger R/T Hemi Clone
1970  Dodge Polara IL State Police Car
---------------------------Future Posibilities------------------------
2010 or later Ford Fusion Hybrid (Replaces 2002 Hyundai)

BLUE68RT4ME

Exactly! The last thing I want is any of the big 3 to fall.   :yesnod:
Mark Schultz
"BLUE68RT4ME"


Brock Samson


BLUE68RT4ME

Good find Brock, but that was before the government bailout and the bailout is the reason I brought it up.  I was curious if people had heard any more on how things would be affected by the government throwing money at the car companies.  Would they actually be able to force/influence them not to release this car, or versions of it?  My concern is that they're going to try to take a certain amount of control over them like they are the financial industry.  Seriously, no beef with you Brock.  Sorry if I wasn't clear before.   :2thumbs:
Mark Schultz
"BLUE68RT4ME"


Brock Samson

 What!? No beef?.. where's the beef?!
Naw,.. it's all good,.. since i been on this site religiously since the beginning and the othe site D-C.com before the implosion i am quite familiar with most of the threads and when i need to know something i just do a search, ussually several a day... I mess with folks alot, sometimes just playing the devils advocate as the folks who git annoyed with me are quite aware,.. huh?.. I used to be the spelling and punctuation nazi, intill it was pointed out to me with a few, ok several, pokes in the eye with a sharp stick, that I have my own style of sphellin and punktuation..  :icon_smile_blackeye:
but these these days i like to go around and critisize the newbies though i've been quite good at stayin out of threads where i have no business,.. and some others have picked up the gauntlent, err,.. whatever..
It's all fine,.. me an Arizona Dave got into a shovefest a couple mos. back...
Part of the reason for my being so anal pardon the term, is that i used to do alot of fact checking and research at my old newspaper job, and i got alot of grief if i was errant or sloppy in the office, ussually shamed right out in public... infront of everybody,.. that's what passes for training in journalism...
anyhow,.. i'd like to see more pics of your ride and hear of your plans and progress...
or maybe there's a thread I missed... like this one... perhaps..  :scratchchin:
  http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,55034.msg611414.html#msg611414