News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Broadcast Sheet Questions?

Started by WingCharger, July 16, 2008, 01:01:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

WingCharger

What was the difference between the broadcast sheet from 1969 to 1970? Were there any differences?

What were the differences between the broadcast sheet of a Daytona and a normal R/T, or was the Daytona simply a number on the sheet. If so, what was it?

I found this picture of a 1970 Buildsheet on 1970chargerregistry.com


Is it the same as a 1969?
Is this decoder the same as 1969? http://1970chargerregistry.com/Production/rt_sheet_decoder.html

Does anybody know where I can find a picture of a blank 1969 Daytona broadcast sheet???



Jeremy

Arthu®

The broadcast sheets were different in title of course, layout remained roughly the same, the one for a daytona is not different from an other 69 car.

Arthur

EDIT: Here: http://www.moparts.org/Tech/ you can download a blank 1969 buildsheet in word or pdf.
Striving for world domination since 1986

WingCharger

Quote from: Arthu® on July 16, 2008, 01:09:55 PM
The broadcast sheets were different in title of course, layout remained roughly the same, the one for a daytona is not different from an other 69 car.

Arthur

EDIT: Here: http://www.moparts.org/Tech/ you can download a blank 1969 buildsheet in word or pdf.

The one on moparts looks like the title wording is too close to the sheet itself.

hemigeno

Quote from: WingCharger on July 16, 2008, 01:21:17 PM
Quote from: Arthu® on July 16, 2008, 01:09:55 PM
The broadcast sheets were different in title of course, layout remained roughly the same, the one for a daytona is not different from an other 69 car.

Arthur

EDIT: Here: http://www.moparts.org/Tech/ you can download a blank 1969 buildsheet in word or pdf.

The one on moparts looks like the title wording is too close to the sheet itself.

Why does that matter?  Are you thinking of fabricating a Broadcast Sheet?   :rotz: 

A Daytona's Broadcast Sheet does differe slightly from a regular R/T, mostly due to the presence of the A11 Sales Code - but Charger 500s had the same code.  There are other minor differences, and some of those have to do more with what options are NOT coded than what is listed.


69_500

Hmmmm, wants a blank broadcast sheet for 69?

I want one so that I can make mine a cleaner copy without the spring holes in it.

WingCharger

Quote from: 69_500 on July 16, 2008, 03:24:38 PM
Hmmmm, wants a blank broadcast sheet for 69?

I want one so that I can make mine a cleaner copy without the spring holes in it.

I dont even own a Charger to forge one for! :angel:

69_500

I was just saying I'd like one too, so that I could type up a nice clean copy for my own car.

JimShine

My 1969's broadcast sheet is just blue and white. No colors.

1972Rallye

To the best of my knowledge, these are accurate.  I created Excel files for each year I've found good examples of.  They are not exact reproductions... they were not intended to be.  They do have all the correct code fields.  I've created several of these for friends to use for display or as a tool to piece together their original.  The pics are converted .pdf files generated from the Excel file, so they look a little heavier than the original.  When printed directly from Excel, they look much better.  Click the pic for larger image.

Edit:

The complete answer was provided here, but completely ignored by the original poster... oh well.

dodgecharger-fan

Quote from: Arthu® on July 16, 2008, 01:09:55 PM
EDIT: Here: http://www.moparts.org/Tech/ you can download a blank 1969 buildsheet in word or pdf.

Just so you know, that 1969 one is not very accurate - I tried filling out the details that I do have from my sheet and I found some sections missing and it got to the point where it was so difficult to edit it, that I just gave up.

The other reason that I wanted it was so that I could figure out what sections are missing from my original. Once I realized there were errors, I didn't trust what was represented on the rest of the sheet...

Back N Black

Hey, this young lad is following  in Cody's footsteps.  :rofl:

WingCharger


moparstuart

GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE

69bronzeT5

Feature Editor for Mopar Connection Magazine
http://moparconnectionmagazine.com/



1969 Charger: T5 Copper 383 Automatic
1970 Challenger R/T: FC7 Plum Crazy 440 Automatic
1970 GTO: Black 400 Ram Air III 4-Speed
1971 Charger Super Bee: GY3 Citron Yella 440 4-Speed
1972 Charger: FE5 Red 360 Automatic
1973 Charger Rallye: FY1 Top Banana 440 Automatic
1973 Plymouth Road Runner: FE5 Red 440 Automatic
1973 Plymouth Duster: FC7 Plum Crazy 318 Automatic

WingCharger

Quote from: moparstuart on July 17, 2008, 12:09:23 PM
Quote from: WingCharger on July 17, 2008, 12:03:57 PM
Quote from: Back N Black on July 17, 2008, 11:55:49 AM
Hey, this young lad is following  in Cody's footsteps.  :rofl:

?????????
cody and cody Jr.



What did 69bronzeT5 do similar to this? How are we similar? :poke:

Oh, and my name is Jeremy!

moparstuart

  It is great to see young people excited about old mopars and carrying on the hobby . That being said you ask alot of the same questions and are alttle excitable. You both put the cart before the horse cinda thing   :Twocents: :nana: :smilielol:
GO SELL CRAZY SOMEWHERE ELSE WE ARE ALL STOCKED UP HERE