XX29L9B217178 Charger 500

[held1823]

original f3 car, according to the fender tag and build sheet

https://www.vanguardmotorsales.com/inventory/3197/1969-dodge-charger-500

[held1823]

...

[held1823]

...

[held1823]

,,,

[held1823]

...

[held1823]

...

[held1823]

...

[held1823]

...

[held1823]

...

[held1823]

...

[held1823]

...

[held1823]

...

[held1823]

...

[held1823]

...

[70 sublime]

Says new gas tank but there are a lot of dents in it near the front

[hemi68charger]

Slick way to do the back glass stainless trim if you don't have the original.......

[70 sublime]

So is it worth any less because it is not the same colour green as on fender tag ?

[tallzag]

Yes

[69_500]

I don't recall this car being numbers matching when it was for sale at Carlisle, I think 10+ years ago. I can't recall what year it was though, but there was a Y2 Hemi 500 4 speed car for sale that year too. XX29J9B210740.

Of course this is all off top of my head, as I am driving home from work. If I am wrong I will correct it when I get home.

[Stevetona]

I like the color but I would prefer it in its original born-with baby poo F3.  

[DAY CLONA]

Wow... the "fit" of panels, components, trim, etc is just horrible on this car!.....almost 6 figures for that?... sad

[nascarxx29]

 lakeland florida dan andrews car

[farm966]

I like the exterior color, but the interior color on top of the exterior is um, well, maybe a little much for me.   

[Simonic]

The fit on the passenger side headlight surround is awful....And how hard is it to fit an armrest....One of them looks like a banana 

[1969daytona]

The fit on the passenger side headlight surround is awful....And how hard is it to fit an armrest....One of them looks like a banana 

That was the first thing that went true my mind to.
How is it possible to get the headlight surrounding so wrong if the baskets/front clip is okay?

K-E