News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

5.7L 1970 dodge charger

Started by 70charginglizard, August 02, 2006, 01:16:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

4cruzin

I agree!  Looks to be done well from what I can see! 
Tomorrow is promised to NOBODY . . . .

Blakcharger440


PocketThunder

BUT ITS GREEN!   :o                                                                            :icon_smile_big: :icon_smile_wink:
"Liberalism is a disease that attacks one's ability to understand logic. Extreme manifestations include the willingness to continue down a path of self destruction, based solely on a delusional belief in a failed ideology."

Silver R/T

http://www.cardomain.com/id/mitmaks

1968 silver/black/red striped R/T
My Charger is hybrid, it runs on gas and on tears of ricers
2001 Ram 2500 CTD
1993 Mazda MX-3 GS SE
1995 Ford Cobra SVT#2722

dodge freak

If I want a new motor I get a newer car with it too. The chrylser's 300's are just ok on the street here, maybe with a little more gearing it help, but I rather have the 383 or better yet a 440 in it. Its not sold yet, he might think its worth 30,000 or so. I am sure he put alot of time and money in it, thats why the old motors are better. For the same amount of cash you can get more power out the old motors. True- some places have smog laws and limit what you can do ,so then it be good to have this motor. If it sells thats why, in Nevada they go back to 1967. Here in Michigan no car is ever tested so its a waste of money to put a new  "hemi" in a old car.

bull

All the hassles of emissions and computerized sensors with none of the benefits of not having them. No thanks.

tan top

intresting swap  , looks a neat  job
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

ChargerSG

Mayby i would stop with my swap and buy this one(but repaint it Black or someting) ;D
Looking for 383 Magnum #0B196875 and 0B115166

hotrod98

Quote from: dodge freak on August 04, 2006, 03:44:36 PM
If I want a new motor I get a newer car with it too. The chrylser's 300's are just ok on the street here, maybe with a little more gearing it help, but I rather have the 383 or better yet a 440 in it. Its not sold yet, he might think its worth 30,000 or so. I am sure he put alot of time and money in it, thats why the old motors are better. For the same amount of cash you can get more power out the old motors. True- some places have smog laws and limit what you can do ,so then it be good to have this motor. If it sells thats why, in Nevada they go back to 1967. Here in Michigan no car is ever tested so its a waste of money to put a new "hemi" in a old car.

Personally, I prefer driving my wife's fuel injected 360, od tranny 73 cuda over my 426 70 challenger convertible. The cuda boils the tires, runs smooth as silk and gets 25 mpg on 87 octane. The challenger really boils the tires, runs a little rough while idling at lights and gets 8 mpg on a good day on 93 octane.
In fact, none of my big block cars get over 10 mpg. Needless to say, they're not getting a lot of drive time right now. We're driving our small block cars a lot more right now since gas hit 3.05 for regular. ::)


Normal is an illusion. What is normal for the spider is chaos for the fly.
Charles Addams

Lowprofile

I like it. It would be interesting to see the numbers on this combo, ie:  mileage, 1/4 mile, 0-60, etc  and compare it to a stock 383 or 440 car.  :scratchchin: Fuel injection is the way to go. IMHO  :Twocents: :D
"Its better to live one day as a Lion than a Lifetime as a Lamb".

      "The final test of a leader is that he leaves behind him in other men the conviction and will to carry on."

Proud Owner of:
1970 Dodge Charger R/T
1993 Dodge Ram Charger
1998 Freightliner Classic XL

dodge freak

Why a stock 383 or 440. This is 2006 not 1970, we have so much great stuff out there now for engines why not use it ? Anybody who is running a car with 35 year old stuff is going to think these new motors are great. If fuel injection is so great why do the racing cars still use carbs. ?

Blown70

Sorry I think of HEMI and I think of a NICE FAT valve cover.  While I do appreciate the work that was done.  When you say it has a HEMI, at least look like a hemi..... ::)

BigBlackDodge

If fuel injection is so great why do the racing cars still use carbs.


Because it's easier for the officials to regulate and spot the cheaters.


If I could afford a swap like that I'd do it............much more reliable...........much more efficient :yesnod:


BBD

Lowprofile

Quote from: dodge freak on August 05, 2006, 07:45:02 AM
Why a stock 383 or 440. This is 2006 not 1970, we have so much great stuff out there now for engines why not use it ? Anybody who is running a car with 35 year old stuff is going to think these new motors are great. If fuel injection is so great why do the racing cars still use carbs. ?

Your missing the point df......If in fact this is a stock 2006 Hemi engine/trans combo, I would be curious to see how it stacks up against our beloved 383/440 engine/trans combo in a B-Body.
"Its better to live one day as a Lion than a Lifetime as a Lamb".

      "The final test of a leader is that he leaves behind him in other men the conviction and will to carry on."

Proud Owner of:
1970 Dodge Charger R/T
1993 Dodge Ram Charger
1998 Freightliner Classic XL

greenpigs

Quote from: dodge freak on August 05, 2006, 07:45:02 AM
Why a stock 383 or 440. This is 2006 not 1970, we have so much great stuff out there now for engines why not use it ? Anybody who is running a car with 35 year old stuff is going to think these new motors are great. If fuel injection is so great why do the racing cars still use carbs. ?

When holley and  other carb makers sell more EFI units than carbs they may push for the pro racers to get the change they have been after. Till then its "old school" .

And yes you missed the point I think.
1969 Charger RT


Living Chevy free

dodge freak

The point is for the same amount of cash maybe less you can build a 383 with Eddy heads , roller rocker arms , headers, MSD ignition and a holley hp carb. That motor will have more power than a new "hemi". Sure the new "hemi" will get better milage but unless you will be driving it a 100 miles everyday big deal. It would make a lot more sense to just get a 1 year old Chrylser 300 with a warranty to go with it. We have not even seen this, just hear it runs as good as a SUV, well thats not so hot in my book. I like to know how he did the speedometer also and if it reads right. Fuel injection cost way more than any carb. and a carb thats tuned right will idle good hot and cold . Mine does so I know first hand.

The point I am making is if you want a new motor get a new car, it have a warranty.

What I like to see is a new car with a hot old motor in it, but the frame won't hold up unless you change that too.

Lowprofile

 :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall: :brickwall:

:wave: Ah, Tomorrow is another Day.  :angel: :icon_smile_big:
"Its better to live one day as a Lion than a Lifetime as a Lamb".

      "The final test of a leader is that he leaves behind him in other men the conviction and will to carry on."

Proud Owner of:
1970 Dodge Charger R/T
1993 Dodge Ram Charger
1998 Freightliner Classic XL

dodge freak

Go down to a drag strip sometime and see "real" fast cars and then look if its a carb or F I , maybe it can be done but why? These carbs. are still great after all these years.

Another problem with F I is that to get a racing motor to have max power at 7000-8000 rpms you need a hugh injector. No problem but then at low speeds 2000 rpms its too big and will run rich. I think the answer is 2 injectors for each one, at low speed one injector is working at high speeds they both are, thats how these $300,000 sports cars do it but if there is no emissions to worry about why again. I do think there are 10,000+ rpms  F I racing motors out there ,mostly overseas but those cars cost over 1 million dollars to build.

These top fuel cars that run 300 mph in the quarter mile burn gallons of gas in 6 seconds, a fuel injector can't spray that much fuel, you need multi-ones. This is getting off subject-sorry, lets see how much that car gets bid up too.

dodge freak

Wow just did a google check on top fuel motor they ARE fuel injector motors . 42 of them, some on top of the supercharger , some in the manifold and 2 more by the spark plugs. Those motors burn 10-12 gallons of fuel during the warm up and quarter mile run. The engines are the old style "hemi" and are 500ci and make 6000 HP. Wow again.

694spdRT

FWIW most of the people doing these conversions are not trying to be the fastest guy around. There is always going to be someone "faster" and lets face the fact it will probably be something newer than our old Mopars anyway. I think these conversions are great for people that want to drive an older car with all the modern convenience of fuel injected powerplants, overdrive trannies, A/C, etc.  I am not that old but I am to a point in life where I wouldn't mind hopping my old car for a 1000 mile worry free weekend cruise and get 25mpg. Plus, I don't drag race so having another 100 or 200hp is pretty pointless for me.

It probably will cost more for this kind of setup but you can get real low mileage complete dropout 5.7 Hemis for $2K and for about $3K more in harnesses, oil pan, mounts, fuel pump, etc. have a running engine in an older car. I would seriously consider doing this if I could get my 833OD to bolt up properly. I just got the 5.7 Hemi installation DVD and catalog from Hotrod Lane in the mail so I have been checking this idea out recently.

 
1968 Charger 383 auto
1969 Charger R/T 440 4 speed
1970 Charger 500 440 auto
1972 Challenger 318
1976 W200 Club Cab 4x4 400 auto 
1978 Ramcharger 360 auto
2001 Durango SLT 4.7L (daily driver)
2005 Ram 2500 4x4 Big Horn Cummins Diesel 6 speed
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 5.7 Hemi

dodge freak

Well in a few more years those motors will be all over the place and the prices will go way down. Don't understand why the old motors aren't good for 1000 mile trips, with a MSD box and other new stuff it be just fine-won't get 25 miles to the gallon I will agree with that. I drive my car about 3000 mile each year and a few years ago when gas was half the price 5000 miles and its been running just fine. I did change just about everything, carb. ignition , wiring to the motor , hoses , belts etc. You are 10 years younger than me so you have lots of time, Good Luck hope it works out for you.


694spdRT

I agree an older engine can make it 1000 miles if it is sound. We took a 383 Super Bee on the HotRod power tour for nearly 1,000 miles two years ago. Other than a broken throttle cable we made it fine and got 12mpg with 3.23 gearing.

I have 2 cars with big blocks right now so now I need to decide between a "been there, done that" 440 for the Challenger or something a little different and more usable like the 5.7 Hemi. I do like how the 5.7 Hemi's run even if it is not a "real" Hemi so that is why it interests me.

As for the price of a newer Hemi I wouldn't expect it to drop much for low mileage ones with all the accessories and computer. I called around for a dropout 360 Magnum thinking that they are getting older now so the price should be reasonable. The best price for a worthwhile one was within $500 of the 5.7 Hemi and it had 50,000 more miles.   
1968 Charger 383 auto
1969 Charger R/T 440 4 speed
1970 Charger 500 440 auto
1972 Challenger 318
1976 W200 Club Cab 4x4 400 auto 
1978 Ramcharger 360 auto
2001 Durango SLT 4.7L (daily driver)
2005 Ram 2500 4x4 Big Horn Cummins Diesel 6 speed
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 5.7 Hemi

Silver R/T

Quote from: bull on August 04, 2006, 05:43:19 PM
All the hassles of emissions and computerized sensors with none of the benefits of not having them. No thanks.

I dont think I would have to pass emissions on it, its a 30 year old car and I would get collectors plates on it and drive it pretty much anywhere with new dependable engine. It gets better mileage than big blocks too
http://www.cardomain.com/id/mitmaks

1968 silver/black/red striped R/T
My Charger is hybrid, it runs on gas and on tears of ricers
2001 Ram 2500 CTD
1993 Mazda MX-3 GS SE
1995 Ford Cobra SVT#2722

greenpigs

Quote from: dodge freak on August 05, 2006, 10:18:34 PM
Wow just did a google check on top fuel motor they ARE fuel injector motors . 42 of them, some on top of the supercharger , some in the manifold and 2 more by the spark plugs. Those motors burn 10-12 gallons of fuel during the warm up and quarter mile run. The engines are the old style "hemi" and are 500ci and make 6000 HP. Wow again.

I guess I should have specified pro stock and nascar + the nitro and supercharger has a fair amount to do with the insane hp.
1969 Charger RT


Living Chevy free