News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Strange starter issue.

Started by Kern Dog, June 20, 2020, 01:35:48 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Kern Dog

Hey guys,
My '70 has developed a strange problem related to the starter.
In 2009 or so, I installed this Denso mini starter I bought from Mancini racing. I have a 440 based 493 with 2 " TTI headers so the starter is pretty much trapped by those headers.
In 2013, I relocated the battery to the trunk. To make it all work, I changed up a few things. The stock starter relay is still underhood.
The positive cable from the battery goes to a post on a FORD ST81 starter solenoid. On the other side, a 1/0 size cable runs across the axle hump and along the left side and directly to the starter. The Ford solenoid acts as a switch so that the starter cable is only live when cranking the engine. The large and small terminals on the starter are bridged together. A trigger wire runs from the factory relay to the Ford solenoid. This closes the switch and allows the battery power to energize the starter.
I have a ground cable from the left cylinder head to the core support. There is another from the right head to the battery and a third one from the right rear frame rail to the battery.
This has worked fine for many years. Spring 2019, the Optima Red Top battery seemed to strain when starting the car. Cold and hot starts were met with slow cranking.
I blamed the battery and switched to a new NAPA AGM unit. It seemed okay but now the car has returned to the former habits.
It cranks slow when cold. The battery can have voltage in the 12.8 range and still spin slowly. It spins over fast once the engine has warmed up a bit and that confuses me.

Kern Dog

I have tried different batteries and the same condition persists. Slow cranking when cold and fast cranking when moderately warm.
Today I went out for a drive. I stopped for gas after about 10 minutes. It was high 90s today. The car strained a bit but started within 6-8 seconds. I drove another 10 minutes or so and it would barely turn over. After a 5 minute cool down, it still spun slow but it was enough to start the car. Back at home, I checked the battery voltage.

Kern Dog

Looking at this battery chart, it seems that I should be fine:

Kern Dog

I have another starter that I am going to try. Changing starters is a pisser though. The spark plugs and wires have to come out, the header has to be unbolted and wiggled around to make room too.
What I find strange about this is that the starter spins slow when cold and at full temperature but spins fast when the engine is between 100 and 160 degrees. I could understand slow cold cranking  if I was running 60 weight oil in sub zero weather. I am not though. I run 15w40 diesel oil.

70 sublime

Maybe try putting a battery charger on the battery and make sure it is fully charged to see if there is any difference
It would suck to change the starter and still do the same thing then find out the alternator was the problem
next project 70 Charger FJ5 green

XH29N0G

Running while charging or with another battery could be an interesting test.

I'm not an expert in electrical so this could be wrong.  I wonder whether measuring the voltage at the battery, or closer to the starter, while the starter was cranking cold and hot might give information?  My thinking is:


  • the voltage is the potential that drives the starter, but the draw of amps runs it.  
  • If the voltage dropped more when cold (maybe because the battery was freshly charged after the car had warmed up but not when the car was cold) that might point to something in circuit that changed, possibly the battery.  
  • What is different with the battery in the trunk is the temperature it is in doesn't change, but the time since its most recent charge might.  
  • I am assuming you have put it on a charger, but maybe the alternator charge and the external charge is also different. I am also assuming that a change in the voltage while cranking is related to the source (battery) rather than something else in the circuit (starter or connections)

If the battery can be taken out of the equation then either it is something with the starter (which you can change with some work) or the connections.  It seems unlikely to me that a connection would flake out when cold and then be better when hot, but I am just thinking if it creates sufficient resistance in the circuit that it could change the voltage the starter sees.

Again.  I'm not electrical.

Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

c00nhunterjoe

Bypass your relay before changing starters. Seen burnt spots in the old ford relays do that. May not be your problem, but less headache then a starter.

john108

I don't understand all your mods but I would suggest disconnecting the battery in your trunk.  Get a freshly charged battery alongside your engine and jump start it.
With your mods, I don't know how to do it but I am confident you can figure it out.
Just my thoughts.  If if works, the problem is in the mods, not the parts.

Kern Dog

Quote from: c00nhunterjoe on June 20, 2020, 07:28:36 AM
Bypass your relay before changing starters. Seen burnt spots in the old ford relays do that. May not be your problem, but less headache then a starter.

I have bypassed the Ford solenoid and had the same reaction. I changed to a new solenoid and again, same reaction.
The battery is in the trunk for several reasons including better handling due to less front weight bias, better traction due to weight over the rear, cooler battery since it isn't near the engine heat and a less cluttered engine bay.
The wiring is in good condition. No melted or softened insulation anywhere.

John_Kunkel

Not trying to pick a fight but I have never understood the fascination with the Ford solenoid. I have always run the positive cable directly from the trunk to the starter terminal and the ground cable directly to the block. I don't trust the unibody to be a satisfactory ground even though the modern LX cars do it that way.
Pardon me but my karma just ran over your dogma.

Kern Dog

Thank you.
I trusted the advice from a guy more knowledgeable that I am. 383Man from Moparts, Ron. Very nice and helpful guy.
Keeping the long starter cable inactive except when starting makes sense to me. Am I being too cautious?
A buddy of mine ran his cable directly to the starter from the trunk battery and his starter turned over slow no matter what he did. Other factors were involved but 383 man seemed to make more sense.

Kern Dog

The new starter is in. At first the starter wouldn't engage so I put the car back up on the lift and noticed that the big terminal on the starter was making contact with the engine block. I was able to unbolt it and rotate it enough to cut the excess length off with a cheap Harbor Freight body saw. The header stayed in place.
It still starts a little slow when cold but seems better with the engine up to temperature.
Not entirely a win-win but at least it starts when warm. Maybe the 15w40 diesel oil is just too thick for the engine when cold. I wouldn't have chosen that weight except for it being the higher quality diesel type of oil.

XH29N0G

I would still look for a voltage drop.  Either with the battery when you first start it (cold wouldn't be the cause, it would be that the battery wasn't delivering consistent voltage when a load is put on it unless it had recently been charged with the alternator)  or I would look for some connection in the circuit from the battery to the starter that changes resistance when warm and cold (some sort of connection issue).  I am sure you have considered both, but I do not think that thick oil will make that much of a difference in cranking rate.  I could be wrong, so I'll wait.   :popcrn:
Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

b5blue

Check all crimped connections, pull/push/wiggle while them cranking and as always redo ground connections to freshen contact.  :scratchchin:

Kern Dog

Thanks guys. This one is testing my already limited patience!
I did change the oil to some Valvoline 5w30 and ran it long enough to warm up to around 190, then shut it down. Oil pressure was a bit lower but not by much. An hour later, I tried to start it and it cranked real slow again. The battery voltage was over 12.5 before I tried to start it and 11.7 after. I was able to jump start it though.
:RantExplode:
My local NAPA store has no equipment to do a load test.
I am tempted to just admit defeat and put the battery back under the hood. The entire reason for the trunk mount was for better handling and traction but in all reality. I am not racing this car. Whatever tiny advantage the weight bias (Front to rear) may have seems to come at a steep price.

c00nhunterjoe

I run 1 optima red top in the trunk. Positive cablefrom battery to front of car at factory locations. 1 ground from battery to trunk support. 1 ground from engine block to k frame. 20w50 oil. Spins fast, fires right up hot or cold. You have more grounds then i do. I dont care for the ford solonoid either but you already bypassed it for testing with no change. You replaced the starter and the battery. To rule out the car wiring, you could rig your current battery to the fender for a trial run. You said when replacing the battery it was cured and now is back. That leans me towards a battery.

Kern Dog

Quote from: XH29N0G on June 20, 2020, 06:58:20 PM
I would still look for a voltage drop. 
The location of the starter cable at the terminal is very difficult to reach. Testing cranking voltage would be really tough to do.

XH29N0G

Quote from: Kern Dog on June 20, 2020, 10:14:36 PM
Quote from: XH29N0G on June 20, 2020, 06:58:20 PM
I would still look for a voltage drop.
The location of the starter cable at the terminal is very difficult to reach. Testing cranking voltage would be really tough to do.

I suspect my suggested test is a poor person's variant of a load test.  I still do not know if it would work.  It might not matter whether you checked the voltage at the starter or at the battery while cranking. You might be able to snake two long wires from a digital volt meter in the car to some other part of the circuit by the battery.  I think a load test will be the best bet to rule out (or determine) the battery is your culprit because we probably won't know how to interpret a voltage drop (large or small) and I am sure a load test will be calibrated to good/bad. 

If it is in the connection from the trunk to the engine compartment and changes, then I would look at connections closer to the engine, remove, clean, and remake them.  You had this working before, right? 

It could be that the longer circuit to the starter makes the car less forgiving to a drop in potential, so it might still be something related to the battery, but where the battery would work closer to the starter. It probably does require a strong battery and good connections because (I believe) any resistance between the battery and the starter will reduce the voltage at the starter. 

I also think that you made it work before (RIGHT?) and it worked for a while.  So you might just have to figure out how to fix it this time and keep an eye on it for future fixes. 

Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

alfaitalia

When I had a similar issue (on my Jeep) it turned out moisture had got into the main big battery wires (both) turning the copper wires green and vastly increasing resistance when under heavy load (like starting) but acting fine the rest of the time.. Someone over on Jeep forum suggested cutting back a little of the insulation....I did to find the dark green mess. Another clue I should have picked upon the was slight discolouring of the insulation near the terminals due to the extra heat when cranking. New wires and was good as new. Might not help of course but just thinking out load. :2thumbs:
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you !!

Challenger340

Quote from: Kern Dog on June 20, 2020, 01:35:48 AM
Hey guys,
My '70 has developed a strange problem related to the starter.


So this is a 'new' problem that has developed recently....... or has it always cranked slower when cold ?
Only wimps wear Bowties !

b5blue


Kern Dog

Quote from: Challenger340 on June 21, 2020, 10:02:20 AM
Quote from: Kern Dog on June 20, 2020, 01:35:48 AM
Hey guys,
My '70 has developed a strange problem related to the starter.


So this is a 'new' problem that has developed recently....... or has it always cranked slower when cold ?
THe car isn't driven as much as I'd like so the problem started about 18 months ago. At first I blamed the problem on inactivity because the car sat so much. The battery would be discharged and it would crank slow. I'd charge the battery and get it to start then it would happen again a few weeks or months later. I bought a 2 amp trickle charger last October along with the new battery.
It used to be that the car could sit awhile and still crank over fine. I have a 67 Dart and a 75 Power Wagon that can sit for a month or more and still crank over fine.
This is the only one with the trunk mounted battery. This one has 10.12 compression. I have noticed that it cranks faster with the throttle cracked open a bit.

Kern Dog

Moments ago:
Cold start, first of the day, fast cranking and an easy start up. Battery read 12.62. Last night, approx 12 hours ago it read 12.66.
150 degree restart, the point where it has traditionally performed best, easy restart. Less than 1 revolution to restart engine.
190 degree restart, same as above. Fast crank, engine fired right up.
I'm letting it sit now to see how it starts after a heat soak.

XH29N0G

Was there something you did to change things?  Good to hear it is working.   :2thumbs:
Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

Kern Dog

Quote from: XH29N0G on June 21, 2020, 03:17:58 PM
Was there something you did to change things?  Good to hear it is working.   :2thumbs:

Yesterday I changed the starter and the oil. I had 15w40 oil, I changed to 5w30.

Kern Dog

A few hot restarts were like they were before, slow and strained. Checking the battery voltage afterwards, it was down to 11.8, 11.7 or so. It slowly rose after sitting but not all the way back.
I tried jump starting with another battery. Starting still slower than ideal but it did start. I pulled the AGM battery and put the other conventional battery in directly to the cables in the car. It started much easier.
I'm taking this AGM battery back and trading it for a conventional one. All along, this may have come down to the AGM not holding it's charge under a load, like some have suggested. I didn't want to suspect a $150 battery though!

c00nhunterjoe

Going from a 40 to a 30 weight oil on a hot soak issue do3snt make sense to me.

c00nhunterjoe

missed the last post about the battery. That makes the most sense.

jlatessa

I'm betting on the oil......

Joe

Kern Dog

Quote from: c00nhunterjoe on June 21, 2020, 06:11:10 PM
Going from a 40 to a 30 weight oil on a hot soak issue do3snt make sense to me.

It didn't to me either but when you've exhausted the sensible possibilities, you start to consider the ones that make no sense! I thought thicker oil may have increased the cranking effort due to thicker oil being harder to pump.

This new battery has 985 cranking amps, 800 CCAs. It was at 12.61 volts when I put it in.
The car cranked right up like a new car. I warmed it up to 190 degrees and shut it down. I immediately restarted it with no problems. I waited 3-4 minutes and it started again. 15 minutes later, it started fine. With the other starter and battery, it cranked real slow when cold AND after a drive/full warm-up.
Also....
The voltage when idling went down with the both of the regular NAPA batteries. The voltage with the AGM was in the mid to high 14 volt range. With these others, it is in the 13.7 range. This makes me wonder if the AGM could register a good surface charge but not handle much of a load.
For now, it seems to be okay.

alfaitalia

"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you !!

Kern Dog

Ah.....It had to be a Brit to say something so sensible !   :2thumbs:

c00nhunterjoe

Quote from: Kern Dog on June 21, 2020, 08:30:55 PM
Quote from: c00nhunterjoe on June 21, 2020, 06:11:10 PM
Going from a 40 to a 30 weight oil on a hot soak issue do3snt make sense to me.

It didn't to me either but when you've exhausted the sensible possibilities, you start to consider the ones that make no sense! I thought thicker oil may have increased the cranking effort due to thicker oil being harder to pump.

This new battery has 985 cranking amps, 800 CCAs. It was at 12.61 volts when I put it in.
The car cranked right up like a new car. I warmed it up to 190 degrees and shut it down. I immediately restarted it with no problems. I waited 3-4 minutes and it started again. 15 minutes later, it started fine. With the other starter and battery, it cranked real slow when cold AND after a drive/full warm-up.
Also....
The voltage when idling went down with the both of the regular NAPA batteries. The voltage with the AGM was in the mid to high 14 volt range. With these others, it is in the 13.7 range. This makes me wonder if the AGM could register a good surface charge but not handle much of a load.
For now, it seems to be okay.

Regarding the oil portion- you said it cranked fine cold, but not hot. Therefore the oil viscosity is not too thick. That was my point.

Kern Dog

Post # 11 detailed how even with the new starter, it cranked over slow during the first start of the day.
Threads like these can be hard to follow. There are so many comments, details can be missed.
The reasoning behind running the thinner oil was to reduce strain on the first start of the day, a condition that has been consistently met with slow cranking.
I didn't know how much of an effect that it might have but I do know just from pre-oiling an engine, driving the oil pump takes some power. My 3/8" drill seems to strain doing it.
To recap, it was cranking slow for the first start, slow when hot but usually cranked fine after running it a few minutes.
Now it seems to be fine during all conditions. I didn't think that the battery could have been at fault because the voltage was in spec. I can only guess that it just couldn't handle the load of the starter. The case of the battery seemed a little bulged out too.

John_Kunkel

When a battery is suspect, only a good carbon-pile load tester (not a small handheld) will tell its condition. An alternate test is to check the battery voltage while cranking, both at the battery and at the starter. I know, headers make that difficult.
Pardon me but my karma just ran over your dogma.

Kern Dog

Thanks, you are right, especially with my setup. The terminals are closer to the engine block than the fender apron. Trying to snake a test probe in there would be difficult.
The easy way would be to test at the output side of the Ford solenoid.  That would not account for whatever voltage drop I'd have through the 16' of 1/0 cable.

c00nhunterjoe

Quote from: Kern Dog on June 22, 2020, 02:23:58 PM
Post # 11 detailed how even with the new starter, it cranked over slow during the first start of the day.
Threads like these can be hard to follow. There are so many comments, details can be missed.
The reasoning behind running the thinner oil was to reduce strain on the first start of the day, a condition that has been consistently met with slow cranking.
I didn't know how much of an effect that it might have but I do know just from pre-oiling an engine, driving the oil pump takes some power. My 3/8" drill seems to strain doing it.
To recap, it was cranking slow for the first start, slow when hot but usually cranked fine after running it a few minutes.
Now it seems to be fine during all conditions. I didn't think that the battery could have been at fault because the voltage was in spec. I can only guess that it just couldn't handle the load of the starter. The case of the battery seemed a little bulged out too.

I was refering to post #14 where you changed to 30 weight and after starting the battery sat idle at 11.7 volts. Thats not a starter or oil problem.

Kern Dog

I was just telling what happened in the order that they happened. I was more concerned with the voltage drop after trying to start the car. I've never tested voltage after trying to start this engine so I don't know what kind of loss is normal.
It started fine today. IT look like the battery was to blame.

green69rt

Quote from: Kern Dog on June 22, 2020, 09:41:43 PM
I was just telling what happened in the order that they happened. I was more concerned with the voltage drop after trying to start the car. I've never tested voltage after trying to start this engine so I don't know what kind of loss is normal.
It started fine today. IT look like the battery was to blame.

I have to say, a bad battery has led me down so many false trails that I can't remember the times.  When I have an electrical problem now, the first thing I check is the battery.  Not just a voltage check, take it to someplace that will do a load test.

Kern Dog


john108

Reply # 7 suggested you disconnect the battery in the trunk and jump start the engine at the engine compartment with a good battery.
Tried to help.

John_Kunkel

Pardon me but my karma just ran over your dogma.

Kern Dog

I have gone out and started this car every day since I put in the new battery and it has not faltered once.
I'm still surprised that a 6 month old battery crapped out. I see no reason to buy another AGM type battery. Charging that one was a hassle.

c00nhunterjoe

90% of the lead in them is chinese recycled junk anymore. Agm is still the way to go, you just got a bad one unfortunately.

green69rt

I use to buy the longest life battery I could, I think Sears use to sell a 6 year battery and it was expensive.  It had 3 year free replacement and then prorate the next three years.  I almost always had to replace them around 3 years, no matter how much I paid.  I just go to Walmart now and get a 36 month battery, don't pay much attention to brand, just whatever fits.  They still last 36-40 months and Walmart installs the new one free.  Whenever I run into a strange electrical problem, I just haul it off to Walmart for testing if the problem is not something obvious.  When I do that, probably 60% of the time it's the battery, 30% of the time it's the cable terminal (loose or corroded.)

Bronzedodge

I still test my lead acid batteries with a hydrometer.   Sadly not an option with the AGM ones. 
Mopar forever!

Kern Dog


Back N Black

Quote from: Kern Dog on June 26, 2020, 11:56:11 PM
I have gone out and started this car every day since I put in the new battery and it has not faltered once.
I'm still surprised that a 6 month old battery crapped out. I see no reason to buy another AGM type battery. Charging that one was a hassle.

I have an AMG in my charger and I don't like it. It seem to take a long time to re charge after startup, the AMP gage slowly moves back to center. I Also have the slow cranking on occasion.

krops cars

I have a friend that is building a drift car for his son. Same issue. I have him running 1/0 welding wire. You are losing amps threw the distance of cable. This is different example. I have a boat. The trolling motor was professionally installed. One time I was fishing it wasn't working. The motor would only turn very slow. Then all of a sudden bang it would work. So I was like bad brush. Tear it down. Nothing wrong. So I was thinking bad cam. Order and install. Oh yes I did check the circuit breaker and even replaced. Go out fishing worked for awhile and again it would go in to turning slow. No I'am very unhappy. I cleaned it up. Take the cover off look at the card and all connections. All good. Bought a new motor and figured it was it. Nope. Now I was real happy. Pull the wires from the connector in the boat and found the wire they used to run over 8" was smaller than what was on the trolling motor. Went with #4 wire. Thing is unstoppable. So in a nut shell. Run a mutch heavier gauge wire to the Ford solenoid. You should be fine from there to the starter.

Kern Dog

I have checked voltage at several points including the battery, the solenoid, the alternator and the starter relay. They all test very close to each other.

krops cars

You may have voltage, but not the right amperage. Unhook coil wire. Go to starter. Check voltage during cranking. Or I don't know if this would work. If you have a quality set of jumper cables. When it cranks hard take your cable hook from battery to solenoid and see if that makes a difference.

c00nhunterjoe

1/0 is more then enough. I dont even have that large in the 63 to save weight and that is 13.5:1 compression and it spins over nice and fast with a single red top in the trunk.

krops cars

Good point. I 'm saying make sure it is heavy enough. I see that a lot in trunk mounts and also not grounded good enough.

Kern Dog

The new battery solved the problem instantly.
Before, the running voltage with the car idling was in the upper 14 volt range as if the battery was in need of a HUGE amount of juice to recharge. Now it idles in the high 13s.
It cranks over great in any condition.
The new starter didn't make a difference. Bypassing the solenoid didn't either. The battery made the difference. I hesitated to blame it since it was so new.

XH29N0G

It sucks when something new is the culprit because it shouldn't be that way.  Glad you sorted it out.
Who in their right mind would say

"The science should not stand in the way of this."? 

Science is just observation and hypothesis.  Policy stands in the way.........

Or maybe it protects us. 

I suppose it depends on the specific case.....

Kern Dog

 :2thumbs:   Thank you. I feel the same way.
It can't be the battery...I bought it a few months ago!

green69rt

Quote from: Kern Dog on July 20, 2020, 04:49:33 PM
The new battery solved the problem instantly.
Before, the running voltage with the car idling was in the upper 14 volt range as if the battery was in need of a HUGE amount of juice to recharge. Now it idles in the high 13s.
It cranks over great in any condition.
The new starter didn't make a difference. Bypassing the solenoid didn't either. The battery made the difference. I hesitated to blame it since it was so new.

:2thumbs: