Mopar Muscle article in their May 2007 issue

[ACUDANUT]

 http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=016&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=260036735969&rd=1,1

On page 99, at the bottom, where it says "Otta Luck" they are telling everyone and a guy in WI that they don't make rear quarter Panels for a 73 Charger.  Wrong. check out this link above.

[Ghoste]

I find more mistakes in that rag all the time.  Great photography but it seems like Primemedia really likes to use freelancers and not Mopar specialists.  They have a few on staff, but I think most of their writers submit as many articles to Chevy, Ford, and Gardening magazines.

[BrianShaughnessy]

They WERE making 73-74 quarters but something dried up awhile back I seem to recall.   Even then, that link is a right side... where's the left?

Otherwise folks were waiting on somebody to actually make 71-72 quarters...  they were promised but I don't actually know if anybody actually did make them or not because... well, it's got nothing to do with a 69     I saw my guy Speedo turn 73-74 quarters into 71 quarters before... it was a LOT of work.   

Meanwhile I just check autobody specialties catalog... they list all of them now..  I just don't know if they're stocked. http://autobodyspecialt.com/cat-sp-06/sp06-147.gif

[ACUDANUT]

 We have been down that road before, about the Lack of 71-72 Rear Quarters. All we can do is pray for those.
Anyway, Mopar Muscle Mag. needs a better Mopar Guru.

[69_500]

It funny that you would say something about them using free lance writers. I don't know if their writers are free lance, but many of their photographers are. They do some good work sometimes in the realm of photography. But other times its a disapointment.

[Ghoste]

I just seem to see some of the names coming up in other places.  Maybe they aren't so much freelance as Primemedia staff?