17" rims questions...............................

[bksfld68]

Hi all -

I am getting ready to get some tires and wheels for my 68.  I am thinking of using 17" front and rear and looking for widths really that these cars can accomodate.  I was thinking 17x8 fronts but would like to see what has been done with the rears.  I would like to run something wider in the back and be able to sort of tuck the tire a bit in the rear,  within the wheel well.  Any suggestions on backsapcing and  sidewall heighths would be cool to if you would like to share.


Thanks,

Ryan

[Silver R/T]

17x10 will fit depending on backspacing

[Blakcharger440]

Bummer dude, you got moved to the least visited section of this board. Wont get much of a reply here.

[bksfld68]

I was thinking the same thing.  And the funny thing is, the heading for this sub-category, just seemed to change last night after I made the post, to include wheels and tires.

[471_Magnum]

This subject has been beat to death on just about every bulletin board. Poke around in some archives. But since you asked...

17x8 front zero offset. 255-50-17. VERY tight
17x9 rear zero offset. 275-50-17. There's room for more tire, but I didn't see the point.

[bksfld68]

471 Magnum -

When you say VERY tight on the fronts, are you experiencing any rubbing?  Also, with the zero offset, does this relate to backspacing as it seems most are using 4.5" of backspacing.

Ryan

[471_Magnum]

When you say VERY tight on the fronts, are you experiencing any rubbing? Also, with the zero offset, does this relate to backspacing as it seems most are using 4.5" of backspacing.

Slight rub on wheel opening molding when traversing a curve with the wheel turned sharply. 1/2" positive offset or less tire would help this.

4.5" back space is zero offset on a 8" rim. Zero offset is 5" back space on a 9" rim.

Tire selection is pretty slim in the 27"-28" range, but that's what best fills the wheel house IMHO.

[Troy]

Bummer dude, you got moved to the least visited section of this board. Wont get much of a reply here.

If people actually asked (and answered) questions in the correct sections then it wouldn't be the least visited now would it? It just so happens that the "tech experts" usually look to answer tech questions in the tech sections (go figure). These sections also move a bit slower so the questions stay up on the first page longer which gives them more visibility and a better chance of being answered correctly. As noted, the question has been asked and answered before so a little searching would have saved a mod the trouble of moving it. One of the main reasons to have a tech section is because usually more than one person has the same question and keeping them organized makes it easier for everyone.

Kinda looks like the replies (other than yours) were pretty relevant...

For the record, I changed the name of the section since it seemed obvious that some people had no idea where to start new threads (or look for answers). I get tired of moving them.

Troy

[79JON]

Hey,    I have 17X8's all the way around on my 68 coronet and I do have a little rub when i turn the wheel all the way.  But not terrible.    What I did on the rear is put 1/2inch spacers and now the wheels look pretty even.      It did look funny with the rear tires tucked in more than the front.

[PocketThunder]

After reading other threads here and on moparts, (and spending half the morning on it here are work,   hehe), here is what i came up with on my excel spreadsheet..   I'm gonna try this on my '68 unless i prove myself wrong or someone esle has something to add.   (and i save up $1000 for rims )

Front: 225/55-17
Sidewall= 4.9"
Width= 8.9"
Height= 26.7"

Rear: 265/55-17
Sidewall= 5.7"
Width= 10.4"
Height= 28.5"

The side walls are an inch apart, so that shouldnt look goofy..   The width is within a good tolerance so there should be no rubbing.   The front height is very close to stock 26" tall tires, with the fronts a little shorter for a good stance..

I'm leaning towards the American Racing: Hopster..  
Part #550-7865 for the front, 17x8, 4" backspacing.
Part #550-79567 for the rear, 17x9.5, 6-3/8" backspacing, gonna need a 1-7/8" spacer to make them fit.   But i'm still doing my homework on this part to make sure they dont rub on the wheel opening...

[471_Magnum]

Curious. What brand/model tire are you planning to use?

275-55-17 or 275-50-17 will fit out back. You could squeeze a 255-50-17 up front.

I'd spend a few extra bucks and order a custom offset wheel rather than messing with spacers (you want zero offset in back). The will give the wheel a bit more "dish" and look more agressive.

Contact Wheels for Less to get the best deal on American Racing Wheels.

Email them for a quote.

[PocketThunder]

I just went to tirerack.com and typed in the size and a couple of choices popped up.

thanks for the link, i'll get an email out to them.  I was using the stock sizes off of american racings website, thats where i got the 9.5" rim and dimensions.  I didnt think to order a custom offset wheel.  We'll see what the cost is..

thanks

Paul
in St. paul

[PocketThunder]

Got a e-mail back from wheelsforless.com on the custom Hopster........

The Hopster can be custom made in 17x9.5 with a 4.5" backspace.  They sell for $303.00 each.  Allow 5-7 weeks for delivery.
Thanks,
Tech Department
Wheelsforless.com
800-810-4512

Guess i gotta pay to play....

[471_Magnum]

Youch!

I had them quote some TrakStars last year. I think it was about a $60 premium for the custom offset. Their price on the standard offset beat everyone else’s by quite a bit AND the price included lugs and stems. Unfortunately, they were still too rich for my blood.

The elimination of the need for adaptors should at least partially offset cost of the custom offset. And like I said, it will look better.

Unfortunately, 17” zero offset wheels are scarce as hen’s teeth, especially in widths over 8”. For zero offset, you almost have to pay for a custom wheel. $300 ain’t bad for a custom wheel. The Hotwheels I’m running are comparatively cheap at $160 each (for polished, $210 for chrome), but they are a one-piece Chinese casting, not an American made forged wheel. They may, however, be the only off the shelf wheel with the desired offset.

BTW, on a 9.5” wheel in back, you probably want another 3/4” back space to center the wheel out back. 5.25” backspace is zero offset on a 9.5” wheel, which is pretty much considered ideal on a stock B-body. 4.5" backspace is 0.75" negative offset on a 9.5" wheel and will put you dangerously close to the lip.

[Blown70]

Got a e-mail back from wheelsforless.com on the custom Hopster........

The Hopster can be custom made in 17x9.5 with a 4.5" backspace.   They sell for $303.00 each.   Allow 5-7 weeks for delivery.
Thanks,
Tech Department
Wheelsforless.com
800-810-4512

Guess i gotta pay to play....

HMMM for the rear of my charger I was looking at some Colorado Customs or Budnick.... $1200 Each for the rear.  I MAY have to do something else for now.... Who knows

Tom

[PocketThunder]

Hey 471_Magnum!,

I just called on those rims from moparts and i bought em.  $530 out the door.  i owe you one

I'm PUMPED!!!!   Now, what size to go with on the back with 8" rims??  Can i go with a 10" wide tire on a 8" rim?  Is an inch overhang on each side to much?  Maybe i can just run 9" wide 235's...

[471_Magnum]

Tire manufacturer will have a rim width recommendation. Your 265-55-17 should be okay. Minimum width for my 275-50-17 was 8" IIRC.

[471_Magnum]

Now, what size to go with on the back with 8" rims?? Can i go with a 10" wide tire on a 8" rim? Is an inch overhang on each side to much? Maybe i can just run 9" wide 235's...

How about 235-55-17 up front and 255-55-17 (28") out back? both will fit on a 17x8 rim and fill out the wheel wells nicely. You can get a Goodyear RS-A in this combo. You'll have about 1/2" rake.

You could run the same combo as me, but as mentioned above, front clearance is tight. Those Hopsters have a little more offset (8 mm) than my wheels, which will help. Nitto and Falken are the only tire manufacturers who have this size (I run Nittos).

[PocketThunder]

So i ran to Goodyear at lunchtime.   RS-A's are $185 and $235.  
They had a Kelly Navigator Platinum for $127 for the fronts, none for the rear.
For the rear i could go with Dunlop Sport Rovers for $199..

So it's looking like about $210 a corner for tires if i want to match the front and rear with the same brand...   maybe tirerack.com has free shipping, their prices are a bit lower than these.....

I'm not driving this car till spring so i'll wait awhile and shop around some more for tires, (and save more money for them)   Guess I gotta pay to play, but wheels/tires make or break the look of any car.   This car will look Bitchen!!

[PocketThunder]

Looks like Goodyear RS-A's from the tirerack.com website are only $135 and $165.... + $52 for shipping....   thats the winner so far..      $652 out the door.

[PocketThunder]

What do you think about KUMHO tires?  I can get 235/55's in the KH11 series for $123 and 255/55's in the 711 series for $99.  The tires have different tread patterns thought but both are blackwall and say KUMHO KH11 and KUMHO 711 on the side.  I guess i can save $200 on tires if i go this route but i'm afraid it will look goofy having two different tread designs on the front and back.... 

[NYCMille]

I'm running 17x9s up front with 255/45/17s and 18x10s out back with 285/40/18s... I run MagnumForce adjustable tubular upper control arms in the front as well as have NO rubbing issues...

[471_Magnum]

Kuhmos are cheap, but seem to be decent quality. I have a set on my daily driver (not sure which model). If you can get past the fact that they are Korean-made, they'll serve their purpose well enough.

The big bonus is you feel a lot less guilt doing a 50 ft smokey with $99 tires versus $165 tires.     Do enough 50 ft smokeys and the tread difference won't be an issue.

Take a look at the Nitto 450s. The 225-50-17 / 255-50-17 combination would work well.

[gremlinsteve]

been following your input guys. if your looking at the khumo's, check out the victorracer. made by them. its a cheapo- sticky race type tire. used to run them instead of the nitto drag radials. there made for scca road racer cars. very good tire.

steve

[PocketThunder]

I do plan on burning some 50' patches, so the Kumho's would be best for that.  However, if i shell out $165 for Goodyears, i would be hesitant to do too many burnouts and then that would probably keep me out of trouble. 

The Nitto 450's are looking about $134 and $152 with free shipping.  $572 out the door.  Not a bad price, they are in the running.