daytona SE on ebay

[tan top]

  sorry guys tried to do a link , but i can't get the damn thing to work    he is a couple of pictures , 

   awesome looking daytona  i want this one   bad 

[Ghoste]

There is something real familiar about that picture.  I can't place it but the house in the background looks familiar for some resaon.  It's probably just my imagination though.
Does the car belong to anyone here?

[69_500]

I don't think it belongs to anyone on here. I don't recall anyone having any SE Daytona's on this board. I've only seen a few SE Daytona's over the years period.

[Ghoste]

Does the photo look familiar to you in any other way Danny?

[69_500]

Now that I look at the add on ebay, it looks familiar because I recognize the sellers name as someone I've talked to. The only thing I saw though, and maybe you guys noticed it too. A typo in the broadcast sheet. its pretty easy to spot.

THE VIN>

[69_500]

In the VIN on the broadcast sheet, it has XXX three X's. Not 2.

[69_500]

I know he mentions in the add how he added a few options to the car, like electric motors to help the headlights, and a new AM/FM radio, but he forgot to mention that someone has added the TACH. I see no N85 on the broadcast sheet or fendertag.

Is a very good looking car though. Not perfect, but its definately a RARE car.

[tan top]

I know he mentions in the add how he added a few options to the car, like electric motors to help the headlights, and a new AM/FM radio, but he forgot to mention that someone has added the TACH. I see no N85 on the broadcast sheet or fendertag.

Is a very good looking car though. Not perfect, but its definately a RARE car.

       few things wrong but who cares easy to put right .  good spot never noticed the XXX on the  broadcast sheet    i wonder what the the deal is with the numbers on the core support .

[hemigeno]

Here is the link:

**Inactive Link Removed**


Nice looking car, but they probably described it appropriately as a #2 car.  There are a ton of little details that would need to be addressed if someone was trying to make it 100% correct, but there's no reason to worry about such - unless the goal was to end up with a 100 point restored car.  I will be interested to see where the auction ends up.  With the lackluster results at B-J, I've been wondering if the waning enthusiasm would carry over into the eBay circus arena as well.

[tan top]

  thanks for sorting the ebay link (hemigeno)

[69CoronetRT]

In the VIN on the broadcast sheet, it has XXX three X's. Not 2.

If you notice, all the numbers starting with the sequence number at the left are over one place to the right.  I think what you're seeing is a combination of the last number of the VON and a tear in the sheet making it appear to be another letter.

i wonder what the the deal is with the numbers on the core support

The stamping on the radiator support matches the tag and BS. The plant letter and number switch positions on the stamping. If you're referring to the '4', I don't see that as a big deal.

Cool car and pretty rare....

[tan top]

i wonder what the the deal is with the numbers on the core support

The stamping on the radiator support matches the tag and BS. The plant letter and number switch positions on the stamping. If you're referring to the '4', I don't see that as a big deal.

Cool car and pretty rare....

 
                   yep the number 4  Hmmm...     still  an awesome daytona , what i would not give to own that 

[hemigeno]

In the VIN on the broadcast sheet, it has XXX three X's. Not 2.

If you notice, all the numbers starting with the sequence number at the left are over one place to the right.  I think what you're seeing is a combination of the last number of the VON and a tear in the sheet making it appear to be another letter.

I saw the same thing you did, Doug - I just couldn't tell if the "first" X was really there or not.  Everything is definitely shifted over.

i wonder what the the deal is with the numbers on the core support

The stamping on the radiator support matches the tag and BS. The plant letter and number switch positions on the stamping. If you're referring to the '4', I don't see that as a big deal.

Cool car and pretty rare....

I thought the radiator yoke stamping was a little odd myself.  Not because of the 4 or the B9, but because the font seems different than my car's (which was made at the same plant just a scant 3 weeks later).  Just an observation though, nothing to be terribly concerned about.

[BigBlockSam]

hey
  i was never crazy about that color. a little pale for me but that car looks awesome in that color. very nice car. Rene

[hotrod98]

There is something real familiar about that picture.  I can't place it but the house in the background looks familiar for some resaon.  It's probably just my imagination though.
Does the car belong to anyone here?

It's not your imagination...

[mikepmcs]

WOW! Owns more than one winged warrior.  That is sweet.

[hotrod98]

The guy sells all kinds of vehicles. He's a flipper, not a collector.

[69_500]

It is still a gorgeous car. One I wouldn't want though, as I don't care for the Y2 yellow. I'd take a daytona in any color though, just would prefer one in another shade than that.

[UFO]

Theres another b-sheet for that car.I was going through some old newsletters and found this.From `89.

[hemigeno]

Theres another b-sheet for that car.I was going through some old newsletters and found this.From `89.

Good Eyes, UFO   

Thanks for posting that.

[69_500]

That one appears to have the typo corrected.

[Aero426]

I fell for it hook line and sinker when I just glanced at it yesterday, but that rad support stamping does not look right at all. 

In particular the  B and 9 are not the correct font, and the 4 looks stamped over something.    

This car was registered with DSAC a couple of different times, in 1981 and 1988 by two different owners - so it's been around.  The mileage reported as 23k original would have to be 123k.  It was registered back then with 109k on the clock.    I will pull the paperwork tonight and see what's there. 

[tan top]

 
      yep i agree   thought that also      

                             

[nascarxx29]

I did find prior owner info this 386543 car.Seems it was a CA car

[nascarxx29]

There is also some discussion of it being a bogus daytona.ColinYoung Bakersfield Ca shows owning this car July 79.

**Inactive Link Removed**