News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Originality question

Started by Troy, September 04, 2008, 11:58:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Troy

A while back I picked up a 70 Challenger. Originally a 340 (A66), console auto in sublime with a black interior, black bumblebee stripe, and A/C. It is missing the drive train but the rest is there and it's pretty solid. I did a bit of research to see how rare the car is and didn't get any definitive answers. I had initially written off putting a 340 in the car because they tend to be tough to find and expensive. Plus, I have a lot of stuff left over from my Barracuda - including a 5.9 Magnum and 5.7 Hemi (both with low miles). I figured a modern engine with good brakes and suspension would be just as much fun as a stock restoration.

Well, here's my dilemma: I found a complete 340 that's within about a month prior to my car's build date. While it will never be "numbers matching" and it's not quite "date correct" it is the right year with all the original parts on it. This makes the cost much more acceptable (although I'd still have to track down all the other correct engine compartment items to match). The engine just needs freshened up but I could upgrade the internals while I have it apart so that it looks stock but has a bit more punch to it.

I am a fan of stock/restored cars as well as modern technology so I'm not particular about which way I go with this car. If the car has some sort of historical significance I'd like to make it as original as possible but, if not, then I will modify things a bit. The cost for the 340 is on par with the 5.9 - although the 5.9 will have more power just because of the heads and intake. The Hemi is the most expensive and difficult route but probably the most streetable when finished. I do drive my cars a LOT. I think I'll be happy no matter which direction I choose but what would you guys do in a similar situation?

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.

PocketThunder

I'd go 5.7 and drive it alot as you say.  The 340 is not original so its just another block.   :Twocents:
"Liberalism is a disease that attacks one's ability to understand logic. Extreme manifestations include the willingness to continue down a path of self destruction, based solely on a delusional belief in a failed ideology."

SFRT

5.7 make it great to drive!

I dont see the point in crazy restos that cant be driven for fear of getting a smudge on the paper tag attached to the cigarrette lighter school of thought. these cars should be driven! often!
Always Drive Responsibly



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Dans 68

Wow. I'd probably flip a coin... :P No, what I would do is to restore it to as close as original. There is history there, and a less powerful (but correct) 340 would make the car more "authentic", and more satisfying to drive. I hope you understand what I'm saying. You can always install other engines, but 340's will not always be available, and clearly not date correct (no matter it is not numbers matching). Add modern upgrades here and there, but the heart of the car is the engine. Keep it old school.

Dan
1973 SE 400 727  1 of 19,645                                        1968 383 4bbl 4spds  2 of 259

moparstuart

 I agree go with the 5.7 and drive the hell out of it !  :Twocents:  but if the 340 is cheap enought pick it up also and keep it . Thats alway a good selling point down the road if you decide to move it.
GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE

41husk

I put a 70 model year 340 in my Challenger and really wish I had gone with the new 5.7 hemi,  Mine was originaly a 6 cylinder.  It would have been much cheeper to through in a 360, but if you already have the 5.7 I think I would go that direction.  Then again if I had another 70 Challenger, I would probably take my extra 340 get a 6pk set up and do a TA clone :shruggy:
1969 Dodge Charger 500 440/727
1970 Challenger convertible 340/727
1970 Plymouth Duster FM3
1974 Dodge Dart /6/904
1983 Plymouth Scamp GT 2.2 Auto
1950 Dodge Pilot house pick up

1969chargerrtse

Once again I'm the odd man out.  I'd put the 340 in it and like my charger be proud to say it's " date code correct "  340's are an awesome engine anyway.  Put a classic motor in your classic.  If it's not going to look mostly original, then drop anything you wish in there.   :Twocents:

I'd like to share my 340 story If I can.   I had a 73 340 Challenger.  I was coming home from the night shift on the highway, and had my head just leaning on the door glass as I zoomed home.  I loved the rumble of the 340 and took a peak at the tach.  it said 5,000 RPM.  5,000 RPM!! I thought?  It glanced at the speedo to find out I was going over 100MPH!!  Yep, great engine. :yesnod:
This car was sold many years ago to somebody in Wisconsin. I now am retired and living in Florida.

Neal_J

I'd go with the 340, regardless of the non-matching numbers.  The modern stuff in an old chassis just doesn't do it for me.  The 340 is a great motor and your ride will be considered stock by 90% of the world.   Chick will dig you, guys will want to be like you.  World peace may also ensue.   But no pressure though, Professor...

Neal

Old Moparz

               Bob               



              Going Nowhere In A Hurry

Joshua

Even though I'm not a big fan of "restored" cars....I'd put the 340 back in if I had one at my disposal. 340's are a screamin' little engine.
Would one of the newer engines have fuel injection, O2 sensors, cam position sensors, fuel pump in tank, etc???? I hate all that CRAP.....but that's just me, I LIKE old technology......

tan top

it would be  tough discision for me  :scratchchin:    would be good to have a modern HEMI bolted in ...  :drool5:  but i think looking stock is the way to go ,  :yesnod: if you challenger was mine Troy , but i think i would be real real tempted with the hemi ,  may be like what has been mentioned  .still buy the 340 & keep in in the garage ..  drop the hemi in it ... &  :drive:
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

41husk

Quote from: Neal_J on September 04, 2008, 01:29:45 PM
I'd go with the 340, regardless of the non-matching numbers.  The modern stuff in an old chassis just doesn't do it for me.  The 340 is a great motor and your ride will be considered stock by 90% of the world.   Chick will dig you, guys will want to be like you.  World peace may also ensue.   But no pressure though, Professor...

Neal
Chicks will dig You?  looks like I will be keeping my 340 :cheers:
1969 Dodge Charger 500 440/727
1970 Challenger convertible 340/727
1970 Plymouth Duster FM3
1974 Dodge Dart /6/904
1983 Plymouth Scamp GT 2.2 Auto
1950 Dodge Pilot house pick up

moparstuart

  here is a 6.1 in a cuda !!   If you read about the 5.7 's alot of guys are getting great performance if you put the 6.1 heads and intake on the 5.7 .  The heads are pretty cheap ( compared to aluminum heads for our old cars) from chrysler also !
GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE

TeeWJay426

An original sublime 340 car? That's not exactly a combination that would be considered plentiful by any stretch of the imagination..... I'd grab the 340 and do it as close to original as possible, if it were me. If it was a plain jane 318 car, I'd probably go in a different (5.7L) direction.... but hey, it's your car, not mine, just chiming in with my  :Twocents:
74 Charger SE, 400 HP, 4-speed

Troy

Well, to clarify...

the 340 (if that's route I take) will look stock. No after market heads, aluminum radiators, chrome accessories, and whatnot. If I wanted to "build up" the 340 I'd go with the 5.9 Magnum any way since it has more cubes and the stock heads are better. The 5.9 is nice because it's still a small block, it drops right in, produces a LOT of power, has a roller cam, and most people (even some Mopar fans) wouldn't notice the Magnum heads on there any way if I made the rest look stock. Plus, I already own it so no more money out of pocket. The Hemi will take a lot more money and effort to get working since I'll need to get the wiring, ignition, and fuel sorted out. It isn't exactly a simple install and the additional items I need to purchase will cost more than the 340 AND the rebuild on it. I certainly won't be able to fool anyone about what is in there either. The nice part about the newer engines is the ability to keep the EFI which is fascinating to me. Fuel injection and a modern overdrive trans would certainly make the car more appealing on road trips (I live 45 minutes from everything).

In order of cost/complexity, the 5.9 would be the best choice with the 340 next and the Hemi last. I have to purchase the 340 before I can build it. I can sell the Hemi and 5.9 to offset the cost of the 340 OR keep the Hemi for one of my Chargers. By the same token, I could sell the Hemi and build a kick-butt 5.9 while clearing some space out of the garage. If I want the best "bang-for-the-buck", the 5.9 wins again. With the availability of cheap stroker kits and excellent aluminum Magnum heads it can be built much stronger than the 340 (even built up) for about the same cost as just getting the stock Hemi installed (and at that point it's well beyond the Hemi performance as well). The Hemi really becomes a novelty item - an expensive one. I'm sure that with more research and careful buying decisions I could get the Hemi going for a somewhat reasonable amount. It's the best performance choice if I don't modify anything internally and has the most potential if I ever want to "upgrade". The initial buy-in is the problem.

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.

Old Moparz

I posted the 5.7 since you already have it in stock & could avoid spending money on an engine again. Not sure how much the 340 would set you back, but do you know for certain it's in good condition & that it has no damage?  :shruggy:

I think sometimes when you have less choices, things are a lot easier to decide.  :lol:
               Bob               



              Going Nowhere In A Hurry

Troy

Quote from: moparstuart on September 04, 2008, 12:13:44 PM
I agree go with the 5.7 and drive the hell out of it !  :Twocents:  but if the 340 is cheap enought pick it up also and keep it . Thats alway a good selling point down the road if you decide to move it.
Not cheap enough to stash in my garage for later. Plus, I have a bad habit of collecting stuff that I never sell.

Quote from: Joshua on September 04, 2008, 01:47:39 PM
Even though I'm not a big fan of "restored" cars....I'd put the 340 back in if I had one at my disposal. 340's are a screamin' little engine.
Would one of the newer engines have fuel injection, O2 sensors, cam position sensors, fuel pump in tank, etc???? I hate all that CRAP.....but that's just me, I LIKE old technology......

Yes, the 340 is a powerhouse and that's originally why I wanted one. All my other cars have big blocks but I think of E-bodies as Trans Am car and should be driven on curvy roads with a high winding small block. The 5.9 will likely be switched to a carb initially so I won't be dealing with the sensors and such (although if I keep the serpentine setup I'll need a fuel pump). The Hemi I'm not sure about. It depends on the computer I end up going with but the electronics are part of the allure of that particular engine.

Quote from: moparstuart on September 04, 2008, 02:00:50 PM
  here is a 6.1 in a cuda !!   If you read about the 5.7 's alot of guys are getting great performance if you put the 6.1 heads and intake on the 5.7 .  The heads are pretty cheap ( compared to aluminum heads for our old cars) from chrysler also !
Define "cheap". I can add heads, cam, valve springs, intake, carb, and headers to the 5.9 and still have less than $4,000 in it or I can skip the heads and cam and have it running in the car for a bit more than the purchase price of the 340. The electronics, motor mounts and headers for the 5.7 will cost around $2,000 without even opening up the engine. There isn't much point in switching to the 6.1 heads without also adding a cam.

Quote from: TeeWJay426 on September 04, 2008, 02:01:34 PM
An original sublime 340 car? That's not exactly a combination that would be considered plentiful by any stretch of the imagination..... I'd grab the 340 and do it as close to original as possible, if it were me. If it was a plain jane 318 car, I'd probably go in a different (5.7L) direction.... but hey, it's your car, not mine, just chiming in with my  :Twocents:
Exactly. My inquiries earlier showed about 7,500 total A66 Challengers in 1970. Depending on the color break downs there probably wasn't more than about 200-300 ever made. Plus, mine has A/C. If it were a 318 car there wouldn't be any discussion. After all, the 5.9 and later the 5.7 were slated for my 318 Barracuda.

Quote from: Old Moparz on September 04, 2008, 02:08:31 PM
I posted the 5.7 since you already have it in stock & could avoid spending money on an engine again. Not sure how much the 340 would set you back, but do you know for certain it's in good condition & that it has no damage?  :shruggy:

I think sometimes when you have less choices, things are a lot easier to decide.  :lol:
Yep, but the purchase price is just one small part of getting that thing installed. As stated above, if the car were a base model there wouldn't be a decision. I'm reasonably certain that this particular 340 is in very good condition. For the price, it's worth it since I mostly find bare blocks that need all the other pieces ($$$) to complete. Fewer choices are definitely better. Anyone who knows me knows I put myself in the position to have lots of choices. :D

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.

moparstuart

 I was quotes 350 each on 6.1  heads , that seemed cheap enought , you might wanna try to find a used intake the factory one is 600.00 and i think thats bare ? 


GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE

Troy

Quote from: Old Moparz on September 04, 2008, 01:35:17 PM
One 1970 Challenger With a 5.7 Hemi Coming Right Up!
By the way, that's a 392 - way out of my budget (list price of ~$19,000).... but pretty cool. I didn't realize they were that light though. :scratchchin:

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.

CB

sorry to hijack this threat but I wonder how much a 340 engine is worth. I do have the original 340 out of my (ex)cuda sitting at a friends shop somewhere in LA. It needs a complete rebuild though.
I don't need/want it.
I'd stay with a 340 in the chally, if possible.  :Twocents:
CB
1968 Dodge Coronet 500

moparstuart

Quote from: Troy on September 04, 2008, 02:50:22 PM
Quote from: Old Moparz on September 04, 2008, 01:35:17 PM
One 1970 Challenger With a 5.7 Hemi Coming Right Up!
By the way, that's a 392 - way out of my budget (list price of ~$19,000).... but pretty cool. I didn't realize they were that light though. :scratchchin:

Troy

sorry if i had 19k to spend on a motor it would be a real hemi 426 based  :Twocents: :Twocents:
GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE

tan top

Quote from: moparstuart on September 04, 2008, 02:56:50 PM
Quote from: Troy on September 04, 2008, 02:50:22 PM
Quote from: Old Moparz on September 04, 2008, 01:35:17 PM
One 1970 Challenger With a 5.7 Hemi Coming Right Up!
By the way, that's a 392 - way out of my budget (list price of ~$19,000).... but pretty cool. I didn't realize they were that light though. :scratchchin:

Troy

  sorry if i had 19k to spend on a motor it would be a real hemi 426 based  :Twocents: :Twocents:

  :yesnod:   :iagree:
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

69*F5*SE

I'm a 340 fan so I guess I'd go that route if it were me, but that's me.   :Twocents:

Old Moparz

Quote from: Troy on September 04, 2008, 02:50:22 PM
By the way, that's a 392 - way out of my budget (list price of ~$19,000).... but pretty cool. I didn't realize they were that light though. :scratchchin:

Troy



Stop nitpickin'   :lol:


BTW, if you go the way of the 340 & want to get rid of the 5.7......I bet it would fit nicely in a Charger ragtop  :scratchchin: 
               Bob               



              Going Nowhere In A Hurry

Rolling_Thunder

Troy -  Don't you already have a couple nicely restored Mopars ?  Make a nice driver...     drop in the 5.7 with an auto OD and just enjoy it...     I'm dropping the 6.1 in my Charger to have a nice driver...       AC, Cruise, power brakes, comfy seats, good handeling...      what's to debate man ?       :2thumbs:
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip