News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

How aerodynamic is a 68-70 Charger???

Started by Blakcharger440, October 08, 2006, 03:01:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Blakcharger440

Anybody know what the drag coefficient is for a 68-70 Charger? I have always wondered just
how aerodynamic they are?  ???


Silver R/T

that brick grille can tell you already...not very aerodynamic
http://www.cardomain.com/id/mitmaks

1968 silver/black/red striped R/T
My Charger is hybrid, it runs on gas and on tears of ricers
2001 Ram 2500 CTD
1993 Mazda MX-3 GS SE
1995 Ford Cobra SVT#2722

Mefirst

The front end sucks air like a a whale sucks up plancton and the rear window design causes drag, so a Charger is just about as aerodynamic as a barn door... but what the hell, it still looks cool..


Blakcharger440

Yeah I figure the grille would be a negative factor but I was just wondering what the actual number is compared to
other vehicles.

squeakfinder

More information your not asking for:

In its day at NASCAR the front end would start to lift (around a 180 mph?). So the Daytona was invented.
Still looking for 15x7 Appliance slotted mags.....

41husk

It's been called a rolling brick, But I never saw another brick that looks that good.
1969 Dodge Charger 500 440/727
1970 Challenger convertible 340/727
1970 Plymouth Duster FM3
1974 Dodge Dart /6/904
1983 Plymouth Scamp GT 2.2 Auto
1950 Dodge Pilot house pick up

Silver R/T

http://www.cardomain.com/id/mitmaks

1968 silver/black/red striped R/T
My Charger is hybrid, it runs on gas and on tears of ricers
2001 Ram 2500 CTD
1993 Mazda MX-3 GS SE
1995 Ford Cobra SVT#2722

dkn1997

Quote from: 41husk on October 08, 2006, 04:16:45 PM
It's been called a rolling brick, But I never saw another brick that looks that good.

and I have never agreed more with a post....so true....
RECHRGED

Just 6T9 CHGR

Quote from: Mefirst on October 08, 2006, 03:10:32 PM
The front end sucks air like a a whale sucks up plancton and the rear window design causes drag, so a Charger is just about as aerodynamic as a barn door... but what the hell, it still looks cool..

Wow where have I heard that before???   I hope you were typing it with an English accent! ;)
Chris' '69 Charger R/T


Lowprofile

Quote from: dkn1997 on October 08, 2006, 05:33:36 PM
Quote from: 41husk on October 08, 2006, 04:16:45 PM
It's been called a rolling brick, But I never saw another brick that looks that good.

and I have never agreed more with a post....so true....

Just sitting still, it looks fast. Kinda like a Jet Fighter.  :icon_smile_big:
"Its better to live one day as a Lion than a Lifetime as a Lamb".

      "The final test of a leader is that he leaves behind him in other men the conviction and will to carry on."

Proud Owner of:
1970 Dodge Charger R/T
1993 Dodge Ram Charger
1998 Freightliner Classic XL

blackcharger

not very, that's why they came out with the 500 and the Daytona

Brock Samson

my car lifts pretty bad at 110 mph..  steering gets really light and the car starts to feel like it's floating along... i suspect having the right stance "down in front" would help alot,.. other then that, a front spoiler would have to help alot but the only car i seen running one of those is NYC Mille's...
anyone else try any mods?..
or maybe one of the '69 50 owners can chime in..
I bet Highbank's is a dream over a 100...

terrible one

Quote from: Brock Samson on October 08, 2006, 06:32:56 PM
my car lifts pretty bad at 110 mph..  steering gets really light and the car starts to feel like it's floating along... i suspect having the right stance "down in front" would help alot,.. other then that, a front spoiler would have to help alot but the only car i seen running one of those is NYC Mille's...
anyone else try any mods?..
or maybe one of the '69 50 owners can chime in..
I bet Highbank's is a dream over a 100...

Yeah, the guy I bought my Charger from told me that they would lift at around 115 mph. He said that he almost lost it with the '69 he had in high school because of that.

zstalker

This ground is not the rock I thought it to be.
I was wrong.
This changes everything.

Dans 68

1973 SE 400 727  1 of 19,645                                        1968 383 4bbl 4spds  2 of 259

deputycrawford

MMMMM.... barn doors are sexy......MMMMM
If it ain't wide open; it ain't running.        Rule number one in motocross racing: Pin it; row the gear box; and wait until you hit something.     At work my motto is: If you need me, call someone else.

bull


Todd Wilson

You guys can try all you want but you wont touch a 71 in the way it handles.


Todd


41husk

I had a 72 that did not ride as nice as my 68 but the 73 has a better ride, just don't look as good.
1969 Dodge Charger 500 440/727
1970 Challenger convertible 340/727
1970 Plymouth Duster FM3
1974 Dodge Dart /6/904
1983 Plymouth Scamp GT 2.2 Auto
1950 Dodge Pilot house pick up

Todd Wilson

Quote from: 41husk on October 10, 2006, 09:58:43 AM
I had a 72 that did not ride as nice as my 68 but the 73 has a better ride, just don't look as good.


We arent talking about ride comfort!   :icon_smile_big:

We're talking about aerodynamics.   My 69 is a much nicer more comfortable car to ride in on the highway then my 71. But its no where close in handling at higher speeds. The 71 seems to suck down to the road at the higher speeds. Another odd thing is going down the highway with the windows down one could light a cigarette with no problems.



Todd


41husk

I will give you that, the 3rd Gens have much better aerodynamics.
1969 Dodge Charger 500 440/727
1970 Challenger convertible 340/727
1970 Plymouth Duster FM3
1974 Dodge Dart /6/904
1983 Plymouth Scamp GT 2.2 Auto
1950 Dodge Pilot house pick up

myk

110?  Feels like the car starts lifting earlier than that.  Even if it isn't, you can feel the car fighting the air as it goes faster.  My 'Z28 on the other hand...

Ghoste

I used to like looking in the rearview and seeing the dust kick up in a continuous swirl from the shoulder of the road when I had my 69 out.  The 67 will do it but you have to be moving alot faster.

Nacho-RT74

who cares, engine beats aerodinamics :D

for better aerodinamic and handling go with 73/74 :D

Another fact is terrorific view on rear view mirror of other cars, so that's another factor to beat te rest... they just take appart :D
Venezuelan RT 74 400 4bbl, 727, 8.75 3.23 open. Now stroked with 440 crank and 3.55 SG. Here is the History and how is actually: http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,7603.0/all.html
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,25060.0.html

myk

It's a shame, really.  I truly believe the 2nd gen is one of the most beautiful cars ever designed, but it's so unstable as the speed picks up...

Blakcharger440

Hmmmm....I can remember a black 68 charger than ran 180mph and it looked pretty much in street trim with off the shelf type of parts in Hot Rod many years ago. I wonder how they cured the lift. I will have to look for the article.

Rolling_Thunder

Quote from: terrible one on October 08, 2006, 08:32:55 PM
Quote from: Brock Samson on October 08, 2006, 06:32:56 PM
my car lifts pretty bad at 110 mph..  steering gets really light and the car starts to feel like it's floating along... i suspect having the right stance "down in front" would help alot,.. other then that, a front spoiler would have to help alot but the only car i seen running one of those is NYC Mille's...
anyone else try any mods?..
or maybe one of the '69 50 owners can chime in..
I bet Highbank's is a dream over a 100...

Yeah, the guy I bought my Charger from told me that they would lift at around 115 mph. He said that he almost lost it with the '69 he had in high school because of that.


true true...    when i had the 318 and the 2.76 gears it got scary around 125-130...      i would NEVER do that again...   
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

WINGMAN

    My 69 500 tops out at 123 with no lift, My Daytona is good to warp six. :icon_smile_big:  Jay.
69 Daytona XX29L9B409032 , 02 Ram Cummins,

JimShine

In my '69, the odd thing I felt was it seemed like the car was getting pressed closer to the ground at around 80. This is ofcourse driving in a straight line.

Troy

Quote from: Blakcharger440 on October 11, 2006, 10:36:39 PM
Hmmmm....I can remember a black 68 charger than ran 180mph and it looked pretty much in street trim with off the shelf type of parts in Hot Rod many years ago. I wonder how they cured the lift. I will have to look for the article.
I remember the car. They had a handmade grill that was pulled out to the very front (kinda lke a 69 500). It also had covers over the drip rails like a 500. I forget how they solved the rear window problem though.

Troy
Sarcasm detector, that's a real good invention.

bull

Quote from: myk on October 11, 2006, 02:58:42 PM
It's a shame, really.  I truly believe the 2nd gen is one of the most beautiful cars ever designed, but it's so unstable as the speed picks up...

Sounds like you're talking about women...

Dans 68

Quote
Sounds like you're talking about women...
Quote

As in everything, it is all about how you drive it.   :P
1973 SE 400 727  1 of 19,645                                        1968 383 4bbl 4spds  2 of 259