News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Can a Mercedes diesel engine be swapped into a 68 Charger?

Started by smithenhiven, March 16, 2018, 05:39:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

smithenhiven

I guess the answer is yes.

https://youtu.be/AziGOGfOga8
(Disregard the crappy background music)

I think this is kinda neat, I stumbled across this while searching for diesel swap ideas, as I have an engineless 70 Fury that I'd like to swap a 12 valve cummins into.

68X426


Wow. A 3 liter diesel putting out 680hp and 928tq is awesome.

The not wow part is busting up turbines and all that black crap smoke.  Turns me off.

Love your Cummins Fury idea.   :2thumbs:





The 12 Scariest Words in the English Language:
We are Here from The Government and
We Want to Help You.

1968 Plymouth Road Runner, Hemi and much more
2013 Dodge Challenger RT, Hemi, Plum Crazy
2014 Ram 4x4 Hemi, Deep Cherry Pearl
1968 Dodge Charger, 318, not much else
1958 Dodge Pick Up, 383, loud
1966 Dodge Van, /6, slow


Mike DC

  
Take a Mopar with a stock 440 and stack about 15 concrete blocks onto the hood.  That's what a modern Cummins diesel engine weighs.

If you want to spin tires and go in a straight line and be different, then go for it.  

Me, I like a car with some cornering & braking agility.




JR

Personally, I find diesel engines to be too agricultural, slow revving, heavy, and smelly to be enjoyable, but considering the owner of this car lives in the U.K., where fuel is 7.50/gallon or whatever, it makes since. I can't blame him.

But by all means, if the car ever comes back to the U.S., I'd be all for throwing the diesel in the trash and putting a gasoline fed V8 back in. The way nature intended. :icon_smile_big:
70 Charger RT top bananna /68 Charger RT triple green

alfaitalia

I here ya....but from that description it sounds like you have not driven any diesel fitted to a modern car (not truck engines) built in the last 10 years or so...lol!
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you !!

Fitz73Chrgr

Did you guys see that Hot Rod Garage is putting a 12V Cummins in a 70 El Camino?  It was either that or a 2JZ.  I would have voted for the Toyota motor.  Smaller, lighter and would make more people angry.
'73 Charger - project                '70 Charger - driver                 '66 Charger - survivor

Resto thread:
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,89803.msg1019541.html#msg1019541

cbrestorations

People try and be different but then fail on popularity. Diesels are not hotrod engines...don't sound cool, heavy and have to totally rely on that turbo to get out of its own way. If ur looking for pulling power and economy great...other than that they are retarded in muscle cars

alfaitalia

.....and of course those 6 diesel cars that won 24 hour LeMans race 6 years in a row.....kicking the buts of all those gas full works racers....they were slow too!! Not saying that I would ever put a diesel in a Charger (and I'm in the UK...land of expensive fuel) but the point is that a modern diesel is neither slow, that heavy and they sound pretty darn good....tractor sounding diesels on Euro cars are a thing of the past. Look at the performance and hp figures(many are 3 or 400 bhp and still getting 40 mpg) and more importantly torque of the latest generation of Mercedes and BMWs etc.....they make the gas models feel flat and lifeless. Torque is king!!
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you !!

Lennard

This:

Quote from: cbrestorations on March 17, 2018, 10:48:01 AM
People try and be different but then fail on popularity. Diesels are retarded in muscle cars.
:iagree:
Don't care how fast they are and how much horsepower and torque they make.

JR

Quote from: Fitz73Chrgr on March 17, 2018, 03:09:35 AM
Did you guys see that Hot Rod Garage is putting a 12V Cummins in a 70 El Camino?  It was either that or a 2JZ.  I would have voted for the Toyota motor.  Smaller, lighter and would make more people angry.

Yup, it's a diesel. Bummer.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BgZW17-nYC3/?hl=en

I can feel the horrible weight balance (70/30?) and smell the exhaust through the screen. This thing is going to drive terribly. (Sorry to be negative, I can't help it on this one.)

The 2jz would have been way cooler.
70 Charger RT top bananna /68 Charger RT triple green

Nacho-RT74

Quote from: alfaitalia on March 17, 2018, 02:57:11 AM
I here ya....but from that description it sounds like you have not driven any diesel fitted to a modern car (not truck engines) built in the last 10 years or so...lol!

:iagree:

not a fan of diesel and I don't have to being on the cheap gas land, but they have got really serious advances on that.

I guess when I cross the Atlantic ocean will have to look on that thought
Venezuelan RT 74 400 4bbl, 727, 8.75 3.23 open. Now stroked with 440 crank and 3.55 SG. Here is the History and how is actually: http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,7603.0/all.html
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,25060.0.html

Nacho-RT74

( I liked the vanish effect down the smoke when "giving gas" on the road LOL )
Venezuelan RT 74 400 4bbl, 727, 8.75 3.23 open. Now stroked with 440 crank and 3.55 SG. Here is the History and how is actually: http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,7603.0/all.html
http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,25060.0.html

alfaitalia

Lol...yep. If he had set it up to actually burn rather more of that fuel instead of just using it to roll coal he might have found another few horses.
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you !!

Mike DC

    




I'm not trying to crap on people's projects.  But people should know what they are getting into.  The weight problems with a big diesel are above & beyond normal engine swapping.  The factory would have used a full truck frame (or a rollcage) for anything like that.



smithenhiven

I hear you about the weight issue, and believe me, if the car I'm planning to diesel swap was anything other than a Plymouth Fury, such as a Charger, I wouldnt even consider it.

It's basically just going to be a trailer hauler, with the end goal of it getting better MPGs than a gas equivalent.

70B5Cuda

That Charger is so cool! I'd drive that just like it is and love every second of driving. The only thing I wouldn't like would be cleaning the soot off after every drive.
1968 Roadrunner-6.1L, 6 speed, 3.91 Getrag, IRS
1968 Charger- 6.1L, TR-6060, 9"
1968 Charger in RR1 "Ribeye"
1969 Charger in EW1 "S'more"
1969 Charger Survivor-R6, 383, 727.....WRECKED
1970 Barracuda-6.1L, 6 speed, 4.10 S60

ws23rt

I like having fun with cars. This looks like fun to me.

alfaitalia

Quote from: Mike DC (formerly miked) on March 17, 2018, 06:13:56 PM
   




I'm not trying to crap on people's projects.  But people should know what they are getting into.  The weight problems with a big diesel are above & beyond normal engine swapping.  The factory would have used a full truck frame (or a rollcage) for anything like that.





True...but the Mercedes Inline six diesel used in the OP only weighs 462lb (dry). 188lbs less than a BB.
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you !!

kokxville

1969 Charger R/T 4 speed A33 Track Pack.
1967 Dodge a108 360 Magnum. Daily driver
1969 Dodge Charger"the car you can take your kids in to school on a friday,go shopping on a saturday,dragrace on a sunday and go to work on monday"

John_Kunkel

Quote from: 68X426 on March 16, 2018, 06:04:21 PM
all that black crap smoke.  Turns me off.

Yeah, "rollin' coal" and "sooting" seem to be the mantra of the diesel guys. Just as dumb as burnouts, maybe worse. :down:
Pardon me but my karma just ran over your dogma.

Mike DC

  
QuoteTrue...but the Mercedes Inline six diesel used in the OP only weighs 462lb (dry). 188lbs less than a BB.

Yeah, I realize that.  But that's more of a car engine in the first place.  

Most musclecar guys kicking around the idea of a diesel swap are looking at the huge torque-monster diesels in big American pickup trucks.


(BTW, that photoshop I did is not an exaggeration.  That really is what 450 lbs worth of cinder blocks would look like.  The only thing wrong with that image is that the block pile has not collapsed the car's hood.)


Kern Dog

Quote from: John_Kunkel on March 18, 2018, 04:53:17 PM
Quote from: 68X426 on March 16, 2018, 06:04:21 PM
all that black crap smoke.  Turns me off.

Yeah, "rollin' coal" and "sooting" seem to be the mantra of the diesel guys. Just as dumb as burnouts, maybe worse. :down:
You seem to be a real fun guy to know.
Burnouts are fun. Have you ever had fun ??

John_Kunkel

Pardon me but my karma just ran over your dogma.

68X426



The 12 Scariest Words in the English Language:
We are Here from The Government and
We Want to Help You.

1968 Plymouth Road Runner, Hemi and much more
2013 Dodge Challenger RT, Hemi, Plum Crazy
2014 Ram 4x4 Hemi, Deep Cherry Pearl
1968 Dodge Charger, 318, not much else
1958 Dodge Pick Up, 383, loud
1966 Dodge Van, /6, slow

Kern Dog

Quote from: John_Kunkel on March 19, 2018, 03:59:12 PM
Quote from: Kern Dog on March 18, 2018, 07:37:58 PM
Burnouts are fun.

So is jerkin' off. Do you do it in public?

Your statement shows that you agree that burnouts are fun. My point is made.
Being a smart car guy but a celibate hermit .....you'd know more about jerking off than I ever will.  :rofl:
Besides.....In public? Me? Take a chance to be branded with the same title that you have and the limitations of staying 500 feet away from all schools like you have to do?   :smilielol:
Nah...Thanks.   :2thumbs:

DanielRobert

Sorry, but Kern dog seems like a total dick. Why does he have to make comments like this?  Is he 12 years old? Several times I've seen his asshole response. Just not needed in a forum. Should be banned from this site.
1972 Charger
1969 Roadrunner
1974 Trans Am

Kern Dog

Maybe you can ask the site owner to be a moderator? Banned? What do you contribute?  
Total dick...and you are asking if I am 12 years old.  :smilielol:
I guess you do not appreciate sarcasm? Me? I love to mix it up with friends like this. Didn't you play sports or mess around like this with your friends?
The man objected to burnouts and you are calling me  out for making jokes about it?
Life would be pretty sad and boring if everyone was polite and sullen all the time. Have some fun sometime.   :2thumbs:

Diesels are great in trucks and buses. Cars? Why?? If you are looking for mileage, why not stick with the simplicity of a factory setup? A 10 to 1 318 2 barrel, an A 999 trans and a 2.76 axle ratio. That combo can squeeze 20 mpg in a 3400 lb car.

draftingmonkey

Thinking about engine weight,  I think the breakdown is close to this:

Cummins 12V Diesel 1,100 lbs
413-426W-440          670 lbs
361-383-400             620 lbs
360                         550 lbs
273-340                   525 lbs
MB 3 liter Diesel         459 lbs
...

LaOtto70Charger


alfaitalia

Well the guy in the OP got 680hp and 928tq .....smoked a tiny bit though so you might want to back the boost down a little! My old E320 was 218 hp as stock I think....lots of torque though.
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you !!

Mike DC

  
QuoteCummins 12V Diesel 1,100 lbs
413-426W-440          670 lbs
361-383-400             620 lbs

360                         550 lbs
273-340                   525 lbs
MB 3 liter Diesel         459 lbs


Those numbers are probably close but the B/RB difference sounds too high IMO.  The actual blocks are only about 15-20 lbs apart.  I don't see another 30-35 lbs between the slightly longer crank journals & con rods and the slightly wider intake manifold.  More likely those two figures were spread farther apart by some other factor.  Those numbers come from a big compilation list on the net and they aren't entirely consistent on the little things.  AC compressors, PS pumps, alternators, exhaust manifolds, starters, wet or dry, etc.  



challenger70

'68 383 A833 QQ1 Charger
'70  440 727 FY1 Challenger

John_Kunkel

Quote from: Kern Dog on March 19, 2018, 09:53:25 PM
Your statement shows that you agree that burnouts are fun.

Another in a long list of incorrect ASSumptions on your part. I think burnouts, donuts, et al are stupid and I also think religious valedictions are inane.

I cherish the fact that I am in the minority in that respect.
Pardon me but my karma just ran over your dogma.

smithenhiven

Quote from: Kern Dog on March 19, 2018, 10:45:23 PM
A 10 to 1 318 2 barrel, an A 999 trans and a 2.76 axle ratio. That combo can squeeze 20 mpg in a 3400 lb car.

My intentions with a diesel swap are two fold.  I want to tow a trailer while still getting decent MPG (which I dont think a 318 would do); and I get all the free waste motor oil I could ever need at work to process into a usable black diesel.
I already know your next objection,...why not buy a diesel truck right?  Well sure, but I'm not a truck guy, plus I got this engineless Fury that I want to do something with, so why not.

Mike DC

QuoteMy intentions with a diesel swap are two fold.  I want to tow a trailer while still getting decent MPG (which I dont think a 318 would do); and I get all the free waste motor oil I could ever need at work to process into a usable black diesel.
I already know your next objection,...why not buy a diesel truck right?  Well sure, but I'm not a truck guy, plus I got this engineless Fury that I want to do something with, so why not.


Sounds like a decent purpose.  

I dislike seeing a workable 68-70 Charger goofed up because those are in high demand in stock form.  But people don't line up around the block to fix engine-less old Furys.