News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Anyone ever put a modern 5.7 or 6.1 L Hemi in there charger?

Started by rydog1130, November 28, 2017, 09:27:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

rydog1130

I tried looking for a thread on this but couldn't find anything? Has anyone ever done it or have a link to a thread? I was thinking of going this route if the title issue gets resolved with the car I found. I like the idea of better mpg's with fuel injection and I know holly, and fitech all make kits but thought why not just dump a 5.7 from a newer charger. I'malso wondering if there are any major pitfalls or mods tht must be done as well. Any info would be great!
2009 Challenger R/T

Baldwinvette77

lots of people have actually, its pretty common, alot of people use truck hemis which have different intakes, timing covers and accessory drives than car stuff.

Kern Dog


rydog1130

Quote from: Baldwinvette77 on November 28, 2017, 09:47:43 PM
lots of people have actually, its pretty common, alot of people use truck hemis which have different intakes, timing covers and accessory drives than car stuff.

gotchya.....thanks
2009 Challenger R/T

lukedukem

this forum has a section dedicated to the swap for the B Body platform. very good info and plenty of guys who have done it and will help
http://www.forbbodiesonly.com/moparforum/forums/new-hemi-engine-swap.57/

Luke
1969 Charger XP29F9B226768
1981 CJ7 I6 258ci
2016 F150, 5.0, FX4, CC

Ponch ®

its been done, but as of now the benefit v. the costs still dont even out, IMHO.
"I spent most of my money on cars, birds, and booze. The rest I squandered." - George Best

Chrysler Performance West

rydog1130

Quote from: lukedukem on November 29, 2017, 12:08:49 PM
this forum has a section dedicated to the swap for the B Body platform. very good info and plenty of guys who have done it and will help
http://www.forbbodiesonly.com/moparforum/forums/new-hemi-engine-swap.57/

Luke

Awesome thanks Luke
2009 Challenger R/T

Rolling_Thunder

Autodynamics did a 6.1L swap years ago...    I did a 6.1L swap about 9 years ago as well...     Ive done a few for customers over the years...   the swap is super easy these days with all the aftermarket support.
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

68X426

Quote from: rydog1130 on November 28, 2017, 09:27:12 PM
why not just dump a 5.7 from a newer charger.

For the time and expense of a 5.7 "dump" why not move up to a Viper V10 and Tremec trans?

Readily available.  Example: https://www.ebay.com/itm/2002-Dodge-Viper-engine-8-0L-V10-4500-miles-only-/182407135057?fits=Model%3AViper



The 12 Scariest Words in the English Language:
We are Here from The Government and
We Want to Help You.

1968 Plymouth Road Runner, Hemi and much more
2013 Dodge Challenger RT, Hemi, Plum Crazy
2014 Ram 4x4 Hemi, Deep Cherry Pearl
1968 Dodge Charger, 318, not much else
1958 Dodge Pick Up, 383, loud
1966 Dodge Van, /6, slow

68X426



The 12 Scariest Words in the English Language:
We are Here from The Government and
We Want to Help You.

1968 Plymouth Road Runner, Hemi and much more
2013 Dodge Challenger RT, Hemi, Plum Crazy
2014 Ram 4x4 Hemi, Deep Cherry Pearl
1968 Dodge Charger, 318, not much else
1958 Dodge Pick Up, 383, loud
1966 Dodge Van, /6, slow

Lennard

Quote from: 68X426 on December 02, 2017, 12:09:52 PM
Quote from: rydog1130 on November 28, 2017, 09:27:12 PM
why not just dump a 5.7 from a newer charger.

For the time and expense of a 5.7 "dump" why not move up to a Viper V10 and Tremec trans?

Readily available.  Example: https://www.ebay.com/itm/2002-Dodge-Viper-engine-8-0L-V10-4500-miles-only-/182407135057?fits=Model%3AViper


A V10 doesn't fit without modifying the engine bay and a 5.7 or 6.1 with forced induction will have more torque and hp than a V10.

rydog1130

I just heard dodge has dropped the price on there crate hellcat..... :drool5: :drool5: :drool5: :drool5:
2009 Challenger R/T

68X426

Still, it is an option.  Especially since rydog is seeking the "wow" factor, and a V10 in any BBody is certainly a WOW.




The 12 Scariest Words in the English Language:
We are Here from The Government and
We Want to Help You.

1968 Plymouth Road Runner, Hemi and much more
2013 Dodge Challenger RT, Hemi, Plum Crazy
2014 Ram 4x4 Hemi, Deep Cherry Pearl
1968 Dodge Charger, 318, not much else
1958 Dodge Pick Up, 383, loud
1966 Dodge Van, /6, slow

Kern Dog

The Viper engine sucks. It sounds terrible, requires extensive modifications to fit and does not impress me like a 3G Hemi...

alfaitalia

I agree with that...but they needed an engine with no personality to put in the a bland GT car like the Viper! As guy can guess I was never a fan!
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you !!

darbgnik

Quote from: Kern Dog on December 02, 2017, 05:17:40 PM
The Viper engine sucks. It sounds terrible, requires extensive modifications to fit and does not impress me like a 3G Hemi...

Idunno about that. Stock for stock, the Viper engine has gobs more horsepower and torque than any Gen 3 Hemi without a blower on it. Modified, it's not even a comparison. There are plenty of 1500WHP stock bottom end latest Gen Vipers running around, as the latest iteration has a forged rotating assembly.

It does suck if you want to cram it in a car like the Charger that wasn't designed for an extra couple cylinders up front. And they've never been considered the best sounding engine in the world, especially I'd assume, to every car you show the tail lights to lap after lap on a road course. That boring GT car is in the top 10 of the fastest production cars tested at any track it's been brought.

And this opinion of mine is actually based on personal experience, having owned 2 including the latest generation I still have. This is also compared with personal experience from Lamborghini's etc I have also personally owned and tracked extensively. I'll tell you honestly, the only thing that Lamborghini V10 I had, had over the Viper was the noise. In any other performance metric, it wasn't even close.

If someone with personal experience wants to debate it, I'm down, but opinions from magazine articles don't count.
Brad

1970 Charger 500. Born a 318, AC, console auto, now 440/727
Build thread:  http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,127291.0.html

Rolling_Thunder

Used 2008 Viper V10 = $10,300

New 6.4L Hemi = $8,429

New crate hemi comes with PCM, throttle pedal, etc etc...     

Used V10 would need FEAD, PCM, wiring, etc...

So...    almost $2000 more for 130hp may be worth it to some - but factor in the K member modifications, motor mounts, and other fitment issues to deal with and that can get quite pricy when you dont do the work yourself...     The Hemi is pretty much a bolt in deal you can get most service parts from your local dealer...   not sure if Viper parts are stocked.

So it is an apples to oranges comparison...   V10 to V8 - I would take ease of installation and fitment over the "exotic" feeling of the V10...   personal opinion --- and yes I have driven Vipers as well as hemi cars...    modifications, blown, turbo, NA...    so no magazine reviews influenced my opinion.
1968 Dodge Charger - 6.1L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.55 Sure Grip

2013 Dodge Challenger R/T - 5.7L Hemi / 6-speed / 3.73 Limited Slip

1964 Dodge Polara 500 - 440 / 4-speed / 3.91 Sure Grip

1973 Dodge Challenger Rallye - 340 / A-518 / 3.23 Sure Grip

darbgnik

Quote from: Rolling_Thunder on December 02, 2017, 10:48:14 PM
Used 2008 Viper V10 = $10,300

New 6.4L Hemi = $8,429

New crate hemi comes with PCM, throttle pedal, etc etc...     

Used V10 would need FEAD, PCM, wiring, etc...

So...    almost $2000 more for 130hp may be worth it to some - but factor in the K member modifications, motor mounts, and other fitment issues to deal with and that can get quite pricy when you dont do the work yourself...     The Hemi is pretty much a bolt in deal you can get most service parts from your local dealer...   not sure if Viper parts are stocked.

So it is an apples to oranges comparison...   V10 to V8 - I would take ease of installation and fitment over the "exotic" feeling of the V10...   personal opinion --- and yes I have driven Vipers as well as hemi cars...    modifications, blown, turbo, NA...    so no magazine reviews influenced my opinion.

I agree 100% that there is no logical reason to try to cram a V10 into our cars. That being said,  in a true sports car, where low cg and aversion to heats soak running lap after lap matter, NA displacement trumps forced induction at similar power levels.
My Viper is primarily my track car, and if given the option, no one would take a forced induction hemi V8 for that kind of work. Then again, it seems that these days, the common definition of a performance car is one that dusts off minivans from red lights. So I'm probably missing the point. Lol.

And this is from a guy with an SRT 6.4 in the driveway.
Brad

1970 Charger 500. Born a 318, AC, console auto, now 440/727
Build thread:  http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,127291.0.html

alfaitalia

Quote from: darbgnik on December 02, 2017, 09:02:36 PM
Quote from: Kern Dog on December 02, 2017, 05:17:40 PM
The Viper engine sucks. It sounds terrible, requires extensive modifications to fit and does not impress me like a 3G Hemi...

Idunno about that. Stock for stock, the Viper engine has gobs more horsepower and torque than any Gen 3 Hemi without a blower on it. Modified, it's not even a comparison. There are plenty of 1500WHP stock bottom end latest Gen Vipers running around, as the latest iteration has a forged rotating assembly.

It does suck if you want to cram it in a car like the Charger that wasn't designed for an extra couple cylinders up front. And they've never been considered the best sounding engine in the world, especially I'd assume, to every car you show the tail lights to lap after lap on a road course. That boring GT car is in the top 10 of the fastest production cars tested at any track it's been brought.

And this opinion of mine is actually based on personal experience, having owned 2 including the latest generation I still have. This is also compared with personal experience from Lamborghini's etc I have also personally owned and tracked extensively. I'll tell you honestly, the only thing that Lamborghini V10 I had, had over the Viper was the noise. In any other performance metric, it wasn't even close.

If someone with personal experience wants to debate it, I'm down, but opinions from magazine articles don't count.


Maybe in the state's compared to some cars at some tracks.....but.....At the Nurblurring....which is a good representation of how a car handles and how quick it will be in the real world (on the road!) only the ACR Viper makes it into the top 100 fastest cars lap times for standard production cars. It's still a fun car I'm sure (I'll admit I've only ever driven one and that was one of the very first in the UK....found it heavy and clumsy in feel compared to the nimble feel of a true sports car) but it's dated looks (long bonnets...hello 1980s !) make it a non starter for me. Which is a pity because or fuel costs have slaughtered their prices now and you can get one here for the price of a used Golf! But each to there own...which is cool.

Although I agree with most saying not to put the motor in a Charger, one of my favourite Chargers is one I'm sure you guys will know. It's black with a red tail stripe viper motor full body subframe.....paint had won awards for being like black glass. Don't know if the owner is a member here but I'm sure he must be known to you guys...he  bought it built though. I have his car as my screen saver...acts as inspiration when the car is not going to plan.....even though I will never be able to equal his standards.
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you !!

darbgnik

Quote from: alfaitalia on December 03, 2017, 12:57:55 PM

Maybe in the state's compared to some cars at some tracks.....but.....At the Nurblurring....which is a good representation of how a car handles and how quick it will be in the real world (on the road!) only the ACR Viper makes it into the top 100 fastest cars lap times for standard production cars. It's still a fun car I'm sure (I'll admit I've only ever driven one and that was one of the very first in the UK....found it heavy and clumsy in feel compared to the nimble feel of a true sports car) but it's dated looks (long bonnets...hello 1980s !) make it a non starter for me. Which is a pity because or fuel costs have slaughtered their prices now and you can get one here for the price of a used Golf! But each to there own...which is cool.

Although I agree with most saying not to put the motor in a Charger, one of my favourite Chargers is one I'm sure you guys will know. It's black with a red tail stripe viper motor full body subframe.....paint had won awards for being like black glass. Don't know if the owner is a member here but I'm sure he must be known to you guys...he  bought it built though. I have his car as my screen saver...acts as inspiration when the car is not going to plan.....even though I will never be able to equal his standards.

Hmmmm, where to start...... At your professed "only track that matters", the Viper ACR is in the top 10 production cars, not top 100...... (number 4 if you only count cars that most of the world can actually drive on the street)

The non ACR Viper was never campaigned at the Nurburgring, so it's time isn't in the top 1000....... And seeing as it's not the Nurburgring, this obviously doesn't matter, but the non ACR Viper is also in the top 10 at Laguna Seca, ahead of other boring GT cars like Audi R8 V10, McLaren MP4-12C and 570S, Nissan GTR, Mercedes AMG GT S, Lamborghini Aventador, Porsche GT2 RS, Ferrari 458 Italia, Acura NSX, Lexus LFA, and on and on. Any on that list make it to your definition of "true sports cars"? By the way, I've actually raced there multiple times, and it seemed real enough to me.

And as for your extensive experience with them, if you got to drive a Gen 1 or 2 Viper, then you aren't speaking for anything made in the last 15 years. Since 2003 they have been a legitimate track car, and since 2008 a dominant one. The first gens were cool cars, terrible handlers(sorry to anyone on here who owns one), but cool. If that's the case, maybe you should actually drive one, and not around the block, that was built in this decade, or century?
Brad

1970 Charger 500. Born a 318, AC, console auto, now 440/727
Build thread:  http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,127291.0.html

alfaitalia

Ok I'm not will to draw this out into a pointless argument but the list I looked at was of street legal production cars. I think the Viper mainly appeals to your side of the pond.....as has always been the case Americans have very differing tastes in cars (only ever seen a handful of Vipers in the UK)..which is a good thing.
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you !!

darbgnik

Quote from: alfaitalia on December 04, 2017, 05:40:05 AM
Ok I'm not will to draw this out into a pointless argument but the list I looked at was of street legal production cars. I think the Viper mainly appeals to your side of the pond.....as has always been the case Americans have very differing tastes in cars (only ever seen a handful of Vipers in the UK)..which is a good thing.

Oh, it is obviously pointless.
Brad

1970 Charger 500. Born a 318, AC, console auto, now 440/727
Build thread:  http://www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php/topic,127291.0.html

rydog1130

2009 Challenger R/T

Harper

 i thought about this a couple times, but


:shruggy: pretty much any stock 440 with a fresh rebuild ($2800), aluminum heads ($2500), Roller rockers ($400) ,hydraulic roller cam kit ($800), about $6500 still out perform a 5.7 hemi...just my  :Twocents:

plus the cool factor is nice when you open the hood :)
1968 Dodge Charger
1969 Dodge Charger (GL Clone)
1951 F1 Ford 302 EFI, Automatic
1965 F100 Ford Straight 6, 3 speed on column (all original)

rydog1130

Quote from: Harper on December 12, 2017, 04:28:49 PM
i thought about this a couple times, but


:shruggy: pretty much any stock 440 with a fresh rebuild ($2800), aluminum heads ($2500), Roller rockers ($400) ,hydraulic roller cam kit ($800), about $6500 still out perform a 5.7 hemi...just my  :Twocents:

plus the cool factor is nice when you open the hood :)

you make a good point, but what about fuel economy though? Itd be nice to take it on a trip and not fill up in every town
2009 Challenger R/T