News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

NEW CHALLENGER. . . ON VIDEO.

Started by chargerboy69, May 25, 2006, 06:51:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

chargerboy69

Just in case some people have not seen this. Here is the new Challenger video. It is worth looking at. http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=115459#43



I will take two of them please.
Indiana Army National Guard 1st Battalion, 293rd Infantry. Nightfighters. Fort Wayne Indiana.


A government big enough to give you everything you need, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have.
--Gerald Ford


                                       

DC_1


ramit

Great video! Thanks for the link.

ChargerRob

Mighty Mean Mexican Mopar

plum500

Echoes by an order of magnitude, everything they missed/messed with the Charger, for this Mopar fan.

Nice video thanks for posting it!

Steve P.

SCHWINGGGGGGGGGGGGGG................................ :icon_smile_approve:
Steve P.
Holiday, Florida

Dale The Bold

Rims need to be smaller, and chrome needs to make a comeback.  Other than that, not bad.
Matt. 14:8 (KJV) "And she, being before instructed of her mother, said, 'give me here John Baptist's head in a Charger.'"

Pistolpete

I agree, definitely hit the nail on the head with this one, thanks for posting
'68 440 4 spd - Pro Tour
'69 R/T 440 4 spd

I love being me......ask anybody!

Old Moparz

Nice. I'll give some serious consideration to that car if it ever makes it into production with a realistic sticker price. Aside from the latest Mustang, this is the only other car I get excited over. At least until I see the price that is. It won't surprise me to see the 6.1 version with a sticker well over $40K, & then have the greedy dealership scum tack on a "market value surcharge" of another $15K to $20 K.

The thought I have right now, is that I would unload my 1995 F-150, make the 2004 Ram the daily driver, sell off something else like the Scamp to make room for a new Challenger at home. Maybe I'll even sell something else too.  :D
               Bob               



              Going Nowhere In A Hurry

69charger2002

just MAKE the damn car already!!!! i will take one, everyone i know will take one.. HURRY THE HELL UP!!! i swear there are 100 06 chargers running around baton rouge now, it's sickening.. the sooner this car comes out the better
i live in CHARGERLAND.. visitors welcome. 166 total, 7 still around      

http://charger01foster.tripod.com/

bull

Did you hear the guy at the Donut Derelicts show talking about car companies slapping classic names on cars that bear little or no resemblance to their classic namesake? Sounds familar doesn't it? It's funny how quick DCX was to make that mistake with the Magnum sedan and yet so hesitant to do it right with the new Challenger. It speaks volumes about the company's current mindset. :image_294343:

It's obviously a nice car that pays tribute to it's namesake; and I've been waiting to see a comparison picture like this one:

Mike DC

 
I still think the success will hinge on whether they'll offer a cheaper V6 base model or not. 

It would still be a big sales hit with only a V8, but they could sell a hell of a lot more of them in the '05 Mustang's $20-something price range than the $35K they're currently talking about.  (And more total Chally sales would help lower the price of V8 models too.)

 

Sinister68

Quote from: bull on May 25, 2006, 04:13:27 PM
Did you hear the guy at the Donut Derelicts show talking about car companies slapping classic names on cars that bear little or no resemblance to their classic namesake? Sounds familar doesn't it? It's funny how quick DCX was to make that mistake with the Magnum sedan and yet so hesitant to do it right with the new Challenger. It speaks volumes about the company's current mindset. :image_294343:

It's obviously a nice car that pays tribute to it's namesake; and I've been waiting to see a comparison picture like this one:

DITTO!  :yesnod:
-James
2013 Challenger SRT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1968 Charger (R/T)
6.4 Hemi/Auto - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 440 4bbl/5 Speed/Dana 3.54

Red440

Quote from: bull on May 25, 2006, 04:13:27 PM
Did you hear the guy at the Donut Derelicts show talking about car companies slapping classic names on cars that bear little or no resemblance to their classic namesake? Sounds familar doesn't it? It's funny how quick DCX was to make that mistake with the Magnum sedan and yet so hesitant to do it right with the new Challenger. It speaks volumes about the company's current mindset. :image_294343:

It's obviously a nice car that pays tribute to it's namesake; and I've been waiting to see a comparison picture like this one:

I did`nt realize how huge the car is :scared:

tan top

Quote from: 69charger2002 on May 25, 2006, 03:10:55 PM
just MAKE the damn car already!!!!


                 :iagree:     good video  i would take one in white defiantly :yesnod: , i know it has been said hundreds of times already , if they can make new challenger look very smiler to an old challenger, then why make a new charger look like a ~#``^*()"?<:{_^&*!"¬:}*^  ,  compared to the awesome looking  first, second & third generation charger .  no offence meant to new charger owners
Feel free to post any relevant picture you think we all might like to see in the threads below!

Charger Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,86777.0.html
Chargers in the background where you least expect them 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,97261.0.html
C500 & Daytonas & Superbirds
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,95432.0.html
Interesting pictures & Stuff 
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,109484.925.html
Old Dodge dealer photos wanted
 http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,120850.0.html

Paul G

It does look like a giant next to an original Chally. I could see one of those in my garage with no second thoughts about it.
1972 Charger Topper Special, 360ci, 46RH OD trans, 8 3/4 sure grip with 3.91 gear, 14.93@92 mph.
1973 Charger Rallye, 4 speed, muscle rat. Whatever engine right now?

Mopars Unlimited of Arizona

http://www.moparsaz.com/#

hemihead

Nice car considering what other choices there are on the market.I see DCX making this a $40G + , 10,000 unit ,rich man's toy though.They will all be spoken for before the first one is made.
And I agree, beside the original the new one looks like a truck.
Lots of people talkin' , few of them know
Soul of a woman was created below
  Led Zeppelin

TheGhost

Quote from: Red440 on May 26, 2006, 07:42:21 AM
Quote from: bull on May 25, 2006, 04:13:27 PM
Did you hear the guy at the Donut Derelicts show talking about car companies slapping classic names on cars that bear little or no resemblance to their classic namesake? Sounds familar doesn't it? It's funny how quick DCX was to make that mistake with the Magnum sedan and yet so hesitant to do it right with the new Challenger. It speaks volumes about the company's current mindset. :image_294343:

It's obviously a nice car that pays tribute to it's namesake; and I've been waiting to see a comparison picture like this one:

I did`nt realize how huge the car is :scared:


Or pug nosed.  Maybe it's just the angle of the picture.  At least I hope so.  One things certain, the 70 ragtop looks FAR better.
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.  Especially if they have access to the internet.

bull

It looks to be about the same length but narrower and taller. Kind of like how the classic Challenger would look if it were squeezed on both sides.

joedotts

and the reason they didnt do this to the new charger is...............?????????????

BigBlockSam

I won't be wronged, I wont be Insulted and I wont be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to others, and I require the same from them.

  [IMG]http://i45.tinypic.com/347b5v5.jpg[/img

Charger1970

QuoteI did`nt realize how huge the car is



Or pug nosed.

Look at the profile on the 06 Charger...talk about pug nosed! I hope it isn't that bad.


How about a new Challenger T/A ...and a vinyl top please.
1970 Charger 500
2015 Challenger SRT

dkn1997

is it just me, or does anyone else think the wheels are very cool looking, but on the big side?.  maybe it's the photos, but they look like 22's or maybe even a bit bigger.  I would like it better if it had 18's/19's and was lower.  still the best looking car  chrysler has put out since.....well...the last challenger/ebodies in 74!!!
RECHRGED

Mike DC

 
Those wheels will probably not make production. 
Lots of concept cars roll around on much bigger wheels/tires than the actual production version.  It's all about the looks.

They might end up installing 17" rims or something as standard, but I doubt they'd use anything like the ones on the concept car.  (Expensive precision-made rims, huge unsprung weight, expensive tires, fender/chassis clearance issues, higher stresses on the suspension parts, etc.)

If they use the huge rims anywhere it will probably be as an expensive extra option and/or be reserved for the hi-po versions. 

 

dkn1997

yeah,after I posted that, I got the video to work for me and saw the part where they said chrysler begged them to be careful driving it because the tires rubbed.

that car is still the cat's ass, though!!!
RECHRGED

Jim Curnane

They should let me run things down there its simple the writing is on the wall its easy to figure out what will sell and what wont look at the new Mustangs. Bring it on Ill buy one if its under 25,000 :yesnod:

69_500

I think they should make it as a 2007 model. Get it out there for the public. The people are wanting one awfully bad, they should step up and make it already.

I know I love it. But then again against what other people think I do like the new chargers as well.