News:

It appears that the upgrade forces a login and many, many of you have forgotten your passwords and didn't set up any reminders. Contact me directly through helpmelogin@dodgecharger.com and I'll help sort it out.

Main Menu

Explain it like I'm 5: Why do six pack rods require external balance weights?

Started by pettybird, September 28, 2017, 03:41:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

pettybird

The answer is "because they weigh more", but this is a reciprocating assembly...why would the rods be heavier in only one direction?  And why are lighter rods OK with zero balance?  I can't make those two things compute.

cdr

the 6pack, 1970 up hp 440 rods are so heavy ,the counter weights on the crank are not heavy enough to off set the heavy rods ,so they put a weight on the balancer.
LINK TO MY STORY http://www.onallcylinders.com/2015/11/16/ride-shares-charlie-keel-battles-cancer-ms-to-build-brilliant-1968-dodge-charger/  
                                                                                           
68 Charger 512 cid,9.7to1,Hilborn EFI,Home ported 440 source heads,small hyd roller cam,COLD A/C ,,a518 trans,Dana 60 ,4.10 gear,10.93 et,4100lbs on street tires full exhaust daily driver
Charger55 by Charlie Keel, on Flickr

pettybird

So the crank is inherently imbalanced?  Are there more "throws" in one direction than others?  It's been a while since I've had a crank in my hand.

cdr

Quote from: pettybird on September 28, 2017, 04:19:49 PM
So the crank is inherently imbalanced?  Are there more "throws" in one direction than others?  It's been a while since I've had a crank in my hand.

yes, the crank without the rod & piston weight would be OUT of balance, high dollar racing cranks have counter weight throws for each pair of rods, others have very heavy throws at the front & rear of crank.
LINK TO MY STORY http://www.onallcylinders.com/2015/11/16/ride-shares-charlie-keel-battles-cancer-ms-to-build-brilliant-1968-dodge-charger/  
                                                                                           
68 Charger 512 cid,9.7to1,Hilborn EFI,Home ported 440 source heads,small hyd roller cam,COLD A/C ,,a518 trans,Dana 60 ,4.10 gear,10.93 et,4100lbs on street tires full exhaust daily driver
Charger55 by Charlie Keel, on Flickr

cdr

this is a regular type crankshaft, notice the counter weight, NOT in the middle.

LINK TO MY STORY http://www.onallcylinders.com/2015/11/16/ride-shares-charlie-keel-battles-cancer-ms-to-build-brilliant-1968-dodge-charger/  
                                                                                           
68 Charger 512 cid,9.7to1,Hilborn EFI,Home ported 440 source heads,small hyd roller cam,COLD A/C ,,a518 trans,Dana 60 ,4.10 gear,10.93 et,4100lbs on street tires full exhaust daily driver
Charger55 by Charlie Keel, on Flickr

cdr

this is one with weight for every pair of rods.
LINK TO MY STORY http://www.onallcylinders.com/2015/11/16/ride-shares-charlie-keel-battles-cancer-ms-to-build-brilliant-1968-dodge-charger/  
                                                                                           
68 Charger 512 cid,9.7to1,Hilborn EFI,Home ported 440 source heads,small hyd roller cam,COLD A/C ,,a518 trans,Dana 60 ,4.10 gear,10.93 et,4100lbs on street tires full exhaust daily driver
Charger55 by Charlie Keel, on Flickr

BSB67

Quote from: pettybird on September 28, 2017, 03:41:35 PM
The answer is "because they weigh more", but this is a reciprocating assembly...why would the rods be heavier in only one direction?  And why are lighter rods OK with zero balance?  I can't make those two things compute.

only the small end reciprocates.  The big end rotates.

The counter weights are simply not big enough to balance the rest of the stuff.  It can be internally balanced with mallory metal.

500" NA, Eddy head, pump gas, exhaust manifold with 2 1/2 exhaust with tailpipes
4150 lbs with driver, 3.23 gear, stock converter
11.68 @ 120.2 mph

Challenger340

Why in the world anyone would use those 6-pack CLUBS anyways ?

Waaay heavier.... but exactly the same Rod Bolt fastener as the much lighter LY Rods ?     

Guess what the first "weak link" in any Rod Assembly is ?

If you said the Rod Bolt ?  BINGO !
Only wimps wear Bowties !

pettybird

Ok thanks all.  I just couldn't visualize it for some reason.

As for 'why the six pack rods' I asked because my friend was having a balance issue with his torque converter on his #'s matching V code '71 R/T.  He's since had an original six pack converter redone.

green69rt

Quote from: Challenger340 on September 28, 2017, 09:09:43 PM
Why in the world anyone would use those 6-pack CLUBS anyways ?

Waaay heavier.... but exactly the same Rod Bolt fastener as the much lighter LY Rods ?     

Guess what the first "weak link" in any Rod Assembly is ?

If you said the Rod Bolt ?  BINGO !

You answered my question before I could even ask it!  I guess Mopar didn't expect anyone to race their 440 6bbl (yeah, right.)